Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Tokyo 2020 Qualifying. Athletes to watch

Options
13468911

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,288 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    Boston can’t be used for qualification times as it’s deemed a downhill marathon


  • Registered Users Posts: 476 ✭✭browne_rob5


    Dodge wrote: »
    Boston can’t be used for qualification times as it’s deemed a downhill marathon

    Top 10 in a major qualifies and it's on the list of approved courses so presumably sub 2.11.30 would work also.

    https://www.worldathletics.org/responsive/download/downloadresultinfo?filename=26bd97e3-e78e-4b99-8a5c-d640270d8c08.pdf&urlslug=Certified%20marathon%20and%20half%20marathon%20courses%20(4%20Sep%202019)


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,641 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Top 10 qualify all right, but times don't count: https://www.worldathletics.org/records/certified-roadevents
    Elevation drop – Performances achieved on courses with a drop in elevation between the start and the finish which exceeds 1:1000, i.e. 1m per km, are:
    not valid for:
    - Legal top lists
    - Entry standards
    - World records

    valid for:
    - World rankings (where a correction is made to the result score from which points are deducted depending on the drop)
    Boston's net downhill is approximately 3.2m/km

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 476 ✭✭browne_rob5


    28064212 wrote: »
    Top 10 qualify all right, but times don't count: https://www.worldathletics.org/records/certified-roadeventsBoston's net downhill is approximately 3.2m/km

    It is strange that he went for Boston as a backup then.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,641 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    It is strange that he went for Boston as a backup then.
    Possibly he thought he had a realistic shot at top 10. Moot point now anyway

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    Scullion is doing boston again!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭jfh


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Scullion is doing Houston again!

    Is he not doing the new York half & Boston marathon?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    Sorry meant to say boston, edited there. Yeah he said he wasnt going to do it but it's back on. Says he'll improve better by racing a marathon before Olympics than doing shorter stuff.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Kevin Seaward 2:10:10 in Zurich this morning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,016 ✭✭✭Itziger


    Exactly wrote: »
    Kevin Seaward 2:10:10 in Zurich this morning.

    Sevilla. It's called the Zurich Maraton de Sevilla (Sponsor)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    Is it looking like we could have too many qualifiers for marathon at this rate


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,288 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Is it looking like we could have too many qualifiers for marathon at this rate

    Again.

    We have 3 now. Any more and there’ll have to be a selection. Hopefully lessons leavened from Rio


  • Registered Users Posts: 476 ✭✭browne_rob5


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Is it looking like we could have too many qualifiers for marathon at this rate

    Who else can you see running the standard?


  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭KSU


    Who else can you see running the standard?

    Probably won’t get another opportunity but Hugh Armstrong just ran today in 2.12 and only fell off the last 2k. Has a very promising career ahead of him with it only being his 2nd marathon


  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭KSU


    Probably flew under the radar a little bit Michelle Finn ran a new PB 9.38 in Australia yesterday in steeple.

    She took the win in a C ranked Sydney classic which will go a long way in the rankings and puts her in a very good place for qualifying for Tokyo


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    Isn't to tobin going for it? Mick Clohisey?


  • Registered Users Posts: 476 ✭✭browne_rob5


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Isn't to tobin going for it? Mick Clohisey?

    Mick a dnf with Achilles injury today and would be amazed if Tobin did it on his debut so won't be either of them I think.


  • Registered Users Posts: 946 ✭✭✭KSU


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Isn't to tobin going for it??

    Someone mentioned he was to debut but from what I have seen has been racing over shorter distances in Aus so cant see him racing marathon any time soon.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,851 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Dodge wrote: »
    Again.

    We have 3 now. Any more and there’ll have to be a selection. Hopefully lessons leavened from Rio

    Scullion is an automatic selection due to heuston 5th place?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,641 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Scullion is an automatic selection due to heuston 5th place?
    Automatically eligible, not a guaranteed pick. If more than 3 are eligible, it's up to the country's athletics authority to select the three.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,641 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Athletics Ireland's selection policy for Tokyo:
    4.5 The Nomination Panel has “sole discretion” to nominate to the Olympic Federation of Ireland the team members that meet with the eligibility and entry rules of the 2020 Olympic Games and as stipulated in this Nomination Policy. This includes nominations for relay teams, individuals and for instances when there are more than 3 athletes who have met the performance standard.
    4.5.1 The Nomination Panel may use their sole and overriding discretion to consider any factor or combination of factors that, in their opinion, are relevant to the nomination of an athlete, including, but not necessarily limited to the following general principles:
    A. Consistency and Repeatability of performances (in all or any events) during the qualification period, achieving the performance standard and showing current form and fitness
    B. Statistical data (ranking/performance list, performance-time curves, course ratings, altitude/wind adjustments)
    C. Championship performance history, in particular the history of the athlete’s on-demand performances at major championships
    D. The competitive head to head record of each athlete
    E. Injury and illness history
    4.6 Where there are more athletes that have achieved the nomination criteria in this policy beyond the maximum entry limit in any one event, the Nomination Panel will have sole discretion to decide which of the athlete(s) is to be nominated.
    They've given themselves a pretty free hand if there is a choice to be made. Which is a good thing

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,604 ✭✭✭Ceepo


    28064212 wrote: »
    Automatically eligible, not a guaranteed pick. If more than 3 are eligible, it's up to the country's athletics authority to select the three.

    And if someone else runs a QT it might put him down the pecking order simply because he wouldn't have a top 3 time..

    Not sure about the selection policy it that happens.

    Tobin is heading to Hamburg.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,851 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Ceepo wrote: »
    And if someone else runs a QT it might put him down the pecking order simply because he wouldn't have a top 3 time..

    Not sure about the selection policy it that happens.

    Tobin is heading to Hamburg.

    I think scullion will go as he is the national champ also.

    If anyone else beats pollocks time it will be interesting.

    There is also the euro's this summer?


  • Registered Users Posts: 333 ✭✭Down South


    Is it also possible that World Athletics could give priority to time qualifications over place qualifications since it looks like more than 80 are going to meet qual time?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    Delighted for the 3 lads regarding Olympic qualification, but as far as the actual times are concerned, I can't buy into the excitement. The Vaporflys have destroyed marathon running in my opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    Would a top 10 in Boston be worth more for Scullion than getting the time? Seems even more odd choice now that a few people might hit the time and not him, even though you would be pretty sure he's more than capable, why not just go get the time...


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,851 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Down South wrote: »
    Is it also possible that World Athletics could give priority to time qualifications over place qualifications since it looks like more than 80 are going to meet qual time?

    I think the opposite actually.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,641 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Would a top 10 in Boston be worth more for Scullion than getting the time? Seems even more odd choice now that a few people might hit the time and not him, even though you would be pretty sure he's more than capable, why not just go get the time...
    He's not doing Boston though, is he?

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    28064212 wrote: »
    He's not doing Boston though, is he?

    Yep I believe so, I listen to the podcast dont think I missed any changes to plan


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,851 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    Yep I believe so, I listen to the podcast dont think I missed any changes to plan

    Yeah he is doing it. A half marathon next weekend also?


Advertisement