Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How is a man supposed to find a woman in the 21st century

11618202122

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,322 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    pinkyeye wrote: »
    It's easy to find out if someone is single or not. Just get into a conversation about holidays or something and ask casually "is it just you and your partner going?"

    Subtle but effective :pac:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So it will do what it says but that doesn't mean it "worked"? Interesting knot-tying there.

    Again not what I said. So the knot tying is yours. However this -
    So talk to more women is common sense. The negging etc. is all just packaging that has no relevance?

    - pretty much is what I am saying yes!!

    It is "common sense" that if you dress a little better - exercise a little more - and maybe talk to more people - that you might get laid more.

    I can see nothing about PUA - or the specific claims of PUA - that will get you laid more. Absolutely nothing.

    However _while_ they sell you PUA bull-turd nonsense about negging and conversation transactional modes - they happen to quite often _also_ distract you from the fact they are basically just getting you to dress a little better - exercise a little more - and maybe talk to more people.


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Again not what I said. So the knot tying is yours. However this -



    - pretty much is what I am saying yes!!

    It is "common sense" that if you dress a little better - exercise a little more - and maybe talk to more people - that you might get laid more.

    I can see nothing about PUA - or the specific claims of PUA - that will get you laid more. Absolutely nothing.

    However _while_ they sell you PUA bull-turd nonsense about negging and conversation transactional modes - they happen to quite often _also_ distract you from the fact they are basically just getting you to dress a little better - exercise a little more - and maybe talk to more people.
    Well in my experience you're completely wrong. A couple of mates always dressed well, fancy smelly stuff etc. and got nowhere for years. Started being arseholes and they pulled more often than not. The girls we knew in common would mention to me it was awful how they went on, yet some still got with them.
    I tried negging myself to see if it worked and depressingly it did. Didn't follow through on it but rather than being my usual cordial and warm self just being a dick for a little while got me a lot more interest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,657 ✭✭✭Doctor Jimbob


    Well in my experience you're completely wrong. A couple of mates always dressed well, fancy smelly stuff etc. and got nowhere for years. Started being arseholes and they pulled more often than not. The girls we knew in common would mention to me it was awful how they went on, yet some still got with them.
    I tried negging myself to see if it worked and depressingly it did. Didn't follow through on it but rather than being my usual cordial and warm self just being a dick for a little while got me a lot more interest.

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and say what "worked" is probably the fact you stopped caring so much rather than the "negging" itself.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well in my experience you're completely wrong. A couple of mates always dressed well, fancy smelly stuff etc. and got nowhere for years. Started being arseholes and they pulled more often than not.

    Alas since this is anecdote that I can not verify as true in any way - we are at the "I will take your word for it" kind of impasse which actually means I am not taking your word for it :)

    For me there seems to be nothing in the material of PUA that is evidenced in any way other than anecdote I hear and can never verify. However my own anecdotal experience is the only reason acting like a dick improved their chances is that what they were doing _before_ there was simply significantly worse or creepier.

    _If_ there is more to it than that it is hard to imagine what. Except possibly the power of placebo. If you feel empowered by a set of "skills" or "moves" you believe will get you laid that can have a placebo effect on your confidence and the like. Which sure - will help. I am happy to concede that for sure.

    Some time ago I worked on a guys "game" and I did it reluctantly. And the whole time I was working on him I was very conscious of not crossing a line into stuff like "PUA". I defined the line and never crossed it I think.

    However we went from him getting _zero_ interest from _anyone_ at speed dating before I worked on him - to actually getting significantly over 50% of the women at the speed dating expressing an interest and sharing contact details.

    So I do genuinely believe there are things that can be improved - that work for genuine reasons - without any of this absolute bullock tripe about getting into the "Right transactional mode of conversation and avoid being a buyer or a seller" and all that absolute anus-biscuits.

    Which alas - I realise - is another anecdote which you in turn can not verify :) But such is the state of play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    My colleague did the Tinder plus thing recently and told me she had 1,400 matches within a few days :eek:

    I mean seriously, how are you going to see the goodness or uniqueness in any one person if you've got that amount of men to choose from. IME, it just leads to this weird online shopping mentality developing where you start prioritising the wrong things and constantly thinking you can do "better"...and round and round we go. I don't want to think about humans that way.

    Its insane, so many lads must just be swiping right to any girl they find remotely attractive.
    I had about 4,800 matches/likes after about 2 weeks and it just made me panic.. I actually took a screenshot and sent it to my friend cause I couldn't believe it. It was so overwhelming - I don't have time to go through 4 thousand profiles!

    And I completely agree about the whole window shopping mentality.
    It was making me really picky and when I reflected on it, I realised I needed to cop myself on and actually give people a proper chance and not be so damn superficial. I don't want to be that kind of person.
    I was in a false sense of security thinking I had hundreds of options when it really wasn't the case. :pac:
    I actually know plenty of lads platonically who are very good looking but just don't photograph well because they aren't posers, and it made me consider how many lads like that I must be swiping left to!
    Best of luck with it! It's been the best thing I did for myself lately. It forces you out of yourself, if you know what I mean. You focus a bit more on meeting people and building relationships, you become a bit more open-minded about what the "right" guy looks like.

    Realistically, IME of romantic partners, he's not going to look like what you think he'll look like. Coz he'll be human and not some manufactured prototype you can order up on a dating app and put through a round of auditions before deciding you're willing to invest. You get what you need, not what you think you want in the end.

    I think that's bang on the money.
    Many of my ex's wouldn't have ticked all my boxes on my checklist, I probably wouldn't have matched with them yet they were perfect for me (at one time:p).
    I'm going to try to live more in the moment and not on my phone, take people for who they are & as they are without mentally calculating if they're husband material or the future father of my kids. :pac:
    I think all the fun has been sucked out of it and I'm hoping this more relaxed "real world" approach will work and be more natural.
    I'm going to try it at the weekend, hopefully it'll go well!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    Its insane, so many lads must just be swiping right to any girl they find remotely attractive.

    Not sure it is insane so much as a use of their time which makes sense in a way if you look at it in isolation. Which they likely are.

    After all if you checked out all the pictures on a profile and all the information and _then_ made a choice - you might swipe yes to about 5 or 6 potential partners in an hour. And then have _none_ of them write back. So it was a waste of time.

    If you just swipe yes to _everyone_ however you can get 100s or even 1000s in a short space of time investment. Then _if_ one or more of them matches back with you you can _then_ invest the time in checking "Is this someone I want to match with?".

    It might seem insane - but if you look at it in terms of investment of time it actually makes a lot of sense. It destroys the entire system for sure - and all guys would benefit as a whole if all guys stopped doing it - but it still makes a lot of sense.

    I guess all guys doing it - even though all guys not doing it would likely benefit them all more - is the dating version of what is known as "The prisoners Dilemma" in psychology. If you know the dilemma - it is essentially the same thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,872 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    I really hope its the same guy with all these PUA accounts.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I really hope its the same guy with all these PUA accounts.

    You gotta love how in the post where I wrote " Sorry mods/admins!" I predicted not only that the re-reg was about to come back but was about to specifically reply to me :)

    I can well see how predicting the blatantly obvious a few times could leave people with a messiah complex or the illusion of being a fortune teller though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Well in my experience you're completely wrong. A couple of mates always dressed well, fancy smelly stuff etc. and got nowhere for years. Started being arseholes and they pulled more often than not. The girls we knew in common would mention to me it was awful how they went on, yet some still got with them.

    Good clothes and smelling nice isn't going to make much difference if you're a personality vacuum when talking to the ladies. It's a pity they had to set their personality to asshat to gain confidence with the women but c'est la vie.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "have ya a jockey yourself" is another good subtle way to check her status imo

    if you have to be an asshole (self-styled) to feel you have a better shot at *anything* then I have doubts whether you should be doing that thing

    it has never been my experience that ive had to be any more of an asshole to meet my relationship needs

    it is entirely likely im naturally just the right amount of asshole, however


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,322 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    Good clothes and smelling nice isn't going to make much difference if you're a personality vacuum when talking to the ladies. It's a pity they had to set their personality to asshat to gain confidence with the women but c'est la vie.

    Too true, I'm often told I'm an attractive girl but I become paranoid then that beyond that I don't have much more to offer or that I'm boring as I've never really been told that I'm good fun or an interesting person - probably a bit of a self esteem issue there :pac: but it's definitely not all about looking good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    OK. Just so we're clear:

    My opinion is most women want to have children, and most women have children.
    Have you any stats?

    Would have thought it was pretty much common knowledge that most women want and have children, but in any case, here's some stats:

    The proportion of women aged 40-44 or around that are childless varies considerably across OECD countries (Table SF2.5.A). In some OECD countries, including Austria, Spain and the United Kingdom, 20% or more of women aged 40-44 or around are childless. In others, by contrast, rates are lower than 10%.

    Rates of childless at or around age 40-44 are particularly low in the South or Central American OECD countries – with the rate in Chile in 2002 only 7.72% and in Mexico in 2010 only 8.55% – and particularly also in Turkey, where as late as 2008 only 4.5% of women aged 40-44 were childless.

    Rates of childless at age 40-44 or around are increasing in most of those OECD countries where data are available for both time points (Table SF2.5.A). In many cases the size of changes are not directly comparable across countries because of differences in the years of reference and in some cases also definitions. Nontheless, in Finland for example, the proportion of 40-44 women that are childless increased by over 5 percentage points between 1990 and 2010, while in the United Kingdom rates of childlessness for women aged 45 increased by 6 percentage points between 1995 and 2010.

    Only four OECD countries (Chile, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Turkey) with available data see the rate of childlessness fall between their two time points, with the decrease in Luxembourg (from 19% in 1991 to 15% in 2001) particularly large.


    Image1.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    Good clothes and smelling nice isn't going to make much difference if you're a personality vacuum when talking to the ladies. It's a pity they had to set their personality to asshat to gain confidence with the women but c'est la vie.

    Again, it comes down to confidence and just being fun.

    Clothes don't make the man but they certainly help, but if you don't have a word in your head or just a dry ****e, no amount of decent clothes will make a jot of a difference.

    Also most women don't want to date an asshole. It's more being confident and playful, bordering on teasing but not overstepping the mark and being rude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,872 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    leahyl wrote: »
    Too true, I'm often told I'm an attractive girl but I become paranoid

    Only way to be sure is to post a pic and start a poll ;)

    That definitely won't give you any self esteem issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    Up until recent generations women had no choice as to whether they had children or not.
    There is still a cultural pressure to be maternal, though less so than in Metropolitan areas. Its definitely less socially acceptable in rural/more traditional communities to not want children.

    Just because most women have children doesn't mean they wanted them. Particularly in the generations before us.

    Disclaimer: I want kids so my opinion isn't coming from a place of defensiveness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,322 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    Only way to be sure is to post a pic and start a poll ;)

    That definitely won't give you any self esteem issues.

    :D not a hope!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Only way to be sure is to post a pic and start a poll ;)

    That definitely won't give you any self esteem issues.

    What are the actual rules of posting pictures of yourself or your partner on this forum? I never see anyone do it so I assumed it was banned? In fact I seem to remember a whole thread for it called "Know your boardsies" which I now can not even find any more? Was it deleted?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    SusieBlue wrote: »
    Up until recent generations women had no choice as to whether they had children or not.
    There is still a cultural pressure to be maternal, though less so than in Metropolitan areas. Its definitely less socially acceptable in rural/more traditional communities to not want children.

    Just because most women have children doesn't mean they wanted them. Particularly in the generations before us.

    Disclaimer: I want kids so my opinion isn't coming from a place of defensiveness.

    Genuinely, I think most people (beyond your immediate family) don't give two shytes whether you have kids or not. There's just a wee bit more of a chance of some pass remarkable geebag commenting on it down the country because they've nothing else to do in their lives but be pass remarkable geebags.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,709 ✭✭✭Feisar


    I really hope its the same guy with all these PUA accounts.

    I mentioned a few pua bits and I’m not connected with the other accounts

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,606 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Ok. I think we should move away from the PUA stuff. If ye would be so kind...

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ok. I think we should move away from the PUA stuff. If ye would be so kind...

    but what if its how you get a girl in the 21st century?

    (kidding, kidding)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,872 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    What are the actual rules of posting pictures of yourself or your partner on this forum? I never see anyone do it so I assumed it was banned? In fact I seem to remember a whole thread for it called "Know your boardsies" which I now can not even find any more? Was it deleted?

    ^^^
    Maybe our mod friend could answer?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭pinkyeye


    best tip is never ever be or have anything to do with PUA culture

    What's PUA?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    pinkyeye wrote: »
    What's PUA?

    Portuguese for knobend.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    pick up artistry

    its

    and i dont mean to offend anyone

    its somewhat aligned with a worrying trend towards categorisation of women and men as easily-simplified carbon copies that react in predictable ways to certain situations and stimuli and can therefore teach you how to get the laydeez eatin out of your palm with a few neat tricks.

    its not all toxic, id say myself that its close enough to a gateway to toxic as makes no difference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    I see PUA as faking confidence and charm.

    And perhaps you can fake it 'til you make it.

    But I feel PUA misunderstands women.

    Most women just want a "normal" guy.

    Reliable, doesn't look like ****, has a future, makes her feel happy and safe.

    Almost every guy can become this guy with a little bit of effort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    Pepperpans, out of respect I watched the entire video.

    I have serious issues with this video.

    These are my comments:

    1. "She pretends she loses interest in the conversation".

    Women don't play this game. This entire logic ("When she pretends to lose interest in you") is psycho. I've chatted up literally hundreds of women, and no woman has ever done this. Women don't pretend to lose interest in you. WTF. This PUA guy does not understand women.

    Some of the things he says are correct: be masculine, be confident.

    What he doesn't understand is real confidence, real charm, real humour is what makes women like you. The way you get this is through self improvement, therapy, education, class, etc.

    2. "Use teasing jokes to bring her back to her childhood schoolyard teasing mentality".

    No, just no. Be funny like a normal human without the manipulation.

    Humour should be normal, it should not be about manipulation whatsoever. It should not be about trying to "create feelings of attraction".

    So ****ing creepy.

    "You're the prettiest, no the second prettiest, no the third prettiest, no not at all". This is just rude and weird.

    The guy in the video comes across as really unattractive. Fake, creepy, just not attractive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    ^--- seems the post with the video was deleted.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I fully understand why our own Ancapailldorcha has asked to get away from this whole PUA thing(never mind that it attracts the reregs like flies to poo), but too many men are getting into this stuff, with a few going right down the rabbit hole and guys need to be warned to put on their cynicism hats.

    Now if a bloke looking to up his chances - and I'd reckon in 90% of cases said blokes just want a girlfriend, not to become whoremasters - watches these vids on youtube, be 100% aware they are adverts. Adverts for "systems" these shillers want to sell to you.

    They usually take the approach of email spam. Fire out dozens of these vids hoping a percentage will stick. They get the guys in by promising "free" advice. Though almost always there's a twist of you should buy their e-book, sign up for some subscription, even sign up for so called boot camps where you can learn to BangSuperModelsOnTheStreet™ or whatever. A few use well tried out marketing techniques designed to make guys feel like some secret group who know the Secret™. These are tremendously effective hooks for lonely guys. Some get into it to the point of obsession. QV our rereg guys who sign up daily to this site and others. And these chancers with the bigger setups can make a pretty penny from it(or did as the market seems swamped now).

    Note that the more established companies nearly always tell men that looks don't really matter, neither does money, or height etc, but personality and attitude and with their Course of Power Dynamics™ or whatever, you'll be able to get the women you want. This is utter bollocks. Of course they say this as the men with looks, money and height are generally not concerned about this stuff. If looks didn't matter then why do the vast majority of couples match in objective physical attractiveness? We're not talking about fat billionaires with blonde dolly birds half their age waiting for them to tap out for the will, we're talking about ordinary people. Now no doubt a few men - and it's almost always men - will chime in and say their girlfriend is way out of their league, but I will bet the farm that if you asked random men and women they'd rate them the same or damned close to it. There have been a lot of studies done on this down the years that back this up. Looking back on my own relationship history, though at the time I thought they were the most gorgeous women on earth and they were to me, objectively they were about the same level as me. With one exception who was a peg above me, but she had more screws loose than a Mongolian made scooter in an earthquake, so..

    Thats another thing with these chancers, a large number of these pickup bullshit artists are objectively OK, physically attractive, even some good looking men. Men can be often very bad at judging physical attractiveness in other men so don't spot this. Example. After I had a quick google on the phenomenon, though there were plenty of small scale books before on how to pick up girls(How to win friends and influence people was a major best seller along the same lines), the current crop came out of a group of guys in the early noughties who as young lads often will went out to clubs and tried to stand out from the crowd. The more geeky of them decided to see if there was a technique that would add to a guys chances and off it went. Now back then they were doing stuff like wearing purple hats and yellow pants to stand out, but one of their leaders was a guy nicknamed Mystery. All daft pants and hats. This is him minus all that stuff.

    tumblr_n4au7lkD6i1rryqc9o1_500.jpg

    He is an objectively physically attractive man. He was also very tall(I presume he still is..). Quite the number of these chancers are similar, though usually not obviously "handsome" as far as many men think that is.

    Then they may show videos of their Technique3000™ on the street or in the club. Many of these have been shown to be fakes using actresses. Not a shock. Or encounters that were nothing to do with romance or getting a date. Hell, I could get someone to video me in Paris or wherever, pretending to be an Irish tourist asking some good looking woman for directions. Most people are polite and generally like having a chat, particularly if it's someone out of the ordinary, mute the sound to "preserve her privacy"(and cover what's actually going on) have a bit of a laugh with her and the video could look like I was going great guns. Try this say twenty times in a day and I'm 100% certain I could get a set of "pickup" videos that would have a load of lads thinking my "system" worked.

    Now some of this stuff does work with women. Some women, a minority. The honest guys in the game will tell people their spiel works with maybe 1-50 or 1-100. Even the most threadbare net will catch a fish if you cast it wide enough.

    TL;DR? While there is some truth in what they may say, said truth is heavily preselected on the women it works for, but the vast majority of their spiel is a sales pitch to buy into their bullsh1t and give them money. Buyer beware. Now it can easily be argued many men do need some guidance, but this really isn't it.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    OMM 0000 wrote: »

    The guy in the video comes across as really unattractive. Fake, creepy, just not attractive.
    I'm sure OMM, but who are his audience likely to be? Guys who feel unattractive and have been accused of being "creepy" because they have not so great social skills. Which is more likely to get more suckers buying into it; An obviously handsome Pearce Brosnan lookalike telling them they can be like him with women, or an average looking yahoo spouting stuff they might themselves?

    Aside: Something I'be noticed down the years. if you look at adverts aimed at women, 9 times outa 10 they show extremely attractive women selling the product. Y'know the ones slimming ads with a lass of 17 that a stiff breeze would carry away, anti aging creams on a 22 year old model and the like. When plus sized models hit magazine covers they almost always trend low in sales. Men seem to have a different approach, so you have ads for armpit spray where an ordinary enough pudgy looking bloke gets hordes of women throwing themselves at him. :D Generally men seem to want to see a stand in for themselves in adverts, whereas women want to see what they might become if they buy Special K or whatever.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I'm sure OMM, but who are his audience likely to be? Guys who feel unattractive and have been accused of being "creepy" because they have not so great social skills. Which is more likely to get more suckers buying into it; An obviously handsome Pearce Brosnan lookalike telling them they can be like him with women, or an average looking yahoo spouting stuff they might themselves?

    That's a good point. "If he can do it so can I".

    Wibbs wrote: »
    Aside: Something I'be noticed down the years. if you look at adverts aimed at women, 9 times outa 10 they show extremely attractive women selling the product. Y'know the ones slimming ads with a lass of 17 that a stiff breeze would carry away, anti aging creams on a 22 year old model and the like. When plus sized models hit magazine covers they almost always trend low in sales. Men seem to have a different approach, so you have ads for armpit spray where an ordinary enough pudgy looking bloke gets hordes of women throwing themselves at him. :D Generally men seem to want to see a stand in for themselves in adverts, whereas women want to see what they might become if they buy Special K or whatever.

    Women aren't complicated. Just like men aren't complicated.

    Here's a scenario:

    Man is not fat. (This is important; lose weight if you're fat).

    He grows his hair long, and shaves the back and sides. Think Brad Pitt in Fury.

    Stubble.

    Casual suit jack (dark colour).

    T-shirt (dark colour).

    Jeans (dark colour).

    Converse or simple vans or sand boots.

    He looks good.

    Women will be attracted to him.

    Now he just needs to not be a weirdo.

    Therapy, proper socialisation, meditation, honesty.

    It's not rocket science.

    It might take 6 months, it might take 2 years, but it's 100% doable for almost every guy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    What often happens in a flirtatious interaction between a man and woman is the woman will test the man, whether it concious or subconcious. She wants to know that his confidence is genuine, that he's not faking it. So she might make a comment to see if he's phased by it. If he does become phased by it she'll lose whatever attraction she had for him. If he takes it in his stride and has fun with it the attraction is usually amplified.

    Bull****. Women don't test men.

    Men just need to be themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,070 ✭✭✭✭pq0n1ct4ve8zf5


    What often happens in a flirtatious interaction between a man and woman is the woman will test the man, whether it concious or subconcious. She wants to know that his confidence is genuine, that he's not faking it. So she might make a comment to see if he's phased by it. If he does become phased by it she'll lose whatever attraction she had for him. If he takes it in his stride and has fun with it the attraction is usually amplified.

    Change about three nouns, leave the general content and tone as it is and you've got you some David Attenborough voiceover right there.

    I'm picturing...lizards or some kind of vole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    I can maybe accept women might test men who are incredibly weak and fake...

    But that's a good thing.

    Fix yourself, become a real person, have feelings, look OK, have passion and drive. Do this for you and the women will follow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    "Fix yourself, become a real person, have feelings, look OK, have passion and drive. Do this for you and the women will follow"

    Really... what if you have a head like a smashed turnip?
    Its all about looks these days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    "Fix yourself, become a real person, have feelings, look OK, have passion and drive. Do this for you and the women will follow"

    Really... what if you have a head like a smashed turnip?
    Its all about looks these days.

    Looks are super important, but you can control this too.

    Get fit and strong.

    Hairstyle.

    Good clothes.

    Good posture.

    You can even hire a photographer to take good photos of you.

    You have to make an effort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,657 ✭✭✭Doctor Jimbob


    "Fix yourself, become a real person, have feelings, look OK, have passion and drive. Do this for you and the women will follow"

    Really... what if you have a head like a smashed turnip?
    Its all about looks these days.

    Find someone else with a head like a smashed turnip. Simple.

    I'm half joking, but the fact some people seem to feel entitled to someone objectively more attractive than them is baffling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    Bull****. Women don't test men.

    Men just need to be themselves.

    They absolutely do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    They absolutely do.

    No they don't.

    They might test losers and fakers, but they don't test men.

    Do you think men test women?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Aye. Was debating it. Will have to wait until next month. Not sure about the workplace thing though. Meant to be unprofessional, no?
    Maybe they meant - go for it - get the seven cats.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    No they don't.

    They might test losers and fakers, but they don't test men.

    Do you think men test women?

    They won't be able to root out the 'losers' and 'fakers' unless they do test men.

    A lot of the time it's just to see if you're a dry ****e or can't take a joke.

    No one wants to go out with someone who's moody or touchy.

    Yes, men test women also. That's the men who know what they want from a relationship longterm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    They won't be able to root out the 'losers' and 'fakers' unless they do test men.

    A lot of the time it's just to see if you're a dry ****e or can't take a joke.

    No one wants to go out with someone who's moody or touchy.

    Yes, men test women also. That's the men who know what they want from a relationship longterm.

    I'm sorry, but this is nonsense.

    How many women have you been with?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    I'm sorry, but this is nonsense.

    How many women have you been with?

    In terms of relationships?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    In terms of relationships?

    Relationships + sex.

    Thanks for your honesty btw.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    Relationships + sex.

    Thanks for your honesty btw.

    Two longterm relationships the last of which ended some three years ago, single since.

    I'm not going to disclose how much sex I've had to a stranger on the internet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    Two longterm relationships the last of which ended some three years ago, single since.

    I'm not going to disclose how much sex I've had to a stranger on the internet.

    My opinion is you need to drop the idea of women "testing" you, and you need to stop testing women.

    It's not normal.

    Be the best version of you (as best as you can) and put yourself out there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    My opinion is you need to drop the idea of women "testing" you, and you need to stop testing women.

    It's not normal.

    Be the best version of you (as best as you can) and put yourself out there.

    But you said yourself only a few posts back that women test to root out 'losers' and 'fakers'?

    I think women test to see if a man is, basically, sound.

    I don't think there is any sinister motive at play.

    Y'know it's a bit like when you see a cat and they are a bit dubious at first, but when you show you mean no harm and just want to have the craic they soon warm to you.

    Same thing.

    Also I never said I test women myself.

    I think I'm pretty awesome as is tbh; I don't really need a relationship to feel any better about myself, that would ultimately defeat the purpose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    But you said yourself only a few posts back that women test to root out 'losers' and 'fakers'?

    I think women test to see if a man is, basically, sound.

    I don't think there is any sinister motive at play.

    Y'know it's a bit like when you see a cat and they are a bit dubious at first, but when you show you mean no harm and just want to have the craic they soon warm to you.

    Same thing.

    Also I never said I test women myself.

    I think I'm pretty awesome as is tbh; I don't really need a relationship to feel any better about myself, that would ultimately defeat the purpose.

    In fairness I didn't say that. I said I can accept women might do that. (I've never personally seen it.)

    I think men have this weird idea of women from movies, YouTube and other sources.

    Women have weird ideas of men too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    In fairness I didn't say that. I said I can accept women might do that. (I've never personally seen it.)

    I think men have this weird idea of women from movies, YouTube and other sources.

    Women have weird ideas of men too.

    It's pretty much the same thing.


Advertisement