When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

ohnonotgmail

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Funny the number of low post count recent joiners that support gemma

Well it is nearly Easter, resurrection all around.

Patty Hearst

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Not a freedom of speech issue. A venue just doesnt want her business.

This is absolute Bullsh1t and you know it. The business have been inundated with threats to slander them online (trip advisor), boycott, threats to ruin their business. The 'progressive' Brownshirts

TheRepentent

skepticalme wrote: »

Coolera House is being bombarded with tweets from the same few people as Cork meetings.
They took down their facebook page before it was announced. Probably were warned about the reviews from this lot that would be posted on their page, like Imperial and Maritime in Cork.

And they finally saw sense and cancelled


Had to laugh at one twitter username :pac::pac:

Gemmented O’Dotty

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

This is absolute Bullsh1t and you know it. The business have been inundated with threats to slander them online (trip advisor), boycott, threats to ruin their business. The 'progressive' Brownshirts

One is entitled to give poor reviews, to boycott and this is all exercising freedom of speech. In general, I think people are calling them and saying that they're incredibly to disappointed to hear that the venue is hosting an anti-semetic,racist conspiracy theorist.

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Gemma hasn't stated anything that isn't based in conspiracies for about a year at this stage.... She's a complete loon who spreads propaganda.

Widespread corruption in Govt...she is correct

Mass Immigration and the detrimental effects it will have on society...she is correct.

Pushing of Gender identity nonsense on Children...she is correct.

Proposing to teach about pornography to primary school children...she is correct.

Govt pandering to ISIS members and neglecting their duty to protect the citizens in Ireland...she is correct.

Corrupt, fake news govt shill media...absolutely correct.

Absolute Worthlessness and indeed the foot soldiers of hyper capitalism People Before Profit...she is correct

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

One is entitled to give poor reviews, to boycott and this is all exercising freedom of speech. In general, I think people are calling them and saying that they're incredibly to disappointed to hear that the venue is hosting an anti-semetic,racist conspiracy theorist.

In any case you are losing and the tide is turning, its happening all over Europe it will happen here too.

The amount of ordinary non political people who lately have expressed to me an absolute loathing of the PBP, Sinn Fein, SJW class was quite something to behold.

The fact that they have to attempt to shut down Gemma at every turn shows how desperate they are.

blackwhite

Patty Hearst wrote: »

This is absolute Bullsh1t and you know it. The business have been inundated with threats to slander them online (trip advisor), boycott, threats to ruin their business. The 'progressive' Brownshirts

It’s a rural pub whose entire business is based of their immediate locality for regulars and for events. Visitors are a tiny element of business for them. I don’t think I’ve ever set foot in the place and not known every person in there.

If you think Michael Woods gives two flying f*cks about trip advisor then you clearly haven’t a clue about the place.


Gemma targets venues like this where she hopes the proprietor won’t be aware of the sort of lowlife scum that are attracted to Gemma like flies to sh*te. Once the owners are made aware of what sort of people Gemma is going to attract then they choose not to take her business.

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Widespread corruption in Govt...she is correct

Mass Immigration and the detrimental effects it will have on society...she is correct.

Pushing of Gender identity nonsense on Children...she is correct.

Proposing to teach about pornography to primary school children...she is correct.

Govt pandering to ISIS members and neglecting their duty to protect the citizens in Ireland...she is correct.

Corrupt, fake news govt shill media...absolutely correct.

Absolute Worthlessness and indeed the foot soldiers of hyper capitalism People Before Profit...she is correct

Gonna respond in numbered order...

1. Generally relates them to conspiracies so actual relevant points disappear

2. Her mass migration crap, the majority of the time relies on propaganda by far right groups/outlets.

3. She's a bit of a transphobe, as are you. Shocker.

4. Her porn crap was trying to create hysteria. Another shocker

5. This is a matter of opinion again.

6. 99% around fake news conspiracies

7. Nonsense, not a fan of people before profit but I haven't seen her highlight anything of note.


So it's more like she's validating your existing opinions and how she's going about it, simply does not matter to you.

Maurice Yeltsin

batgoat wrote: »

One is entitled to give poor reviews,.

People are entitled to leave bad reviews of a business they've never used?

I suppose since the commies who oppose Gemma think that a business built on a lifetime of hard graft and self sacrifice should be seized by the state, that this vile opinion isn't too surprising.

Patty Hearst

blackwhite wrote: »

It’s a rural pub whose entire business is based of their immediate locality for regulars and for events. Visitors are a tiny element of business for them. I don’t think I’ve ever set foot in the place and not known every person in there.

If you think Michael Woods gives two flying f*cks about trip advisor then you clearly haven’t a clue about the place.


Gemma targets venues like this where she hopes the proprietor won’t be aware of the sort of lowlife scum that are attracted to Gemma like flies to sh*te. Once the owners are made aware of what sort of people Gemma is going to attract then they choose not to take her business.

He clearly said on twitter (before the bombardment) that he knew about ACI and Gemma and did not agree with everything she said but believed in Free Speech.

But The 21st Century Brownshirts put an end to that.

batgoat

Maurice Yeltsin wrote: »

People are entitled to leave bad reviews of a business they've never used?

I suppose since the commies who oppose Gemma think that a business built on a lifetime of hard graft and self sacrifice should be seized by the state, that this vile opinion isn't too surprising.

I actually do think it's okay to specify in a review that you have an issue with the people that they allow to host in their venue. You haven't illustrated anything that isn't respecting freedom of speech as it's literally using it.

Don't even know what the second paragraph relates to. So just an insane rant or what?

Patty Hearst wrote: »

He clearly said on twitter (before the bombardment) that he knew about ACI and Gemma and did not agree with everything she said but believed in Free Speech.

But The 21st Century Brownshirts put an end to that.

It's perfectly possible that they simply concluded that it's bad press and not the type of group you wish to associate with. Get over it Patty.

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Gonna respond in numbered order...

1. Generally relates them to conspiracies so actual relevant points disappear

2. Her mass migration crap, the majority of the time relies on propaganda by far right groups/outlets.

3. She's a bit of a transphobe, as are you. Shocker.

4. Her porn crap was trying to create hysteria. Another shocker

5. This is a matter of opinion again.

6. 99% around fake news conspiracies

7. Nonsense, not a fan of people before profit but I haven't seen her highlight anything of note.


So it's more like she's validating your existing opinions and how she's going about it, simply does not matter to you.

The existing opinions of an exponentially increasing amount of people all over Europe as you will find out soon.

Patty Hearst

The laughable thing is that some people are so stupid that they do not realise that when things get hot enough FF/FG will throw PBP and assorted lefties to the wolves.

Thats why they're called useful idiots.

blackwhite

Patty Hearst wrote: »

He clearly said on twitter (before the bombardment) that he knew about ACI and Gemma and did not agree with everything she said but believed in Free Speech.

But The 21st Century Brownshirts put an end to that.

I know Michael personally. He wasn’t aware of half the evil sh1te Gemma and her nasty band of acolytes were espousing. When made aware of the sort of scum that follows & supports her he didn’t want that sort of person coming in (and possibly seeing it as a place to revisit again)

Patty Hearst

blackwhite wrote: »

I know Michael personally. He wasn’t aware of half the evil sh1te Gemma and her nasty band of acolytes were espousing. When made aware of the sort of scum that follows & supports her he didn’t want that sort of person coming in (and possibly seeing it as a place to revisit again)

'Made aware' of what? made aware of the highly biased opinions of (Brownshirt) people who think anyone to the right of them is a Nazi.

Anyway I hope Gemma continues to book hotels because ultimately the business owners of Ireland will start to wonder if they should be bullied into submission by a group of raggedy arsed miscreants.

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

The existing opinions of an exponentially increasing amount of people all over Europe as you will find out soon.

People can have ****ty views, does not make Gemma any less of a loon or make your own views any more legitimate. In reality the number of people who Gemma actually appeals to in Ireland is relatively small.

Jackman25

batgoat wrote: »

I actually do think it's okay to specify in a review that you have an issue with the people that they allow to host in their venue. You haven't illustrated anything that isn't respecting freedom of speech as it's literally using it.

Don't even know what the second paragraph relates to. So just an insane rant or what?




It's perfectly possible that they simply concluded that it's bad press and not the type of group you wish to associate with. Get over it Patty.

Nasty and unnecessary thing to do to a rural business.

Annasopra

Patty Hearst wrote: »

'Made aware' of what? made aware of the highly biased opinions of (Brownshirt) people who think anyone to the left of them is a Nazi.

Anyway I hope Gemma continues to book hotels because ultimately the business owners of Ireland will start to wonder if they should be bullied into submission by a group of raggedy arsed miscreants.

Hilarious stuff. Hotels dont want her because they are made aware that she is an extreme racist bully

batgoat

Jackman25 wrote: »

Nasty and unnecessary thing to do to a rural business.

As specified by another user who knows the owner, it got cancelled because the owner did not realise the extent of how reprehensible Gemma's views are.... So get over yourself.

Jackman25

batgoat wrote: »

People can have ****ty views, does not make Gemma any less of a loon or make your own views any more legitimate. In reality the number of people who Gemma actually appeals to in Ireland is relatively small.

Its positively tiny I would think - phone box job.
So why don't people leave them to have their little meetings then without all the nonsense giving them unnecessary publicity.
As I said before, social media activists will never miss a chance to show their "activism".

BBFAN

As a matter of interest Patty Hearst, which party do you see winning the next election and leading us into the greater land???

Cause as far as I can see you hate any party that has any chance of even getting close to government yet see a huge sea change in our future??

What???? :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Jackman25

batgoat wrote: »

As specified by another user who knows the owner, it got cancelled because the owner did not realise the extent of how reprehensible Gemma's views are.... So get over yourself.

After reading some postings of the person in question...I personally, certainly don’t agree with some of her views, but I have little problems with free speech.

From their twitter. Looks like they were aware of Gemmas views.

batgoat

BBFAN wrote: »

As a matter of interest Patty Hearst, which party do you see winning the next election and leading us into the greater land???

Cause as far as I can see you hate any party that has any chance of even getting close to government yet see a huge sea change in our future??

What???? :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Patty went weirdly silent the other day when I sourced some of the stuff she/he was posting back to some weird Neo Nazi sites.... So interesting views to say the least.

Jackman25 wrote: »

From their twitter. Looks like they were aware of Gemmas views.

You could have an idea but know the extent fully... Eg An Spailpín Fánach which was the other place she was holding an event. They're pretty left wing so it was inevitable that they dropped her when they became aware as well.

BBFAN

Jackman25 wrote: »

Its positively tiny I would think - phone box job.
So why don't people leave them to have their little meetings then without all the nonsense giving them unnecessary publicity.
As I said before, social media activists will never miss a chance to show their "activism".

The reason is simple. As long as looneys think they have a platform they will carry on with their looney crap. The sooner they realise no-one wants to hear their crap the sooner they'll seek help with their mental problems.

blackwhite

Jackman25 wrote: »

From their twitter. Looks like they were aware of Gemmas views.

You clearly don’t understand the word “some”

Stuff like the NZ claims from a Gemma were pointed out, as well as many of the tweets and videos from the filth who support her.

Michael decided his business is better served by not having evil scum like some of those likely to turn up in support of Gemma darken it’s door

Patty Hearst

BBFAN wrote: »

As a matter of interest Patty Hearst, which party do you see winning the next election and leading us into the greater land???

Cause as far as I can see you hate any party that has any chance of even getting close to government yet see a huge sea change in our future??

What???? :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Keep an eye on the European elections.

As it happens I do not see much change yet in 'Paddy Last' perpetually behind the times Ireland.

What happens in Europe will set the stage for what happens here.

Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building.

I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties.

Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls.

If there is any kind of economic slowdown in the coming years hold on to your hats.

TheRepentent

Probably better venues cancel her meetings...AntiFa get an interest in her and her supporters, it would get messy.

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Patty went weirdly silent the other day when I sourced some of the stuff she/he was posting back to some weird Neo Nazi sites.... So interesting views to say the least.



You could have an idea but know the extent fully... Eg An Spailpín Fánach which was the other place she was holding an event. They're pretty left wing so it was inevitable that they dropped her when they became aware as well.

What was this?

BBFAN

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Keep an eye on the European elections.

As it happens I do not see much change yet in 'Paddy Last' perpetually behind the times Ireland.

What happens in Europe will set the stage for what happens here.

Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building.

I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties.

Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls.

If there is any kind of economic slowdown in the coming years hold on to your hats.

Renua are building???????

Source please.

Last I heard they were absolutely falling off the cliff, :rolleyes:

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

What was this?

You're anti-fa archived piece... I sourced the actual background to the piece which you ignored at the time. The other part was that the two main sites linking to it were of questionable origin.

blackwhite

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Keep an eye on the European elections.

As it happens I do not see much change yet in 'Paddy Last' perpetually behind the times Ireland.

What happens in Europe will set the stage for what happens here.

Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building.

I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties.

Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls.

If there is any kind of economic slowdown in the coming years hold on to your hats.

Funnily enough, I’d say most posting about GOD’s vile racism on here have f*ck all time for SF, PBP or the loony left.
We just know that Gemma is the other cheek of the same arse, a rabble-rousing lowest-common-denominator-seeking sh1te-spouter. The only difference is that she includes spouting hate on her list of populist nonsense.

Appeals to the terminally unemployable who are incapable of accepting their own deficiencies, and instead need conspiracy theories to try and convince themselves that they aren’t just a waste of space

Maurice Yeltsin

batgoat wrote: »

I actually do think it's okay to specify in a review that you have an issue with the people that they allow to host in their venue. You haven't illustrated anything that isn't respecting freedom of speech as it's literally using it.

Reviews are meant to be for customers to report their experience as paid users of a venue (or unpaid, if the place or the staff are so bad you leave without engaging).

They are not meant for a bunch of nonces to throw a hissy fit because the hotel allowed a meeting take place hosted by someone to whom you're idealogically opposed.

Don't even know what the second paragraph relates to. So just an insane rant or what?

Left wingers are generally unemployed and usually display wealth envy. They have little respect for the sacrifice it takes to get a business off the ground as most of them have no desire to earn an income beyond either welfare or working for a state funded quango (Galway Anti Racism or some other scutter).

Of course, a great deal of Gemma's followers are the exact same. The problem for your mob is that they now respect Gemma more than Ruth, Paul, Brid et al. And you're running scared.

As an aside though, despite the aforementioned clowns getting elected I'd be very surprised if the ACI movement even runs a single Dail candidate let alone gets any elected. And I'd imagine the movement is too new to organise for the council elections. Running for office would mean Gemma engaging in debate, and judging from her youtube she isn't articulate enough to do that.

BBFAN

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Keep an eye on the European elections.

As it happens I do not see much change yet in 'Paddy Last' perpetually behind the times Ireland.

What happens in Europe will set the stage for what happens here.

Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building.

I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties.

Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls.

If there is any kind of economic slowdown in the coming years hold on to your hats.

Oh and Sinn Fein are only growing by the second for the last 5 years at least. So you're obviously just spouting crap from the Daily Fail at this stage.

batgoat

blackwhite wrote: »

Funnily enough, I’d say most posting about GOD’s vile racism on here have f*ck all time for SF, PBP or the loony left.
We just know that Gemma is the other cheek of the same arse, a rabble-rousing lowest-common-denominator-seeking sh1te-spouter. The only difference is that she includes spouting hate on her list of populist nonsense.

Appeals to the terminally unemployable who are incapable of accepting their own deficiencies, and instead need conspiracy theories to try and convince themselves that they aren’t just a waste of space

Yep pretty spot on in relation to PBP and SF for me anyway. Soc Dems might get a vote off of me but not the most confident in them either. I don't have any time for Farage types either if not obvious, think politics has been infected with some incredibly dodgy individuals. Ireland is luckier than most of Europe.

gmisk

BBFAN wrote: »

Renua are building???????

Source please.

Last I heard they were absolutely falling off the cliff, :rolleyes:

The last poll I can find from end of Feb has them on less than 1%

Maurice Yeltsin

batgoat wrote: »

. In reality the number of people who Gemma actually appeals to in Ireland is relatively small.

I don't know if the CSO does an estimate of people who have dodged filling in the census form.

But if it does, that right there is Gemma's core support.

It might also be ascertained by comparing how many people vote for Solidarity/ PBP in 2015 nationwide, compared to how many votes they get the next GE. The missing amount being the defectors.

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

You're anti-fa archived piece... I sourced the actual background to the piece which you ignored at the time. The other part was that the two main sites linking to it were of questionable origin.

The interview was real, the subsequent denial was a lie.

Strange that an American hoaxer would have so many details about Ireland and Irish AntiFa isn't it?

The fact that it showed up on an American site is irrelevant. It actually showed up on Irish sites soon after it was published.

BBFAN

Maurice Yeltsin wrote: »

Reviews are meant to be for customers to report their experience as paid users of a venue (or unpaid, if the place or the staff are so bad you leave without engaging).

They are not meant for a bunch of nonces to throw a hissy fit because the hotel allowed a meeting take place hosted by someone to whom you're idealogically opposed.



Left wingers are generally unemployed and usually display wealth envy. They have little respect for the sacrifice it takes to get a business off the ground as most of them have no desire to earn an income beyond either welfare or working for a state funded quango (Galway Anti Racism or some other scutter).

Of course, a great deal of Gemma's followers are the exact same. The problem for your mob is that they now respect Gemma more than Ruth, Paul, Brid et al. And you're running scared.

As an aside though, despite the aforementioned clowns getting elected I'd be very surprised if the ACI movement even runs a single Dail candidate let alone gets any elected. And I'd imagine the movement is too new to organise for the council elections. Running for office would mean Gemma engaging in debate, and judging from her youtube she isn't articulate enough to do that.

You do know what nonce means yes??

Fairly disgusting use of the word.

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

The interview was real, the subsequent denial was a lie.

Strange that an American hoaxer would have so many details about Ireland and Irish AntiFa isn't it?

The fact that it showed up on an American site is irrelevant. It actually showed up on Irish sites soon after it was published.

First it showed on Irish fascist sites. Secondly as I pointed out at the time, it was removed because the website had accidentally found some loon, claiming to be something he was not... They stated as much...

The fact that Neo Nazi groups were pushing it would indicate that they were likely responsible for the interviewee.

AndrewJRenko

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building.

I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties.

Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls.

What exactly are they building?



I'm no fan of PBP but they have multiple times the support of any of the far-right crazies. They actually have TDs, and Councillors. Let's revisit this post after the local elections and see how many Councillors Renua get.

For Forks Sake

gmisk wrote: »

The last poll I can find from end of Feb has them on less than 1%

Or if their current trajectory continues, "the margin of error party"

Patty Hearst

BBFAN wrote: »

You do know what nonce means yes??

Fairly disgusting use of the word.

The founder of Anti Fa Ireland was certainly a Nonce..a convicted Nonce.

Maurice Yeltsin

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

I'm no fan of PBP but they have multiple times the support of any of the far-right crazies. They actually have TDs, and Councillors. .

It's only their student activists and the older union types that are bona fide left wing.

Their core following are plain anti establishment, unemployable conspiracy theorists, most of them anti abortion. Since the last election ISIS attacks went through the roof, abortion passed, and our refugee intake increased. Three issues either supported outright by or tacitly condoned by AAA etc. This has impacted a lot of their core group.

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

The founder of Anti Fa Ireland was certainly a Nonce..a convicted Nonce.

Here we go again, prove it. Your source for this specific claim is the Kilkenny Journal aka crazy man's blog. It seems like facts aren't a biggy for you.

https://www.facebook.com/KilkennyJournal/posts/antifa-leader-found-guilty-of-being-a-paedophile-this-is-the-fella-calling-other/1015740601826613/

Jackman25

BBFAN wrote: »

The reason is simple. As long as looneys think they have a platform they will carry on with their looney crap. The sooner they realise no-one wants to hear their crap the sooner they'll seek help with their mental problems.

Yes, if people ignored them, they would probably go away. The no-platforming nonsense gives them the oxygen of publicity they crave and succour to the "conspiracy against them".

Jackman25

blackwhite wrote: »

You clearly don’t understand the word “some”

Stuff like the NZ claims from a Gemma were pointed out, as well as many of the tweets and videos from the filth who support her.

Michael decided his business is better served by not having evil scum like some of those likely to turn up in support of Gemma darken it’s door

Ah so he was just unlucky that he had only read some of the "less mad" tweets when he did his research.
OR maybe when the howling twitter mob got on his case he had a change of heart.
I'll choose to believe the latter thanks.

Birneybau

Patty Hearst wrote: »

In any case you are losing and the tide is turning, its happening all over Europe it will happen here too.

The amount of ordinary non political people who lately have expressed to me an absolute loathing of the PBP, Sinn Fein, SJW class was quite something to behold.

The fact that they have to attempt to shut down Gemma at every turn shows how desperate they are.

Wasn't Patty Hearst's defense at her trial as being part of the Symbionese Liberation Army, that she had been brainwashed?

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Here we go again, prove it. Your source for this specific claim is the Kilkenny Journal aka crazy man's blog. It seems like facts aren't a biggy for you.

https://www.facebook.com/KilkennyJournal/posts/antifa-leader-found-guilty-of-being-a-paedophile-this-is-the-fella-calling-other/1015740601826613/

AntiFa themselves admitted that he was a founding member and was subsequently expelled. Its the truth

If you want to engage in Catholic Church style denials go right ahead. I'm not getting into this again.

People are free to research themselves.

Patty Hearst

Birneybau wrote: »

Wasn't Patty Hearst's defense at her trial as being part of the Symbionese Liberation Army, that she had been brainwashed?

Yes just like the ISIS bride who is returning to Ireland...the one the Irish media tells us was 'brainwashed'

Birneybau

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Yes just like the ISIS bride who is returning to Ireland...the one the Irish media tells us was 'brainwashed'

So?

At the time of her arrest, Patty Hearst weighed only 87 pounds (40 kg) and was described by Dr. Margaret Singer in October 1975 as "a low-IQ, low-affect zombie".[41] Shortly after her arrest, there were some clear signs of trauma: her IQ was measured as 112, whereas it had previously been 130; there were huge gaps in her memory regarding her pre-Tania life; she was smoking heavily and had nightmares.[42] Without a mental illness or defect, a person was held fully responsible for any criminal action not done under duress, defined as a clear and present threat of death or serious injury.[43][44] Securing an acquittal on the basis of brainwashing would be completely unprecedented.[45][46]