Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

dundalkfc10

davedanon wrote: »

A list, in no particular order, of people that are eminently milkshake-worthy.

1 Donald Trump
2 Nigel Farage
3 'Tommy Robinson'
4 Boris Johnson
5 Dominic Cummings
6 Gemma O'Doherty
7 John Waters
8 Katie Hopkins
9 Ann Coulter
10 Laura Ingraham
11 Tucker Carlson
12 Allison Pearson
12 Nadine Dorries
13 Moscow Mitch McConnell
14 Lyndsey Graham
15 Gym Jordan

Your list is 3-17
1. Leo
2. Simon Harris

davedanon

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Your list is 3-17
1. Leo
2. Simon Harris

Feck off and make your own list.

glenfieldman

davedanon wrote: »

A list, in no particular order, of people that are eminently milkshake-worthy.

1 Donald Trump
2 Nigel Farage
3 'Tommy Robinson'
4 Boris Johnson
5 Dominic Cummings
6 Gemma O'Doherty
7 John Waters
8 Katie Hopkins
9 Ann Coulter
10 Laura Ingraham
11 Tucker Carlson
12 Allison Pearson
12 Nadine Dorries
13 Moscow Mitch McConnell
14 Lyndsey Graham
15 Gym Jordan

Your very "right" with your choices --- ill get my coat

davedanon

glenfieldman wrote: »

Your very "right" with your choices --- ill get my coat

Yeah, the biggest wastes of skin & oxygen on the planet are all right-wingers. Well, it sort of goes with the territory, to be fair.

coolbeans

davedanon wrote: »

Yeah, the biggest wastes of skin & oxygen on the planet are all right-wingers. Well, it sort of goes with the territory, to be fair.

And that's why we are where we are.

Muscles Schultz

davedanon wrote: »

A list, in no particular order, of people that are eminently milkshake-worthy.

1 Donald Trump
2 Nigel Farage
3 'Tommy Robinson'
4 Boris Johnson
5 Dominic Cummings
6 Gemma O'Doherty
7 John Waters
8 Katie Hopkins
9 Ann Coulter
10 Laura Ingraham
11 Tucker Carlson
12 Allison Pearson
12 Nadine Dorries
13 Moscow Mitch McConnell
14 Lyndsey Graham
15 Gym Jordan

No cucks, libtards or woke baes?

ShineOn7

Stop giving her a voice on Ireland's most read forum (this one)

The mods have been speaking over the last while in regards to posts which relate to Gemma O'Doherty. She's been cropping up a lot on r/Ireland lately - which has directly resulted in her twitter feed getting more followers, alongside her live streams getting a large boost in viewers. Noteably, during her last "stake-out" at Twitter HQ, the link posted on r/Ireland boosted her from about 50 live viewers, to about 400 within a very short period of time.

The result was her live feed being full of people taking the mick out of her - and while normally any sane person would welcome the mick being taken out of a woman who spends her days bemoaning the fact that black people appear in advertisements, there's a sinister motive behind how she works.

Any publicity - be it negative or positive - is good publicity for someone like Gemma.

As was incredibly common during the American Media circus circuit back during 2016, a swathe of new public figures appeared, and subsisted solely off the hatred they were being fed. Publicity is publicity, and it is an extremely powerful tool in the hands of someone like Gemma, who will without any shame, feed a barrage of racism, lies, and hatred to anyone who may be within earshot.

The classic quote on this is that while a lie is making its way around the world (such as Gemma's high-touted myths such as Vaccinations being dangerous, or "The Great Replacement"), the truth is still putting on its pants.
We've found that with Gemma dragging in a massive amount of traffic & publicity from r/Ireland posts, we're effectively feeding the problem. Yes, our posts are always to laugh at, criticise, and even to show pity for her - but they're attention for her nonetheless. And when she's capable of using this attention to spread her own sileage mixture of lies and hatred, it's better and healthier for everyone to avoid giving her what's essentially become a public platform.

And with all of that in mind, we've made the decision to remove any content in relation to Gemma O'Doherty moving forward.

We wouldn't allow any other random sub user to use /r/Ireland as an advertisement ground for their anti-vaxx, or racist blogspam - and there should be no exception for someone backed up by a Twitter following.

Note that in the event where a non-blog news source reports on Gemma, we would not remove any content in that regard. Random bull****/tweets/live streams are what we're cutting out with this, under our standard Political Agenda Spam and General Spam rules.

Odhinn

Theres a thread or two that slags her off, whereas reddit seems to have far more activity by the sounds of it.

MeMen2_MoRi_

Never would of heard of her and her thoughts if it wasn't for boards and Reddit. The sooner these thoughts are extinguish to the realms from where they come from the better.

McMurphy

Never heard of her.

pjohnson

Ah she provides quality comedy tbf.

Mentioning her can attract a few of her and then hilarity ensues.

Augme

Just waiting for some clown to pipe up about "what happened to freedom of speech?"....

osarusan

She's a useful yardstick for measuring people's stupidity on here.

Infini

To be honest the likes of her aka the Terminally Stupid or the Intentionally Malicious are best dealt with by being starved of oxygen on as many platforms as possible. The likes of her are cancerous idiots and deserve to be treated like the village idiot and ignore, blacklisted and boycotted as much as possible if not outright ridiculed for being wasters in general. If they banned her from here nothing of importance will have been lost.

Rodney Bathgate

Presumably they will (or should) ban references to equivalent left leaning gob****es also. The likes of Fintan The Toole would be a good start.

whisky_galore

Rodney Bathgate wrote: »

Presumably they will (or should) ban references to equivalent left leaning gob****es also. The likes of Fintan The Toole would be a good start.

Why not just ban all things you disagree with?

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy

G O’D, Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins. They’re all the fcuking same.

Rodney Bathgate

whisky_galore wrote: »

Why not just ban all things you disagree with?

Is that not the point of this thread? Banning something the OP disagrees with?

Calhoun

Why censor when you are much better off bringing to the light how off the wall she is.

Ulysses Gaze

No way should Boards.ie ban posts mentioning her.
Best way to take her down is to ruthlessly mock her ridiculousness.

How was Nick Griffin finally taken down? When the BBC had him on in front of a live audience and his idiotic views were exposed for the bollocks they were.

suicide_circus

push them further to the fringes and empower her.

Let their madness be exposed and everyone laughs.

**** censorship.

Experience_day

I'm actually worried for the future. The willingness of people to embrace censorship is actually a cause of concern.

Crazy world

Beasty

ShineOn7 wrote: »

Stop giving her a voice on Ireland's most read forum (this one)

All we can do is merge any threads mentioning her....

ShineOn7

Beasty wrote: »

All we can do is merge any threads mentioning her....

It's a start ;-)

Omackeral

suicide_circus wrote: »

**** censorship.

:pac::pac::pac:

Rodney Bathgate

Omackeral wrote: »

:pac::pac::pac:

Are we playing hangman?

Is there a C?

suicide_circus

banning her could be 4 star censorship.

ie: **** censorship

Muscles Schultz

I see that lad who looks like a hobo Warren Chambers is banned off YouTube (again!). He’s a big Gemma fanboi.

Google him. Some interesting stories with chainsaws and bbqs.

AngryHippie

Rodney Bathgate wrote: »

Presumably they will (or should) ban references to equivalent left leaning gob****es also. The likes of Fintan The Toole would be a good start.

At least his writing is researched and referenced, the basics of good journalism. I don't always agree 100% but he always has a valid point to make and hasn't been parroting out a sponsored agenda.

jimmycrackcorm

I voted on the POLL not realising it didn't refer to mentioning Bishop Brennan.
Perhaps all posts should have a mandatory I never kicked Gemma up the arse part.