Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Scarlets vs Munster match thread, Sat 2nd March 5pm

2

Comments

  • #52
    ionadnapokot
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,859 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    thomond2006 wrote: »
    Ugly defence for the Scarlets try, though the offload was good.

    17 tackles made by Munster??
    140 tackles by Scarlets

    Can someone check that?


  • #53
    Burkie1203
    Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    ionadnapokot wrote: »
    17 tackles made by Munster??
    140 tackles by Scarlets

    Can someone check that?

    147 - 23 from few ppl on twitter

    Crazy stats


    Dumb from Loughman (?) There


  • #54
    yerrahbah
    Registered Users Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭yerrahbah


    Marshall shouldn't be tapping and going there


  • #55
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Idiotic from Goggin. Head wrecking stuff. Fonotia looked at the ref while giving away his penalty though, proper shíthousing.


  • #56
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    yerrahbah wrote: »
    Marshall shouldn't be tapping and going there

    It was a good call...not his fault that Goggin was over exuberant


  • #57
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Cassiem has 23 tackles already at this point of the game


  • #58
    Burkie1203
    Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Scarlets harsh done by there. Never a pen


  • #59
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Neither of those were penalties. The crowd bought the first so they can’t complain now.


  • #60
    yerrahbah
    Registered Users Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭yerrahbah


    Have to get a score here


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Definitely a try


  • #62
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    not bound to the maul. off side


  • #63
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Scarlets 9 wasn’t even interested in the tackle he rolled out of the way of the two lads.


  • #64
    thomond2006
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Ugh.


  • #65
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Holland not happy..and he's not wrong


  • #66
    Burkie1203
    Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    Holland not happy..and he's not wrong

    Marshall was in front so its offside.

    Should be Munster Pen for the high shot on Botha and YC minimum


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Flincher
    Registered Users Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Flincher


    There's a nasty late shot by Scarlets 20 as the maul ended. Tmo really should have picked that up.


  • #68
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Too much to ask the lads in comms to highlight red 20, too busy talking to Shane Williams about hating this weather


  • #69
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Marshall was in front so its offside.

    Should be Munster Pen for the high shot on Botha and YC minimum

    The one thing that the ref didn't ask about is offside,


  • #70
    Former Former
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    razorblunt wrote: »
    Scarlets 9 wasn’t even interested in the tackle he rolled out of the way of the two lads.

    Yeah, Marshall didn't even need to be there, Kleyn would have steamrolled him on his own. Trying to be too clever


  • #71
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Ah Botha FFS


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Scarlets jumping over and offside again. .and again


  • #73
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    We're spending way too much time in the Scarlets 22 with no tries to show for it.

    The conditions are awful, but we should be winning this game


  • #74
    thomond2006
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Shocking waste of a brilliant line from Sweetnam.


  • #75
    Burkie1203
    Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    The one thing that the ref didn't ask about is offside,

    The ref reviewed. Marshall was in front of the ball carrier and dragged him up from the ground. That is offside effectively. It's like playing a knock on from in front.


  • #76
    Burkie1203
    Registered Users Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Akrasia wrote: »
    We're spending way too much time in the Scarlets 22 with no tries to show for it.

    The conditions are awful, but we should be winning this game

    Why are they not taking the 3 points.


  • #77
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    The ref reviewed. Marshall was in front of the ball carrier and dragged him up from the ground. That is offside effectively. It's like playing a knock on from in front.

    It wasn't offside,


  • #78
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    It wasn't offside,

    The maul is over when the ball carrier goes to ground. Marshall kept playing from in front of the ball, he was offside


  • #79
    molloyjh
    Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    It wasn't offside,

    It was. They broke from the maul, Marshall was in front of the ball carrier. That’s offside.


  • #80
    The Lost Sheep
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    It wasn't offside,
    It 100% was. Maul was complete. Player in front of ball carrier couldnt do as they did. They were offside as in front of ball carrier


  • #81
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Why are they not taking the 3 points.
    Drop goals?


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Akrasia wrote: »
    The maul is over when the ball carrier goes to ground. Marshall kept playing from in front of the ball, he was offside

    Did the ref call offside...


  • #83
    molloyjh
    Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    Did the ref call offside...

    Upon reviewing with the TMO he did.


  • #84
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    molloyjh wrote: »
    Upon reviewing with the TMO he did.

    Really, thought he gave it for impeding a scarlet defender


  • #85
    yerrahbah
    Registered Users Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭yerrahbah


    Ah Botha, come on man


  • #86
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    As it stands, Munster aren't looking likely to get the try they need


  • #87
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    Really, thought he gave it for impeding a scarlet defender
    If he was in the maul, he would have been allowed to impede the scarlet tackler, but because the maul was over, he was offside and shouldn't have been involved in play.


  • #88
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    One of the games where it feels like Munster could be out there till tomorrow and still wouldn't score a try....


  • #89
    thomond2006
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    AgreeableUnitedAustraliansilkyterrier-size_restricted.gif


  • #90
    molloyjh
    Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    Really, thought he gave it for impeding a scarlet defender

    In an offside position. He explained that they broke from the mail and so Marshall was offside and prevented a defender from making a tackle.


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Mike Oxlong wrote: »
    As it stands, Munster aren't looking likely to get the try they need

    Oh ye of little faith


  • #92
    Defunkd
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭Defunkd


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Marshall was in front so its offside.

    Should be Munster Pen for the high shot on Botha and YC minimum
    A shoulder to the head is red. Got Botha in the jaw.


  • #93
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Akrasia wrote: »
    Oh ye of little faith

    Scarlets have grown into the game now and look very comfortable


  • #94
    KrustyUCC
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Only Munster could lose a game having that much possession and territory

    No imagination unfortunately


  • #95
    Mike Oxlong
    Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭Mike Oxlong


    Last chance saloon


  • #96
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    balls


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    Clegg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,225 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That's that.

    Good win for Scarlets.


  • #98
    thomond2006
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Awful all round. Garbage performance.


  • #99
    KrustyUCC
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Last chance saloon and they still knocked on

    Awful performance

    They got what they deserved unfortunately


  • #100
    mangobob
    Registered Users Posts: 1,149 ✭✭✭mangobob


    If I was a munster fan I would be absolutely wrecking the house now.


  • #101
    Akrasia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,603 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Scarlets have only lost once this year at home. In those conditions it was always going to be a really tight game.

    Munster should have won but we'll take the LBP


  • Advertisement
Advertisement