Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread VII (Please read OP before posting)

1314315317319320325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,762 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Spelman passed, well well well


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Good grief 312 v 308 the Ayes have it. Government defeated


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,051 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    4 votes, wow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,234 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Pointless anyway as unless they agree to the WA the default is no deal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    devnull wrote: »
    They've been far better than the BBC throughout the whole Brexit debacle for me.

    The BeeB seems to be more concerned these days on having gender balance on their panels and contributors.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Patser


    4 votes!!!!! 308 MPs thought no deal was a good idea?!?!?!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    devnull wrote: »
    Amendment A (Caroline Spelman) Result

    This calls for MPs to reject leaving without a deal in any circumstance.

    PASSED

    Yes - 312
    No - 308
    Majority - 4

    That are insane!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Pointless anyway as unless they agree to the WA the default is no deal.

    Must they not adjust legislation accordingly?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,483 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Patser wrote: »
    4 votes!!!!! 308 MPs thought no deal was a good idea?!?!?!?

    Seems to be absolutely disgraceful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,132 ✭✭✭✭briany


    A non-binding vote? With a slim majority? Where have I seen that before?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Does this oblige the British government to revoke A50 if it gets down to the wire with no deal in place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,225 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Jesus that was a bit close for comfort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Surprised it was so close. Many MPs still away with the fairies, or should we say unicorns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,234 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    The BeeB seems to be more concerned these days on having gender balance on their panels and contributors.

    Nothing to do with that in the slightest, bizzare comment given the political editor of Sky News is a woman and Kay Burley is playing a blinder. You see reverse sexism everywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Kalyke


    The list of Tory rebels will be crucial!


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,681 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Next Vote

    Amendment F (Malthouse v2)
    This instructs the government to extend Article 50 until 22nd May and offer a transitional phase until end of 2021, with no backstop commitment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    So all we need for now deal in May and 2 others to jump ship?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,470 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    briany wrote: »
    A non-binding vote? With a slim majority? Where have I seen that before?

    Another defeat for the government whip. TMs ammended bill still a free vote, will be interesting to see that result


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,422 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Has to be a few big cabinet minsters or 'ex' cabinet ministers in that defeat?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    devnull wrote: »
    Next Vote

    Amendment F
    This instructs the government to extend Article 50 until 22nd May and offer a transitional phase until end of 2021, with no backstop commitment.

    Pointless either way as the EU will never buy it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,192 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    devnull wrote: »
    Next Vote

    Amendment F
    This instructs the government to extend Article 50 until 22nd May and offer a transitional phase until end of 2021, with no backstop commitment.

    This is tomorrow, isn't it?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,331 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Does this oblige the British government to revoke A50 if it gets down to the wire with no deal in place?


    Nope. Non-binding vote, far as I'm aware. As someone else said, it's a bit of a pointless vote, but at least they're making a little progress on what they actually do and don't support.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Kalyke


    Has to be a few big cabinet minsters or 'ex' cabinet ministers in that defeat?
    Apparently, Ministers voting against the Gov. means automatic resignations.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    devnull wrote: »
    Next Vote

    Amendment F
    This instructs the government to extend Article 50 until 22nd May and offer a transitional phase until end of 2021, with no backstop commitment.

    That'll fail for sure. So just going around in circles as it has always been


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    This is tomorrow, isn't it?


    No, it is happening right now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,390 ✭✭✭sjb25


    4 votes, wow.

    That was very close to all our melt down


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Surprised it was so close. Many MPs still away with the fairies, or should we say unicorns.
    Technically speaking they weren't voting against no deal off the table, but against this particular version of it. Party politics and a preference for a more meaningless type of brexit off the table vote. But who knows for sure?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Kalyke


    devnull wrote: »
    Next Vote

    Amendment F (Malthouse v2)
    This instructs the government to extend Article 50 until 22nd May and offer a transitional phase until end of 2021, with no backstop commitment.
    The Malthouse Compromise, no?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,681 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Kalyke wrote: »
    The Malthouse Compromise, no?

    That's why I called it Malthouse :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Shelga


    So May whipped her government to vote No, is that why the gap was so small?

    Sorry, I’m getting confused about the structure of the amendments and what yes and no mean.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement