Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

freshpopcorn

Well Gemma has John and John has Gemma so they don’t need Porn!

LollipopJimmy

Seth Brundle wrote: »

If I recall correctly, those in the Boyle family that were looking for justice quickly didn't want Gems near that case.

Pretty sure a family member posted here about it, she went after relatives of the family when they distanced from her iirc.

That was also the start of her vendetta against RTE, when they invoiced her for footage she used in the documentary.

Funny it seems a lot of her crusades start over money, she had no issue with 'big tech' until they removed her YouTube channel and had at the time stumbled and spoke about revenue.

TheRepentent

Seth Brundle wrote: »

If I recall correctly, those in the Boyle family that were looking for justice quickly didn't want Gems near that case.

I think a relative has posted before in this thread but can't remember his/her name.

EDIT: only seen post above now

Seth Brundle

It was oranbhoy67 I believe.
He posted in here: Why did Gardai destroy possible burial site of Irelands longest missing child?

Kermit.de.frog

freshpopcorn wrote: »

Well Gemma has John and John has Gemma so they don’t need Porn!

eewww

For Forks Sake

freshpopcorn wrote: »

Well Gemma has John and John has Gemma so they don’t need Porn!

Timberrrrrrrr

dublinman1990

She is on the big pharma & Denis O'Brien again. She never stops with the crap she spouts of her mouth doesn't she? She just keeps on giving and giving.

Those two ladies walking behind her could have thought oul Gemma was talking to the f*cking wall.

https://twitter.com/AnIrishIreland/status/1314281762604879874

dublinman1990

dublinman1990 wrote: »

She is on the big pharma & Denis O'Brien again. She never stops with the crap she spouts of her mouth doesn't she? She just keeps on giving and giving.

Those two ladies walking behind her could have thought oul Gemma was talking to the f*cking wall.

https://twitter.com/AnIrishIreland/status/1314281762604879874

I reported that twitter account. Obviously Gemma is using it to get around her ban. Shame twitter don't have an option in their reporting section.

Grab All Association

WiMAX a comin’ across the nation!

ancapailldorcha

dublinman1990 wrote: »

She is on the big pharma & Denis O'Brien again. She never stops with the crap she spouts of her mouth doesn't she? She just keeps on giving and giving.

Those two ladies walking behind her could have thought oul Gemma was talking to the f*cking wall.

https://twitter.com/AnIrishIreland/status/1314281762604879874

So, autistic people are basically some sort of subhuman mutation that we should be avoiding like the plague by avoiding vaccines which objectively do not cause autism.

What an utterly vile wretch she is. She has no redeeming qualities whatsoever as far as I can see.

Seth Brundle

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314469416965492737

AndrewJRenko

ancapailldorcha wrote: »

So, autistic people are basically some sort of subhuman mutation that we should be avoiding like the plague by avoiding vaccines which objectively do not cause autism.

What an utterly vile wretch she is. She has no redeeming qualities whatsoever as far as I can see.

Pure Trumpism - if we stopped diagnosing all those kids, the oul autism thing would just go away apparently.

Though she's right about not listening to Newstalk, for very different reasons.

The J Stands for Jay

dublinman1990 wrote: »

She is on the big pharma & Denis O'Brien again. She never stops with the crap she spouts of her mouth doesn't she? She just keeps on giving and giving.

Those two ladies walking behind her could have thought oul Gemma was talking to the f*cking wall.

https://twitter.com/AnIrishIreland/status/1314281762604879874

I'll accept her stats at face value (other than the future projection of the rate of autistic boys in the future). I'll disagree with her conclusions.

Rates of autism were low in the 1970s. A few questions: what were the rates of testing for autism? Was there a widely accepted definition of autism at that point, and did a reliable test exist? Is it possible that many people were never tested and went undiagnosed?

I have been told that higher ages of mothers is linked to higher likely good of autism. The ages of new parents is much higher now than in the 1970s. Does she address this?

Could there possibly be any other external factors other than vaccines that could cause this rise (plenty of potential for conspiracy theories here)?

Has she considered when the vaccines were introduced, and when autism rates began to rise? (I'll ignore that the link between MMR and autism was debunked years ago).

All the stuff about abortions in vaccines. Fresh abortions aren't needed to produce the vaccines; they did require fetal tissue to develop them, but if abortion was banned worldwide, more of the existing vaccines could still be produced.

eviltwin

ancapailldorcha wrote: »

So, autistic people are basically some sort of subhuman mutation that we should be avoiding like the plague by avoiding vaccines which objectively do not cause autism.

What an utterly vile wretch she is. She has no redeeming qualities whatsoever as far as I can see.

Both my kids have autism, both are vaccinated. I wonder if Gemma and her ilk think parents like me are irresponsible or negligent for our kids.

The J Stands for Jay

ancapailldorcha wrote: »

So, autistic people are basically some sort of subhuman mutation that we should be avoiding like the plague by avoiding vaccines...

...and getting the plague

LollipopJimmy

McGaggs wrote: »

I'll accept her stats at face value (other than the future projection of the rate of autistic boys in the future). I'll disagree with her conclusions.

Rates of autism were low in the 1970s. A few questions: what were the rates of testing for autism? Was there a widely accepted definition of autism at that point, and did a reliable test exist? Is it possible that many people were never tested and went undiagnosed?

I have been told that higher ages of mothers is linked to higher likely good of autism. The ages of new parents is much higher now than in the 1970s. Does she address this?

Could there possibly be any other external factors other than vaccines that could cause this rise (plenty of potential for conspiracy theories here)?

Has she considered when the vaccines were introduced, and when autism rates began to rise? (I'll ignore that the link between MMR and autism was debunked years ago).

All the stuff about abortions in vaccines. Fresh abortions aren't needed to produce the vaccines; they did require fetal tissue to develop them, but if abortion was banned worldwide, more of the existing vaccines could still be produced.

No, see thats all logical and reasoned so must be fake news!

The thing about autism and the link to vaccines, its not even that it was debunked, the professor that published the paper was found to have completely lied about his research findings. I can't comprehend why somebody would do this

eviltwin

McGaggs wrote: »

I'll accept her stats at face value (other than the future projection of the rate of autistic boys in the future). I'll disagree with her conclusions.

Rates of autism were low in the 1970s. A few questions: what were the rates of testing for autism? Was there a widely accepted definition of autism at that point, and did a reliable test exist? Is it possible that many people were never tested and went undiagnosed?

I have been told that higher ages of mothers is linked to higher likely good of autism. The ages of new parents is much higher now than in the 1970s. Does she address this?

Could there possibly be any other external factors other than vaccines that could cause this rise (plenty of potential for conspiracy theories here)?

Has she considered when the vaccines were introduced, and when autism rates began to rise? (I'll ignore that the link between MMR and autism was debunked years ago).

All the stuff about abortions in vaccines. Fresh abortions aren't needed to produce the vaccines; they did require fetal tissue to develop them, but if abortion was banned worldwide, more of the existing vaccines could still be produced.

She's is conveniently omitting that autism was only recognised as a stand alone condition back in the 80's. Before that people with autism were lumped into other conditions or described as a bit slow or odd.

There are older members of my family I'm nearly certain are autistic but just never got a diagnosis because who did back then? Diagnosing learning disabilities in general are a fairly new thing.

Birneybau

Appeal set for January, article full of usual bonkers stuff from Gem-Gem.

Ms O’Doherty, who appeared with Mr Waters via a remote link, said the matter is urgent and affects every citizen living in the Republic who, she said, are threatened with arrest if they leave their counties, along with fines and Garda checkpoints.

The World Health Organisation had “effectively said” in the last two days this virus “has not yet been proven to exist” and is “less serious than the average seasonal flu” but the country’s economy is being destroyed, she said.

She added she and Mr Waters objected to the directions hearing being held via a remote, video conference, saying that did not meet the constitutional requirement for justice to be heard in public. The courts “have prejudiced themselves unwittingly”, she said.

https://www.echolive.ie/nationalnews/Gemma-ODoherty-and-John-Waters-Covid-19-appeal-set-for-January-989e1586-219e-4ae7-b9bb-8186b5507632-ds

The J Stands for Jay

Birneybau wrote: »

Appeal set for January, article full of usual bonkers stuff from Gem-Gem.





https://www.echolive.ie/nationalnews/Gemma-ODoherty-and-John-Waters-Covid-19-appeal-set-for-January-989e1586-219e-4ae7-b9bb-8186b5507632-ds

Their claim that the WHO said covid doesn't exist is pretty much ungoogleable. Does anyone know what they're on about?

1641

McGaggs wrote: »

Rates of autism were low in the 1970s. A few questions: what were the rates of testing for autism? Was there a widely accepted definition of autism at that point, and did a reliable test exist? Is it possible that many people were never tested and went undiagnosed?

.

Diagnosis for autism was very different in the 1970s. Many people recognised as being on the autistic spectrum today would not have been diagnosed then. Indeed, the very idea of a "spectrum" was not really recognised, even among professionals in the area.


A few points.
There were very few autism specialists at the time. Many people with autism would never have been seen by such a specialist. Those at the more severe end of the scale would have been locally diagnosed as "mentally handicapped" and placed in what we would now term as intellectual disability services. As these were congregate settings, they exacerbated the distress experienced by the individuals with autism. The result was very often ever increasing levels of chemical restraint. Many were drugged into zombies.
On the other hand, those at the milder end of the spectrum were not recognised at all - other than, maybe, as "odd". As their social difficulties increased with age, many developed mental health problems and were seen as a part of the general psychiatric population.
Even among the very few specialists in the area at the time, understanding of the spectrum (or what today we would call "the spectrum") would have been limited relative to today.

The Nal

McGaggs wrote: »

Their claim that the WHO said covid doesn't exist is pretty much ungoogleable. Does anyone know what they're on about?

No. Shes clearly in the middle of a prolonged manic episode. Coupled with a narcissistic personality disorder and delusions of grandeur.

Symptoms include

- difficulty getting along with others because of the delusion
- a persistent belief in the delusion in spite of contrary evidence
- dismissal of or anger at people who refuse to accept the delusional belief
- persistent attempts to get others to accept the belief

Anyway, first line of the Whos website

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus.

eviltwin

You’d think autism was some kind of death sentence the way she goes on. Those on the higher end of the spectrum manage absolutely fine and as people learn more about the condition things become easier.

Birneybau

I won't quote The Nal's post, above, but there's really no other way can it be seen.

She's here saying 'The Troubles' was a 'staged event'. Huge if true.

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314558950155657218

The Nal

Birneybau wrote: »

I won't quote The Nal's post, above, but there's really no other way can it be seen.

She's here saying 'The Troubles' was a 'staged event'. Huge if true.

Yeah thats a new level of batsh1t even for her. Waters just as bad encouraging her. He should be trying to get her help.

gmisk

Birneybau wrote: »

I won't quote The Nal's post, above, but there's really no other way can it be seen.

She's here saying 'The Troubles' was a 'staged event'. Huge if true.

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314558950155657218

Waters starring off into the distance thinking....how the hell did I end up here listening to this nonsense...ha ha he deserves it...hitching his wagon to that looper

ancapailldorcha

eviltwin wrote: »

You’d think autism was some kind of death sentence the way she goes on. Those on the higher end of the spectrum manage absolutely fine and as people learn more about the condition things become easier.

It's like the anti-choice brigade. Anyone currently autistic can f**k off, they only care about preventing more cases or pretending to care about it to push their imported con job.

Hotblack Desiato

LollipopJimmy wrote: »

The thing about autism and the link to vaccines, its not even that it was debunked, the professor that published the paper was found to have completely lied about his research findings. I can't comprehend why somebody would do this

Money.

Wakefield hoped MMR would be severely discredited because he stood to make a lot of money out of testing for the bogus bowel inflammation he linked it to. He was also linked to a competing vaccine, ironically given that he's since gone full antivaxxor.

eviltwin

Birneybau wrote: »

I won't quote The Nal's post, above, but there's really no other way can it be seen.

She's here saying 'The Troubles' was a 'staged event'. Huge if true.

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314558950155657218

I can't wait to hear which bombings she believes were faked.

humberklog

The Troubles being a staged event?


A False Fleg operation one could say?