When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Ulysses Gaze

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Can you list the people involved and link.to the evidence for this (especially your claims about human sanctification) please.

FYI: A random youtube video will not be deemed evidence, I'm looking for solid evidence for your claims please.

Here you go!

Apparently the Queen is the head of the hydra

Ipso

The illuminati is so 2004 (Dan brown era), now its the Rotschilds or Soros if your second wave but if you really want to impress the mouth breathers it’s the Payseurs.

The Nal

Now shes saying "they" will bring diseases into Ireland with 5G.

Said the same about 4G but this time it will happen.

Ulysses Gaze

Ipso wrote: »

The illuminati is so 2004 (Dan brown era), now its the Rotschilds or Soros if your second wave but if you really want to impress the mouth breathers it’s the Payseurs.

Well according to that font of all things Lizard;

A battle continues for control of the former Payseur holdings, but at the moment it appears they are controlled by the Rothschilds.

David Icke - The Biggest Secret.

klaaaz

The latest crusade against unicorns, think Gemma needs psychiatric help at this stage

ohnonotgmail

klaaaz wrote: »

The latest crusade against unicorns, think Gemma needs psychiatric help at this stage

So her issue is with what looks like a page from an art workbook? I think the final screw has come loose.

SKILFUL

The librral elite cabbal are AFRAID OF GEMMA TOMMY AND GRAN TORINO

Ipso

SKILFUL wrote: »

The librral elite cabbal are AFRAID OF GEMMA TOMMY AND GRAN TORINO

WWG1WGA

Solidarity brother.

SKILFUL

Ipso wrote: »

WWG1WGA

Solidarity brother.

Kysf

marieholmfan

I do think the Guerin case should be reopened. She may have been 'even closer' to Haughey than we know.

The Nal

Gemma will be taken into care if this continues.

Its not like she has many followers. 24k on twitter (1/3 of them bots and promo accounts) and less than 10 subs on youtube. Sad really to see her decline like this.

seamus

klaaaz wrote: »

The latest crusade against unicorns, think Gemma needs psychiatric help at this stage

The one thing that never fails to amaze me is that whackjobs like Gemma are so quick to point to conspiracies everywhere and evil plots to program people's minds and spread false information, are often just as vociferous in defending religious doctrine.

The institutions which are the closest thing we have to huge evil cabals hellbent on controlling and brainwashing the world, are religious ones. But conspiracy theorists are often bizarrely fixated on defending them.

gman2k

What's worse is she is now saying that hedgecutting down in Kilkenny is part of a globalist agenda!

gman2k

gman2k wrote: »

What's worse is she is now saying that hedgecutting down in Kilkenny is part of a globalist agenda!

It's all part of the globalist plot, you see...

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1099988377296883716?s=19

gmisk

A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: »

It's all part of the globalist plot, you see...

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1099988377296883716?s=19

First step the hedges of kilkenny...tomorrow the WORLD!!!

humberklog

I don't get the idea of calling her crazy and therefore giving her a pass on responsibility. It's also quite patronising to those with mental health.

Some people are just arseholes with whacky ideas.

Personally I think Gemma's just very vain with crushing status anxiety who's willing to shapeshift to garner any audience's attention. If the audience of the masses is ignoring you then you've got to go fishing in margins where there's a more radical element. And Conger Eels.

She's a scheming wagon craving relevance and adoration regardless of where that comes from. Not unlike John Waters.

gmisk

klaaaz wrote: »

The latest crusade against unicorns, think Gemma needs psychiatric help at this stage

The comments below are a joy...
"It’s pure indoctrination into occultism. We are fast departing our Christian heritage. I cannot help think this is the softening up phase for when the education system will next promote gender dysmorphia as part of a twisted curriculum."


"The unicorn is occult symbolism. It symbolises the coming of the Messiah, The Anti-Christ...The New Age. Or in modern terms, the NEW WORLD ORDER. Everything the globalists do has hidden meaning, everything. It's hidden in plain sight because they are laughing at our ignorance."

SoundsRight

"Both promise to believe in each other's existence from that moment on."

The unicorn is intrinsically linked to the gay rights movement. I'd raise an eyebrow if my kids came home with that, especially with the associated text.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/oct/15/return-of-the-unicorn-the-magical-beast-of-our-times

gmisk

SoundsRight wrote: »

"Both promise to believe in each other's existence from that moment on."

The unicorn is intrinsically linked to the gay rights movement. I'd raise an eyebrow if my kids came home with that, especially with the associated text.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/oct/15/return-of-the-unicorn-the-magical-beast-of-our-times

Errr ok....a few LGBT people liking unicorns doesnt mean something is "intrinsically linked to the gay rights movement", come on now lets not be silly.
That article/opinion piece is a hotch potch of nonsense.


So you would you be worried your child is being indoctrinated to being a "gay" if they came home with anything with a unicorn on it?

ohnonotgmail

SoundsRight wrote: »

"Both promise to believe in each other's existence from that moment on."

The unicorn is intrinsically linked to the gay rights movement. I'd raise an eyebrow if my kids came home with that, especially with the associated text.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/oct/15/return-of-the-unicorn-the-magical-beast-of-our-times

Oh noes, the gays are brainwashing our kids. :rolleyes:

gmisk

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Oh noes, the gays are brainwashing our kids. :rolleyes:

As are the Irish government!!!!
https://encircleworldphotos.photoshelter.com/image/I0000AnQgrvZ_Oes



I think Varadkar climbed up there and chiselled out this unicorn on Custom House!!!

Hotblack Desiato

A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: »

It's all part of the globalist plot, you see...

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1099988377296883716?s=19

Some of those comments... jeez.

Renua councillor doing a great job there making his party look Not Nuts At All, Honest.

So 5G can see through walls, but not hedgerows. Gotcha

ohnonotgmail

gmisk wrote: »

As are the Irish government!!!!
https://encircleworldphotos.photoshelter.com/image/I0000AnQgrvZ_Oes



I think Varadkar climbed up there and chiselled out this unicorn on Custom House!!!

In fairness that is a lovely bit of chiselling. They must have been ****ting themselves doing the horn in case they accidentally knocked it off.

gmisk

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Some of those comments... jeez.

Renua councillor doing a great job there making his party look Not Nuts At All, Honest.

So 5G can see through walls, but not hedgerows. Gotcha

I think that ship has thankfully well and truly sailed.
They were polling 0% last I read.

ohnonotgmail

gmisk wrote: »

I think that ship has thankfully well and truly sailed.
They were polling 0% last I read.

That high?

gmisk

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

That high?

Margin of error of -1%
Well I suppose they can vote for themselves?

lbc2019

I thought it was top stop the unicorns hiding???

SoundsRight

gmisk wrote: »

Errr ok....a few LGBT people liking unicorns doesnt mean something is "intrinsically linked to the gay rights movement", come on now lets not be silly.
That article/opinion piece is a hotch potch of nonsense.


So you would you be worried your child is being indoctrinated to being a "gay" if they came home with anything with a unicorn on it?

It's a gay rights symbol, same as a pink triangle and the rainbow flag. That's fact, not opinion.

I'd keep an eye on it. I can understand it being promoted in non-faith schools, but there's stricter codes in Catholic schools.

ohnonotgmail

SoundsRight wrote: »

It's a gay rights symbol, same as a pink triangle and the rainbow flag. That's fact, not opinion.

I'd keep an eye on it. I can understand it being promoted in non-faith schools, but there's stricter codes in Catholic schools.

Sometimes a unicorn is just a unicorn.

lbc2019

SoundsRight wrote: »

It's a gay rights symbol, same as a pink triangle and the rainbow flag. That's fact, not opinion.

I'd keep an eye on it. I can understand it being promoted in non-faith schools, but there's stricter codes in Catholic schools.

They just let the priests rape kids

gmisk

SoundsRight wrote: »

It's a gay rights symbol, same as a pink triangle and the rainbow flag. That's fact, not opinion.

I'd keep an eye on it. I can understand it being promoted in non-faith schools, but there's stricter codes in Catholic schools.

It is an opinion not a fact, the rainbow flag and pink triangle are ingrained in gay rights movement yes, a unicorn is not despite it popping up at protests mainly in the 70s and 80s.



The pink triangle, employed by the Nazis in World War II as a badge of shame, was re-appropriated but retained negative connotations. The rainbow flag, previously used as a symbol of unity among all people, was adopted to be a more organic and natural replacement without any negativity attached to it. I am not sure you understand the history of the gay rights movement and the symbols involved, that is my opinion not a fact....I understand the difference.


What is being promoted in non-faith schools? Unicorns or gay rights?

serserkenj

ccc

ohnonotgmail

gmisk wrote: »

It is an opinion not a fact, the rainbow flag and pink triangle are ingrained in gay rights movement yes, a unicorn is not despite it popping up at protests mainly in the 70s and 80s.



The pink triangle, employed by the Nazis in World War II as a badge of shame, was re-appropriated but retained negative connotations. The rainbow flag, previously used as a symbol of unity among all people, was adopted to be a more organic and natural replacement without any negativity attached to it. I am not sure you understand the history of the gay rights movement and the symbols involved, that is my opinion not a fact....I understand the difference.


What is being promoted in non-faith schools? Unicorns or gay rights?

The whole unicorn thing is very new. It is certainly not ingrained in the gay rights movements. Or at least it wasnt when i was out and about on the scene 25 odd years ago.

gmisk

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

The whole unicorn thing is very new. It is certainly not ingrained in the gay rights movements. Or at least it wasnt when i was out and about on the scene 25 odd years ago.

I was going by a few things I read online, tbh I have never seen a unicorn anything at a pride parade that I can remember and I have been going to them for about 18 years on and off.


Honestly I am not sure why I am even humoring this poster tbh, but hey obviously Gemma O Doherty has a willing audience for her increasingly bizarre rants, it doesnt mean that people should be allowed to spout them as facts.

Also I do find it hilarious Gemma O Doherty wrote a fawning letter to Panti hoping for an endorsement for he presidential attempt lol.

The Nal

gmisk wrote: »

but hey obviously Gemma O Doherty has a willing audience for her increasingly bizarre rants, it doesnt mean that people should be allowed to spout them as facts.

A tiny audience. Miniscule. Most just following her out of morbid curiosity. Like that idiot priest who ran out on the F1 track or the clown who danced on Haugheys grave.

ohnonotgmail

gmisk wrote: »

I was going by a few things I read online, tbh I have never seen a unicorn anything at a pride parade that I can remember and I have been going to them for about 18 years on and off.


Honestly I am not sure why I am even humoring this poster tbh, but hey obviously Gemma O Doherty has a willing audience for her increasingly bizarre rants, it doesnt mean that people should be allowed to spout them as facts.

Also I do find it hilarious Gemma O Doherty wrote a fawning letter to Panti hoping for an endorsement for he presidential attempt lol.

I dont even remember much in the way of rainbow flags when i attended my first pride parade in (oh my god is it really that long ago??) 1992. Though in my defence I was a bit drunk so they may have been there. Certainly didn't have randomers waving rainbo flags.

SoundsRight

gmisk wrote: »

Honestly....what the heck are you on about?
Were there unicorns involved? Gay ones?
What is your point here, say what you actually mean?

Don't take everything at face value. Of all the mythical creatures to choose from, why a unicorn?

PhoneMain

gmisk wrote: »

I was going by a few things I read online, tbh I have never seen a unicorn anything at a pride parade that I can remember and I have been going to them for about 18 years on and off.


Honestly I am not sure why I am even humoring this poster tbh, but hey obviously Gemma O Doherty has a willing audience for her increasingly bizarre rants, it doesnt mean that people should be allowed to spout them as facts.

Also I do find it hilarious Gemma O Doherty wrote a fawning letter to Panti hoping for an endorsement for he presidential attempt lol.

She takes rejection very badly. She wanted Panti to endorse her, Panti wouldn't and now she's on a mission against the LGBT community. She's the same about the Social Democrats & AAA. They wouldn't endorse her (probably the first time ever I've agreed with them on something!) and every chance she gets she attacks them.

Wibbs

SoundsRight wrote: »

Don't take everything at face value. Of all the mythical creatures to choose from, why a unicorn?

Buggered if I know S. In classical mythology, actually I can't recall what they represented TBH, beyond rare fantastical creature that lives somewhere you don't type, no I swear I saw one in Asia, no really and men with eyes in their chests deal. By the medieval it became a Christian symbol of innocence, that would only approach and fall asleep in the arms of a virgin/Virgin Mary. It's been a Christian symbol for a loooong time.

mzungu

SoundsRight wrote: »

Don't take everything at face value. Of all the mythical creatures to choose from, why a unicorn?

Why are you taking at face value the words of a somebody that thinks cutting a hedge is part of a worldwide conspiracy?

donspeekinglesh

I'm way, way behind on my Podcast listening, and I'm listening to Here's How from last August. Gemma is on it, showing her lack of knowledge of the role of President, but trying to hid the crazy. Happy to talk about the good things she did in the past, but very quick to change the subject when the host, William Campbell, brings up her sharing of Hilliary Clinton conspiracy theories and videos from Jerry Beades

SoundsRight

mzungu wrote: »

Why are you taking at face value the words of a somebody that thinks cutting a hedge is part of a worldwide conspiracy?

I'm not saying it's subversive, I'm just saying I would question it, given the current climate.

ohnonotgmail

SoundsRight wrote: »

I'm not saying it's subversive, I'm just saying I would question it, given the current climate.

What climate would that be? The one that gemma and her cohort have imagined?

Arthur Daley

SoundsRight wrote: »

I'm not saying it's subversive, I'm just saying I would question it, given the current climate.

Why are we cutting down trees in lots of parks and road sides. See also what has been done to Merrion square in recent years, as well as other public parks. We thought we need as many trees as we can get, what with climate change and all.

pjohnson

SoundsRight wrote: »

Don't take everything at face value. Of all the mythical creatures to choose from, why a unicorn?

The Baba Yaga had a prior arrangement.

Grayson

Wibbs wrote: »

Buggered if I know S. In classical mythology, actually I can't recall what they represented TBH, beyond rare fantastical creature that lives somewhere you don't type, no I swear I saw one in Asia, no really and men with eyes in their chests deal. By the medieval it became a Christian symbol of innocence, that would only approach and fall asleep in the arms of a virgin/Virgin Mary. It's been a Christian symbol for a loooong time.

Maybe it's just the horn?

Grayson

Arthur Daley wrote: »

Why are we cutting down trees in lots of parks and road sides. See also what has been done to Merrion square in recent years, as well as other public parks. We thought we need as many trees as we can get, what with climate change and all.

You're not from the country are you? Every year at this time the hedges are trimmed. It looks like they've been ripped apart. A few months later they're all nice and bushy again.

pjohnson

Grayson wrote: »

You're not from the country are you? Every year at this time the hedges are trimmed. It looks like they've been ripped apart. A few months later they're all nice and bushy again.

Cutting them back so much actually encourages them to come back stronger.

Simple_Simone

Arthur Daley wrote: »

Why are we cutting down trees in lots of parks and road sides. See also what has been done to Merrion square in recent years, as well as other public parks. We thought we need as many trees as we can get, what with climate change and all.

Probably because if large bits of the said trees happen to fall on cars or people and damage them, then the unfortunate victims (or their next of kin) tend to seek large amounts of compensation from the Local Authority responsible.

seamus

SoundsRight wrote: »

Don't take everything at face value. Of all the mythical creatures to choose from, why a unicorn?

Because unicorns and dragons are about the two best-known mythical creatures.

Also, Gemma's issue here is not the gay agenda, but the implication that unicorns are mythical creatures that don't exist unless you believe in them.

Since the Bible mentions unicorns a number of times in a factual context, it's a fairly large smoking gun that that the bible is just a big book of fantasy nonsense.

The most ardent believers therefore reject the notion that unicorns are make-believe, instead asserting that they must have, at one time, existed. And any suggestion that unicorns are mythical, is an attack on the bible.

Of course, given that the argument is about translation of translations of translations of a book of fairytales, it's fair to say that whatever a "unicorn" was when originally written, is not a unicorn in the 15th-century sense. But we're talking about conspiracy theorists and mythological creatures, so nothing need make coherent sense