Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Energy infrastructure

Options
1141142144146147179

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭MightyMunster


    The problem with 20% hydrogen is the other 80%. If this is to be fossil gas it's only a short term use of hydrogen so mightn't be worth spending huge money on



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,661 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    As mentioned above, the last 80% can be biogas and syngas.

    What the actual percentage mix of hydrogen/biogas/syngas will be will likely come down to what is most economic overall.

    “For those concerned with NOx emissions an incentive program to replace gas hobs with induction hobs should be looked at. NOx indoors in your face is potentially more risk than being generated at a power plant.”

    Yes, I’ve got to say open gas hobs and fires in homes is complete madness. They produce a massive amount of NOX right in your home. Lot of evidence that it is linked to increased asthma levels, etc. I suspect that in future we will look back at it in the same way as we look at cigarette’s today or lead in Diesel or asbestos.

    If you have one, do yourself a favour and replace it with an induction hob.

    “Concerning adding hydrogen to the gas network to get a 5% CO2 reduction, the other side of the coin reducing heat demand of existing housing stock. One Stop Shop is great in theory but a tiny portion of the population have the money for it and it's very heat pump focused. A zero up front cost scheme could be implemented that focuses on getting building fabric improvements done rather than that and heating system replacement. Doing this without corruption/moral hazard would prove difficult, this must be acknowledged.”

    I think about this a lot for myself. I live in an apartment, it is a pretty nice BER B3 or so with natural gas heating.

    How can I really improve this though, I don’t think I can improve the insulation without losing more interior space which is already not great in an apartment. I also can’t see what I can do with the boiler. Heat pump is not an option as where do you put it?

    I suppose ideally my building should be hooked up to a district heating system or the building itself could do a building wide one. But no sign of anything like that from DCC and good luck getting the building management to do anything like that!

    I do wonder if biogas might just be easier given our countries rural industry and the need to decarbonise farm waste anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,454 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    The problem with bio-gas is how much fossil fuel energy it takes to produce the nice green clean bio-gas .

    Or to put it another way if you powered the whole process with bio-gas ( including fertilizer) would there be any net gain ?

    To have any chance of an energy "gain " you need to be using animal waste in the process ( slurry basically ) , so growing harvesting and transporting and ensiling maize / grass clover ect to an A/D plant , and transporting slurry to the plant , and then transporting digestate back to the farm for storage / spreading

    All that equipment ,process already exists and is in place.

    The A/D plants aren't particularly complicated ,or novel either

    Siting them is going to be a nightmare , small plants in every village ? Individual planning applications and local protests

    Large regional plants mean much more road haulage, positioned near towns( road hubs ) , but more efficient operation, and easier for gas injection or storage ..

    In a way the ideal would be on farm , with one farmer building and operating the plant and neighbouring farmers supplying crops and waste,and receiving the waste back

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,454 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Isn't Nox a serious greenhouse gas ? (Directly or indirectly )

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Depends on how you do it. Sewage farms are frequently powered by electricity produced from the methane coming off the anaerobiotic digesters.

    Not sure. Lightning produced NOX makes up about 1% of nitrogen fixation in the nitrogen cycle so there will always be some in the atmosphere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,454 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Isn't that the point ? There's no point in setting up a system that produces only enough power to run the system

    You need a net gain in energy, ( including the diesel for tilling,fertillizing harvest,and transport ,

    There's also a lot of Nox from nitrogen fertilizer .. ( I think )

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I have a hob that is both gas and induction. I can assure you from experience that having a gas hob and a wood burning stove has been useful during extended power cuts on several occasions.

    NOX is 298 times more potent a GHG than CO2 by weight.



  • Registered Users Posts: 871 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    80% natural fossil gas mix is totally fine so long as the whole grid is not on it. If the grid gets up toward 75% renewables there is less issue using fossil gas for the thin end of the wedge. Don't fight the diminishing return with taxpayers money.

    Gas turbine plants will probably be around for another century if green hydrogen production doesn't get off the ground.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    A wood burning stove would emit hundreds of times more PM 2.5 particulates than a gas boiler so not ideal for continuous use in a city unless something like an internal gasifier was used which essentially converts it to a gas burner. Might be interesting for the future.

    I've no idea where cheapo Chinese Diesel Heaters using biodiesel would fall on the NOX or particulates or Carbon Monoxide scale when used as a backup heater.

    For commercial power exhaust NOX is measured in parts per million, exhaust CO2 is measured in % , it's not a major contributor to greenhouse emissions but it's nasty stuff to breath in. Clean burn or scrubbing with things like AdBlue will reduce it , but jet engines on airliners would still be a problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭MightyMunster


    If it's only being used for power plants is there any reason not to just have 100% green hydrogen? I thought the 20% max hydrogen was for the gas grid



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭323


    Well, the Moneypoint Offshore Wind "proposal" is still going, whether anything comes from it is anyone's guess.

    Early days. Over a year since Foreshore Licence application submitted, nothing unusual there, in Ireland they can take years, but have heard no more to be issues for the moment, until then ESB can't even have a site investigation survey done. Licences issued on the east coast were given to legacy projects that have been in the pipeline for over 15 years. Going forward all to be handled by the new Maritime Area Regulatory Authority (MARA), whenever they get up and functioning.

    Little wonder Equinor (and others) have pulled out of Ireland, leaving ESB with basically zero knowledge about how to even begin to tackle a project like this.

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Burning hydrogen in a gas turbine generates 3 times the NOX emissions compared to NG. This can be reduced significantly through water injection, but doing that significantly lowers the efficiency and amount of energy generated. The round trip efficiency of hydrogen as an energy storage medium and underpinning of a net zero grid strategy - Such as the ESB's plan for Ireland, really looks questionable.

    Water injection sounds simple but it isn't remotely, requiring vast quantities of distilled water, not tap water or that from a river, and it reduces the lifespan of the turbines and the efficiency of the turbine as the water reduces the compbustion temperature and so reduces the effiiciency and amount of electricity generated. There is another technique being trialled so as to avoid water injection, but it looks to be 25% less efficient than a conventional NG powered turbine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 871 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    As mentioned the hardware isn't there yet to burn only hydrogen while maintaining the same NOx emissions as natural gas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    15 years for a bike lane, 30 years to build a children's hospital. What a great planning system and culture. That's Ireland, for you.

    In Oct 2016, in South Australia, the grid suffered a catastrophic failure as it was over reliant on wind generation, and when a big storm hit, wind farms feathered the blades and stopped generating, leading to a sudden huge demand on an interconnector which caused that to shutdown also.

    By Dec 2017, they commissioned the worlds largest grid storage battery to solve the problem - 14 months.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    36 offshore wind farms are going through various stages of development and planning at the moment.

    7 are likely to be in place before 2030 (one hopes) but planning delays at ABP may scupper timelines




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I am eagerly awaiting the details on financing of these.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If anyone is bored, throw a vote into this poll, I'm curious to see how it might stack up against the WEI survey on the same topic




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,454 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Honestly it's going to be interesting,

    Even small changes in intrest rates will make a huge difference especially on a capital heavy project ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,866 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Most of the finance wouldn't have to be drawn down though until the construction phase though? Which is quite short relative to other capital heavy projects...



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    From Politics - not sure what this would mean to the single energy market given that there's a few big power plants up there that have seen better days.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,706 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Government seem to have handed over energy and planning polices to WEI. Would explain the many and ongoing attempts by them to butcher the Aahaus Directive and other citizen environmental rights in this space



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,671 ✭✭✭eire4


    Seems to be pretty closely correlated. 76% in favour after I voted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 795 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    Planning application for a part hydrogen fuelled 114MW peaker plant in Mayo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,790 ✭✭✭Apogee



    Constant Energy are also behind the hydrogen project. Above potentially addresses some of MCC concerns about the lack of access for the hydrogen onto GNI network and provides an alternative outlet. It also avoids transport via road, which was another of their concerns.

    Planning files/drawings are here. Revised layout shows electrolysis plant (electrolysers 29 and storage 34) and OCGT (14)


    Post edited by Apogee on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The seabed survey for phase 2 of the offshore Arklow Wind Park has been completed




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,790 ✭✭✭Apogee


    Some slides from the webinar. The full video is due to be posted on the moneypoint website.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,816 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Regarding the poll referenced above showing a supermajority support for wind farms, I guess it just goes to prove the old saying from WWII to be painfully accurate "tell a lie, make it big and keep repeating it." This is the only logical explanation for support for expensive, unreliable, ugly, bat killing, bird chomping monstrosities. I still have no idea why the eco types want to drive all the bats and large birds to extinction, or why it's supposedly "green" to industrialise the landscape on a scale literally unprecedented in human history. Nevertheless, it seems, here we are.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    industrialise the landscape on a scale literally unprecedented in human history

    Farming



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭MightyMunster


    I quite like looking at windfarms, quite therapeutic.

    Would love to hear your suggestion for an alternative energy source for Ireland that doesn't impact on wildlife .





Advertisement