Werewolf - The Hunger Games

Liam WW

#FFA1

1.Conor - not a fan of his FFA or making people lock clear previous to that, his "you people post" stands out

2. Fiona - SK style post and Abi killed after posting suspicions on her = perhaps pushing FIona for lynch was why they munched ABi though
3. Steve/Clodagh/Oisin - Gut from stirring for Steve - Steve and Oisin wouldn't be on the same team I'd think but he did rect very strongly and it stood out as extra defensive - Codagh isn't acting like a roled villager at least

The problem here is it's day 1 and we have nothing concrete to work off so those flimsy reasons are the best I have right now after being off thread but trying to read it all day I've voted but if I get to a computer later I might change it if I get to re-read when things might stand out better

Barbara WW

Alright all, been afk all day, I'll do a bit of catch up now and get a vote in but I won't be able to contribute properly till tomoro hopefully

Angus WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

These are Babs only two posts. Don't ignore her people, if she's voting in the lynches then she needs to be taken out.

Definitely time to improve but needs to up their game.

Before anyone says it, i'm not trying to pocket Gabriel, but I've just realised based on this post that I've not looked at Barbara, Brendan or Tegan today...

Babs - I've nothing to go on. I'm reluctant to let this go with so few posts…
Brendan - says he's trying to catch up but I'm struggling to form an opinion with so few posts.
Tegan - few posts but I'm getting a villagey feel (it's all gut though, no real reason why… less fluffy than others maybe?)

I'm not strong enough on any of these to change my FFA, but I'd be looking for more tomorrow or I'd need to consider them as low flying wolves.

P.S. Eva, I've got my eye on you too. I do think you've posted more of substance today though, and having looked at my own postings I've been fairly quiet myself (quality over quantity!).

Gabriel WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all back on for a little bit.

#ffa1

Gabriel: Lots of posts, very helpful. But so much helpful and nice. It seems most of his posts are hedged to make sure nothing comes back to him, with a touch of casting shade on players attempts to solve.

Oisin: basically for that reaction to being accused - that was a hell of a pushback to a fairly standard D0 cage rattle

Conor: Realise it looks omgus, but your ffa is weak as dishwater.

Other notables are liams comments on staged interactions; Phil, who is a top three poster but has very little actually in them bar questions and bants (I also don't get his earlier attempt to focus on the traps but maybe I've missed something) and Clodagh's odd behaviour

Eh.... not sure what you're getting at with the shade casting Tegan. I had a back and forth with Conor over his readslist alright...

Ironically you've FFA'd him for that very list?

My posts aren't hedged, they are the opinions of a villager who hasn't got enough info to be so gung ho on anyone specifically right now, hence the ISOs.

Angus WW

I hate to say this, but I'm getting more uncomfortable with Conor. Hopefully he'll come on here to defend himself. I'm not promising my FFA list is in exact order as I was compiling it while trying to catch up on the hours where I had some meetings and jumped back and forward a bit.

Assuming it's approximately right:
- Conor appeared in 2 of the first 4 FFAs (50%).
- He appeared in 2 of the first 6 FFAs (33.33%)
- 4 of the first 8 FFAs (50%)
- 4 of the first 10 FFAs (40%)
- 5 of the first 12 FFAs (42%)
- 7 of the first 15 FFAs (47%)

I just feel like there is a lot of bandwaggoning here. Maybe everyone is getting the same bad vibes and maybe i'm just second;-guessing myself, but I have a bad feeling about this.

Conor WW

Angus WW wrote: »

You're an odd duck Conor. As well as the other faults pointed out in this ISO, you say that I commented on the two wolves munched. In the same post I commented on every other player apart from 3 which I noted.

I was leaning village on you but this is a very wolfy post for me.

Hands up that was just laziness, I was on the page that recaps all ur posts and it looked like the post was short so I didn't click into it
My bad

Conor WW

Jake WW wrote: »

Quoting Conor here cause he and Holly both used the same expression in a very short time. Could be coincidental.

Reading back over Clodagh's "rage quit", what strikes me is Holly is really the only one who goes all in on using it to justify a vote tonight. Everyone else seems to take a step back or state they won't vote for Clodagh. Holly makes it a point to say she will. Everyone else is happy to let the situation calm. Holly tries to use it to rally people.

Its not a whole lot, but it does feel a bit like Holly needs to find any excuse to justify a vote tonight, even if it's a bad one, and seizes the opportunity quite hastily.

Point of information: before that I had already said I didn't think we should vote Clodagh, gave my reasons, which I stand by

Conor WW

Welcome back Clodagh, hope all is good again!

WerewolfGM

A sponsor has delivered two gifts.

Gabriel WW

Blargh, you grabbed my attention there Tegan so here's your very own dedicated post!

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all, I see things have been getting active in here so.

Opening post... ok. NAI.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Wasn’t aware you were dead tbh. Over a day to lynch so a lot can happen in that time

Responding to Oisin and the 'avenge me' comment. I like this post, it's logical and villagery. Good start.

Unfortunately that's everything from night 0.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Afternoon all

Rip to Mary and abi. Not sure why they would have been targeted, especially Mary with 2 posts. I’m assuming all players are split between a number of communal backrooms. We may find that things that are said in there will influence the morning kills also. If there are village players who knew who Mary was in there they would do well to sleuth and discuss in there also

This is interesting. Discussion of the communal backrooms and a very good point re: the dead (Mary being the focus here but it works for both tbh).

Makes me wonder if there was anything off thread that might have made Abi/Mary a target. Don't wanna get too bogged down in it though.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Nothing in the op that reads like a day phase trapping ability. Could be the result of a gift I guess or possibly one of the mod secrets

Mech talk, but you can see Tegan has informed herself and read the OP properly anyways. Not really alignment indicative but I like that anyways.

Tegan WW wrote: »

That’s supposed to be a night phase action I think. It might kick in during the day but it should be effective before now if it’s a night action.

Roleblock talk, again very to the point. NAI again.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Ah go on, add flavor instead. Double brownie points if the flavor is helpful in catching baddies

Meh. Fluff. At a minimum for Tegan though, so that's a bonus I suppose?

Tegan WW wrote: »

Might still be a little early to be highlighting low posters. Plenty of time and if people aren’t reasonably active by say tomorrow afternoon we can revisit

Fair point again when (Phil or Henry I think) brings up the low posters. Unless there's something inherently wolfy that you think you see, leave them till tomorrow imo.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Why do you think this? Specifically, as opposed to being say compromised in some other way

Responds to Frank stating that the trap might stop someone from posting. I can't see any mechanic that would stop players from posting on the game thread myself tbh.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Every game we have a low posting wolf.....we also have four or five low posting villagers. We have plenty of time and tools to figure out the difference, including modkills and seer peeks. Not saying we ignore them forever just that we have a more sophisticated strategy than kill the quiet ones.

My money would be on one quiet wolf in a format like this with the rest being more active.

More talk about low posters, not sure I agree with her points here though - why just one? I've been in games with multiple low posting wolves, don't limit your scope.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Why not? The trapping?

Responds to Jake about a mention of a legit post count.

Tbh I have no clue what this means (or the post from Jake).

Tegan WW wrote: »

In that case she better start talking to us about her role, since one way or another there’s a target on her now

Talking about Clodagh possibly being roled. Not gonna go there, I see the merits in her post though

Tegan WW wrote: »

One for Phil’s left pocket and one for his right....

Accuses Phil of pocketing. Ok, interesting.

Tegan WW wrote: »

And why would that make anyone good?

And responding to Phil who stated he was on the same wavelength as Conor and Henry. Again, I have to agree. That triangle is likely to contain some pocketing imo.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Evening all back on for a little bit.

#ffa1

Gabriel: Lots of posts, very helpful. But so much helpful and nice. It seems most of his posts are hedged to make sure nothing comes back to him, with a touch of casting shade on players attempts to solve.

Oisin: basically for that reaction to being accused - that was a hell of a pushback to a fairly standard D0 cage rattle

Conor: Realise it looks omgus, but your ffa is weak as dishwater.

Other notables are liams comments on staged interactions; Phil, who is a top three poster but has very little actually in them bar questions and bants (I also don't get his earlier attempt to focus on the traps but maybe I've missed something) and Clodagh's odd behaviour

Her FFA. Interesting choices, I've addressed the points made to me already.

Her reasoning for Conor is kinda weird, I mean she's barely engaged with him at all, and kinda went after Phil for pocketing. She does allude to Phil in player salad beneath the FFA but... eh, it's day 1. Maybe give her a pass? It's a kinda bandwagony FFA though with the exception of me.

Tegan WW wrote: »

Also, If Liam is a wolf Id doubt Phil is, same for Oisin and Clodagh

Eh, don't be ruling these things out just yet. Wait till we get more info on who exactly Phil, or Liam - or Oisin/Clodagh (though I'd be kinda with you on the Oisin/Clodagh read atm).


Overall it's a villagery ISO, with a few caveats. FFA is kinda bandwagony, I don't like that.

I'd like her and Jake to address the post I highlighted above too with legit post counts/the trapping. Doesn't make much sense to me tbh.

Another thing is the immediate assumption there's one low posting wolf, it might be the case but it could also be the case that all four are hiding in the reeds (or indeed in the mid range).

Aside from the FFA though I'm leaning village for now anyways.

Conor WW

Right it looks like i could be lynched this evening, so I'll put this out there before I am
Raging I didn't think of this earlier as it would have closed off a loop hole

Basically I think definitely the priest and maybe the seer should come out anonymously to their BR

Positives of this are that if we have the priest we get reliable info on each death

Negatives
- The wolves/SK have already killed the priest and claim the role themselves, slightly less than 10% chance of this being the case
- We have two people come forward as priest - this we can get around at their death - Players A&B claim to be priest. Both agree to be present at 9pm and 10am to give their answers. If one of them dies then the other should be saying a wolf is dead unless they are the wolf themselves. The permutations on that need to be worked out but it will give us some information


Likewise for the Seer. I have a feeling Henry already has someone in his group claiming a role? What if that's a wolf, maybe that role could be claimed by another group?


I've suggested putting this information out there in my group and I've gotten no response. I believe it can only help the village

So - our BR is called The Capitol, i believe there are four BRs of 6 members each, we have 6 in ours, unless there are people arriving late.
Somebody said earlier they thought the capitol was for the wolves, its not. I would presume the wolves have their own BR separate to all this. I think it means a wolf in each BR but it means the two people Kandiss is looking for is in a BR with another RV, surely that can be useful

Doris WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Holly - Happy to see Clodagh lynched. Interested to see if her opinion changes now

Eva - Decent enough FFA, with no other accusatory posts prior to it

Steve - Quick to accuse Oisin yesterday. Asking questions of ill significance today

Frank - Nothing of significance that I can see. Not adding much to the conversation

Jake - First to point out Conor's possible slip. Pointed out Conor and Holly's comments towards Clodagh

Riona - Currently thinks I'm the SK based on a gif

Oisin - Thin reasoning behind his FFA, hasn't contributed much

Desmond - Most of his posts today concern Conor - who he claims to have already voted for - or the number of players

Doris - In a game like this, I find it hard to believe that you knew what 'Dandy' was, but not RNG

I think that covers everyone.

My #FFA1 is:

Conor
Steve
Doris

So you are putting me on your FFA because I knew who Dandy was and didn’t know what an RNG was? Has to be the flimsiest reasons ever!!

Anyway just on to vote for lynch. Watching BGT, will check in again later

Conor WW

On people asking me to defend myself, if you're not trying to get on a bandwagon then you're facilitating it.

As I said earlier I wouldn't have gone after Clodagh like i did if i was a wolf, it would make zero sense. I would wait and kill her tomorrow morning and try and avoid the BG protecting her.

Going after me for watery FFAs, WTF do you expect me to say, well I saw Tegan shoot Mary so thats why i think its him
Someone has an FFA of two people and I'm there because they have a bad feeling about me FFS and mine are called watery!

If I was a wolf you can be 100% certain I wouldn't make some schoolboy error like saying you instead of us, i;ve explained it, thats all i can do.

How about you look at what I'm actually saying and judge me on that.

Tegan WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Blargh, you grabbed my attention there Tegan so here's your very own dedicated post!





Opening post... ok. NAI.



Responding to Oisin and the 'avenge me' comment. I like this post, it's logical and villagery. Good start.

Unfortunately that's everything from night 0.



This is interesting. Discussion of the communal backrooms and a very good point re: the dead (Mary being the focus here but it works for both tbh).

Makes me wonder if there was anything off thread that might have made Abi/Mary a target. Don't wanna get too bogged down in it though.



Mech talk, but you can see Tegan has informed herself and read the OP properly anyways. Not really alignment indicative but I like that anyways.



Roleblock talk, again very to the point. NAI again.



Meh. Fluff. At a minimum for Tegan though, so that's a bonus I suppose?



Fair point again when (Phil or Henry I think) brings up the low posters. Unless there's something inherently wolfy that you think you see, leave them till tomorrow imo.



Responds to Frank stating that the trap might stop someone from posting. I can't see any mechanic that would stop players from posting on the game thread myself tbh.



More talk about low posters, not sure I agree with her points here though - why just one? I've been in games with multiple low posting wolves, don't limit your scope.



Responds to Jake about a mention of a legit post count.

Tbh I have no clue what this means (or the post from Jake).



Talking about Clodagh possibly being roled. Not gonna go there, I see the merits in her post though



Accuses Phil of pocketing. Ok, interesting.



And responding to Phil who stated he was on the same wavelength as Conor and Henry. Again, I have to agree. That triangle is likely to contain some pocketing imo.




Her FFA. Interesting choices, I've addressed the points made to me already.

Her reasoning for Conor is kinda weird, I mean she's barely engaged with him at all, and kinda went after Phil for pocketing. She does allude to Phil in player salad beneath the FFA but... eh, it's day 1. Maybe give her a pass? It's a kinda bandwagony FFA though with the exception of me.



Eh, don't be ruling these things out just yet. Wait till we get more info on who exactly Phil, or Liam - or Oisin/Clodagh (though I'd be kinda with you on the Oisin/Clodagh read atm).


Overall it's a villagery ISO, with a few caveats. FFA is kinda bandwagony, I don't like that.

I'd like her and Jake to address the post I highlighted above too with legit post counts/the trapping. Doesn't make much sense to me tbh.

Another thing is the immediate assumption there's one low posting wolf, it might be the case but it could also be the case that all four are hiding in the reeds (or indeed in the mid range).

Aside from the FFA though I'm leaning village for now anyways.

The legit post counts bit is basically cause I don't get Jake's point. I was trying to understand what he meant, possibly that if someone couldn't post they'd look like a low poster. I could also have been that backroom chat would be happening I guess. Overall though I cant explain it because I cant explain what Jake meant.

On the low posting wolf, yes fair point. My starting point is usually that they'll spread themselves out a bit in most games. There could be more than one in the lows but from previous games there's also likely to be several villagers who can't/ won't post more. Basically we'll get to the lows but they're not where we should start imho.

On the phil/conor/henry thing, its a fair point. I just haven't worked this one out yet. For now I'm tagging Conor but yeah ok

Phil WW

Sorry guys I don't have a lot of time tonight. Votes have to be in by 9 right? I will get one in at least. May not be able to post a lot. My main suspect is steve as he jumped on oisin which i think was dodgy.

Tegan WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Right it looks like i could be lynched this evening, so I'll put this out there before I am
Raging I didn't think of this earlier as it would have closed off a loop hole

Basically I think definitely the priest and maybe the seer should come out anonymously to their BR

Positives of this are that if we have the priest we get reliable info on each death

Negatives
- The wolves/SK have already killed the priest and claim the role themselves, slightly less than 10% chance of this being the case
- We have two people come forward as priest - this we can get around at their death - Players A&B claim to be priest. Both agree to be present at 9pm and 10am to give their answers. If one of them dies then the other should be saying a wolf is dead unless they are the wolf themselves. The permutations on that need to be worked out but it will give us some information


Likewise for the Seer. I have a feeling Henry already has someone in his group claiming a role? What if that's a wolf, maybe that role could be claimed by another group?


I've suggested putting this information out there in my group and I've gotten no response. I believe it can only help the village

So - our BR is called The Capitol, i believe there are four BRs of 6 members each, we have 6 in ours, unless there are people arriving late.
Somebody said earlier they thought the capitol was for the wolves, its not. I would presume the wolves have their own BR separate to all this. I think it means a wolf in each BR but it means the two people Kandiss is looking for is in a BR with another RV, surely that can be useful

This isn't a bad idea I think. Anyone see any flaw with it? Only danger I can think of is if players have been id'd in the backrooms

Frank WW

More gifts. Be interested to see what the story is with those.

@Gabriel the Jake post count thing was explained by him. He was basically saying that people are posting in BRs too so the number of posts here on this thread might not reflect the total number of game posts.

Fiona WW

Doris WW wrote: »

So you are putting me on your FFA because I knew who Dandy was and didn’t know what an RNG was? Has to be the flimsiest reasons ever!!

Anyway just on to vote for lynch. Watching BGT, will check in again later

Knowing an obscure game-related acronym but not knowing a basic one says inconsistency to me. Which say possible lie, which says possible wolf

Frank WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Knowing an obscure game-related acronym but not knowing a basic one says inconsistency to me. Which say possible lie, which says possible wolf

To be fair...Dandy is the name of a player not an obscure game related acronym.

Fiona WW

Frank WW wrote: »

To be fair...Dandy is the name of a player not an obscure game related acronym.

It's an obscure name-related acronym, that other people - myself included - didn't know

Clodagh WW

Frank WW wrote: »

To be fair...Dandy is the name of a player not an obscure game related acronym.

I’m a legend in my own underpants, everyone should know my name, obviously a wolf if not.

Conor WW

Guys can you have a look at this post please

If we are to do it then we should probably agree to do it by 9pm or we are increasing the risk of the priest being killed off

Conor WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

This isn't a bad idea I think. Anyone see any flaw with it? Only danger I can think of is if players have been id'd in the backrooms

I should have said if you're already outted in your BR then maybe not a great idea

Henry WW

New information has come to light. Why did Liam post a dandy story and then clodes claimed to be Dandy?

I was working off an assumption only nrvs were in the district backrooms but that is now definitely not the case. If it had been it would have meant Liam and Clodagh were nrv buddies. Now I cant be sure.

Why did you share a story with someone else to post dandy.

Frank WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

It's an obscure name-related acronym, that other people - myself included - didn't know

It literally came up in the most recent game. Which had 20 odd players who would know the name. It's not that obscure. Being able to explain it means it was likely someone who played that game or read the thread.

Henry WW

Conor WW wrote:

If we are to do it then we should probably agree to do it by 9pm or we are increasing the risk of the priest being killed off

We discussed it in our room earlier today . If there is no link between someone's on thread and br accounts, then fine. If someone thinks they can be identified through post style, then maybe not.

Desmond WW

Quotes Fiona's jigsaw GIF asking a valid question

Riona WW wrote: »

Wasn't jigsaw a.... Serial killer?

replies to Fiona's post who had said jigsaw/SK was misunderstood

Riona WW wrote: »

Are... You misunderstood?

Brings up Fiona again

Riona WW wrote: »

Can we not just lynch Fiona for the blatant serial killer gif and work from there?

This post an hour after her last and just after announcement from mods re gifts

Riona WW wrote: »

No gifts here

Posting this morning before munch (Nb: at time of posting this ISO, Liam has recently done a list of pre munch posters but does not include Riona).
I've included Oisin as I there's a post in the middle i'm querying ....

Oisin WW wrote: »

I’m inclined to think the tasks could be wolf v SK for the first kill. Be interesting to see if we have 1 or 2 kills this morning.

Riona WW wrote: »

Why? Inside knowledge?

Oisin WW wrote: »

If I had inside knowledge I wouldn’t be sharing it

Where is the post that shows this leap? I searched Oisin's but couldn't find reference to "are there or not tasks"

Riona WW wrote: »

Its an interesting leap to go straight from "are there or not tasks" to "its for the first kill".

Change of subject and is looking at role mechanics. Fair enough......

Riona WW wrote: »

Seneca Crane: Was the Head Gamemaker during the 74th Hunger Games. Snow told Katniss he had him executed for letting both her and Peeta live by locking him in a room containing poisonous nightlock berries to consume. However, in reality, he was banished from the Capitol and given a new identity. Snow has now identified him as a key member of team Capitol as he knows a thing or two about the arena.

Probably means they'll show as Village on first seer peak.

Fluff post to Henry just before munch.

Riona WW wrote: »

I'm here for you Henry.

Back to Fiona. I questioned this earlier but why would a baddy draw a peek? If they know they peek good would they just not worry about it?

Riona WW wrote: »

I had an idea in my head that Fiona could be Crane. Using the serial killer GIF to be peaked and showing good if the Seer bit.

Abigail poked at Fiona too and is dead. No way to tell the kills apart reading that flavor. Maybe the SK thought the same as me and killed Abi to get heat on Fiona?

Reference to tusk posting naked

Riona WW wrote: »

Makes sense from that liking all Pters posts would have side effects.

Asking Clodagh what last part of long post stood for

Riona WW wrote: »

and ph7?

Clodagh says PH7 is neutral and Riona posts this. I don't get the reference.

Riona WW wrote: »

Mods have just announced someone is trapped. Few players discussing if it's a gift.

Riona WW wrote: »

Trapped?

Riona WW wrote: »

Who posted the gift gif yesterday? Any input from them?

Riona WW wrote: »

Or even better, is the trapped player able to make themselves known?

Responds to Clodagh's venus fly trap post.

Riona WW wrote: »

Are you claiming credit?

reply again to Clodagh re: same convo as above

Riona WW wrote: »

u ok hun xx?

Henry is talking about low posters and the last game teaching us nothing. Riona replies...

Riona WW wrote: »

There were no roles in the last game.

Still looking for push on Fiona. Bit calm about losing a RV.

Riona WW wrote: »

I'm gonna quote this again as my vote is on Fiona for now and I gotta go for a while. Clodagh is too chaotic to lynch right now, maybe give some time and see what happens. If they're RV then a Munch might do the job for us anyway.

This one NAI

Riona WW wrote: »

Not gonna vote Clodagh either. Mods will sort it if there's a real issue.

As an aside, play the game looking enough and you're going to be lynched a lot as a village. It's the wolf's job after all, munches alone don't work. Dandy I'd prefer if you stayed so we can work together (maybe still lynch you at some point, could still be a wolf after all) but don't take any of this personally. It's just a game

Once again quite calm at possibilty of losing a villager.

Riona WW wrote: »

It's a self resolving situation. Worst case scenario it wastes a lynch and we start tomorrow down two more villages after 10am with no proper work done.

Riona WW wrote: »

Feels a bit tense in here, are we all ok? Let "attack the post not the poster" guide us as we play.

Replying to me re: Alma Coin. Now this is where my suspicions really lie. Seeing as Riona knew so much about Crane and his peeking good and tying Fiona into a scenario, how did she not know what the other roles in the game in particular the SK which she thinks Fiona was pretending to be?

Riona WW wrote: »

How do you know she peeks good?

Replying to a mad theory of mine that SK might just post in districts and not on thread.

Riona WW wrote: »

Easy to find, just look at the post history for the character not posting but making lynch votes. Or not posting but not getting mod killed for missing lynch votes.

Pushing Clodagh again? Is there a bandwagon at this time forming elsewhere?

Riona WW wrote: »

Or Clodagh... who has made moves to abandon the game but no action seems to have been taken yet?

conclusion
Not that many posts to analyse. The pushing of Fiona, pushing the Clodagh lynch too. Big warning sign over her missing the SK mechanics. On the wolfy side for me.

Jake WW

Henry WW wrote: »

We discussed it in our room earlier today . If there is no link between someone's on thread and br accounts, then fine. If someone thinks they can be identified through post style, then maybe not.

If I were one of them, I’d be really reluctant to step out of the shadows at all on Day one. An investigative wolf might notice things you didn’t. Common spelling mistakes, time stamps aligning, etc. putting any sort of target on your back on night one, even a very small one, seems super risky. Right?

Frank WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Guys can you have a look at this post please

If we are to do it then we should probably agree to do it by 9pm or we are increasing the risk of the priest being killed off

It's an interesting idea. It's obviously not going to work if people have revealed their names in their BRs but if not it might be effective.

There could be a downside in that it might give the wolves a narrower pool to role hunt in though.

Conor WW

Henry WW wrote: »

New information has come to light. Why did Liam post a dandy story and then clodes claimed to be Dandy?

I was working off an assumption only nrvs were in the district backrooms but that is now definitely not the case. If it had been it would have meant Liam and Clodagh were nrv buddies. Now I cant be sure.

Why did you share a story with someone else to post dandy.

I thought Liam was Dandy when he posted first

Gabriel WW

Henry WW wrote: »

New information has come to light. Why did Liam post a dandy story and then clodes claimed to be Dandy?

I was working off an assumption only nrvs were in the district backrooms but that is now definitely not the case. If it had been it would have meant Liam and Clodagh were nrv buddies. Now I cant be sure.

Why did you share a story with someone else to post dandy.

Tbh Henry I'm confused as to why you ever thought that might be the case. Speaking purely from a mechanics perspective, wouldn't that be very village sided?

Conor WW

Frank WW wrote: »

It's an interesting idea. It's obviously not going to work if people have revealed their names in their BRs but if not it might be effective.

There could be a downside in that it might give the wolves a narrower pool to role hunt in though.

How does it narrow it down? I don't understand that bit


@Gabriel what's ur thoughts?

Gabriel WW

Conor WW wrote: »

How does it narrow it down? I don't understand that bit


@Gabriel what's ur thoughts?

I see the merits but it's risky. I'm certain there are wolves in the backrooms and if they collate post times/identify backroom posters correctly it's a turkey shoot for them.

Remember they already know who they are, and can likely collate all the rooms information in their own.

Henry WW

Jake WW wrote:

If I were one of them, I’d be really reluctant to step out of the shadows at all on Day one. An investigative wolf might notice things you didn’t. Common spelling mistakes, time stamps aligning, etc. putting any sort of target on your back on night one, even a very small one, seems super risky. Right?

Yep.

Gabriel WW wrote:

Tbh Henry I'm confused as to why you ever thought that might be the case. Speaking purely from a mechanics perspective, wouldn't that be very village sided?

Mods have secrets. We thought it was nrv club house, but Snow could watch us intermittently or something. So secret club but not really secret.

Plus there could be stuff at play we don't know about to balance it out. Unless you have all the info gabe, I don't see how you can dismiss it like that.

Conor WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

I see the merits but it's risky. I'm certain there are wolves in the backrooms and if they collate post times/identify backroom posters correctly it's a turkey shoot for them.

Remember they already know who they are, and can likely collate all the rooms information in their own.

But there's only one baddie per BR, and we're only talking about two good roles

Phil WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

It's an obscure name-related acronym, that other people - myself included - didn't know

I also knew Dandy but not RNG.

WerewolfGM

Players are reminded to use their Anon name when casting their lynch vote. Existing votes using Boards account will be accepted but please use the Anon name going forward or your vote may not be counted.

Gabriel WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Yep.



Mods have secrets. We thought it was nrv club house, but Snow could watch us intermittently or something. So secret club but not really secret.

Plus there could be stuff at play we don't know about to balance it out. Unless you have all the info gabe, I don't see how you can dismiss it like that.

Ha, you realise how powerful a tool that is where villagers can confirm each other?

I don't have all the info, I bloody well wish I did!

There are liars amongst you if they are all claiming NRV.

Choc Chip

Conor WW wrote: »

How does it narrow it down? I don't understand that bit


@Gabriel what's ur thoughts?

See Conor, I want to think you're village, but you keep doing stuff like this - it just feels like pocketing.

I'm going to be away til after lynch. My vote's in. May the mods be ever in your favour.

Frank WW

Conor WW wrote: »

How does it narrow it down? I don't understand that bit


@Gabriel what's ur thoughts?

Could be overthinking but what if priest/seer is in BR1 along with wolf. Comes out in backroom. Now wolves can focus on trying to match BR style/time of posting to main thread. Also what if one BR has both? No clue on the mechanics of the BRs but if randomly assigned could be possible.

Desmond WW

Henry WW wrote: »

New information has come to light. Why did Liam post a dandy story and then clodes claimed to be Dandy?

I was working off an assumption only nrvs were in the district backrooms but that is now definitely not the case. If it had been it would have meant Liam and Clodagh were nrv buddies. Now I cant be sure.

Why did you share a story with someone else to post dandy.

Why would you think there were only NRVs in the district backrooms? What would be the point of that?


Did Clodagh give Liam a story to write whilst you were chatting in your district?



You all sound loosed tongued in there!

Gabriel WW

Conor WW wrote: »

But there's only one baddie per BR, and we're only talking about two good roles

One? How can you be sure?

There's 5 baddies in total. Definitely gonna be a double stack somewhere.

Conor WW

Jake WW wrote: »

If I were one of them, I’d be really reluctant to step out of the shadows at all on Day one. An investigative wolf might notice things you didn’t. Common spelling mistakes, time stamps aligning, etc. putting any sort of target on your back on night one, even a very small one, seems super risky. Right?

But if you die your information dies with you?
Maybe its up to them to decide how important the information they have
The danger with waiting is that they are killed and the wolves take a chance and just claim the role. The earlier its revealed the more reliable it will be IMO

Conor WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

One? How can you be sure?

There's 5 baddies in total. Definitely gonna be a double stack somewhere.

Theres four on one team and another team, so a room is double stacked but they don't know

Angus WW

Choc Chip wrote: »

See Conor, I want to think you're village, but you keep doing stuff like this - it just feels like pocketing.

I'm going to be away til after lynch. My vote's in. May the mods be ever in your favour.

Oh sh1t. That's me. Sigh.

Jake WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

One? How can you be sure?

There's 5 baddies in total. Definitely gonna be a double stack somewhere.

Is your read of the SK not that they don’t have a district? (I.e. isn’t in a backroom with another group)

Desmond WW

Conor WW wrote: »

How does it narrow it down? I don't understand that bit


@Gabriel what's ur thoughts?

Can I interject?


Conor, you should be fighting for your life not submitting to death. Get on another wagon.

Clodagh WW

Henry WW wrote: »

New information has come to light. Why did Liam post a dandy story and then clodes claimed to be Dandy?

I was working off an assumption only nrvs were in the district backrooms but that is now definitely not the case. If it had been it would have meant Liam and Clodagh were nrv buddies. Now I cant be sure.

Why did you share a story with someone else to post dandy.

I didn’t, I don’t have exclusive rights on flavour

Wendy WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Ok, I patiently waited for Wendy to engage with me but she has ignored all posts where I referenced her.

I’m aboard the Wenderley Wagon

Vote. Wendy

I have not seen any post where you asked to engage with me. The result of a somewhat skimmy relationship with the thread


Like I said at the time, I found your opening post wolfy. its curious that you take that line with me as soon as I leave the thread. Vote me when I cant be online to defend myself

Frank WW

Conor WW wrote: »

But there's only one baddie per BR, and we're only talking about two good roles

We can't possibly be sure of that. There could be more than one per BR.