ICC World Cup 2019

Strumms

Larbre34 wrote: »

What??? Missus won't turn over the tennis

You need a divorce you have no idea what you are missing

VillaMad

15 off 6. Boult on.

Strumms

Think You’d have to back New Zealand clearly now.

VillaMad

Two dot balls. New Zealand almost there.

VillaMad

SIX!!!!!!

Larbre34

Strumms wrote: »

You need a divorce you have no idea what you are missing

Its 11-11 in the 5th, 4th deuce. The boys are shagged. Someone in England got scheduling badly messed up for today.

VillaMad

OMG!!

gmisk

I am cricket on phone tennis on TV lol

gmisk

3 from 2...

Mr. Guappa

CRAZY!

Schwanz

Craziest game of all time

VillaMad

I have watched cricket for 20 years and never seen that happen before.

VillaMad

Rashid run out. 2 needed from 1.

gimli2112

insane stuff

gmisk

Super over...

VillaMad

SUPER OVER!

Larbre34

Bleedin tennis at a 12-12 tiebreaker under new rules. Tight as a crab's arse too.

sabat

If this was a movie you'd be scoffing at how unrealistic it is

Schwanz

Good lord what a game no matter what happens now

amcalester

What’s a super over?

I just cannot believe this. The luck England had at the end, it has to be their day.

KevIRL

Who said cricket is boring!

Larbre34

VillaMad wrote: »

SUPER OVER!

One over for each team. A Cricket tiebreaker basically.

Whoever scheduled Thalia for today should be shot

Incredible luck for England. Should do it now.

Schwanz

How does he get 6 there when the ball didn’t go directly out?

gimli2112

Australia and South Africa had a crazy semi final 20+ years ago. Never thought I'd see nonsense like it and now this.

Strumms

Basil3 wrote: »

I just cannot believe this. The luck England had at the end, it has to be their day.

I wouldn’t bet on either, it’s throwing money up in the sky..... unreal best game of one day cricket I’ve ever seen, World Cup final too, phenomenal skill execution.

Schwanz

Schwanz wrote: »

How does he get 6 there when the ball didn’t go directly out?

Ran 2, then 4 otherthrows.

gimli2112

Schwanz wrote: »

How does he get 6 there when the ball didn’t go directly out?

ran 2 and 4 when it went over the line

Schwanz

gimli2112 wrote: »

ran 2 and 4 when it went over the line

Got ya cheers. Phew this is mad

alchemist33

My hearts been thumping for 20 minutes

Strumms

Yep, right choice of batsmen.

Larbre34

Tennis finally over!

alchemist33

If England win this I'll be delighted for Stokes after what happened in the T20

Strumms

He leaves that it’s wide

Hammer Archer

Archer bowling for England!

Inquitus

15 runs is a tidy total, Archer to bowl.

Guy:Incognito

Some last 2 overs for England. (1 + super over)

Looked dead and buried going in to the last over.

gmisk

If England win this are we never gonna hear the end of it like 1966 in the world cup?!

Strumms

Inquitus wrote: »

15 runs is a tidy total, Archer to bowl.

If it’s a tie they just said England win, so 16 needed:eek:

Larbre34

gmisk wrote: »

If England win this are we never gonna hear the end of it like 1966 in the world cup?!

I presume thats a rhetorical question.

blueser

gmisk wrote: »

If England win this are we never gonna hear the end of it like 1966 in the world cup?!

Ireland would be just as bad in a similar scenario. People still attend novenas to honour Ray Houghton.

Dr. Bre

gmisk wrote: »

If England win this are we never gonna hear the end of it like 1966 in the world cup?!

Unlikely as cricket not as big of a following as football

Harry Palmr

Taking far too long for this.

gmisk

Piers F#CKING Morgan

VillaMad

Guptill and Neesham.

Guy:Incognito

Harry Palmr wrote: »

Taking far too long for this.

Whats the rush. Its been over 7 weeks.

Injuryprone

Strumms wrote: »

If it’s a tie they just said England win, so 16 needed:eek:

If it's a tie, it goes down to boundaries hit. England hit 2

VillaMad

First ball is a wide.

Inquitus

Injuryprone wrote: »

If it's a tie, it goes down to boundaries hit. England hit 2

If they both hit 2?