Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Luas Green Line - Bray extension

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,123 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    the landfill closed in 2003, realistically it could be what? 2033 before this luas would be built?

    Does it have to be so many years to allow the waste at the site to settle or something?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Does it have to be so many years to allow the waste at the site to settle or something?

    It's to do with potential gas build up and leeching I believe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,730 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Depending on conditions they can be built on a lot sooner. Readings stadium was built on an 8 or so years closed dump - the stadium integrates gas venting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I see a local TD wants the NTA to look at using the Fassaroe site for the Luas Bray extension eventually. I’m not sure how this lines up with the previous proposals to bring it in via Little Bray to the DART although I did see the latest NTA map seemed to suggest the Luas would split at Bray, I’m assuming with the thinking being that they can go the other side of the N11 to put in place a P+R.

    https://www.independent.ie/regionals/wicklow/bray-news/sale-of-280-acre-site-is-opportunity-to-bring-luas-to-bray-says-wicklow-td/a611272719.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,147 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    the previous proposed route had it splitting with one branch going to Fassoroe and the other to Bray Dart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Having the Fassaroe branch linking up to the proposed P&R there would be quite beneficial for those further south.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Does it make sense to push further south to Southern Cross with it?

    You’d be bringing more parts of Bray and the tip of Greystones into direct catchment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭prunudo


    The Luas has no place going to Bray, it is an urban tram system, and has no place trundling though green fields at 60kph.

    Whats needed is high frequency, high speed public transport linking, bray and n11 to Sandyford, west dublin and beyond, to give an alternative to cars using the m50 to commute.



  • Registered Users Posts: 81 ✭✭joeymcg


    Unfortunately the M50 is a commuter Motorway and will always be that



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    This sort of stuff is unhelpful.

    Yes in an ideal world that’s what we’d have.

    Also in an ideal world the builders of the Kingstown line and beyond would have gone a mile more inland everywhere as well but they didn’t.

    We have to deal with the infrastructure we have in place and to see how we can develop it further. There are micro business and educational hubs around the south east of Dublin (Bray, Dún Laoghaire, Cherrywood, Sandyford, Blackrock, UCD) that can see improvement in their connectivity without even considering the city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭prunudo


    no its not unhelpful, its the truth. I'm tired of people on here or on Facebook thinking the answer to congestion in north Wicklow is 'sticking a luas in the middle of the n11'.

    The luas green line is too long and too busy as it is. Maybe it can be designed as Luas2 or a type of overground Metrolink, but it shouldn't be a Luas tram as we know it.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The purpose of this line would be to develop those green fields as high density, transport oriented housing built around the Luas line.

    The luas green line is too long and too busy as it is. Maybe it can be designed as Luas2 or a type of overground Metrolink, but it shouldn't be a Luas tram as we know it.

    Obviously it would be once the Green line is upgraded to Metro, so that it has the capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭prunudo


    And once its designed right, thats brilliant. But we can't have a situation where a project is designed but turns out to be another constrained model as planners have allowed multiple developments which overwhelm the greenline further.

    As I said in my previous post, this shouldn't be a Luas, but something better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭gjim


    What is the fixation with building expensive rail infrastructure in the least dense areas of the city?

    It's madness when we're using buses as the main mode for getting into and through the centre (currently 3 times as many bus journeys as tram or rail).

    Capacity is most urgently needed in the core, not in commuter/suburban towns. Build more Luas lines in the centre of the city and use the buses to do what buses are designed to do - serve outer suburban and orbital routes and provide frequent connections to rail services.

    We're doing everything backwards - except for ML, everything is about adding capacity to the fringes, despite the fact that the most demand, the most density, the biggest deficit is in the centre of the city.

    It's time to stop cheapskating and focus investment in rail infrastructure in the core of the city - yes it's more expensive and disruptive than building through green fields but it's far more important than providing a street tram connecting Bray and Cherrywood running more or less 800m parallel to a heavy rail line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,964 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    The reality is, it’s not really cheap skating.

    It’s political cowardice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The intention is ultimately for it to go via UCD.

    All you are adding in here is more crayon drawings, which itself is incredibly tedious.

    Yes we’d all live a Grand Paris Express or whatever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    You’ve posted this before.

    Sorry it’s nonsense. Light rail is not unusual in suburbs and satellite hubs.

    Yes if it was the case that we were building these everywhere and not focusing on the city. That is not it though. This is an original rail alignment that would not cost significant sums and would add a lot to the area.


    It might not be priority no 1, but honestly I don’t care what your opinion of what that should be or not. This is a thread about the Bray Luas extension, not your musings on the one or two places you’ve happened to live yourself (you know others have lived abroad too, right?).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Or as suggested for it to be part of the N11 Luas.

    As pointed out on page 1, how much this adds to the Green Line if it doesn’t have the N11 is suspect. It is likely that it would prompt a lot of people to get to Sandyford but not necessarily the city centre. Bray already has the DART and good buses to the city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭prunudo


    You accuse me of using crayons and then mention a hypothetical route via ucd! The most recent plan was to extend from Brides Glen. I'm all for new public transport infrastructure, but I stand by my previous post, the Luas as we know it, is the wrong model for a new rail line to Bray.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It is literally on the NTA most recent release and also discussed here.

    Perhaps do a bit of reading up on the proposals before polluting here with musings.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭gjim


    It might not be priority no 1, but honestly I don’t care what your opinion of what that should be or not. This is a thread about the Bray Luas extension, not your musings on the one or two places you’ve happened to live yourself (you know others have lived abroad too, right?).

    You "honestly" don't care what I think but you read what I wrote and then wrote a response. Sure.

    My musings about places I've lived? Wtf are you talking about? Where have I said anything about where "others" live?

    I made a simple argument which relates directly to the idea of the Bray Luas extension - that we should not be building expensive rail infrastructure through green fields 15-20km away from the centre of a city in sparsely populated areas while the city core itself is starved of rail infrastructure. Particularly when the tram line being proposed will, for most of its length be 10 minutes walk from a DART line and run through low-density semi-d suburbia.

    In the meantime the number of people forced to use slow and unpredictable double decker buses to get into the city centre every day is more than twice the entire population of Bray.

    It's not nonsense to point out that rail public transport works best where there is density. The density between the canals is at least 5 times that of the area this extension will run through - yet between the canals the total amount of rail comprises 3km of heavy rail and less than 11km of tram lines. If this extension goes ahead, it will mean that there will be more tram infrastructure between Sandyford and Bray than there is in the city centre itself. This is backwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It’s the same old stuff you post here. Multiple paragraphs to tell us how great things are wherever you are an expat and trying to “educate” us Paddies.

    There is absolutely nothing unique about going to Bray with the Luas, none whatsoever.

    Yes there are other “priorities” - but that is not the thread for those.

    You either have something productive to add here or you don’t.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭prunudo


    With all due respect, you're being overly angry to myself and other posters.

    The thread title is Luas Green Line, Bray extension. I have an opinion on it being the wrong plan to extend from Brides Glen to Fassaroe or Bray as from both a speed and capacity issue.

    This is a discussion board and the n11 route to ucd is just other peoples musings so maybe less of the attacking people who have differing views.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It is literally from the NTA. It is not a musing.

    Perhaps start a Metro West thread or post in any number of the crayon related threads on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Anyway, keeping this on topic.

    I wonder is one drawback of the Wicklow DART that it would involve multiple changes for people coming from further south if they want to get to Sandyford etc.

    I am assuming there would be a fair bit of CPO’ing in Bray itself. The new road down via Ravenswell and the PT bridge will be a good in between route but the Carlisle Grounds can expect to lose space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Cologne, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart and Melbourne have very long tramlines - Stuttgart’s U6* is longer than Green would be after this proposed extension; Cologne has lines that are far longer. It’s not unheard-of to run a tram this distance, but it is unusual. Normally this kind of outer-urban service would be carried by commuter heavy rail, but for various reasons (mostly geographical) that’s not viable here.

    In any case, It’s not the distance between the end of the line and the city core that matters, but the usage between stops along the line. I strongly suspect that more passengers would have journeys that began and ended on the extension than take a trip from Bray to Broombridge (let alone Finglas).

    The top speed of the latest rolling stock used on Green line is 80 km/h, but the earlier sets were 70 km/h. By the time any extension is done, all trams on this line should be capable of 80 km/h - that’s fast enough for a service this length.

    I do see the reason behind this, but my personal preference for Luas service extensions would be to add more through the city centre, to provide a more available central network to complement these very long outer services. This doesn’t require extra capacity: lines would split as they approach the city, then re-unite as they leave: overall in/out capacity is the same, but there are more destinations within the city, and the extra track allows new, city-area routes to be implemented (e.g., inner orbital services, or links between Metro, DART stops). Doing this would reduce the number of buses that need to enter the core of the city.

    I know it’s disruptive in the short term, but the retailers who complained about the disruption of Luas Cross-City stopped complaining once they saw the effects that nearby Luas stops had on their footfall. We can surely manage a rolling programme of much shorter projects to create a proper city tram network.

    __

    * Stuttgart’s U-Bahn, despite the name, is a tram system with express sections running on dedicated track or tunnels.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Likely service times of 48-50 mins to Bray from SSG based on 80km p/h and existing service times to Cherrywood.

    On the UCD / N11 configuration I’m sure it would be similar enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,147 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    It's 42 minutes from Brides Glen to SSG now, from Bray it'll be over an hour, that's assuming you don't have to change at Sandyford if the Metro upgrade ever happens.

    I am assuming there would be a fair bit of CPO’ing in Bray itself. The new road down via Ravenswell and the PT bridge will be a good in between route but the Carlisle Grounds can expect to lose space.

    there's a good bit of space between the Carlisle and the railway for a Luas stop, I think this was in the previous plan. It's currently a carpark and a power substation for the Dart which will presumably be moved. There's also some space to the east of the Dart track that used to be sidings so the existing tracks could be moved a few metres in that direction. There's basically 30 metres between the 2 walls that's owned by Irish Rail.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭gjim


    It’s the same old stuff you post here. Multiple paragraphs to tell us how great things are wherever you are an expat and trying to “educate” us Paddies.

    Like I asked before wtf are you on about? I haven't once mentioned where I live. Feel free to provide a quote to or else gtfo.

    You either have something productive to add here or you don’t.

    You're not a mod as far as I know.

    You don't "own" this thread and don't get to dictate what people discuss. You're acting like a spoilt child and turning to personal attacks because - surprise, surprise on a discussion board - people simply have different opinions to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The distance is not that big. 5-6 stops with a more rights of way.

    It is part of the UCD line so it does not necessitate changing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Well done @gjim.

    We all agree with more heavy rail, Luas extensions through the CC etc

    I have no issue with discussions flowing, but this isn’t it. This is the same old posters hijacking the discussion at the outset with the same stuff they posted elsewhere. I’ve 50 things I’d prefer were built or were prioritised but this isn’t the thread for that.

    If you have anything constructive to add to this discussion, feel free to add it to this thread. Really interested to hear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭scrabtom




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭mackerski


    It's the norm certainly for the German cities you name here that very few people would choose to ride the full length of such a long tram route. Instead, even if you want to go to the end destination of the tram route, you'll fairly quickly pass an U- or S-Bahn station from which you can complete your journey more quickly. Meanwhile, folk who have alighted at those stations will change to the tram to get closer to their planned destination. I used to live in Munich very close to the eastern terminus of the number 19 tram. Its western terminus is walking distance from Pasing railway station. If you actually wanted to travel from where I lived to Pasing, if you chose to use the tram at all (U-Bahn was nearby), you would stay on it only as far as Ostbahnhof (a journey of about 10-15 minutes), then change to the S-Bahn for a much quicker completion of your journey.

    Having a really long tram line where many riders have no option for their journey other than to ride the whole route leads to overlong journey times and full trams that travellers towards the middle of the route may have difficulty boarding. There's a reason InterCity trains don't stop at every intermediate station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I agree that long journeys aren’t good, but I wasn’t suggesting that. As I underestand the long-term plan for Green Line, it will start at Bray DART station, intersect with Metro (formerly green-line) at Sandyford , continue north on a new route along N11 serving UCD, interchange again with Metro at Charlemont, St Stephen’s Green and O’Connell Street, then DART at Broombridge. That allows the Luas to collect and distribute passengers for those services. Given those connection-points There will be very few people riding the whole length: just as the 19 tram isn’t the fastest way from Berg-am-Laim to Pasing, there would be better options than sitting on the Green Line all the way from Bray to O’Connell St.

    (I wasn’t a frequent user of the trams, as I lived near Trudering, just outside the reach of the Tram… or, in those days, the U-Bahn too).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,638 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Getting rid of through traffic cars from the city centre is the first step. Destination-only cars in the city centre.

    There are opportunities for increasing Luas in the City Centre. Use Thomas St and Dame Street to bring the Red Line to TCD, then onwards along Pearse Street to Ringsend.

    Use the Chapelizod bypass from Heuston instead of the Red Line for the first part of Lucan Luas.

    Use Conyngham Road to Heuston West, then into the Park to the Zoo, before along the Wall at Blackhorse Avenue to Ashtown, Dunsink, Abottstown and Tyrellstown.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Thing is, you don't just randomly build tram lines in the city center, they usually are built as part of longer lines that stretch into the city center.

    Like if the Green line was originally built from just Stephens Green to Parnell Street, it really wouldn't have been very useful and probably not a success.

    New lines like the Lucan Luas will bring new lines to the city center, along with the proposed 2042 network.

    We build extensions like to Bray and Finglas because they are typically very cheap and easy to build, while adding a lot of utility. Low hanging fruit you might say. The previous Luas extensions went very well, were very cheap and easy and we couldn't imagine the Luas without them now.

    I don't think these extensions are in any way competing with more substantial projects. Like no one is suggesting Metrolink won't be built because the Luas is extended to Finglas!

    The main purpose of the Bray extension would be to open up a lot of greenfield sites to major transport oriented development. Building high density apartment buildings right next to Luas stops, like Sandyford and Cherrywood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,638 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Greater capacity is needed in the City Centre, and some linkage of the lines would be good.

    Taking the Luas down Thomas Street to TCD is a no-brainer, increases the capacity of the Red Line in the City Centre and gives alternative destinations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,237 ✭✭✭gjim


    Bit of a straw man there - no one is suggesting scattering disconnected 1.5km stretches of tramlines (SSG to Parnell st.) around the city. If we stuck to "cheap and easy to build" we'd never have bothered with BXD and instead be half way to blessington.

    There are load of potential routes for trams in the city covering distances in the 5 to 10km range - Dublin once had one of the most extensive tram networks in Europe.

    And "opening up a lot of greenfield sites" also means greenfield in terms of a lack of schools, shops, pubs, restaurants, entertainment, etc. and almost zero walkability or cycleability to reach those facilities. And in the end, you still have a 1 hour commute to get into the city. You're effectively encouraging a doughnut city. There's finally some serious density starting to appear in Dublin in relatively central areas like the Guinness/Hueston area, Ringsend/Glass bottle, the North docks, Connolly station, etc. - this is the sort of development that benefits everyone, densifying the city core, justifying more spending on the public realm, public transport, schools and supporting existing businesses, etc. The cheapness of building 6 story apartments in green fields 10km or more from the centre is a mirage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Eh that part of Dublin and North Wicklow is one of the most liveable in the country. One of the biggest issues is accessibility to places like Bray that is wedged between the coast and a major motorway.

    Not everything is about funnelling to the centre.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭Consonata


    The one thing I hope with the Bray Luas extension is that they at least try to build it to a spec which could be converted to Metro in future. The section between Carrickmines and Sandyford basically can never be converted because of the amount of at grade junctions. Would be very short sighted to further kneecap quite a good alignment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Absolutely, given the land available and the current developments around Cherrywood, the route and track bed need to be designed with the future in mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    If they upgrade the Green Luas to Metro as far as Sandyford, would it knock some time off the 1 hour commute?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Indeed. Metrolink was only ever cutting Ranelagh. The real prize was the capacity improvements.

    Very few people will have a complaint about a commute of 45 mins to 60 mins from Bray. The reality is though it would be far less for many coming from that direction. It is continually ignored that the N11 “corridor” is stacked with places of interest. Sandyford is our La Défense. UCD is our largest University. Cherrywood, Carrickmines, Dundrum Dún Laoghaire and Blackrock are one of or several of services/ retail / educational hubs. These will all be in that 20-30 range to get there from a Bray “hub”.

    Opening up some more development land close to this is a no brainer along with facilitating more public transport for those coming from the south east.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,087 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I think in future, once the Green Line as far as Sandyford has been upgraded to Metrolink, it should then be extended south via Leopardstown Racecourse to join up with the existing Green Line after it has turned east of the M50. That can then be extended to Fassaroe as metro.

    The existing Green Line immediately south of Sandyford to Carrickmines should become a separate Luas line and get extended to and up the N11. This section can never become Metro so splitting it off is the only way to continue Metrolink further south.



Advertisement