Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

28 y/o Starting pension - Are AVCs the best way to go?

  • 08-05-2019 7:07am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭


    A small bit of guidance is need on the above.

    A bit of background- I'm in my late 20s, in the public service with 32 years to go til mandatory retirement.
    I'm on the single public service pension scheme. However, I've been advised that this will not be enough to live on, given that the Contributory pension may well be gone in 40 years. So I'm looking to set up private pension.

    The only option that seems to be easily accessible to me is AVCs with Cornmarket. I was speaking to a rep the other day and he informed me that there are three funds - 1. Cautious fund (average 3 % return), 2. A moderate fund (average 5 % return) and 3. An adventurous fund (average 7% return).

    The funds are managed by Irish life. I've been informed that there is a €595 set up fee, and then a 1% annual fund management fee per year.

    I intend to pump in as much as I possibly can into this ( approx 12 % of gross income).

    I'm thinking if the adventurous fund given my age.

    Can anybody tell me if this represents good value for money, or am I best advised to look elsewhere?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Yes, you should be adventurous while you are young and more cautious as the pot grows large and you come close to retirement

    I'm in an occupational pension scheme so it might be like comparing apples to oranges but that 1% annual fee is high to me.

    The highest fee in my scheme is 0.50% and its for the most adventurous fund, i.e. a diversified equity fund (mix of active/passive)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    Dempsey wrote: »
    Yes, you should be adventurous while you are young and more cautious as the pot grows large and you come close to retirement

    I'm in an occupational pension scheme so it might be like comparing apples to oranges but that 1% annual fee is high to me.

    The highest fee in my scheme is 0.50% and its for the most adventurous fund, i.e. a diversified equity fund (mix of active/passive)

    Thanks Dempsey. Do you mind me asking which company manages your pension? There doesn't seem to be much choice readily available. Irish life and zurich from what I can see, and the various brokers who use the.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,553 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Rothmans wrote: »
    Thanks Dempsey. Do you mind me asking which company manages your pension? There doesn't seem to be much choice readily available. Irish life and zurich from what I can see, and the various brokers who use the.

    Mercer are managing, Irish Life are providing the investment funds


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    Dempsey wrote: »
    Mercer are managing, Irish Life are providing the investment funds

    Many thanks. I must enquire as to why my proposed fees are so much higher given that irish life are providing the underlying funds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,747 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    Rothmans wrote: »
    Many thanks. I must enquire as to why my proposed fees are so much higher given that irish life are providing the underlying funds.

    At a guess - your a random individual walking in off the street. Dempsey works for a company where the trustees of the schemes have the power to possible get lower investment fees if their business is large. For instance if Dempsey is in a pension fund with 400m+ of assets, investment managers be fighting for the business which will push the mgmt. fees down.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,786 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    Ace2007 wrote: »
    At a guess - your a random individual walking in off the street. Dempsey works for a company where the trustees of the schemes have the power to possible get lower investment fees if their business is large. For instance if Dempsey is in a pension fund with 400m+ of assets, investment managers be fighting for the business which will push the mgmt. fees down.

    It's because cornmarket (owned by Irish life) got a cushy deal with the department of education to provide AVCs. You don't have to go with them, you can set up a PRSA AVC with whoever you want. You may or may not be able to get a better deal (I reckon you will). You'll easily be able to get a better fund choice at least


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,581 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    OP my advice would be to have a think about things - I would not rush into it. Would you be saving for a mortgage deposit etc? If so, it might make more sense to prioritise this right now as you are still only in your 20s rather than locking away your savings in a pension. You already have your occupational scheme so it's not like you are not already contributing or building up your pension.

    Are you sure you must retire at 60 OP? Some of the newer entrant conditions are a bit later iirc and I even thought they pushed legislation through recently to allow people stay on until 70, so you could build up your full 40 years of contributions if this was the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,747 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    McGaggs wrote: »
    It's because cornmarket (owned by Irish life) got a cushy deal with the department of education to provide AVCs. You don't have to go with them, you can set up a PRSA AVC with whoever you want. You may or may not be able to get a better deal (I reckon you will). You'll easily be able to get a better fund choice at least
    OP never said that he was a teacher?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,540 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    Ace2007 wrote: »
    OP never said that he was a teacher?

    I think Cornmarket have a deal done across the Public Service. OP can choose any provider just they will have to do some extra work that Cornmarket would take care of.
    Tax back etc but that's very straightforward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    Many thanks for the replies.
    Ace2007 wrote: »
    At a guess - your a random individual walking in off the street. Dempsey works for a company where the trustees of the schemes have the power to possible get lower investment fees if their business is large. For instance if Dempsey is in a pension fund with 400m+ of assets, investment managers be fighting for the business which will push the mgmt. fees down.

    Cornmarket has a scheme for the trade union that I am a member of. But I suspected that what you have highlighted above may be the case. I have been sent further policy documents outlining that the management fees drop to 0.75% on anything after the first 40k in the pension fund. It seems to be the same deal as Irish Life provide directly. No contribution fees other than the set up fee.
    McGaggs wrote: »
    It's because cornmarket (owned by Irish life) got a cushy deal with the department of education to provide AVCs. You don't have to go with them, you can set up a PRSA AVC with whoever you want. You may or may not be able to get a better deal (I reckon you will). You'll easily be able to get a better fund choice at least

    I was thinking of a PRSA, but most PRSAs seem to have contribution charges up to 5% in addition to the 1% management fees, which seems very high compared to the Cornmarket AVCs which only charge a set-up fee in lieu of contribution fees.
    OP my advice would be to have a think about things - I would not rush into it. Would you be saving for a mortgage deposit etc? If so, it might make more sense to prioritise this right now as you are still only in your 20s rather than locking away your savings in a pension. You already have your occupational scheme so it's not like you are not already contributing or building up your pension.

    Are you sure you must retire at 60 OP? Some of the newer entrant conditions are a bit later iirc and I even thought they pushed legislation through recently to allow people stay on until 70, so you could build up your full 40 years of contributions if this was the case.

    That was my first priority caviadreams, and I spent my first 4 years working saving the deposit, and bought last year. Now the focus has shifted to pensions. 60 is mandatory retirement for me unfortunately. When I retire at 60 (after 38 years service), my occupational pension will be worth around 14k which, while nowhere near the level of the old public service pensions, is not bad. However, I think I'll need an extra annuity of maybe 8k to live comfortably. I don't want to just 'survive' if you know what I mean. 14k might seem a lot, but when you factor in LPT, house maintenance, gas, electricity, bins, broadband, car etc in retirement, I'd imagine 14k wouldn't go to far. I think 22k a year would afford a reasonably comfortable quality of living, given that my mortgage would (ideally) be paid off. Would I be right in thinking that?
    Ace2007 wrote: »
    OP never said that he was a teacher?

    Correct.
    yabadabado wrote: »
    I think Cornmarket have a deal done across the Public Service. OP can choose any provider just they will have to do some extra work that Cornmarket would take care of.
    Tax back etc but that's very straightforward.

    As far as I can work out, Irish Life seem to charge the 1% management fee, even if you go direct to them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,540 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    They all charge a management fee but iirc Cornmarket have a few extra charges most others dont.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,581 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    OP I would not worry that much about the state pension portion of the public service pension disappearing - the unions would not let it happen easily, and I think even if the state pension did disappear, there could be some agreement worked out in terms of public service pensions etc.

    If you have already bought property then you are sorted and absolutely right to look towards your pension. Fair play to you for having everything in order at such a young age!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,747 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    OP I would not worry that much about the state pension portion of the public service pension disappearing - the unions would not let it happen easily, and I think even if the state pension did disappear, there could be some agreement worked out in terms of public service pensions etc.

    Currently for every pensioner there are 5 people working, this will drop to 2 workers for every pensioner in around 20/30 years time - how will the government afford the state pension - do you want your kids/grand kids paying 80% taxes so that others can have a pension?

    Generations will look back and be like why didn't people just save for retirement for themselves - why did they have this idea that they had to buy a house etc and get into huge debt and have no income in retirement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    OP I would not worry that much about the state pension portion of the public service pension disappearing - the unions would not let it happen easily, and I think even if the state pension did disappear, there could be some agreement worked out in terms of public service pensions etc.

    If you have already bought property then you are sorted and absolutely right to look towards your pension. Fair play to you for having everything in order at such a young age!
    Ace2007 wrote: »
    Currently for every pensioner there are 5 people working, this will drop to 2 workers for every pensioner in around 20/30 years time - how will the government afford the state pension - do you want your kids/grand kids paying 80% taxes so that others can have a pension?

    Generations will look back and be like why didn't people just save for retirement for themselves - why did they have this idea that they had to buy a house etc and get into huge debt and have no income in retirement.

    I'm not worried about anything happening to the occupational pension. I paid 7k in pension contributions last year. At that rate I'd hope the occupational pensions would be safe enough! Last year, I paid 17.5 % in pension contributions on any salary over 28750, which I think is quite a lot. As I understand things, this rate is going to be reduced somewhat for anyone in the single scheme over the next few years whereas it will remain in place for anyone on the old scheme. This should free up some funds to invest in a private scheme.

    So, to be clear, I have no concerns re the occupational scheme. That should really be secure. It's the Contributory PRSI pension which I think will be significantly reduced.
    Even if the PRSI pension is still going strong, the fact that mandatory retirement will be 60 for me, means that there will at least be a significant gap between retirement and pension age that I will need to bridge at the very least.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,586 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Few quick points:

    PRSI + PS pension should be enough, especially with long service

    Maybe saving for a house is more important? - sorry, I see you bought a house

    Cornmarket fees are very high, get a PRSA-AVC instead with lower fees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    Geuze wrote: »
    Few quick points:

    PRSI + PS pension should be enough, especially with long service

    Maybe saving for a house is more important? - sorry, I see you bought a house

    Cornmarket fees are very high, get a PRSA-AVC instead with lower fees.

    I asked a few times, and was told that the only fee applied by Cornmarket is the set up fee, so their fees must have come down somewhat!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,540 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    Rothmans wrote: »
    I asked a few times, and was told that the only fee applied by Cornmarket is the set up fee, so their fees must have come down somewhat!

    I thought there was around €600 set up fee ,1% management fee.
    Is there a 4 or 5% charge for what something else ?I thought there was but can't recall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,586 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Rothmans wrote: »
    I asked a few times, and was told that the only fee applied by Cornmarket is the set up fee, so their fees must have come down somewhat!

    https://www.cornmarket.ie/uploads/12748_Update_AVC_charge_statements_11-17_rebranded_TUI.pdf

    Here are the TUI AVC fees:

    525 set-up fee

    Plus

    2% charge on all regular conts

    Plus

    1% AMC.


    You can reduce the first two fees to zero by not using Cornmarket.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,586 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Rothmans wrote: »
    A small bit of guidance is need on the above.

    A bit of background- I'm in my late 20s, in the public service with 32 years to go til mandatory retirement.
    I'm on the single public service pension scheme. However, I've been advised that this will not be enough to live on, given that the Contributory pension may well be gone in 40 years.

    I don't agree with this advice.

    A full-service PS pension is enough to live on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Prezatch


    The pensions authority of Ireland publish an overview of all PRSA charges and providers which may be useful:

    https://www.pensionsauthority.ie/en/I_want_to_start_a_Pension_PRSA/PRSAs/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,540 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    Geuze wrote: »
    I don't agree with this advice.

    A full-service PS pension is enough to live on.

    How do you know the PS pension will be enough for him to live on?
    It isn't one gold plated pension payment across the whole service.

    No one here knows what the OP is currently on nor what he is likely to finish is job on .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,928 ✭✭✭billyhead


    Sorry for going off topic OP but I am paying into an AVC plan and have about €25,000 saved thus far. I will be retiring at 60 after 40 years service in the Civil Service. I joining pre 2013. I am considering stopping the payments into the AVC plan. Would i be penalized for stopping and should I withdraw the amount if I stop. Is it difficult to do this? Will I lose all the tax relief build up. Should I leave it in the fund until I retire. Can the pension provider do this or would I have to pay some sort of annual fee etc to leave it sitting in the account until I reach 60.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,275 ✭✭✭august12


    billyhead wrote: »
    Sorry for going off topic OP but I am paying into an AVC plan and have about €25,000 saved thus far. I will be retiring at 60 after 40 years service in the Civil Service. I joining pre 2013. I am considering stopping the payments into the AVC plan. Would i be penalized for stopping and should I withdraw the amount if I stop. Is it difficult to do this? Will I lose all the tax relief build up. Should I leave it in the fund until I retire. Can the pension provider do this or would I have to pay some sort of annual fee etc to leave it sitting in the account until I reach 60.
    So you will have the full 40 years service, I thought the purpose of AVC was to make up the shortfall if one didn't have the 40 years, my understanding of this, you can only take 1.5 times of your salary tax free, anything above this will incur tax, prsi, USC etc. You can stop paying into this policy but there will be an annual management fee I would presume,


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭ezra_pound


    Rothmans wrote: »
    I'm not worried about anything happening to the occupational pension. I paid 7k in pension contributions last year. At that rate I'd hope the occupational pensions would be safe enough! Last year, I paid 17.5 % in pension contributions on any salary over 28750, which I think is quite a lot. As I understand things, this rate is going to be reduced somewhat for anyone in the single scheme over the next few years whereas it will remain in place for anyone on the old scheme. This should free up some funds to invest in a private scheme.

    So, to be clear, I have no concerns re the occupational scheme. That should really be secure. It's the Contributory PRSI pension which I think will be significantly reduced.
    Even if the PRSI pension is still going strong, the fact that mandatory retirement will be 60 for me, means that there will at least be a significant gap between retirement and pension age that I will need to bridge at the very least.

    If the state pension is got rid of, the single scheme benefit will increase by the amount of the contributory state pension, so you don't have to worry about state pension going.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭ezra_pound


    august12 wrote: »
    So you will have the full 40 years service, I thought the purpose of AVC was to make up the shortfall if one didn't have the 40 years, my understanding of this, you can only take 1.5 times of your salary tax free, anything above this will incur tax, prsi, USC etc. You can stop paying into this policy but there will be an annual management fee I would presume,

    The current rules under revenue are that lump sums between 200 k and 500k are taxed at 20 per cent. Over 500k is 40%. You're correct about the 1.5 salary tax free in public sector pension.
    But suppose your ps lump sum is 100k, which would be realistic under the single scheme for someone retiring at ap level, depending on when they were promoted etc. In this circumstance, they could avail of 100k tax free avc lump sum top up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭ezra_pound


    billyhead wrote: »
    Sorry for going off topic OP but I am paying into an AVC plan and have about €25,000 saved thus far. I will be retiring at 60 after 40 years service in the Civil Service. I joining pre 2013. I am considering stopping the payments into the AVC plan. Would i be penalized for stopping and should I withdraw the amount if I stop. Is it difficult to do this? Will I lose all the tax relief build up. Should I leave it in the fund until I retire. Can the pension provider do this or would I have to pay some sort of annual fee etc to leave it sitting in the account until I reach 60.
    Are you pre 1997?


  • Registered Users Posts: 235 ✭✭Heiser


    Im in a similar position to OP. 35 y/o, joined PS in 2008. Will probably retire at 65 after 40 years service. I'm going to get an AVC setup so I have options of maybe retiring can bit earlier when I get to my sixties. My understanding is up to 200k is tax free and over that it's 20% tax on the lump sum. The money I'd be getting paid instead of going into my AVC would be getting taxed at 40%, worse case scenario it gets taxed at 20% on drawdown.

    OP look into Irish pensions & finance. No setup fee but 2.75% for ten years and then .75% after, you also get a bonus 5% on retirement. You also pay the 1% fund management fee. It's taken at source too which is handy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    yabadabado wrote: »
    How do you know the PS pension will be enough for him to live on?
    It isn't one gold plated pension payment across the whole service.

    No one here knows what the OP is currently on nor what he is likely to finish is job on .

    Exactly! As mentioned above, I'm not in the pre 1995 scheme which Gueze seems to think is applied to all public servants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭Rothmans


    ezra_pound wrote: »
    If the state pension is got rid of, the single scheme benefit will increase by the amount of the contributory state pension, so you don't have to worry about state pension going.

    Really?

    That'd be great if true. However, while the single scheme policy document states that the Single scheme is calculated on the assumption that the Contributory pension will be there in it's current form, it makes absolutely no suggestion that the state will make up the shortfall if it's gone or reduced.

    Can you give me any information source for the above. As I said, it would be great if true, but I fear it may just be another generalised assumption about public service pensions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,275 ✭✭✭august12


    Heiser wrote: »
    Im in a similar position to OP. 35 y/o, joined PS in 2008. Will probably retire at 65 after 40 years service. I'm going to get an AVC setup so I have options of maybe retiring can bit earlier when I get to my sixties. My understanding is up to 200k is tax free and over that it's 20% tax on the lump sum. The money I'd be getting paid instead of going into my AVC would be getting taxed at 40%, worse case scenario it gets taxed at 20% on drawdown.

    OP look into Irish pensions & finance. No setup fee but 2.75% for ten years and then .75% after, you also get a bonus 5% on retirement. You also pay the 1% fund management fee. It's taken at source too which is handy.
    Are you sure 200,000 is tax free, I understood 1.5 times final salary is tax free up to 200,000, so let's say, final salary is 50,000, in this case 75,000 would be the tax free lump sum and any amount drawn from an AVC as a further lump sum above 75,000 would be liable to the 20% tax up to 200,000. Can anyone clarify if this is correct.


Advertisement