When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

is_that_so

humberklog wrote: »

She's registered today for the EU elections. Doesn't say which constituency but i presume Dublin?

Hopefully she gets plenty of air time and asked more indepthly about some of her ideas.

So Gemna, everyone who watches The Late Late is a traitor?

She'll be in the no-expenses brigade.

SoundsRight

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Please elaborate.

The event they had planned in Deansgrange library, where they invited parents to offer up their children to drag queens. Common sense prevailed.

francois

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Please elaborate.

Dun Laoghaire CC has dropped the drag group Glitter Hole from a kids story telling event in the library, after a load of triggered snowflakes had a go on social media

Timberrrrrrrr

SoundsRight wrote: »

The event they had planned in Deansgrange library, where they invited parents to offer up their children to drag queens. Common sense prevailed.

Likr sacrificial lambs?

What do you mean "common sense prevailed"?

Penn

SoundsRight wrote: »

The event they had planned in Deansgrange library, where they invited parents to offer up their children to drag queens. Common sense prevailed.

As a sacrifice to the Drag Gods or as food?

VinLieger

SoundsRight wrote: »

The event they had planned in Deansgrange library, where they invited parents to offer up their children to drag queens. Common sense prevailed.

Yep thats exactly what they were doing. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Maybe in your head its what was happening to you though.....

AndrewJRenko

francois wrote: »

Dun Laoghaire CC has dropped the drag group Glitter Hole from a kids story telling event in the library, after a load of triggered snowflakes had a go on social media

Presumably you're against ALL scenarios of men in dresses telling fairy stories to children

francois

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Presumably you're against ALL scenarios of men in dresses telling fairy stories to children
http://sacredheartcarlton.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/IMG_1680.jpg

I'm not against it in the slightest, in fact it was a poor decision by the CC.

AndrewJRenko

SoundsRight wrote: »

The event they had planned in Deansgrange library, where they invited parents to offer up their children to drag queens. Common sense prevailed.

Presumably you're against ALL scenarios of men in dresses telling fairy stories to children

kunst nugget

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Likr sacrificial lambs?

What do you mean "common sense prevailed"?

You know, where there's enough threats of violence that it becomes a safety concern and the event has to be cancelled to protect everyone from intimidation and injury. That sort of common sense...

SoundsRight

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Likr sacrificial lambs?

What do you mean "common sense prevailed"?

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

francois

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Presumably you're against ALL scenarios of men in dresses telling fairy stories to children

I'm not sure why you are having a pop at me, I disagree with the decision to stop the event.

Penn

SoundsRight wrote: »

I'm not even sure if it's legal.

What law do you think it might break? Genuine question.

AndrewJRenko

francois wrote: »

I'm not sure why you are having a pop at me, I disagree with the decision to stop the event.

My mistake - I meant to reply to the other lad

kunst nugget

SoundsRight wrote: »

I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Ah, put a bit of effort into your trolling...

circadian

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Either trolling or ****ing thick.

Timberrrrrrrr

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

What?


Why would it be illegal? So thats it kids, no more Panto at xmas cos we cant be having a man dress up as the wicked stepmother or evil queen :rolleyes:

AndrewJRenko

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Is this legal?

circadian

G'wan, sure post it one more time there.

gmisk

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Is this legal?

SoundsRight

kunst nugget wrote: »

Ah, put a bit of effort into your trolling...

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

AndrewJRenko

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

Why would you think there was sexual content involved?

gmisk

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

Any idea what the proposed "sexual content" was going to be?
As far as i am aware it was just going to be a reading of a kids story?
I think its a total storm in a teacup, it isnt as if anyone was being forced to bring their bloody kids to it but hey its cancelled now.

Birneybau

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

The lady doth protest too much (and we generally know what that's hiding)

SoundsRight

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Why would you think there was sexual content involved?

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

gmisk

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

yes a man in a dress is exactly the same thing as watching pornhub :rolleyes: your just being ridiculous now.
I have seen some drag queens who look more like someone who would fit your boiler...just in a dress, not exactly hyper-sexualised.
Also I am not sure what this has to do with Gemma O Doherty....
How would you feel if the story was being read by people dressed as unicorns?

Penn

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

Interesting that you find drag queens to be so sexual... Very interesting...

circadian

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Here's something that'll blow your mind. My wee man went into crèche last week in his sister's dress because he was adamant he wanted to wear it. **** it I thought, if that's what he wants so be it. Absolutely nothing wrong with a fella wearing women's clothes. It's only sexual if you think it's sexual.

It's like people who are homophobic. I can't think of something more gay than concerning yourself and obsessing over what two people do with their genitals.

kunst nugget

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

The safety risk was the performers being beaten up by people who want to 'protect the children'. Nothing to do with the content of the show...

Hurrache

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

You've plenty of time to prep for your campaign come panto season. Don't say you weren't given the heads up.

Oh yes you were....

AndrewJRenko

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

Have a look at the photo and see if you want to take another go at that post

https://twitter.com/GlitterHoleDub/status/1117702595240501248?s=19

CosmicFool

It's a pity it cancelled but come on lads, glitterhole? Not exactly a great name for a kids story telling.

Timberrrrrrrr

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

And do you know why there was a safety risk? Wanna take a guess as to what the safety risk was?

SoundsRight

Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

RIP Ireland.

Bannasidhe

Ragerage wrote: »

It really is sad to see the level of degeneracy in Ireland now. Sure, send your son to school in drag. What could possibly go wrong?

Liberal Ireland is on a self-hating suicide march.

Hello new user.
Welcome to the Gemmadome.

Timberrrrrrrr

Ragerage wrote: »

It really is sad to see the level of degeneracy in Ireland now. Sure, send your son to school in drag. What could possibly go wrong?

Liberal Ireland is on a self-hating suicide march.

Says the chap who took time to rereg just so he could post a few words of utter scutter :rolleyes:

Timberrrrrrrr

SoundsRight wrote: »

Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

RIP Ireland.

Jaysus you even know all the words! Is your address somwhere in Narnia by any chance?

Bannasidhe

SoundsRight wrote: »

Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

RIP Ireland.

You ok hun?

I would say tell Aunty Dyke all about it but I can't be bothered with your shyte.

B0jangles

How tremendously, unbelievably insecure do you have to be to feel that masculinity is threatened because a man wears a dress?

Like, do you cover your eyes and say a wee prayer for protection from Satan every time you see a woman in trousers, or is that just 'different' for some reason?

Bannasidhe

B0jangles wrote: »

How tremendously, unbelievably insecure do you have to be to feel that masculinity is threatened because a man wears a dress?

Like, do you cover your eyes and say a wee prayer for protection from Satan every time you see a woman in trousers, or is that just 'different' for some reason?

About as insecure as if you are in a panic about your culture disappearing because .01% of the population might do things belonging to their own foreign culture in a public place.

SoundsRight

We should all send our boys to school in fishnet tights and leather basques in solidarity.

frag420

SoundsRight wrote: »

You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

That’s sounds like something a paedo groomer would do, are you a paedo groomer?

Timberrrrrrrr

SoundsRight wrote: »

We should all send our boys to school in fishnet tights and leather basques in solidarity.

I bet you typed that with one hand

B0jangles

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I bet you typed that with one hand

I was just thinking that sounded like a particularly fevered imagination at work.

SoundsRight

Would drag queens have a higher rate of infection of AIDS/HIV compared to the normal population? Perhaps that was the safety risk.

Bannasidhe

SoundsRight wrote: »

Would drag queens have a higher rate of infection of AIDS/HIV compared to the normal population? Perhaps that was the safety risk.

No they do not you homophobic little oik.

The "safety risk" was people just like you threatening the venue and the performers.

As a mother and a grandmother I can say in absolute honesty that I would far prefer my son when he was small, and my grandchildren were in the company of drag queens and kings than someone whose mind is so consumed with bigotry that you project your own filthy thought on others.

Mods - if you feel the need to sanction me fair enough but I am really very angry at the appalling things this poster is saying.

Timberrrrrrrr

SoundsRight wrote: »

Would drag queens have a higher rate of infection of AIDS/HIV compared to the normal population? Perhaps that was the safety risk.

The safety risk was because if the threats if violence towards the drag queens, homophobes will always try and equate with child abuse or aids :rolleyes:

For Forks Sake

SoundsRight wrote: »

Would drag queens have a higher rate of infection of AIDS/HIV compared to the normal population? Perhaps that was the safety risk.

SoundsRight wrote: »

We should all send our boys to school in fishnet tights and leather basques in solidarity.

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

SoundsRight wrote: »

Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

RIP Ireland.

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

The only creepy thing going on is you obsession with the personal lives of others, masked under faux concern

super_furry

Christ, I hope he never finds out about pantomime dames. Buffy and Sammy Sausages will need a restraining order.

donspeekinglesh

CosmicFool wrote: »

It's a pity it cancelled but come on lads, glitterhole? Not exactly a great name for a kids story telling.