When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

DublinWriter

I really liked her Ted talk on corruption in the Irish establishment and followed her on Twitter because of it.

...but, after seeing some of her tweets and her love-in with John (Holy) Waters it was obvious to me that she is firmly in the forefront of the swivel-eyed-loon brigade.

This is one of her latest Tweets:

"Welcome to Sweden! Tourist ad shows a woman wearing the veil. This is what happens when liberal countries crawl to globalists and multiculturalists. It’s probably too late for Sweden. It will soon be too late for #Ireland if Irish people don’t waken up and take back their country"

Bet she's OK with nuns wearing the veil in public though?

The Nal

DublinWriter wrote: »

Bet she's OK with nuns wearing the veil in public though?

She is. And these lads.

Good ole white religion, keep Ireland white.

Grayson

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Accusing political opponents of being 'mental' is of course a tried and tested tactic of the left

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

'Political Opponents' being the key term here.

That's another ad hominem. No defense of her or her ideas. You make references to soviet show trials to try and say people who think what Gemma says is crazy, are part of an authoritarian group who want to shut down dissent.

The stuff she comes out with is crazy. The ideas she espouses have no basis in reality. So the options are that she is mentally ill, deluded or just shilling these ideas for a few quid.

Timberrrrrrrr

marieholmfan wrote: »

In fairness she shines a light into areas no one else will talk about.
Police corruption. Political corruption. Press corruption. If some LGTBQIGQ :rolleyes: people have their delicate feelings bruised than so be it.

She puts childrens health/lives at risk by advocating non vaccination! She also believes in chemtrails :rolleyes:

Timberrrrrrrr

DublinWriter wrote: »

I really liked her Ted talk on corruption in the Irish establishment and followed her on Twitter because of it.

...but, after seeing some of her tweets and her love-in with John (Holy) Waters it was obvious to me that she is firmly in the forefront of the swivel-eyed-loon brigade.

This is one of her latest Tweets:

"Welcome to Sweden! Tourist ad shows a woman wearing the veil. This is what happens when liberal countries crawl to globalists and multiculturalists. It’s probably too late for Sweden. It will soon be too late for #Ireland if Irish people don’t waken up and take back their country"

Bet she's OK with nuns wearing the veil in public though?

The woman in question on the billboard was born in Sweden as well but that seemed to slip Gemma's tiny mind.

gmisk

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

The woman in question on the billboard was born in Sweden as well but that seemed to slip Gemma's tiny mind.

But but but she isnt white?!?! She should be blond and white definitely if she is Swedish!!!!

Annasopra

marieholmfan wrote: »

Anti Vaxx is a complete red herring there is no one who actually won't get their kids vaccinated because of Gemma O F cking Doherty
As for the purported homophobia - it is intemperate but her perception rightly or wrongly is that a shadowy cabal of the international super rich are for reasons of their own trying to trick people into being gay; as such she would be very remiss if she did not call attention to this cabal!

She is not against homosexuals and lesbians per se but rather she is against those who trick straight people into being gay.

I actually fell on the floor laughing at this.

Annasopra

This is just hilarious

Gemma is wonderful even though she believes a shadowy globalist cabal are going around tricking people into being gay.

Thanks for bringing back the comedy after hours.

Well you know - how else will they reduce the world population so they can achieve their targets of - what was it - 35% Autism rates in the general populace by 2050? Sure of course you are going to want to get everyone to go gay and so stop reproducing. Then you have less people to hit with the Autism making chemtrails - and less areas to have to broadcast the Autism making 5G signals. Lucifer's plans cost money you know!

Sure its all so obvious you sheeples.

TaurenDruid

Deleted User wrote: »

Well you know - how else will they reduce the world population so they can achieve their targets of - what was it - 35% Autism rates in the general populace by 2050? Sure of course you are going to want to get everyone to go gay and so stop reproducing. Then you have less people to hit with the Autism making chemtrails - and less areas to have to broadcast the Autism making 5G signals. Lucifer's plans cost money you know!

Sure its all so obvious you sheeples.

I'm confused. If the population shrinks due to us all being gay (apparently being tricked into being gay, at that!), then who will big pharma sell their vaccines to?

Who knows. Lucifer moves in mysterious ways.

super_furry

How do you trick someone into being gay?

HEY dude, want to play some videogames? You can use my throbbing flesh coloured joystick!

Hotblack Desiato

marieholmfan wrote: »

In fairness she shines a light into areas no one else will talk about.
Police corruption. Political corruption. Press corruption.

Her nonsensical ramblings and nasty attacks actually do harm to the causes she claims to support.

Grayson

super_furry wrote: »

HEY dude, want to play some videogames? You can use my throbbing flesh coloured joystick!

I'm not falling for that again.

Grayson

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Her nonsensical ramblings and nasty attacks actually do harm to the causes she claims to support.

That's true. There's so much nonsense that she spouts that if there was one thing that's true hidden amongst it all, we'd never realise.

humberklog

I listened to her recent YouTube regarding the ACI meeting in Ashbourne.

What a load of meandering, scaremongering guff. If you're fooled by this disingenuous charlatan then you're a dopeyhole.

Looking like Oswald Mosley did make me laugh. As did her dewy eyed recollection of St. Patrick's Day of yore and hoping we can reclaim it as the reverential day of appreciation it once was (when was that?). The fact that St. Patrick was a foreigner spreading a new religion in Ireland was kinda lost on her Celtic dreamscape lie.

What a wagon.

super_furry

humberklog wrote: »

What a load of meandering, scaremongering guff. If you're fooled by this disingenuous charlatan then you're a dopeyhole.

Thing is, there's no shortage of them. No-hopers and shut-ins who are just desperate for someone to blame for their own short-comings.

Birneybau

humberklog wrote: »

I listened to her recent YouTube regarding the ACI meeting in Ashbourne.

What a load of meandering, scaremongering guff. If you're fooled by this disingenuous charlatan then you're a dopeyhole.

Looking like Oswald Mosley did make me laugh. As did her dewy eyed recollection of St. Patrick's Day of yore and hoping we can reclaim it as the reverential day of appreciation it once was (when was that?). The fact that St. Patrick was a foreigner spreading a new religion in Ireland was kinda lost on her Celtic dreamscape lie.

What a wagon.

It is, and always will be, an opportunity to get hammered. Not much more than that.

ollkiller

super_furry wrote: »

Thing is, there's no shortage of them. No-hopers and shut-ins who are just desperate for someone to blame for their own short-comings.

This 100%. They are not content in their own lives and instead of doing something positive to better their own existence they have to find someone to blame. It's easier to blame others for your woes instead of taking the hard option and doing something to better yourself.

Grayson

Birneybau wrote: »

It is, and always will be, an opportunity to get hammered. Not much more than that.

It is now but it wasn't always. Pubs were closed on St. Patrick's day. However in the US it was used as an excuse to get drunk. Drinking on St. Paddy's day is actually an american tradition we imported.

However now it's started, I'm sure it'll never go away.

francois

Grayson wrote: »

It is now but it wasn't always. Pubs were closed on St. Patrick's day. However in the US it was used as an excuse to get drunk. Drinking on St. Paddy's day is actually an american tradition we imported.

However now it's started, I'm sure it'll never go away.

The pubs were closed, however there was the dog show in the RDS which sold alcohol until 1961, which proved inexplicably popular

Birneybau

francois wrote: »

The pubs were closed, however there was the dog show in the RDS which sold alcohol until 1961, which proved inexplicably popular

I *HIC* FCUKING LOVE DOGSH *HIC*

lbc2019

Grayson wrote: »

I'm not falling for that again.

I fall for it every time! Well if its an impressive Joystick!

wingsof daun

gman2k wrote: »

She doesn't speak or present like a person with an actual mental illness. But it's disconcerting for rational people to listen to her "crazy" outpourings.
She's a hateful individual, who is doing genuine harm to people she has targeted with her outlandish conspiracies. She is presenting as homophobic, racist, xenophobic etc. before we even get to her anti Vax views, the anti semite Soros /globalist theory.......
She's the delusional idiot who put herself forward to be President of this nation, and has ramped up her extreme rightwing bile, so forgive us if we call her crazy.

It is easy to give all to these labels and derogatory names to people. Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues. I see propaganda making people ashamed of their European culture, that is hatred directed towards us but people swallow the propaganda. Multicultural crap in adds. If there were European blooded people in African or middle eastern adverts there would be an outcry. Russians in the USSR fell for propaganda and were nearly genocided, history repeats itself.

one world order

She's definitely on the ball with a lot of issues. You just have to look at the MSM and see their constant anti Russian propaganda. Sad that we are so easily manipulated by the MSM and swayed by those that control the world.

WinnyThePoo

wingsof daun wrote: »

gman2k wrote: »

She doesn't speak or present like a person with an actual mental illness. But it's disconcerting for rational people to listen to her "crazy" outpourings.
She's a hateful individual, who is doing genuine harm to people she has targeted with her outlandish conspiracies. She is presenting as homophobic, racist, xenophobic etc. before we even get to her anti Vax views, the anti semite Soros /globalist theory.......
She's the delusional idiot who put herself forward to be President of this nation, and has ramped up her extreme rightwing bile, so forgive us if we call her crazy.

It is easy to give all to these labels and derogatory names to people. Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues. I see propaganda making people ashamed of their European culture, that is hatred directed towards us but people swallow the propaganda. Multicultural crap in adds. If there were European blooded people in African or middle eastern adverts there would be an outcry. Russians in the USSR fell for propaganda and were nearly genocided, history repeats itself.

Another neo nazi.... Yawn..

humberklog

All I read and hear from Gemma is Russian troll factory news . She's swallowed the whole lot sideways and spits it out as a newly formed doctrine that she's in command of.

The irony is quite something. She's telling all who will listen that the sheep are heading for Armageddon because of communist globalist propaganda and yet (imo) she's the one that the Russian propagandists have caught- hook, line and sinker.

Larbre34

one world order wrote: »

She's definitely on the ball with a lot of issues. You just have to look at the MSM and see their constant anti Russian propaganda. Sad that we are so easily manipulated by the MSM and swayed by those that control the world.

Read Bill Browder's book' Red Notice' and decide for yourself about the principles and tactics of the Russian political and judicial architecture.

You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

gman2k

Larbre34 wrote:

Read Bill Browder's book' Red Notice' and decide for yourself about the principles and tactics of the Russian political and judicial architecture.

100%, and more essential reading is A Very Expensive Poison by Luke Harding re the Litvinenko assassination.
Knowing about these two stories alone, and the way Russia Today spins propaganda about them tells you all you need to know.

lbc2019

Russia are becoming more and more powerful. Undermining the E.U. USA and NATO with their stooges

gman2k

wingsof daun wrote:

Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues.

Yes, basically its more anti Semitic Elders of Zion BS, except today it's wrapped up in Soros (wealthy Jew) who has a globalist agenda, along with Rothschilda controlled central banking.

Research......FFS, get off YouTube man.

one world order

Larbre34 wrote: »

Read Bill Browder's book' Red Notice' and decide for yourself about the principles and tactics of the Russian political and judicial architecture.

You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

Is it about a group of families that own the worlds reserve currency, spending money on foreign groups to destabilise countries, getting involved in conflicts with over 50 countries since WW2, invading and bombing countries, sending in the IMF and World Bank to strip the assets of the country and in slave them to debt?

batgoat

one world order wrote: »

Is it about a group of families that own the worlds reserve currency, spending money on foreign groups to destabilise countries, getting involved in conflicts with over 50 countries since WW2, invading and bombing countries, sending in the IMF and World Bank to strip the assets of the country and in slave them to debt?

Fun fact, the Rothschild's were a family of significance in the 19th century. Not so much now... Cause I'm pretty sure you believe them to be a part of the evil conspiracy.

Ipso

batgoat wrote: »

Fun fact, the Rothschild's were a family of significance in the 19th century. Not so much now... Cause I'm pretty sure you believe them to be a part of the evil conspiracy.

Yeah, it's the Payseurs that control the Unicorn Industrial complex now.

Auntie Semite

batgoat wrote: »

Fun fact, the Rothschild's were a family of significance in the 19th century. Not so much now... Cause I'm pretty sure you believe them to be a part of the evil conspiracy.

Yeah, no significance at all...

batgoat

Auntie Semite subscribing to a World War 2 conspiracy, I am shocked! They are insignificant in terms of wealth at this point in time and strangely surrounded by anti-semetic conspiracies, of which the Nazis were one of the most famed proponents.

Auntie Semite

batgoat wrote: »

Auntie Semite subscribing to a World War 2 conspiracy, I am shocked!

Who said I subscribed to anything?


You claimed that the Rothschild family are of no significance,
this is plainly untrue.

They are an extremely important family in international finance, business, mining, philanthropy, Art, property, this is all easily researched and is all public and above board.
Conspiracy has nothing to do with it.

Why must you tell untruths when making your point?

Or perhaps you're not as smart as you think you are..

batgoat

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Who said I subscribed to anything?


You claimed that the Rothschild family are of no significance,
this is plainly untrue.

They are an extremely important family in international finance, business, mining, philanthropy, Art, property, this is all easily researched and is all public and above board.
Conspiracy has nothing to do with it.

Why must you tell untruths when making your point?

Their peak was in the 19th century. Only one member of the family made it onto the Forbes wealthiest people list, he was 1121st place with a a worth of 1.6 billion dollars. That's a lot but insignificant by modern standards and he's unlikely to shift geopolitical affairs.

Source for you

Also, the Rothschilds began acquiring their wealth in the 1700s, and since then the family has spawned hundreds of descendants, so there is no longer any centralized Rothschild family wealth. The closest thing to a “Rothschild Family” business in 2016 is the Rothschild Group, a multinational investment banking company, but that firm does not in itself generate nearly enough income to back up claims about the family’s wealth. In 2015, the Rothschild Group’s annual revenue was approximately $500 million. In comparison, the world’s largest company, Walmart, has an annual revenue of nearly $500 billion.

It should also be noted that only one member of the Rothschild family is included among Forbes’ 2015 list of the world’s billionaires: Benjamin de Rothschild, who was ranked at number #1121 with a net worth of $1.61 billion.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rothschild-family-wealth/

And every time, you claim not to subscribe to a conspiracy but you seem to give all of them plenty of credence. Eg QAnon, fluoride in the water and now the Rotschild's being of considerable influence in the 21st century. And I was completely accurate in terms of describing them as pretty insignificant.

Auntie Semite

batgoat wrote: »

Their peak was in the 19th century. Only one member of the family made it onto the Forbes wealthiest people list, he was 1121st place with a a worth of 1.6 billion dollars. That's a lot but insignificant by modern standards and he's unlikely to shift geopolitical affairs.

Source for you

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rothschild-family-wealth/

And every time, you claim not to subscribe to a conspiracy but you seem to give all of them plenty of credence. And I was completely accurate in terms of describing them as pretty insignificant.

Whether they peaked in the 19th century is irrelevant, many members of the family today have significant interests in a multitude of billion dollar interests. Even Wikipedia will tell you this. its a plain matter of fact.

Edit ..I see the family is considered to be worth 400 billion, most people would regard that as significant.

The reason I chime in is because you and others consistently and arrogantly dismiss the views of others whilst posting or countering with thoroughly inaccurate information yourselves.

If you are going to accuse others of holding inaccurate info make sure yours is completely factual otherwise it somewhat diminishes your argument.

You could have deconstructed the Rothschild conspiracy with facts but you chose to post inaccurate information yourself.

Don't bother attempting to get into a long argument about what constitutes 'significant' I'm not interested

ohnonotgmail

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Whether they peaked in the 19th century is irrelevant, many members of the family today have significant interests in a multitude of billion dollar interests. Even Wikipedia will tell you this. its a plain matter of fact.

The reason I chime in is because you and others consistently and arrogantly dismiss the views of others whilst posting or countering with thoroughly inaccurate information yourselves.

If you are going to accuse others of holding inaccurate info make sure yours in completely factual otherwise it somewhat diminishes your argument.

You could have deconstructed the Rothschild conspiracy with facts but you chose to post inaccurate information yourself.

a family where the richest person is outside the top 1000 is not running the world.

one world order

Forbes?? Really, you can count their wealth on a public list. Did it also happen to mention their share of the US federal reserve?

batgoat

Auntie Semite, it was perfectly accurate and you have disproven nothing. You get very aggressive when you're really not winning your argument.

one world order wrote: »

Forbes?? Really, you can count their wealth on a public list. Did it also happen to mention their share of the US federal reserve?

Well at least you're blatantly honest about the fact you subscribe to Nazi era conspiracies.

ohnonotgmail

one world order wrote: »

Forbes?? Really, you can count their wealth on a public list. Did it also happen to mention their share of the US federal reserve?

presumably you do have some proof for this claim that does not involve a YT video?

Auntie Semite

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

a family where the richest person is outside the top 1000 is not running the world.

Again I did not say anything about running the world.

Auntie Semite

batgoat wrote: »

Auntie Semite, it was perfectly accurate and you have disproven nothing. You get very aggressive when you're really not winning your argument.



Well at least you're blatantly honest about the fact you subscribe to Nazi era conspiracies.

I am polite always

ohnonotgmail

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Again I did not say anything about running the world. Maybe you should pay more attention.

what exactly do you think the Rothschild conspiracy is about?

batgoat

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Again I did not say anything about running the world. Maybe you should pay more attention.

You're totally trying to push that claim, you posted a picture of one of them with Prince Charles as if it signified something. :rolleyes:

Auntie Semite

batgoat wrote: »

You're totally trying to push that claim, you posted a picture of one of them with Prince Charles as if it signified something. :rolleyes:

It showed that they are an important family.

As I said already, you can easily dismiss the conspiracy claims without making inaccurate statements.

Edit: The idea that one family 'controls the world' is patently absurd.
But that does not mean they are not wealthy and influential.

batgoat

Auntie Semite wrote: »

It showed that they are an important family.

As I said already, you can easily dismiss the conspiracy claims without making inaccurate statements.

Erm this is the post you responded to.

batgoat wrote: »

Fun fact, the Rothschild's were a family of significance in the 19th century. Not so much now... Cause I'm pretty sure you believe them to be a part of the evil conspiracy.

You responded with a photo of one of the Rotschilds with Prince Charles as if it signified political influence. Combined with your username and tendency to love conspiracies, it would indicate that you seem to think that there's something there in the conspiracy.

In the 19th Century, the Rotschilds were consolidated wealth, now most of the wealth has been distributed and diluted as a direct result. It's inheritance so mainly a load of millionaires. But nobody of any major note. So yep, insignificant.

Annasopra

wingsof daun wrote: »

It is easy to give all to these labels and derogatory names to people. Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues. I see propaganda making people ashamed of their European culture, that is hatred directed towards us but people swallow the propaganda. Multicultural crap in adds. If there were European blooded people in African or middle eastern adverts there would be an outcry. Russians in the USSR fell for propaganda and were nearly genocided, history repeats itself.

The propaganda is coming from The GO'D Squad. Her allies in Irexit even created fake candidates in Kerry