When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

dav3

She wants to ban certain ideologies and education, also wants to promote free speech.

She wants to ban the HPV vaccine, but also wants to promote pro-life polices, which interestingly enough doesn’t include all life.

These “pillars” don’t appear very stable. A bit like Gemma and her followers.

gman2k

If any Boardsie is there tonight, will you let her know that the farmer down in Kilkenny who cut down the hedges has new ones planted already.
I'm not sure if these have been funded by Soros or are 5g resistant.

AndrewJRenko

So Gemma is getting people thrown out of the meeting by security guards that don't appear to be wearing the mandatory ID required by the Private Security Authority;

https://twitter.com/EchoChambersPod/status/1105192880820420609

Annasopra

So much for Gemma saying she supports free speech

http://tortoiseshack.ie/anti-corruption-ireland-martin-mcmahon/

batgoat

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

So much for Gemma saying she supports free speech

http://tortoiseshack.ie/anti-corruption-ireland-martin-mcmahon/

Martin has reported it to the Gardaí since it looks like laws were broken... She was previously on their podcast but they since realised she was a bit of a loon, to give credit to them.

skimpydoo

batgoat wrote: »

Martin has reported it to the Gardaí since it looks like laws were broken... She was previously on their podcast but they since realised she was a bit of a loon, to give credit to them.

I have been a guest on their podcast too and they do try to cover all the bases, which is why it is so popular and also one of the best podcasts around. Maybe by having her on it, they were letting more people know what a loon she is.

Auntie Semite

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

So much for Gemma saying she supports free speech

http://tortoiseshack.ie/anti-corruption-ireland-martin-mcmahon/

Good crowd at the meeting judging from the video.

batgoat

skimpydoo wrote: »

I have been a guest on their podcast too and they do try to cover all the bases, which is why it is so popular and also one of the best podcasts around. Maybe by having her on it, they were letting more people know what a loon she is.

They were pretty big fans of hers at the time but her extreme views weren't as apparent at the time. They're pretty open and honest on the topic.

skimpydoo

It's funny seeing Gemma diss Sinn Fein especially since she asked them to nominate her for president.

CatFromHue

skimpydoo wrote: »

I have been a guest on their podcast too and they do try to cover all the bases, which is why it is so popular and also one of the best podcasts around. Maybe by having her on it, they were letting more people know what a loon she is.

I listened to them for the first time when they had Karl Deeter on and while I don't agree with everything they say they do a good podcast and seem to know what they're talking about.

Annasopra

skimpydoo wrote: »

It's funny seeing Gemma diss Sinn Fein especially since she asked them to nominate her for president.

Oh she did the same with PBP and Soc Dems and she tried to convince Panti Bliss she was a big lgbt supporter. Since then she has viciously attacked PBP and Soc Dems and gone extreme homophobe transphobe. Shes a liar and a hypocrite and a racist bully. See the way she targeted a young child in Ashbourne the other day because she is black.

Timberrrrrrrr

She has gone very quiet in twitter/FB after many people pointed out to her the lies contained in the liberals article about Tyrellstown.

The Nal

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Good crowd at the meeting judging from the video.

Theres about 40 people there. Its a pathetic crowd.

pjohnson

The Nal wrote: »

Theres about 40 people there. Its a pathetic crowd.

Its double figures so that is a win for her.

marieholmfan

Still and all I wonder who really killed Veronica Guerin.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Oh she did the same with PBP and Soc Dems and she tried to convince Panti Bliss she was a big lgbt supporter. Since then she has viciously attacked PBP and Soc Dems and gone extreme homophobe transphobe. Shes a liar and a hypocrite and a racist bully. See the way she targeted a young child in Ashbourne the other day because she is black.

Panti Bliss is not Transgender.

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Good crowd at the meeting judging from the video.

Well they called it 'anti corruption' bit like calling it sunshine and rainbows.

DS86DS

The basic summary of this thread is,

"I don't agree with Gemma O'Doherty, therefore she's crazy".

ohnonotgmail

marieholmfan wrote: »

Panti Bliss is not Transgender.

They did say

gone extreme homophobe transphobe.

I'm pretty sure Rory is gay. His boyfriend certainly is.

The Nal

DS86DS wrote: »

The basic summary of this thread is,

"I don't agree with Gemma O'Doherty, therefore she's crazy".

Nope. Its "Gemma O'Doherty says crazy things, therefore she's crazy"

ohnonotgmail

DS86DS wrote: »

The basic summary of this thread is,

"I don't agree with Gemma O'Doherty, therefore she's crazy".

more like:

I dont agree with her BECAUSE she is crazy.

Yer Da sells Avon

DS86DS wrote: »

The basic summary of this thread is,

"I don't agree with Gemma O'Doherty, therefore she's crazy".

Even when she used to express left-leaning views, before she started cosying up to the far-right, I thought she was a bit... off... to put it mildly. The Mary Boyle stuff, for example. Conspiracies everywhere.

batgoat

DS86DS wrote: »

The basic summary of this thread is,

"I don't agree with Gemma O'Doherty, therefore she's crazy".

Well if you're to conveniently ignore the conspiracy theories she subscribes to.

Grayson

She was posting this crap from the liberla.ie the other night

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1104869721541955584

It's worth noting that the liberal took that photo from a music video.

The Nal

Grayson wrote: »

It's worth noting that the liberal took that photo from a music video.

haha fantastic.

You know you're onto a loser when Buzz.ie are easily debunking your politics.

https://www.buzz.ie/amp/news/theliberal-ie-have-been-caught-out-for-posting-fake-inaccurate-and-downright-racist-news-218878

ollkiller

There is a post about Isis fighters returning and one lady said "Varadker didn't have a drop of Irish blood in his body". I said well his mother is from Dungarvan in Waterford so he kinda does have some Irish blood. To which she replied "But where was he born". I replied The Rotunda in Dublin. And with that my posts were removed from the thread. And i was being civil. Bit of an echo chamber going on.

The Nal

ollkiller wrote: »

There is a post about Isis fighters returning and one lady said "Varadker didn't have a drop of Irish blood in his body". I said well his mother is from Dungarvan in Waterford so he kinda does have some Irish blood. To which she replied "But where was he born". I replied The Rotunda in Dublin. And with that my posts were removed from the thread. And i was being civil. Bit of an echo chamber going on.

Ah sure its an old, tried and tested tactic.

Ulysses Gaze

ollkiller wrote: »

There is a post about Isis fighters returning and one lady said "Varadker didn't have a drop of Irish blood in his body". I said well his mother is from Dungarvan in Waterford so he kinda does have some Irish blood. To which she replied "But where was he born". I replied The Rotunda in Dublin. And with that my posts were removed from the thread. And i was being civil. Bit of an echo chamber going on.

And I'll bet these gob****es parrot that line "Facts don't care about your feelings."

Ipso

ollkiller wrote: »

There is a post about Isis fighters returning and one lady said "Varadker didn't have a drop of Irish blood in his body". I said well his mother is from Dungarvan in Waterford so he kinda does have some Irish blood. To which she replied "But where was he born". I replied The Rotunda in Dublin. And with that my posts were removed from the thread. And i was being civil. Bit of an echo chamber going on.

Censorship!!

dohboy

skimpydoo wrote: »

I have been a guest on their podcast too and they do try to cover all the bases, which is why it is so popular and also one of the best podcasts around. Maybe by having her on it, they were letting more people know what a loon she is.

They had her on a year ago and it was a very soft-soap stuff. Didn't challenge her at all on the fact she was retweeting InfoWars etc, by that stage. They've since realised the error of their ways but were happy to champion her for long enough.

ollkiller

Ipso wrote: »

Censorship!!

Aye. Fair enough if i was trolling them but i didn't insult anyone on that page. Just pointed out where they were factually incorrect. They don't like facts. Of should i say they like alternative facts.

DS86DS

Grayson wrote: »

She was posting this crap from the liberla.ie the other night

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1104869721541955584

It's worth noting that the liberal took that photo from a music video.

So in other words, Gemma is in the wrong here for reporting on African gang violence, and not the African gangs causing violence. Makes sense :rolleyes:

batgoat

DS86DS wrote: »

So in other words, Gemma is in the wrong here for reporting on African gang violence, and not the African gangs causing violence. Makes sense :rolleyes:

The Liberal have a long history of making up stories and plagiarism so strange that they're her source...

Timberrrrrrrr

DS86DS wrote: »

So in other words, Gemma is in the wrong here for reporting on African gang violence, and not the African gangs causing violence. Makes sense :rolleyes:

"Reporting" lol :rolleyes:

The liberal made up a story that the people of Tyrellstown are being terrorised by gangs, they are not! There was some trouble a few years ago but there isnt anymore.

The Liberal posted a picture from 3 years ago that was used for a music video (it was staged for that purpose) and acted as if this was the gang of teens on the rampage.

Gemma the "reporter" retweeted it, her and that gobsh/te Sherlock are both racist lowlifes and the sooner they have their FB/Twitter accounts shut down the better.

Now before anyone screams "he wants free speech shut down" i don't! I do want racist lowlifes who advocate violence against people based solely on race/colour/religion to be shut down because there is no place for them in civilised society.

lbc2019

marieholmfan wrote: »

Still and all I wonder who really killed Veronica Guerin.



Panti Bliss is not Transgender.


Well they called it 'anti corruption' bit like calling it sunshine and rainbows.

John Giligan

mcmoustache

DS86DS wrote: »

The basic summary of this thread is,

"I don't agree with Gemma O'Doherty, therefore she's crazy".

If you read what she writes and listen to what she says and end up thinking to yourself "These are some interesting opinions from someone who is perfectly sane", you might want to get that checked out.

I get where you're coming from, though. Here you have someone who's for loads of the same things that you are for. She expresses a lot of the same sentiment that you do and you like what she says. She has a high profile and it makes it easier to validate your views.

There's a small problem though. She has shown herself to be either crazy, deluded or just plain dishonest. It could be all three, I'm not sure.

At the same time, this luminary is probably the best representative of your views that you can get. If you had to discount her, you'd be left with some freeman of the land type guy in Mullingar who makes youtube videos about how you don't need insurance for your car or some other guy, also on youtube, probably from West Cork, going on about the dangers of fluoridation while he links to his gofundme for a trip to Antarctica to prove the flatness of the earth.

You've got a small pool of like-minded people there and you can't afford to write off the crazies or else you're left with crazier crazies.

Meanwhile, the world moves on and everyone else has figured out that she's crazy. Not you, however. If you decided to write her off as crazy, you might need to do some introspection and revisit some of your beliefs and you know that you're not going to do that. You can't afford to write her off as crazy.

But pretty much everyone else can.

Auntie Semite

mcmoustache wrote: »

If you read what she writes and listen to what she says and end up thinking to yourself "These are some interesting opinions from someone who is perfectly sane", you might want to get that checked out.

I get where you're coming from, though. Here you have someone who's for loads of the same things that you are for. She expresses a lot of the same sentiment that you do and you like what she says. She has a high profile and it makes it easier to validate your views.

There's a small problem though. She has shown herself to be either crazy, deluded or just plain dishonest. It could be all three, I'm not sure.

At the same time, this luminary is probably the best representative of your views that you can get. If you had to discount her, you'd be left with some freeman of the land type guy in Mullingar who makes youtube videos about how you don't need insurance for your car or some other guy, also on youtube, probably from West Cork, going on about the dangers of fluoridation while he links to his gofundme for a trip to Antarctica to prove the flatness of the earth.

You've got a small pool of like-minded people there and you can't afford to write off the crazies or else you're left with crazier crazies.

Meanwhile, the world moves on and everyone else has figured out that she's crazy. Not you, however. If you decided to write her off as crazy, you might need to do some introspection and revisit some of your beliefs and you know that you're not going to do that. You can't afford to write her off as crazy.

But pretty much everyone else can.

If she is mentally ill as you say then I'd advise you to check your flagrant abuse of a person with a mental Illness..someone might report you.

Is it within the rules of this site to laugh, belittle, slander and denigrate those with mental illnesses?

Auntie Semite

Accusing political opponents of being 'mental' is of course a tried and tested tactic of the left

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

'Political Opponents' being the key term here.

KikiLaRue

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Accusing political opponents of being 'mental' is of course a tried and tested tactic of the left

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

'Political Opponents' being the key term here.

So which is it - are people bullying someone who has a mental health issue, or are people making up her mental health issues to discredit her?

You can't have it both ways.

pjohnson

KikiLaRue wrote: »

So which is it - are people bullying someone who has a mental health issue, or are people making up her mental health issues to discredit her?

You can't have it both ways.

Stop censoring Ms. Semite.

Auntie Semite

KikiLaRue wrote: »

So which is it - are people bullying someone who has a mental health issue, or are people making up her mental health issues to discredit her?

You can't have it both ways.

I don't want it both ways, in fact it is others here who wish to have it both ways.

I don't believe Gemma is 'mental' as some here put it.

It should be noted that this term is entirely derogatory.

If posters here believe Gemma O Doherty is suffering from a psychological disorder then it is advised that they desist from blatantly abusing her due to her (supposed) illness.

Ipso

And if she is mentally ill, people need stop enabling her.

batgoat

Also mental illness does not give anyone license to be go off on racist rants. Or make nonsensical claims that morons lap up. All of this is free to highlight as bull**** and to highlight as bigoted nonsense. Same for her anti-semitic claims.

mcmoustache

Auntie Semite wrote: »

If she is mentally ill as you say then I'd advise you to check your flagrant abuse of a person with a mental Illness..someone might report you.

Is it within the rules of this site to laugh, belittle, slander and denigrate those with mental illnesses?

It's OK. I have you covered.
WARNING: Literacy and comprehension skills required.

mcmoustache wrote: »

There's a small problem though. She has shown herself to be either crazy, deluded or just plain dishonest. It could be all three, I'm not sure.

gman2k

She doesn't speak or present like a person with an actual mental illness. But it's disconcerting for rational people to listen to her "crazy" outpourings.
She's a hateful individual, who is doing genuine harm to people she has targeted with her outlandish conspiracies. She is presenting as homophobic, racist, xenophobic etc. before we even get to her anti Vax views, the anti semite Soros /globalist theory.......
She's the delusional idiot who put herself forward to be President of this nation, and has ramped up her extreme rightwing bile, so forgive us if we call her crazy.

Annasopra

ollkiller wrote: »

There is a post about Isis fighters returning and one lady said "Varadker didn't have a drop of Irish blood in his body". I said well his mother is from Dungarvan in Waterford so he kinda does have some Irish blood. To which she replied "But where was he born". I replied The Rotunda in Dublin. And with that my posts were removed from the thread. And i was being civil. Bit of an echo chamber going on.

Ah yeah.

Free speech until she censors you or sets her lawyers on you.

As I said she is a bullying lying hypocrite.

The Nal

She seems to just block anyone on Twitter who doesn't agree with her. Even Trump doesn't do that.

marieholmfan

gman2k wrote: »

She doesn't speak or present like a person with an actual mental illness. But it's disconcerting for rational people to listen to her "crazy" outpourings.
She's a hateful individual, who is doing genuine harm to people she has targeted with her outlandish conspiracies. She is presenting as homophobic, racist, xenophobic etc. before we even get to her anti Vax views, the anti semite Soros /globalist theory.......
She's the delusional idiot who put herself forward to be President of this nation, and has ramped up her extreme rightwing bile, so forgive us if we call her crazy.

In fairness she shines a light into areas no one else will talk about.
Police corruption. Political corruption. Press corruption. If some LGTBQIGQ :rolleyes: people have their delicate feelings bruised than so be it.

gmisk

marieholmfan wrote: »

In fairness she shines a light into areas no one else will talk about.
Police corruption. Political corruption. Press corruption. If some LGTBQIGQ :rolleyes: people have their delicate feelings bruised than so be it.

She links to a load of racist, xenophobic, homophobic guff and rants about nonsensical anti vax rubbish.
The term is actually LGTBQIQ but then again I think you knew that.
She may have at one stage had decent and honest journalistic intention but these are long gone.

I think she flings as much crap as she possibly can at everything in the hope something sticks, I dont think she believes half the stuff she even posts.

The unicorn tea towels in tk maxx and the hedge cutting was a highlight!

marieholmfan

gmisk wrote: »

She links to a load of racist, xenophobic, homophobic guff and rants about nonsensical anti vax rubbish.
The term is actually LGTBQIQ but then again I think you knew that.



The unicorn tea towels in tk maxx and the hedge cutting was a highlight!

Anti Vaxx is a complete red herring there is no one who actually won't get their kids vaccinated because of Gemma O F cking Doherty
As for the purported homophobia - it is intemperate but her perception rightly or wrongly is that a shadowy cabal of the international super rich are for reasons of their own trying to trick people into being gay; as such she would be very remiss if she did not call attention to this cabal!

She is not against homosexuals and lesbians per se but rather she is against those who trick straight people into being gay.

gmisk

marieholmfan wrote: »

Anti Vaxx is a complete red herring there is no one who actually won't get their kids vaccinated because of Gemma O F cking Doherty
As for the purported homophobia - it is intemperate but her perception rightly or wrongly is that a shadowy cabal of the international super rich are for reasons of their own trying to trick people into being gay; as such she would be very remiss if she did not call attention to this cabal!

She is not against homosexuals and lesbians per se but rather she is against those who trick straight people into being gay.

You would be surprised the people that believe her guff about anti vaxx.


Do you believe in this cabal? How are they tricking people into being gay lol?
Do you not see how insane that claim is?

The Nal

marieholmfan wrote: »

In fairness she shines a light into areas no one else will talk about.
Police corruption. Political corruption. Press corruption. If some LGTBQIGQ :rolleyes: people have their delicate feelings bruised than so be it.

No one else reports on police, political and press corruption? lol.

I guess Gemma set up the McCracken Tribunal so.