Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Timberrrrrrrr

Rebranding wrote: »

Then I would say people who support third world immigration into Europe should be put into mental hospitals.

That's your opinion and you are entitled to hold that opinion, personally I don't know anyone that subscribes to the above.

TaurenDruid

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

I think she is doing stellar work in winding up the twitter mob; boomer hipster types, hysterical lefties, shrill 'flakes and angry trots.

Long may it continue.

"Boomer hipster types"?! Er... you know they're entirely different things, right, separated by decades? If you're going to troll, do some pop culture research first.

Timberrrrrrrr

Rebranding wrote: »

Why is it ok for you to call for those who think Soros is dangerous to be committed?

Because that's my opinion which I am entitled to hold.

TaurenDruid

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

We've had debates and indeed a history of emigration and immigration for hundreds of years. We'll continue to have debates and policies will continue to evolve.

On the other hand: someone who believes she's being poisoned by the vaccines, chemtrails and the 5G, that her opponents are funded by Soros, who lies about her position on abortion, who hypocritically opposes immigration despite marrying an immigrant, who thinks there's a conspiracy by the elite to reduce the world's population (it's an incredibly inefficient conspiracy!), that the elections she's lost were rigged, that t-shirts with unicorns and rainbows are another conspiracy, that it's ok to post photos of other peoples' kids online alongside hate speech, and who believes Google owe her a social media platform but who will block anyone who questions her on social media - nah, she doesn't really do debate, does she?

Acosta

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

You don't have to be much of a progressive to find her horrible racism offence. Any half decent person should find much of what she's come out with over the last year and a half fairly disgusting.

Infini

padd b1975 wrote: »

I'd say you're definitely triggered.

Nope. Just have no time for and despise those who peddle lies, myths and talk shíte out of their hole while either refusing to show evidence or worse peddle debunked myths like they're the truth when in fact they've been proven to be lies.

Having an opinion is fine but there's a difference beween an opinion and broadcasting outright malice and lies for no reason other than for the sake of it. This is a woman who is utterly devoid of reality, launching shítposting campaigns on cancer media against people who appeared in a bloody LIDL ad for crying out loud. She's also a bellend and complete muppet for the way she acts and ignores facts for fantasies and delusions. The looney bin is the only appropiate place for that sorts.

Human Stupidity is the cancer of existence and the opinions of idiots like her are only deserving of ridicule and humiliation for having no facts whatsoever.

banie01

TaurenDruid wrote: »

"Boomer hipster types"?! Er... you know they're entirely different things, right, separated by decades? If you're going to troll, do some pop culture research first.

Obviously he means those trans-ageist folk!
Those 50+y.o whom I identify as 25 and under!
Simples!

Dick_Swiveller

Das Pints wrote: »

I'm just saying these lads are no better than the lads who are obsessed over Louise O'Neil.

My advice to these people is to put down the phone, leave the house and go talk to real people. It's not all doom and gloom out there.

Very well said.

Acosta

First two posts as a Boards member are on this thread accusing others of being obsessed lol

humberklog

I wonder how she got to be so rude and dismissive to ordinary working Joes. I know she comes from a fairly privileged background but it's a certain strain of people that continue that aloof sense of entitlement into adulthood.


Last night there was some chap trying to lock up at the count centre as per the guidelines he's given. Gemma runs through him insisting soldiers should be on watch and why isn't the count happening overnight anyway? This guy's just trying to get on with the job he's tasked with and get home.


She's an ugly excuse of a human.

padd b1975

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

If you believe the government or George Soros or whoever is trying to poison you with chemicals dropped from commercial jet planes, or that 5G is going to dry your brain or are anti vax then yes, you belong in a mental hospital imo.

Oh calm down.
You'll overhear worse while waiting to be served in your local pub.

Timberrrrrrrr

padd b1975 wrote: »

Oh calm down.
You'll overhear worse while waiting to be served in your local pub.

Yeah, but the people in said pub don't post personal details online about people, they don't have an army of deranged followers spreading their lies putting children's lives at risk.

Ulysses Gaze

Mezzotint wrote: »

Bear in mind too that this is an election with a very low turnout and her voters are probably die hards, so will have all turned out. So this is about as big a number as she will ever get.
In a full general election it would probably translate to significantly less than 1%.

It shows that, despite the online bubble, there's no real world appetite for the kind of politics she's pushing. This is Ireland, not the US and the political landscape is hugely different. She and others are spending their time shouting into an echo chamber that feels much larger than it actually is.

The vast, vast majority of Irish people will listen to what she has to say and then reply:

"Ah listen. Will ya ever piss off with that ****e."

super_furry

padd b1975 wrote: »

Oh calm down.
You'll overhear worse while waiting to be served in your local pub.

Christ what kind of loopers do you drink with?

Guy:Incognito

Ulysses Gaze wrote: »

The vast, vast majority of Irish people will listen to what she has to say and then reply:

"Ah listen. Will ya ever piss off with that ****e."

The problem is that over 1,000 people in Fingal listened to her and thought "thats the kind of stuff I like" enough to actually go out and vote for her over any other candidate. Youd have to assume at least twice that also agree but didnt or dont bother voting. Multiply that across the country and thats a worrying enough amount of people that will vote for outright racist and looney conspiracy opinions over anyone else.


Not enough people to get elected to anything, but a lot of people nonetheless.

The Late Late Show

Beasty wrote: »

You have made 236 posts in this forum. 47 of them make reference to The Handmaid's Tale - across the site you can multiply both of those figures by 4. I would suggest you refrain from doing so as it is winding others up and any repeats in this forum will be considered trolling

Any questions, PM me

There are 2 ways of looking at this. People should be free to make comparisons about what they see. If it is that easy to wind up people, then there is something wrong with those sad people. They really should get a life. No wonder Gemma and her kind can gain votes. Some really strange people around and if they can close down posts, bullies win simple as. The same types would crow about free speech if they were deprived of writing posts like this that are put downs and bullying:

'Would you ever stop posting this handmaid's tale s***e! Almost every f*cking post you make has some idiotic reference to a television show!'

It is those people who should be warned and those thanking such posts too. They are using bad language which I blotted out from the above too and GET AWAY with it. This site is either moderated properly or not at all. It has often become a free-flow site for bullies and the far right as the above post shows. Of course such types do not like when their favourite politicians are compared to bad people.

Mod-Banned

Muahahaha

3.7% is pretty pathetic. Great to see Gemma and her racist supporters get their asses handed to them.

Timberrrrrrrr

Muahahaha wrote: »

3.7% is pretty pathetic. Great to see Gemma and her racist supporters get their asses handed to them.

3.6% too much for my liking, happy to see her get nowhere though, she'll be back to screaming about Google denying her a platform now I suppose.

Ken.

Mod-Thread closed for a clean up. Have it back open as soon as possible. .

Ken.

Mod-Thread reopened.
The late late show banned for one day.
Keep it on topic please.

relax carry on

padd b1975 wrote: »

Oh calm down.
You'll overhear worse while waiting to be served in your local pub.

And prior to the internet and social media, such drivel that Gemma & related trolls espouse would be confined to the local drunks/gob****es in a pub. Most of the pub patrons would rightly have ignored such utter ****. It's an unfortunate consequence of social media that such views seem to have a greater following than they have in reality.

Good to see that despite her supporters turning out, the percentage was very low. She had her democratic chance yet again and her message was soundly rejected.

Annasopra

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

Shes far right fascist racist scum

Ulysses Gaze

Dick_Swiveller wrote: »

Why does she trigger the progressives so much? Just read back at the last few pages and look at the venom and hatred directed at her?

Is it because she is raising the issue of immigration in a country which has had no serious debate about whether we wanted to change our demographic make up to such an extent in such a short period of time?

Do her opponents want to shut down any discussion on immigration?

Or is it her her perfectly legitimate criticism of the excesses of the LGBT movement? Ya know, kids transitioning and all that jazz.

What gives?

It's not just that she is anti-immigration, Dick.

She is peddling the Great Replacement/Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan conspiracy theory that has been at the forefront of White Nationalist discussion for 20 or more years. She has hashtagged Great Replacement multiple times on Twitter over the last few years.

And of course that conspiracy all leads down the road to the "Evil Jewz" are the puppet masters of this conspiracy. First The Rothschilds and now Soros. Again she has mentioned Soros consistently in her anti-Immigration tweets online linking him to this Great Replacement.

That's why she pisses people off and "triggers the progressives".

Guy:Incognito

Has she said anything on her glorious race to Leinster House yet?

circadian

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Has she said anything on her glorious race to Leinster House yet?

Not seen anything but the electorate of Fingal have shown that they overwhelmingly believe in climate change and not Gemma's crackpot ramblings.

TaurenDruid

Yeah, just saw the tweet blaming the people of Fingal for being taken in by the "climate change hoax"...

Dank Janniels

I reckon most of the votes she got were from full time mad bastards pulling the piss!

Dank Janniels

Dank Janniels wrote: »

I reckon most of the votes she got were from full time mad bastards pulling the piss!

More like full time dick heads.

Muahahaha

Well shes tweeted that shes planning to run in the GE next year. And theres this gem from a deluded Justin Barrett

https://twitter.com/JustinBarrettNP/status/1200807688822808576

gandalf

This is her pinnacle, theres always a bigger protest vote going to fringe candidates during by-elections. She'll be rejected to a greater extent at the GE. If she doesn't get locked up before then of course....