When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

pjohnson

Dr Brown wrote: »

I've never heard of any "far right" people who support asylum seekers.

Rambling about supermosques and #goodbyeIreland doesnt seem very supportive?

Or a you stuck in a timewarp again?

batgoat

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

Doubt he'd admit that he himself is far right...

Dr Brown

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force?

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

Annasopra

Dr Brown wrote: »

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma O'Doherty is a far right radicalising force?

Dr Brown

Dr Brown wrote: »

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

Ah so not as racist as yourself so not good enough to be included as far as your concerned gotcha clear now cheers

batgoat

Dr Brown wrote: »

Because shes not "far right" you can't be "far right" if you support Asylum Seekers.


That would be like someone who was a member of UKIP but opposed Brexit.

She runs frequent conspiracies about asylum seekers. She does nothing to support them..

Dr Brown

batgoat wrote: »

She runs frequent conspiracies about asylum seekers. She does nothing to support them..

She was involved in a court case were she deafened an asylum seeker.

Annasopra

Dr Brown wrote: »

She was involved in a court case were she deafened an asylum seeker.

Why do you try to deny she is a far right radicalising force? Why do you defend her all the time? Why do you try to minimise everything far right that she says?

Bannasidhe

Dr Brown wrote: »

There is a much bigger terror threat from left wing fascists than there is from any so called far right (ie normal people who are concerned with the direction the country is going.)

batgoat wrote: »

Doubt he'd admit that he himself is far right...

Oh, I dunno.

I thought that was a very telling statement.

According to the Dr those seen as 'far right' are actually the normal people.

Drawing the line of normality that far right is certainly an indication of where his political beliefs lie.

That and his constant use of the oxymoron lefty fascists. He understands 'fascists' are bad m'kay but the right aren't bad because they are just Mr Normal Concerned Citizen and absolutely not fascists even though fascists are by definition on the right not the left but but but National Socialism so they were really LEFTIES! .... or something.... free speech.

Odhinn

Dr Brown wrote: »

Can you imagine the out cry there would be if a group of "far right" thugs attacked the leader of legitimate political party ? we would rightly never hear the end of it. But when its far left thugs there is a deafening silence from the establishment.

The "national party" are not registered as a political party, fyi.

Bannasidhe

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Thats more bullsh it bingo deflection phrases for you to add Bannasidhe

*But "left wing" fascists
*But AFA
*But free speech
*But left violence
*But the kilkenny journal
*But but but Mary Boyle

Gemma is now beyond defensible and it really is about scrabbling around to find any old sh ite to deflect.

I mean this kind of deflection wants to deny that Gemma is radicalising people to make death threats against Angela Merkel and Fiona O'Leary, to deny the vast similarities between what Gemma says and the Christchurch manifesto.

Why are you trying to deny that Gemma is a far right radicalising force Dr Brown?
Why are you ok with Fiona O'Leary being harassed and bullied and threatened Dr Brown?

Well feck it. Now I'll have to ask Soros for a few quid to buy a bigger bingo ball. :mad:

Arthur Daley

I see Gemma had RFK junior on her youtube tonight. Presumably he's deemed a fruitcake and all.

jeremyj1968

Gemma is having a protest outside RTE this weekend. That sounds like a great idea to be honest. For the hypocrisy of the socialist hero Joe Duffy alone I'll join that protest.

jeremyj1968

Arthur Daley wrote: »

I see Gemma had RFK junior on her youtube tonight. Presumably he's deemed a fruitcake and all.

Yeah, found it very hard to listen to though, I think he has something wrong with his voice. Veeery difficult to listen to him. And that's not a criticism of the man, unfortunately he seems to have an issue.

But the thought did cross my mind, one of the families that Tubridy holds up as his heroes, and here is bobby saying that he has questions about vaccines. I am wondering if tomorrow we will have Bill Clinton saying that immigration is a bad idea. :pac:

Larbre34

Two things that never get old:

1. Making fun of Anti-Vaxxers

2. Their children.

lbc2019

pjohnson wrote: »

Rambling about supermosques and #goodbyeIreland doesnt seem very supportive?

Or a you stuck in a timewarp again?

Tasty and tempting halal food at... Supermosques

batgoat

Arthur Daley wrote: »

I see Gemma had RFK junior on her youtube tonight. Presumably he's deemed a fruitcake and all.

When it comes to vaccines, he is a fruitcake...... Thinks vaccines cause autism which is categorically untrue.

Annasopra

Bannasidhe wrote: »

Oh, I dunno.

I thought that was a very telling statement.

According to the Dr those seen as 'far right' are actually the normal people.

Drawing the line of normality that far right is certainly an indication of where his political beliefs lie.

That and his constant use of the oxymoron lefty fascists. He understands 'fascists' are bad m'kay but the right aren't bad because they are just Mr Normal Concerned Citizen and absolutely not fascists even though fascists are by definition on the right not the left but but but National Socialism so they were really LEFTIES! .... or something.... free speech.

Yep very telling

It explains why he goes to huge lengths to defend Gemma and to minimise, deny and brush off her far right tendencies. Kinda funny too that Gemma is as far right as She is but apparently not far right enough for Dr B. Says a lot about Dr B.

humberklog

RFK is also a big environmentalist who believes in the scientists that mankind is somewhat responsible for climate change. Did Gemma delve into this topic with RFK?

She has previously posted that children are being brainwashed by marxist globalists into believing that human's are partly responsible for climate change.

For Forks Sake

Dr Brown wrote: »

She was involved in a court case were she deafened an asylum seeker.

That's a wonderful freudian slip right there

pjohnson

Odhinn wrote: »

The "national party" are not registered as a political party, fyi.

Pfft whats registration? None of his anti-vex doctors are registered either.

Odhinn

pjohnson wrote: »

Pfft whats registration? None of his anti-vex doctors are registered either.

True. Taking that on board I'd like to be referred to as His Holiness The Pope in all subsequent posts.

Dr Brown

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Why do you try to deny she is a far right radicalising force? Why do you defend her all the time? Why do you try to minimise everything far right that she says?

Shes not "far right" her main issue is corruption.


People calling her "far right" are just trying to smear her.

batgoat

Dr Brown wrote: »

Shes not "far right" her main issue is corruption.


People calling her "far right" are just trying to smear her.

Her main cause is conspiracy theories...

Annasopra

Dr Brown wrote: »

Shes not "far right" her main issue is corruption.


People calling her "far right" are just trying to smear her.

Not far right enough for you?

Dr Brown

Bannasidhe wrote: »

Oh, I dunno.

I thought that was a very telling statement.

According to the Dr those seen as 'far right' are actually the normal people.

Drawing the line of normality that far right is certainly an indication of where his political beliefs lie.

That and his constant use of the oxymoron lefty fascists. He understands 'fascists' are bad m'kay but the right aren't bad because they are just Mr Normal Concerned Citizen and absolutely not fascists even though fascists are by definition on the right not the left but but but National Socialism so they were really LEFTIES! .... or something.... free speech.

Mussolini was actually a Leftist who looked up to Stalin.

batgoat

Dr Brown wrote: »

Mussolini was actually a Leftist who looked up to Stalin.

Ah christ, are you never filled with bollock, Mussolini was far right. Are you gonna claim that Hitler was left wing next? You are constantly espousing propaganda while I'm not sure if you've said a word of truth yet.

Bannasidhe

Dr Brown wrote: »

Mussolini was actually a Leftist who looked up to Stalin.

Do you really want to get into history with me?
Really really??

Dr Brown

Dr Brown wrote: »

Mussolini was actually a Leftist who looked up to Stalin.

That's some alternate universe your living in.

Pherekydes

Dr Brown wrote: »

Mussolini was actually a Leftist who looked up to Stalin.

What is this new devilry?

lbc2019

DubInMeath wrote: »

That's some alternate universe your living in.

Imagine being that far right of Mussolini, he seems lefty to you...

pjohnson

Its a amusing Parody account. I thought it would gone into retirement after this morning but its had some quality this evening.

lbc2019

lbc2019 wrote: »

Imagine being that far right of Mussolini, he seems lefty to you...

I'm thinking just old man yells at cloud. Other theories too such as a quote stating there's no cure for being a

Dr Brown

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Not far right enough for you?

Politically I would be left of centre.


I have a lot of respect for Gemma but I don't support her.

batgoat

Dr Brown wrote: »

Politically I would be left of centre.


I have a lot of respect for Gemma but I don't support her.

No you aren't...

Snickers Man

batgoat wrote: »

Ah christ, are you never filled with bollock, Mussolini was far right. Are you gonna claim that Hitler was left wing next?

Mussolini WAS a socialist. Leading member of the Italian socialist party, editor of Avanti, Italy's main socialist newspaper. So were many eventual members of his Fascist party. Including one of those strung up with him in Milan at the end of the war.

And the name of Hitler's party was the National Socialist German Workers' Party

So yeah. It's an easy one to claim.

BTW I am also in full agreement with the proposition that Gemma O'Doherty is indeed "batshyt crazy"

batgoat

Snickers Man wrote: »

Mussolini WAS a socialist. Leading member of the Italian socialist party, editor of Avanti, Italy's main socialist newspaper. So were many eventual members of his Fascist party. Including one of those strung up with him in Milan at the end of the war.

And the name of Hitler's party was the National Socialist German Workers' Party

So yeah. It's an easy one to claim.

BTW I am also in full agreement with the proposition that Gemma O'Doherty is indeed "batshyt crazy"

Mussolini did go on to condemn the Italian Socialist Party after leaving so it was more an early part of his life. In terms of the naming scheme for the Nazi Party, it was more evoking a type of image rather than exposing there actual political leanings.

Got a feeling you may already agree with this.

donkeykong5

Dr Brown wrote: »

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Not far right enough for you?

Politically I would be left of centre.


I have a lot of respect for Gemma but I don't support her.

I also have a lot of support for Gemma. But I DO support her.

Dr Brown

donkeykong5 wrote: »

I also have a lot of support for Gemma. But I DO support her.

Anyone who is against corruption should at the very least allow her meetings to take place.

francois

Dr Brown wrote: »

Anyone who is against corruption should at the very least allow her meetings to take place.

Hi Gemma!

Annasopra

Dr Brown wrote: »

Politically I would be left of centre.


I have a lot of respect for Gemma but I don't support her.

Left of centre?

That's a joke

You were only saying earlier that you support bringing back the apartheid regime. Not only that but you claim you don't support Gemma because she supported refugees i.e. - Gemma isn't extreme anti refugees enough for you. You are also perfectly fine with quoting from Michael McGrath who campaigned to jail, murder and execute gay people and who is a well known neo Nazi.

Nah your political views are far right. Very far right.

AndrewJRenko

Dr Brown wrote: »

Anyone who is against corruption should at the very least allow her meetings to take place.

Surely if you're a fan of free speech, you would be supportive of those people who speak their anti-Gemma views to the operators of these establishments. If you like free speech, that includes liking those who speak freely in disagreement to you.

gman2k

Dr Brown wrote:

Anyone who is against corruption should at the very least allow her meetings to take place.

What is she proposing about corruption?
Her recent online activity consists of:
5g, anti vacc, boycott hotels, boycott hair salons, globalism, anti media (TV & newspapers) anti Muslim, Sweden, anti immigrant, anti abortion, 9/11, political traitors, Soros, gaslighting about those opposing her being fascist and anti free speech, gaslighting about those in power having mental disorders with narcissistic personalities.
No concrete proposals on how to deal with the corruption. Luckily we already have laws in place, a relatively independent judiciary, unarmed police and functioning democracy.
Ireland scores higher than the USA on perceived corruption....
tradingeconomics.com/ireland/corruption-index
Nobody has ever prevented her from having free speech. What has happened is that private entities (hotels and social media) have decided not to give her a platform. Nobody has stopped her from getting on a soapbox.
Her playbook is exactly out of the 1920s Fascist movement, calling the current politicians traitors and corrupt, whilst apportioning blame on immigrants and religious groups, shadowy global Jewish masters...
Simple thought experiment- Replace her rhetoric about Islam with Jews and you will see we have come full circle.
She has whipped up some of the fascists enough that they are now calling for direct action, storming the Dail etc.
And you and her supporters go on and on and on about free speech when
1: It has never been denied to you
2: She is anti free speech, blocking those who ask simple questions.

This country is far from perfect, but guess what? Nowhere is. And her populist far right agenda would only lead to a far right fascist dictator.

rgossip30

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Left of centre?

That's a joke

You were only saying earlier that you support bringing back the apartheid regime. Not only that but you claim you don't support Gemma because she supported refugees i.e. - Gemma isn't extreme anti refugees enough for you. You are also perfectly fine with quoting from Michael McGrath who campaigned to jail, murder and execute gay people and who is a well known neo Nazi.

Nah your political views are far right. Very far right.

I can see at this point your views are far left .

Boggles

rgossip30 wrote: »

I can see at this point your views are far left .

Because they oppose apartheid and execution based on sexual preference?

Are you okay?

AndrewJRenko

gman2k wrote: »

boycott hair salons

Really? Tell me more, I need a good laugh this morning.

rgossip30

Boggles wrote: »

Because they oppose apartheid and execution based on sexual preference?

Are you okay?

This thread is about GoD nothing to do with what are trying to say ?You got proof she supports those views you claim.

Boggles

rgossip30 wrote: »

This thread is about GoD nothing to do with what are trying to say ?You got proof she supports those views you claim.

I'm pretty sure the poster you were referring to doesn't support those views.

You should ask them though, not me.

rgossip30

gman2k wrote: »

This country is far from perfect, but guess what? Nowhere is. And her populist far right agenda would only lead to a far right fascist dictator.

A far left facist dictator is just as likely a possibility.

super_furry

rgossip30 wrote: »

A far left facist dictator is just as likely a possibility.

In Ireland? Where we've never ever had a centre-left Taoiseach?