Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread VIII (Please read OP before posting)

Options
1213214216218219324

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    BBC, SKY both have covered this. I think Sky broke it, and BBC had a piece on it this morning.

    I wouldn't necessarily hold Corbyn up as a beacon for advancing the cause of the left at this point given his outright resistance to a peoples vote.
    Sure, but nevertheless there is a popular perception of him as a crusty socialist desperate to nationalise everything and demolish big business.

    Tbh, I expect any explanation behind the video is relatively innocent, it's just the optics that are appalling.

    A handful of braindead squaddies having a laugh rather than some deep and meaningful political statement.

    Falls into the, "I can't believe they were dumb enough to film themselves doing this" category, a category which is expanding by the minute.

    Still though, coupled with the international joke that is now Westminster, this video just serves to create suspicion that the rot is expanding across the public services.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,387 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    SNIP.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Another resignation:

    https://twitter.com/chhcalling/status/1113456229232381953

    Although it was the person in charge of making sure the disaster scenario wasn't too disastrous so no real loss.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,126 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The shocking disrespect aimed at Corbyn, considering he's doing them a favour- I don't mean disagreement with his politics or beliefs - but hatred directed at him from the British hard right - shows there are two Britain's batting it out.

    Furthermore, this has appeared on the Internet.

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/world/europe/uk-soldiers-jeremy-corbyn-shooting-range.amp.html

    BBC were slow to report it.

    British army spokesperson : "This behavior is totally unacceptable and falls well below the high standards the army expects"

    British army standards.....


    It's like Russia or some dictatorship where the army backs the far right politicians.


    It being the third parachute regiment, by past British army standards had they being firing live rounds at Corbyn, rather than paint balls at his image there would be no investigation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,872 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Hurrache wrote: »


    A "whos who" of truth botherers, charlatans and liars. And Michael Fabricant.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Haha, Eddie Mair on LBC is currently having a phone in on people who are obsessed with Brexit, while simultaneously being completely sick of it. I think a few of us on here could contribute :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 437 ✭✭Robert McGrath


    They didn't try to derail the train. They put a cable between the rails to trick the signalling system into thinking that there was a train in the block, essentially leaving the "traffic light" stuck on red. The protesters wanted to cause delays.

    I believe that the line that this protest was attempted on uses an upgraded signalling system and detected the interference on the line with minimal disruption.

    And apparently that upgraded signalling system was necessary due to EU safety standards, which is just a delicious irony


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,626 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    robinph wrote: »
    Another resignation:

    https://twitter.com/chhcalling/status/1113456229232381953

    Although it was the person in charge of making sure the disaster scenario wasn't too disastrous so no real loss.

    These resignations are all bizarre. What are we missing here? Why do so many MPs want no-deal Brexit? Its a shocking outcome


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,805 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Dead heat, reportedly, on Benn amendment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,371 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    AdamD wrote: »
    These resignations are all bizarre. What are we missing here? Why do so many MPs want no-deal Brexit? Its a shocking outcome

    Because they represent constituencies that voted strongly for Leave. Or they're deluded. Or both.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,406 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    AdamD wrote: »
    These resignations are all bizarre. What are we missing here? Why do so many MPs want no-deal Brexit? Its a shocking outcome
    Liam Fox told them Britannia will rule the waves of global trade after he has negotiated all these wonderful trade deals with the world and global Britain will be the envy of the post-EU world.

    On a serious note, it's difficult to understand. These people are the most informed of any MPs and while the likes of Fox are expected to hold this view, seeing remainers like Javid going down this road is daft.


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Schnitzler Hiyori Geta


    What is going on? This is almost comedic at this stage and if it is a tie, what do they do?


  • Registered Users Posts: 803 ✭✭✭woohoo!!!


    A sight to behold. The Irish are fine once they know their place. There's a large section of society over there who feel this way. The inherent superiority complex.

    A deal has to side line these sorts and I rate the chances at 20% cos this move is so late in the day. It's as if it's designed to fail and blame Corbyn. Outraged Brexiteers are playing their role very well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    The Ties have it!


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Schnitzler Hiyori Geta


    Bercow breaks tie for no.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,805 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    What is going on? This is almost comedic at this stage and if it is a tie, what do they do?

    If it was the Dáil, Ceann Comhairle would vote with the Government, and it would be rejected - based on the original Westminster rule, I believe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Schnitzler Hiyori Geta


    So no more indicative votes and no more meaningful votes, so... :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,509 ✭✭✭Purgative


    AdamD wrote: »
    These resignations are all bizarre. What are we missing here? Why do so many MPs want no-deal Brexit? Its a shocking outcome


    I don't get it either.


    But then I never really understood what was so bad with the back stop. Once you have the GFA there's no alternative - to my mind at least.


    And I don't understand what Cox is going on about either.


    I'm a remainer, aside from purely selfish - Brit citizen living in RoI very happily until 2016 - I really do think the UK is better off in. All this guff about soveriegnty - you do what the next big guy (Russia, China, USA) tells you to or you lose your lunch money.


    Sorry just a rant


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,228 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    So it looks like it's down to May and Corbyn.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    And apparently that upgraded signalling system was necessary due to EU safety standards, which is just a delicious irony

    It would be if it was true but it is not


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 39,903 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    If a vote summed things up then this one is it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Schnitzler Hiyori Geta


    This vote for the extension will now pass I'm sure, and the EU will be left with no option but to say "no" unless May and Corbyn can come to an agreement (IMO) by close of play on Friday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,067 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    If it was the Dáil, Ceann Comhairle would vote with the Government, and it would be rejected - based on the original Westminster rule, I believe.

    Precedence states that any vote to be carried should have a majority of the house so the Speaker, as is right, casts a vote to keep the "status quo" as it were.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    robinph wrote: »
    Another resignation:

    https://twitter.com/chhcalling/status/1113456229232381953

    Although it was the person in charge of making sure the disaster scenario wasn't too disastrous so no real loss.

    So that means the Tories are just one more resignation away from losing their majority, even with the DUP, amirite?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Precedence states that any vote to be carried should have a majority of the house so the Speaker, as is right, casts a vote to keep the "status quo" as it were.

    Can I assume that we will be hearing a string of FG ministers blame SF for this, dispite this particuar vote going one way or the other not being all that important in any case?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gooch2k9


    volchitsa wrote: »
    So that means the Tories are just one more resignation away from losing their majority, even with the DUP, amirite?

    No, he only resigned as minister. He'll now be a backbench Conservative.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    volchitsa wrote: »
    So that means the Tories are just one more resignation away from losing their majority, even with the DUP, amirite?

    No, he has resigned from his position, not from the party. He is still a conservative MP, just a backbench one now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,067 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Can I assume that we will be hearing a string of FG ministers blame SF for this, dispite this particuar vote going one way or the other not being all that important in any case?

    Unlikely, but you'll definitely hear the usuals on here having their daily SF moan when they get home from work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Can someone outline what the nature of the current vote is? What is the motion now?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Schnitzler Hiyori Geta


    312 to 311 approving a debate on the Cooper Bill. Shocking.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement