Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

AndrewJRenko

Stop moaning ffs wrote: »

It seems she’s listed her address in swords yet the address is an empty office?

Is that not against the rules?

LollipopJimmy wrote: »

Possibly election fraud

I've a vague memory of previous cases where someone gave de mammy's address rather than their own, but this was deemed not be fraud. Once there was a vague connection, it could be called 'address' as there was no actual definition of what 'address' entailed.



Is it a Regus office or not?

ShamNNspace

davedanon wrote: »

This is an exceptionally stupid post. Hillary might have been a bad candidate (mainly because of the sustained campaign mounted against her. Benghazi and her emails? - nothing to see) but she is an exceptional administrator and would have been nothing if not super-competent in office.

People voted for Trump because of what he is, and what he stands for. Hatefulness, bigotry, and selfishness.

Just as a matter of interest how would you say the middle east would have fared under this "acceptional administrator" had she become potus. Her past actions have shown her to be a hawk consistently endorsing starting new wars and expanding old ones
2002 as senator in NY she voted for the use of military force in Iraq. That war turned out to be the greatest foreign policy and geopolitical disaster reverberations of which are still echoing around the world today. 2009 she again endorsed the surge in Afghanistan sending thousands more groundtroops in. Like Iraq many of them didn't return and to what ends?? It achieved nothing. Then we come to Libya where she was a strong proponent of and shiller in chief for regime change. What a mess that turned out to be? Open air slave markets on the edge of Europe, a functioning society turned into bandit country and no end in sight. Then in 2012 she along with Petraeus proposed that a covert program be set up to supply munitions to Syrian rebel groups opposed to Assad, Obama btw opposed the idea on the grounds that there would be no guarantee of where the arms would end up but the hawks got their way in the end. Take a look at one of her great friends Gen Jack Keane a man who has rarely seen a country that couldn't be improved with US ground troops and airstrikes . No imv Trump is bad and was voted potus for more complex reasons than you put forward but the world in general dodged a bullet (or a nuclear bomb) the day that vile woman lost that election

Auguste Comte

weldoninhio wrote: »

Gave her a number 2 in the end.

In this fashion I hope.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj6NMiuU0ys

oranbhoy67

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

I think she is doing stellar work in winding up the twitter mob; boomer hipster types, hysterical lefties, shrill 'flakes and angry trots.

Long may it continue.

the boomer chat has got really old really quick


- signed a non "boomer"

Achasanai

Pedro K wrote: »

She did, though. When she was seeking nominations to run for president she was very careful about not being drawn into any discussions on vaccinations or abortion, and immigration didn't feature at all. So let's not hold her up as some bastion of honesty or integrity.

Her ideas and ideology also changed remarkably depending on the person she was seeking nominations from. I think it was in a letter to Panti where she spoke about her commitment to LGBT and Muslim communities.

Dick_Swiveller

Stop moaning ffs wrote: »

The appalling part is our current crop of politicians are only slightly better dressed but aren’t that far from her thinking.
Would you live in DP for even a month? Would she? Would they?

No.
And she’s clearly and deeply very troubled. So what’s their excuse?

They’re all imprisoned by the whole pc thing and protecting their image politically. She’s a loose cannon.

It’s all a bit scary.

And what exactly are you doing to change the situation for those in direct provision, seeing as you care so passionately about it?

And what do you have to say about the fact that the vast majority of asylum claims are rejected, and that many in DP are exhausting endless appeals to avoid being deported.

Why are there more Albanians and Georgians here than Syrians and Afghanis?

Are we allowed to ask these questions, or is it racist?

For Forks Sake

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Is it a Regus office or not?

Yes: https://www.regus.ie/offices/ireland/dublin/dublin/office-space/dublin-airport

She put her address for the European elections as a wine bar in Foxrock

Stark

Polls closed now anyway. Don't think any exit polls were taken?

brightspark

Now claiming on her Facebook page that the voting is "rigged" and she claims to have been "assaulted" too!

For Forks Sake

brightspark wrote: »

Now claiming on her Facebook page that the voting is "rigged" and she claims to have been "assaulted" too!

She spends 26 hours a day with her phone attached to a selfie stick, surely such an incident would have been recorded.........:rolleyes:

brightspark

For Forks Sake wrote: »

She spends 26 hours a day with her phone attached to a selfie stick, surely such an incident would have been recorded.........:rolleyes:

It was pointed at the Garda.

brightspark

brightspark wrote: »

Now claiming on her Facebook page that the voting is "rigged" and she claims to have been "assaulted" too!

According to her every election she has run in is rigged, same old ****e.

As for the assault, I'm sure she reported it to the guards, being a law and order candidate apparently.

The Nal

3.7% lol

https://twitter.com/NextIrishGE/status/1200728747873374208

Ash.J.Williams

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

I think she is doing stellar work in winding up the twitter mob; boomer hipster types, hysterical lefties, shrill 'flakes and angry trots.

Long may it continue.

You’ve really bought into this

Loafing Oaf

brightspark wrote: »

Now claiming on her Facebook page that the voting is "rigged"

You wonder why people like her bother taking part in elections...:rolleyes:

davedanon

Stop moaning ffs wrote: »

I got banned for a month for calling someone a cockwomble
Admittedly it was cos of other stuff but still.
Go figure

cockwomble is one of my faves. Along with 'spunktrumpet'.

AndrewJRenko

Loafing Oaf wrote: »

You wonder why people like her bother taking part in elections...:rolleyes:

Specifically so that she CAN make a fuss afterwards about it being rigged.

Birneybau

The Nal wrote: »

3.7% lol

https://twitter.com/NextIrishGE/status/1200728747873374208

Still too much

Yakov P. Golyadkin

For Forks Sake wrote: »

She put her address for the European elections as a wine bar in Foxrock

That's another Regus office

https://www.regus.ie/offices/ireland/dublin/dublin/office-space/dublin-the-gables-foxrock

TheRepentent

Birneybau wrote: »

Still too much

well I'm sure some of the boards.ie cockroaches gave her a vote going from some of the gemtards posts in this thread leading up to the by-election.

Mezzotint

Bear in mind too that this is an election with a very low turnout and her voters are probably die hards, so will have all turned out. So this is about as big a number as she will ever get.
In a full general election it would probably translate to significantly less than 1%.

It shows that, despite the online bubble, there's no real world appetite for the kind of politics she's pushing. This is Ireland, not the US and the political landscape is hugely different. She and others are spending their time shouting into an echo chamber that feels much larger than it actually is.

Dick_Swiveller

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

Sir Oxman

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

Nah.
She's just a grifting dick swiveller.

For Forks Sake

Birneybau wrote: »

Still too much

It should be taken in the context of a very low turnout, she'd be demolished in a GE

Infini

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

I wouldn't call it triggering as such she acts like a daft cùnt and would fit well in at Dundrum Mental Asylum for basically being utterly devoid of reality whatsoever. She deserves all the crap she gets for acting that way expecially since she goes out of her way to attack people with her delusions and bullshìt.

padd b1975

Infini wrote: »

I wouldn't call it triggering as such she acts like a daft cùnt and would fit well in at Dundrum Mental Asylum for basically being utterly devoid of reality whatsoever. She deserves all the crap she gets for acting that way expecially since she goes out of her way to attack people with her delusions and bullshìt.

I'd say you're definitely triggered.

Guy:Incognito

padd b1975 wrote: »

I'd say you're definitely triggered.

Is everyone that isnt a racist or otherwise doesnt agree with what she says, "triggered" ?

Theres no opposing view to have , just "being triggered"

TheDoc

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

It’s nothing to do with being a progressive. It’s too so with being a normal person. She is scum of the highest order.

She doesn’t engage in any legitimate debate. She simply goes around putting cameras in people’s faces knowing that in 2019 no one can touch her where as a decade ago she’d be absolutely lamped around the place

She spreads hate speech , racism and xenophobia. As a person from Swords I was disgusted she turned up in the area peddling her ****e with her dribbling supporters.

Every issue is open to debate. But this cretin doesn’t engage in debate. She is a nobody who uses controversy and tin foil hattery to get a load of dribbler followers to build a reputation that only exists online.

In reality she is a nobody and wish people on Twitter and Facebook would understand this. She is only getting traction from people sharing her stuff to criticize. She gets no traction of support.

As we’ve done for decades need to just ignore the knuckledraggers and they fade from public discourse

padd b1975

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Is everyone that is a racist or otherwise doesnt agree with what she says, "triggered" ?

Theres no opposing view to have , just "being triggered"

I wouldn't class suggesting someone who holds a different point of view be committed to a mental hospital as an 'opposing view'.

Timberrrrrrrr

padd b1975 wrote: »

I wouldn't class suggesting someone who holds a different point of view be committed to a mental hospital as an 'opposing view'.

If you believe the government or George Soros or whoever is trying to poison you with chemicals dropped from commercial jet planes, or that 5G is going to dry your brain or are anti vax then yes, you belong in a mental hospital imo.