When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Billcarson

Billcarson wrote: »

skepticalme wrote: »

TaurenDruid wrote: »

Bullies? No. It's perfectly fine to stand up to hatespeech. In fact, it should be the default.

Bullying is when someone attends one of these "public" meetings, says something GO'D doesn't like, and gets manhandled out of the venue.

They have bullied another venue into cancelling by threatening their business.
I read a few peoples tweets discussing that. Is that the same guy who kept asking the same question over and over even when others were talking, and then held onto the door handle when he was being escorted out.
He was there to disrupt only. That was obvious.
I hope these bullies get a taste of their own medicine.

They are clowns. Are they afraid of gemma? What are they afraid of? They are the fascists.

batgoat wrote: »

humberklog wrote: »

I think Gemma's is a nasty creep but getting her shut down every time isn't right.

Sneaky unpleasant arseholes on both sides in this case.

She called a recent tragic event a false flag, regularly engages in hate speech. Feck all time for her or to sympathise with the fact people complain about her.

What about all the Christians murdered by Muslims they are equally tragic events but we hear very little about them.

humberklog

batgoat wrote: »

She called a recent tragic event a false flag, regularly engages in hate speech. Feck all time for her or to sympathise with the fact people complain about her.

It's playing into her conspiratorial hands though. I'd say Gemma's loving it and will ramp up her booking of places just to have them knocked down so she can play the gagged victim to her on line audience. It plays well for her and those who are vehemently against her are falling for it each time.

That's just my thoughts on it.

blackwhite

skepticalme wrote: »

They have bullied another venue into cancelling by threatening their business.
I read a few peoples tweets discussing that. Is that the same guy who kept asking the same question over and over even when others were talking, and then held onto the door handle when he was being escorted out.
He was there to disrupt only. That was obvious.
I hope these bullies get a taste of their own medicine.

Threatening their business? :pac::pac::pac:

Coolera House is a small rural pub.
It has a business of a handful of regulars, local GAA club events, and a smattering of local birthdays, christenings, etc.

The online twitter mob threatening to "boycott" wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to the business.

More like is that the twitter sh*tstorm lead to them doing a bit of reading up on the crap that GO'D has been spewing, and that lead them to realise the likely characters from Sligo town that might come out to attend one of Gemma's "meetings". Doubt they wanted their few regulars to have to listen to the BS that Gemma and pals would be spewing for the evening

batgoat

Billcarson wrote: »

What about all the Christians murdered by Muslims they are equally tragic events but we hear very little about them.

What relevance does that have to my point? Age was grossly insensitive in relation to the event and made it into a platform for self promotion.

Hotblack Desiato

Billcarson wrote: »

What about all the Christians murdered by Muslims they are equally tragic events but we hear very little about them.

Next time a hotel in Ireland is going to have a meeting glorifying same, will you defend their "free speech" too?

Billcarson

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Billcarson wrote: »

Freedom of speech in Ireland dead. Who are the fascists I wonder. Certainly not gemma imo. She's a racist is she? What a load of boll*x.

Not a freedom of speech issue. A venue just doesnt want her business.

Boll*x . There are those who don't want her voice to be heard and are doing what they can to try and keep her from holding meetings. I'm sure they heard what happened in cork. They surely knew enough about her to give her the venue and what then suddenly they change their mind?

batgoat

Billcarson wrote: »

Boll*x . There are those who don't want her voice to be heard and are doing what they can to try and keep her from holding meetings. I'm sure they heard what happened in cork. They surely knew enough about her to give her the venue and what then suddenly they change their mind?

You realise that it's also a part of freedom of speech to outline your feelings to a business right?

Billcarson

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Billcarson wrote: »

What about all the Christians murdered by Muslims they are equally tragic events but we hear very little about them.

Next time a hotel in Ireland is going to have a meeting glorifying same, will you defend their "free speech" too?

Glorifying what? Killing Muslims? Lol. If you think that's what gemma is about well then i suggest you learn more about her. But you have made up your mind anyways that she is a rasist.

Billcarson

batgoat wrote: »

Billcarson wrote: »

Boll*x . There are those who don't want her voice to be heard and are doing what they can to try and keep her from holding meetings. I'm sure they heard what happened in cork. They surely knew enough about her to give her the venue and what then suddenly they change their mind?

You realise that it's also a part of freedom of speech to outline your feelings to a business right?

I though she said they offered her the venue. Anyway all seems her fishy to me.

Annasopra

skepticalme wrote: »

They have bullied another venue into cancelling by threatening their business.
I read a few peoples tweets discussing that. Is that the same guy who kept asking the same question over and over even when others were talking, and then held onto the door handle when he was being escorted out.
He was there to disrupt only. That was obvious.
I hope these bullies get a taste of their own medicine.

So basically behind it all you support Gemma. You support her views and you support her harassment and bullying of people that disagree with her. You dont really give a sh it about free speech at all because you want Gemmas critics silenced, harassed and bullied.

blackwhite

As of 7 min ago Gemma is claiming the meeting is going ahead.

Looks like Gemma is opposed to property owners having the right to decide how to use their own premises

Annasopra

This free speech sh ite is thick and stupid.

Gemma DOES NOT STAND FOR FREE SPEECH.

She hired security to remove people from an ACI meeting in Meath. She targets and harasses her critics online actively encouraging others to do so too. She has been sending out hundreds of solicitors letters to get people to remove social media posts.

Gemma is actively trying to silence, harass and bully her critics.

skepticalme

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

So basically behind it all you support Gemma. You support her views and you support her harassment and bullying of people that disagree with her. You dont really give a sh it about free speech at all because you want Gemmas critics silenced, harassed and bullied.

There you go again throwing around statements without any evidence.
Having just been an observer of what is going on, it's disgraceful.
Gemma's critics are in no danger of being silenced, they are thugs who threaten businesses and threaten to show up at meetings to cause trouble.
This will end in violence and it won't be G O Dohertys fault.

gman2k

Any day a meeting of fascists is cancelled due to pressure from normal decent people is a good day.
This argument about free speech is bollocks.
Fcuk Fascists.

Billcarson

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

This free speech sh ite is thick and stupid.

Gemma DOES NOT STAND FOR FREE SPEECH.

She hired security to remove people from an ACI meeting in Meath. She targets and harasses her critics online actively encouraging others to do so too. She has been sending out hundreds of solicitors letters to get people to remove social media posts.

Gemma is actively trying to silence, harass and bully her critics.

Where's your evidence for this???

circadian

Are people actively seeking out conspiracy theories to follow? I know some people that I would consider very intelligent, dipping into some strange climate change, brexit etc theories. I genuinely think they don't believe it per se but want these things to be true because as far as they're concerned it's more interesting.

Gemma O'Doherty is a dangerous individual, fuelling what I can only describe as an anti-intelligence movement. I have absolutely no problem with people opposing her, and if that means businesses refusing service then so be it.

gman2k

Billcarson wrote:

Where's your evidence for this???

Anyone who has the temerity to ask a question of her on Twitter gets instantly blocked, then denounced as a government / Soros troll

Hotblack Desiato

Billcarson wrote: »

Glorifying what? Killing Muslims? Lol. If you think that's what gemma is about well then i suggest you learn more about her. But you have made up your mind anyways that she is a rasist.

Reading comprehension fail.

batgoat

Billcarson wrote: »

Where's your evidence for this???

Was a pretty notable case of somebody being removed a month back.

Billcarson

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Billcarson wrote: »

Glorifying what? Killing Muslims? Lol. If you think that's what gemma is about well then i suggest you learn more about her. But you have made up your mind anyways that she is a rasist.

Reading comprehension fail.

Sorry . Maybe the fact I agree with alot of what gemma says has dulled my mind and made me stupid.

circadian

Billcarson wrote: »

Sorry . Maybe the fact I agree with alot of what gemma says has dulled my mind and made me stupid.

What do you agree with? Honestly curious if there's something more than the 5G flat earther type of bollocks to her.

Jackman25

humberklog wrote: »

I think Gemma's is a nasty creep but getting her shut down every time isn't right.

Sneaky unpleasant arseholes on both sides in this case.

Yep, looking at twitter comments you have the full basket of deplorables on both sides of the argument.

If I actually gave a **** and thought Gemma was dangerous and needed to be stopped, I would be encouraging people to give her a platform. I would support having her on Prime Time, Six-One, Main Stream Radio etc. Any half-competent interviewer would fillet her within minutes.

This no-platform stuff plays right into her hands and makes her the victim, and I suspect most of these social media activists know that, but its more important to them to be seen to be an activist than actually achieving anything.

Billcarson

That there is alot of corruption in this country. I don't trust 5g btw or at least I feel uneasy about it, there has not been enough research done into it.
Mass migration I don't agree with. Every country has a right to protect its borders. We can't just let anybody in here. But anyone who doesn't agree with mass
Migration is considered rasist . I think it will only lead to problems down the road.

Admittedly she perhaps paints an overly poor view of Ireland and can be a bit ott. But if rather trust her then our gov.

Billcarson

Billcarson wrote: »

That there is alot of corruption in this country. I don't trust 5g btw or at least I feel uneasy about it, there has not been enough research done into it.
Mass migration I don't agree with. Every country has a right to protect its borders. We can't just let anybody in here. But anyone who doesn't agree with mass
Migration is considered rasist . I think it will only lead to problems down the road.

Admittedly she perhaps paints an overly poor view of Ireland and can be a bit ott. But if rather trust her then our gov.

Best get rid of your mobile then and get rid of your broadband connection if you don't trust 5g.

And yes the rest of your post is exactly what you claim it seems

Acosta

After watching her latest video, If I was the owner of that place I'd lock the doors.

Annasopra

Billcarson wrote: »

Where's your evidence for this???

It has been widely noted on social media that someone who questioned her at The Pillo Hotel in Ashbourne was escorted from the room by private security. There are questions about alleged assault too. The videos had to be taken down so that the Gardai could investigate

Gemma had a video up a few weeks openly harassing Fiona O'Leary an autism campaigner saying Fiona "should be dealt with" - again tgis had to be taken down because the Gardai are investigating

Its well known Gemma has been sending out dozens of solicitors letters. #suemegemma on twitter has documented this.

Annasopra

skepticalme wrote: »

There you go again throwing around statements without any evidence.
Having just been an observer of what is going on, it's disgraceful.
Gemma's critics are in no danger of being silenced, they are thugs who threaten businesses and threaten to show up at meetings to cause trouble.
This will end in violence and it won't be G O Dohertys fault.

Nah Gemma is actively encouraging violence from her supporters towards Fiona O'Leary.

Its kinda odd how you keep trying to minimise the harrassment and bullying that Gemma does.

But then Gemmas supporters do this here constantly. Try to deflect and pretend Gemma is innocent and virtuous. She isnt. She's a bully who harasses and tries to silence her critics.

skepticalme

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Nah Gemma is actively encouraging violence from her supporters towards Fiona O'Leary.

Its kinda odd how you keep trying to minimise the harrassment and bullying that Gemma does.

But then Gemmas supporters do this here constantly. Try to deflect and pretend Gemma is innocent and virtuous. She isnt. She's a bully who harasses and tries to silence her critics.

She meant deal with Fiona OLeary legally, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the video.

Autism advocate my ass. None of the autism parent groups would touch her with a barge pole. She has even gone after some of them who are dealing with severely autistic children.

You're constantly lying. That's what I oppose.

Annasopra

skepticalme wrote: »

She meant deal with Fiona OLeary legally, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the video.

Autism advocate my ass. None of the autism parent groups would touch her with a barge pole. She has even gone after some of them who are dealing with severely autistic children.

You're constantly lying. That's what I oppose.

Ah right once again you twist O'Dohertys words to your interpretation.

Nope no lying here.

O'Doherty harassed and bullied O'Leary

batgoat

skepticalme wrote: »

She meant deal with Fiona OLeary legally, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the video.

Autism advocate my ass. None of the autism parent groups would touch her with a barge pole. She has even gone after some of them who are dealing with severely autistic children.

You're constantly lying. That's what I oppose.

She really is an autism advocate, she exposed a group that were effectively poisoning children with bleach. Gemma is well aware of the fact that she has plenty of followers who will do some pretty questionable harassment of Fiona. Your love for all things Gemma and making Fiona out to be the bad person is pretty cringe.

Dr Brown

It's another very sad day for democracy in Ireland.

People may not like Gemma but to deny her the right to speak is putting Ireland on the road to fascism were the rule of law is ignored and only those the left wing mob agree with are allowed to speak.

Its funny that none of there anti democratic thugs seem to have a problem with the likes of FG/FF holding conferences when they're the ones who destroyed the country. But they will attack likes of Gemma who is trying to stamp out corruption.

ohnonotgmail

Dr Brown wrote: »

It's another very sad day for democracy in Ireland.

People may not like Gemma but to deny her the right to speak is putting Ireland on the road to fascism were the rule of law is ignored and only those the left wing mob agree with are allowed to speak.

Its funny that none of there anti democratic thugs seem to have a problem with the likes of FG/FF holding conferences when they're the ones who destroyed the country. But they will attack likes of Gemma who is trying to stamp out corruption.

well its no surprise that you support her

Boom_Bap

Paraphrasing Gemma:

"there are hundreds of people who have travelled here tonight"....as the camera pans to 6 cars and 3 people

suttree31

Dr Brown wrote: »

It's another very sad day for democracy in Ireland.

People may not like Gemma but to deny her the right to speak is putting Ireland on the road to fascism were the rule of law is ignored and only those the left wing mob agree with are allowed to speak.

Its funny that none of there anti democratic thugs seem to have a problem with the likes of FG/FF holding conferences when they're the ones who destroyed the country. But they will attack likes of Gemma who is trying to stamp out corruption.

Spare us your concern for Irish democracy - do FG/FF regularly use the phrase "traitors to Ireland" for people who disagree with them? GO'D throws it around like cheap confetti - she used it for people who watch the Late Late Show. There's only risk to putting Ireland on the road to fascism is allowing that kind of bile to have a platform.

Dr Brown

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well its no surprise that you support her

I'm not a member of her organization.

But I support free speech and lawful assembly.

Maurice Yeltsin

I'm still baffled as to what the left fear from her aside from her hoovering up their voters. Because that is who votes left in Ireland. The unemployable. The conspiracy theorists. The freemen on the land. It's simple jealously, Gemma is stealing your retards and you want your retards back, so that they can vote again for your preferred retards. Former heroes like her and Ben Gilroy have spoken out of turn and are influencing too many of the permanently angry.

Have you actually listened to her live streams?

I didn't last more than 10 minutes. She's inarticulate. She's a poor orator. She's VERY boring. I'm loathe to give Ruth Coppinger a credit but even her scuttering nonsense comes across marginally better.

She's a touring comedy act, and you're sadder than she is for even caring.

ohnonotgmail

Dr Brown wrote: »

I'm not a member of her organization.

But I support free speech and lawful assembly.

well that is odd because gemma doesn't. Or should i say she supports her own free speech. She isn't so keen on the free speech of those who oppose her.

Dr Brown

suttree31 wrote: »

Spare us your concern for Irish democracy - do FG/FF regularly use the phrase "traitors to Ireland" for people who disagree with them? GO'D throws it around like cheap confetti - she used it for people who watch the Late Late Show. There's only risk to putting Ireland on the road to fascism is allowing that kind of bile to have a platform.

FF/FG are traitors to the country I thought that would be obvious to anyone with half a brain.

Maurice Yeltsin

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well that is odd because gemma doesn't. Or should i say she supports her own free speech. She isn't so keen on the free speech of those who oppose her.

A lot of people are saying she is anti free speech because her security removed protesters from her meetings by force. (I'm baffled she has the funds to hire security, or even a function room, but anyway)


Out of interest, if a left wing group were holding a meeting about something they claimed to care about, say, the housing crisis, and I walked in and demanded to debate how one can claim to be for resolving a housing crisis while approving of preferential social housing treatment for refugees, would I be allowed the floor? Or would I be escorted out?

Serious question.

ohnonotgmail

Funny the number of low post count recent joiners that support gemma

BBFAN

Why on earth can Gemma not spew her bile on the street if she believes in free speech. You don't need a venue to talk ****e.

Billcarson

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Funny the number of low post count recent joiners that support gemma

It's all a conspiracy. Lol.
Wtf has that got to do with it?

GinAndBitter

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

O'Doherty harassed and bullied O'Leary

The both of them are absolute crazies, have a look at O'Learys Twitter from today, that's not the behaviour of a normal human being. The two of them should be disappeared.

skepticalme

batgoat wrote: »

She really is an autism advocate, she exposed a group that were effectively poisoning children with bleach. Gemma is well aware of the fact that she has plenty of followers who will do some pretty questionable harassment of Fiona. Your love for all things Gemma and making Fiona out to be the bad person is pretty cringe.

No she's not an autism advocate. She is obsessed with MMS and thinks any parent of an autistic child doing anything to help them is on a par with MMS. She is against any help for autistic people.

I don't care what you think. Fiona is known as someone to avoid apart from her idiot followers.

Dr Brown

skepticalme wrote: »

No she's not an autism advocate. She is obsessed with MMS and thinks any parent of an autistic child doing anything to help them is on a par with MMS. She is against any help for autistic people.

I don't care what you think. Fiona is known as someone to avoid apart from her idiot followers.

Its well known that O'Leary has serious mental health problems.


Just look at her in this video shouting and screaming like a complete lunatic.

batgoat

Just did a quick google on 'Dr Suzanne Humphries', ah so she's one of the loons who claims vaccine cause autism. She also seems to advocate vitamin c as some bizarre treatment of autism.... But Fiona is the one with the problem...

Patty Hearst

GinAndBitter wrote: »

The both of them are absolute crazies, have a look at O'Learys Twitter from today, that's not the behaviour of a normal human being. The two of them should be disappeared.

Why would you say that about O'Doherty? I don't agree with her on a number of issues but calling her 'Absolute Crazy' is a bit far?

Patty Hearst

gman2k wrote: »

Any day a meeting of fascists is cancelled due to pressure from normal decent people is a good day.
This argument about free speech is bollocks.
Fcuk Fascists.

Bollocks until its your opinion being censored..but that will never happen of course it won't.

pjohnson

batgoat wrote: »

Just did a quick google on 'Dr Suzanne Humphries', ah so she's one of the loons who claims vaccine cause autism. She also seems to advocate vitamin c as some bizarre treatment of autism.... But Fiona is the one with the problem...

You cant have thought it'd be an actual respected doctor?

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Why would you say that about O'Doherty? I don't agree with her on a number of issues but calling her 'Absolute Crazy' is a bit far?

Gemma hasn't stated anything that isn't based in conspiracies for about a year at this stage.... She's a complete loon who spreads propaganda.