Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Who Watches the Watchmen (Our Chit Chat Thread)

Options
19293959798298

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,744 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Its the jazzmaster maestro I am after, its a chrono!

    Very reminiscent of the IWC Portugieser.
    Nice watch, and good luck finding it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    I picked up a orient kamasu at Xmas for my son for 185 euro delivered Amazon Germany. Nice watch for the money. Accuracy isn’t a big deal at this price point. Isnt orient a seiko sub brand?

    Snap, he made his choice in the end, green dialed kamasu from Jomashop, 230 with tax and delivery.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    njburke wrote: »
    Snap, he made his choice in the end, green dialed kamasu from Jomashop, 230 with tax and delivery.

    Snap!

    That's exactly what I paid for my Citizen A-T, also from the States.

    Forget the UK buy from the good old US of A.


  • Posts: 17,728 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    redlead wrote: »
    I don't get the universal love for the SKX. What's so great about it?....

    I bought an SKX171K about a year before I pulled the trigger on my longines hydroconquest. For me the SKX171K was a sort of see how I get on with an auto. I've it on a shark mesh strap and rarely wear it now.... Folk do comment on it in a complementary way though, likely the mesh catches their eye.

    Iirc mine was 15 secs / day fast or something.

    I'll likely keep it forever TBH despite practically never wearing it


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭redlead


    Fitz II wrote: »

    Telling the time is a function of a watch not the function of a watch. A watch is jewellery.
    .

    All fair points on the SKX but I disagree here. The primary reason I wear a watch is to tell the time. Yes, my phone tells the time, but my phone is in my pocket. I want the time at a glance and a watch best serves that purpose. After that, there is multiple reasons people chose to wear the watch they wear and being jewlery is just one of them (admittedly a big one with luxury pieces). I disagree with the "if you want accuracy, buy a quartz" view too. You can really appreciate mechanical things and the craft that goes into it and want the best performance out of that. It's like saying why would you want a Constable painting when you can just get a photograph; the photograph will be more accurate. Fair enough, that's a wild analogy but true to an extent.

    I agree with you on Vostoks. I love their quirkiness but ultimately nearly everything about them outside of aesthetics (which I love) is rubbish. Mine has the worst bracelet and the worst bezel I've ever encountered. I don't know what the caseback is made from but it feels horrendous. If it's not Nickel which they claim it isn't, it must be the lowest grade steel in existence.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Mr Mcgregor's latest, apparently...
    https://twitter.com/HotFreestyle/status/1349873785483259904?s=19

    Bwaaahhhaaaaaaaaaaa!

    Etc


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭The Floyd p


    The Jacbob & Co. never did it for me, although the Casino variant is probably the least egregious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭redlead


    Lorddrakul wrote: »
    Mr Mcgregor's latest, apparently...
    !

    Etc

    He's looked at one Producer Michael video too many it seems


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,744 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Just watching Antiques Roadshow.
    A Rolex 5513 with a great military provenance and history including photos and a logbook and an ultra rare underlined dial indicating Tritium early batch, aswell as the original riveted bracelet as a spare!
    £50-60k :eek:


  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭wanderer 22


    Lorddrakul wrote: »
    Mr Mcgregor's latest, apparently...
    https://twitter.com/HotFreestyle/status/1349873785483259904?s=19

    Bwaaahhhaaaaaaaaaaa!

    Etc

    The dial on the second watch he bought that day - The Rasputin Diamond Erotic Minute Repeater - is ,er, interesting: https://timeandtidewatches.com/conor-mcgregor-drops-2-2m-on-a-duo-of-knockout-jacob-co-watches/

    I would embed but suspect a threadban may result...


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,728 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Poor chap has terrible taste. Toadesque trend (Wind in the Willows).


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,059 ✭✭✭OldRio


    colm18 wrote: »
    The dial on the second watch he bought that day - The Rasputin Diamond Erotic Minute Repeater - is ,er, interesting: https://timeandtidewatches.com/conor-mcgregor-drops-2-2m-on-a-duo-of-knockout-jacob-co-watches/

    I would embed but suspect a threadban may result...

    Good grief. That's just tack.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,159 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    banie01 wrote: »
    Just watching Antiques Roadshow.
    A Rolex 5513 with a great military provenance and history including photos and a logbook and an ultra rare underlined dial indicating Tritium early batch, aswell as the original riveted bracelet as a spare!
    £50-60k :eek:
    I'd bet in a big ticket auction at one of the main auction houses you could very easily quadruple that estimate. With some extra jam on top. Must have been an older Roadshow? Around 2014 maybe? Here's an example from a 2018 auction and nearly 170,000 sterlings. Recently I think they've been going for north of 300,000. With a provenance like that and with the logbook? I reckon well over 300k

    Still my fave Rolex of all time and by quite a margin.

    12456527k_xxl_v1569078994618.jpg

    IMHO far nicer hands and dial and bezel. Still surprised Rolex hasn't done a reissue. I reckon it would fly off the shelves at the speed of light.

    Then again having seen a few watches go through the Antiques Roadshow down the years the experts consistently lowball estimates and by quite the degree. There was one show where there was a fake, or very dodgy example of a JLC IIRC? And the expert was going on about fakes... Another where an extremely rare pre war prototype German B-Uhr in a far more wearable size than normal ones was valued at 4k. Quadruple that. Or Lawrence of Arabia's Omega valued around the 5-6k IIRC. Now that has all sorts of questions around it, but it went for 60+ again IIRC to Omega themselves and that was many moons ago when Milsubs could be had for 10-20k. Or less.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    redlead wrote: »
    I disagree with the "if you want accuracy, buy a quartz" view too. You can really appreciate mechanical things and the craft that goes into it and want the best performance out of that. It's like saying why would you want a Constable painting when you can just get a photograph; the photograph will be more accurate. Fair enough, that's a wild analogy but true to an extent.

    Maybe a better one would be why complain about the speed of horse when cars exist, and you drive to your horse in one. Riding a horse is a nice hobby and romantic and looks class, but if transport is your chief desire just use a car. Sure you can get some fast Horses, but dont expect to win the derby on some old pieball you bought from the tinkers.


  • Posts: 17,728 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You'd not get an entry with a pieball, need a thoroughbred iirc :pac:


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,159 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Fitz II wrote: »
    I have had Orients and Vostocks and they are unworthy to touch the helm of the Seiko SKX's garment.
    I'd agree there. If I were going east of the Iron Curtain I'd go for a vintage Vostok, much cheaper, more interesting historically, better quality for the money, new seals and pretty water resistant and you'll lose feck all if you flip it(and like the cheaper Seiko can be regulated to be remarkably good timekeepers).
    Fitz II wrote: »
    Jomashop have them around 1000 euro so after duty about 1400. Just a little bit more (50%) and you would have a very similar used zenith el primero, certainly a speedmaster reduced.

    Hammilton is not a bad brand and they have some genuine history, but for that sort of dosh I would tend towards a classic.
    +1000 on this. If I were looking at a Hamilton I'd be looking at used, but those recommendations would be my first choices. The Zenith in particular. Jaysus Fitz, two for two. :D
    Telling the time is a function of a watch not the function of a watch. A watch is jewellery.
    It also depends on why someone collects. The jewellery aspect is very much in play, especially in the last few years, but while I may be a bit of a weirdo here :D there are still quite a few collectors still out there for which that really would be way down the list. Even around here I'm not that weird. Our very own Irishplayer hereabouts with his 30's Pilot's Watch and that bloody fantastic 60's Seiko he wanted, researched and went hunting for and snared. And his interest in the old and often mad stuff :) Hell, he can even tell us what watches were on display in Knight Rider. Probably can tell us what KITT was sporting under the bonnet(I'm thinking Casio Calculator :D). Not a lot of the jewellery thing going on there.

    Though I do take your point, especially with newbies coming into this madness hobby. In the early days they can often take a scattergun approach and live to regret it. That goes for the more jewellery guys and the vintage guys(if anything more the latter). It can be easy to get distracted even conned and IMHO that's become more of a problem than it was. So many dealers and chancers and brands too, looking to part the unwary from their wallet.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 65,399 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Fitz II wrote: »
    Jomashop have them around 1000 euro so after duty about 1400.

    Agreed that's far too much to be spending on one. For comparison, I sold mine for €700
    banie01 wrote: »
    Very reminiscent of the IWC Portugieser.

    Yeah thought that too. And funny thing is the Jazzmaster chrono has the ETA 7750 "Valjoux" automatic movement, which is also used in many other watches costing several grand, including some from IWC. That alone makes the latter seem rather overpriced and the Hamilton good value


  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭IrishPlayer


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Probably can tell us what KITT was sporting under the bonnet(I'm thinking Casio Calculator :D).

    :) Under the bonnet of K.I.T.T was a futuristic Turbine engine that can run on any combustible liquid thanks to his fuel processor ( in reality it was the standard Pontiac 305 V8 with a 3 speed auto and a special Line lock for the front wheels allowing for those great wheel spin scene's :cool: )A great video showing one if the actual screen used cars featured in Jay Leno's Garage with the guys from Knight Rider Historians [Link]


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭sparrowcar


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I'd bet in a big ticket auction at one of the main auction houses you could very easily quadruple that estimate. With some extra jam on top. Must have been an older Roadshow? Around 2014 maybe? Here's an example from a 2018 auction and nearly 170,000 sterlings. Recently I think they've been going for north of 300,000. With a provenance like that and with the logbook? I reckon well over 300k

    Still my fave Rolex of all time and by quite a margin.

    12456527k_xxl_v1569078994618.jpg

    IMHO far nicer hands and dial and bezel. Still surprised Rolex hasn't done a reissue. I reckon it would fly off the shelves at the speed of light.

    Then again having seen a few watches go through the Antiques Roadshow down the years the experts consistently lowball estimates and by quite the degree. There was one show where there was a fake, or very dodgy example of a JLC IIRC? And the expert was going on about fakes... Another where an extremely rare pre war prototype German B-Uhr in a far more wearable size than normal ones was valued at 4k. Quadruple that. Or Lawrence of Arabia's Omega valued around the 5-6k IIRC. Now that has all sorts of questions around it, but it went for 60+ again IIRC to Omega themselves and that was many moons ago when Milsubs could be had for 10-20k. Or less.

    Steinhart really did a great job with their OVM in bringing this to your average Joe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,744 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I'd bet in a big ticket auction at one of the main auction houses you could very easily quadruple that estimate. With some extra jam on top. Must have been an older Roadshow? Around 2014 maybe? Here's an example from a 2018 auction and nearly 170,000 sterlings. Recently I think they've been going for north of 300,000. With a provenance like that and with the logbook? I reckon well over 300k

    It was a new episode, filmed with social distancing and all.
    Had a look at that particular watch and it's auction, I'd be honest from just the personal history of the AR watch last night, along with its owner being pictured wearing it on duty and also in RN promo shots from the time, I'd expect it to blow past the 2018 sale easily.

    The original owner was a RN rescue Diver, watch is untouched and the appraiser even commented on not just the rarity of the dial, but also the original bracelet.

    The whole segment was lovely, the excitement of the appraiser and the original owners history would really make one's ears perk up.

    edit
    Some screengrabs over here.

    https://omegaforums.net/threads/good-old-bbc-antiques-roadshow-5513.125571/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,290 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    Lorddrakul wrote: »
    Mr Mcgregor's latest, apparently...
    https://twitter.com/HotFreestyle/status/1349873785483259904?s=19

    Bwaaahhhaaaaaaaaaaa!

    Etc

    What a big manky heap of shíte! That's what happens when you take the watch as a piece of jewellery too far.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Homer


    Cienciano wrote: »
    What a big manky heap of shíte! That's what happens when you take the watch as a piece of jewellery too far.

    Also that’s what happens when you give a knacker money they’re not used to!


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,744 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    unkel wrote: »
    Agreed that's far too much to be spending on one. For comparison, I sold mine for €700



    Yeah thought that too. And funny thing is the Jazzmaster chrono has the ETA 7750 "Valjoux" automatic movement, which is also used in many other watches costing several grand, including some from IWC. That alone makes the latter seem rather overpriced and the Hamilton good value

    Just on that, afaik it's only quite recently that IWC moved from using an elaboré grade 7750 with some in house customisation, to completely in-house movements.

    The Hamilton looks a fantastic piece, shares internals with far more "respected" brands and should be available 2nd hand at a decent discount over new.


  • Registered Users Posts: 456 ✭✭oxocube


    Cienciano wrote: »
    What a big manky heap of shíte! That's what happens when you take the watch as a piece of jewellery too far.

    Putting the Christmas decorations back in the attic the other day. This looks like he strapped a bauble to his wrist and hey presto Jacobs & Co :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,055 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    unkel wrote: »
    That alone makes the latter seem rather overpriced and the Hamilton good value

    at 700 quid yes, but whats that as a % of RRP??


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Cienciano wrote: »
    What a big manky heap of shíte! That's what happens when you take the watch as a piece of jewellery too far.

    I get you, and it's not a nice watch imho, but McGregor's watch game is super strong. He has a awesome collection with a lot of classics and heavy hitters. In the context of his collection this kinda makes sense. It's a big brash conversation piece that stands out in the world of even the Uber collector.

    A horror show yes but by God that takes balls.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,055 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Fitz II wrote: »
    I get you, and it's not a nice watch imho, but McGregor's watch game is super strong. He has a awesome collection with a lot of classics and heavy hitters. In the context of his collection this kinda makes sense. It's a big brash conversation piece that stands out in the world of even the Uber collector.

    A horror show yes but by God that takes balls.

    i wonder did he actually buy it? or was just wearing it for a bit, he has earned a lot but i dont think he is in the drop 1m on a watch category?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭hitemfrank


    Cyrus wrote: »
    i wonder did he actually buy it? or was just wearing it for a bit, he has earned a lot but i dont think he is in the drop 1m on a watch category?

    He got something like 80 million for the boxing match against Mayweather alone so I'd say he has a few quid to be spending on watches.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,491 ✭✭✭stuchyg


    Cyrus wrote: »
    i wonder did he actually buy it? or was just wearing it for a bit, he has earned a lot but i dont think he is in the drop 1m on a watch category?

    Id imagine he is comfortably in that range. He is been making 30 odd million per ufc fight for his last 4/5 plus the mayweather fight and the purchase of his knockoff whiskey


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,055 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    stuchyg wrote: »
    Id imagine he is comfortably in that range. He is been making 30 odd million per ufc fight for his last 4/5 plus the mayweather fight and the purchase of his knockoff whiskey

    i think you might be overegging his UFC earnings, even if he has a net worth of 100m, spending 1% of it on one watch seems excessive.

    Maybe he is worth 2-300m but id be surprised.


Advertisement