Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Options
1…3536384041…333

Comments

  • Options
    #1112
    For Forks Sake
    Registered Users Posts: 11,584 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    This is good news. Its about her vile racist hate speech was deplatformed.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/youtube-terminates-gemma-o-doherty-s-account-over-breach-of-hate-speech-policy-1.3958500?mode=amp

    She's taking it well


    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154


  • Options
    #1113
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Irish times article was up mere minutes after Gemmas channel was deleted...hmmmmm

    Please do elaborate


  • Options
    #1114
    listermint
    Registered Users Posts: 33,931 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    hatrickpatrick wrote: »
    Deplatforming is never good news. Not only does it fundamentally go against the spirit of democratic freedom, it'll also give her and her conspiracy minded followers a huge amount of fuel for their conspiracy mindedness.

    The internet is being totally ruined by the editorialisation of communication platforms. Sure, they have the right to do it, but they're still scumbags for choosing to.

    She , nor you nor I have the democratic right to a platform


    The fact that nonsense is now a thing that lunatics like to spread is gas.



    Let me spell it out.


    You have no right to a platform.


    The end


  • Options
    #1115
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    hatrickpatrick wrote: »
    Deplatforming is never good news. Not only does it fundamentally go against the spirit of democratic freedom, it'll also give her and her conspiracy minded followers a huge amount of fuel for their conspiracy mindedness.

    The internet is being totally ruined by the editorialisation of communication platforms. Sure, they have the right to do it, but they're still scumbags for choosing to.

    Why? Do you think she should be allowed to post whatever she wants in a clear breach of the T&C's she agreed to when signing up?

    Should anyone be allowed post whatever they like?


  • Options
    #1116
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Stop moaning ffs wrote: »
    Please do elaborate

    Its quite simple, Gemmas channel was deleted and minutes later an article appeared in the Irish times saying as much.

    Clearly they knew in advance.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1117
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    She's refused the biggest platform in the country. She could have easily made her point.
    If they only had enough pages to print her incoherent nonsense

    ‘A number of attempts have been made by The Irish Times this evening to speak to Ms O’Doherty, so far without success.’


  • Options
    #1118
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    hatrickpatrick wrote: »
    Deplatforming is never good news. Not only does it fundamentally go against the spirit of democratic freedom, it'll also give her and her conspiracy minded followers a huge amount of fuel for their conspiracy mindedness.

    The internet is being totally ruined by the editorialisation of communication platforms. Sure, they have the right to do it, but they're still scumbags for choosing to.

    She doxxed a woman who regularly receives death threats.... She targets children for racist tangents... So yep, get over it. She deserved to be banned.


  • Options
    #1119
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Its quite simple, Gemmas channel was deleted and minutes later an article appeared in the Irish times saying as much.

    Clearly they knew in advance.

    What time was her channel deleted at?

    Is she not delighted with this now cos she’s been ‘silenced’.

    Surely that will help her ultimate goal no?


  • Options
    #1120
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Its quite simple, Gemmas channel was deleted and minutes later an article appeared in the Irish times saying as much.

    Clearly they knew in advance.

    She was banned days ago....


  • Options
    #1121
    n97 mini
    Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    She's taking it well


    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154

    That's one of Leah Doherty's Twitter accounts I think?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1122
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    She's taking it well


    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154

    Newsworthy doxxed a mans young child earlier in the week, why would you post scum like newsworthy?


  • Options
    #1123
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Newsworthy doxxed a mans young child earlier in the week, why would you post scum like newsworthy?


    Gemma published a picture of a class of school kids in Longford that had some immigrant children in it. Without asking their parents. But that’s ok is it


  • Options
    #1124
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    batgoat wrote: »
    She was banned days ago....

    One of her channels was banned, the other was up and running. She was live streaming last night.
    Both channels were deleted entirely today and the Irish Times had a preprepared article which appeared almost immediately after her channels were deleted.

    At least we now know that which we knew all along...that big tech and the media in Ireland are colluding.

    I wonder if some enterprising journalist (Gemma perhaps) can do some digging and find out just how deep this collusion goes. Perhaps there was collusion when tech companies interfered in the Abortion referendum. Perhaps there was some illegality.

    Very sloppy by the IT in any case.


  • Options
    #1125
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Stop moaning ffs wrote: »
    Gemma published a picture of a class of school kids in Longford that had some immigrant children in it. Without asking their parents. But that’s ok is it

    She published a picture which had already featured in the media. She did not publish names.

    Whoever the lowlife scum Newsworthy is...they published a picture of the child, including the names of the parents and the workplace address of the parents.


  • Options
    #1126
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    One of her channels was banned, the other was up and running. She was live streaming last night.
    Both channels were deleted entirely today and the Irish Times had a preprepared article which appeared almost immediately after her channels were deleted.

    At least we now know that which we knew all along...that big tech and the media in Ireland are colluding.

    I wonder if some enterprising journalist (Gemma perhaps) can do some digging and find out just how deep this collusion goes. Perhaps there was collusion when tech companies interfered in the Abortion referendum. Perhaps there was some illegality.

    Very sloppy by the IT in any case.

    Creating a 2nd account to circumvent a ban is against T&C's tjat she agreed to when signing up so thats why both were closed.

    What time was her accounts closed? what time was IT article posted?

    If you're gonna make this claim at least back it up with proof please.


  • Options
    #1127
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Creating a 2nd account to circumvent a ban is against T&C's tjat she agreed to when signing up so thats why both were closed.

    What time was her accounts closed? what time was IT article posted?

    If you're gonna make this claim at least back it up with proof please.

    She didn't create an account it was her first account.

    Obviously I wasn't watching as youtube removed her channel, but it was sometime before 6 and the IT article went up shortly after


  • Options
    #1128
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Absolutely shocking that the so called libs and lefties here fail to see that they will be next.


  • Options
    #1129
    super_furry
    Registered Users Posts: 27,322 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    Gem-Trails is off to make her own YouTube, with hookers, blackjack and Black and Tan Torino.


  • Options
    #1130
    gandalf
    Registered Users Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Google took their time banning the hatemonger, now to get her off Twitter.

    The state of her and that goon in black kicking off outside Google's headquarters.


  • Options
    #1131
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    She didn't create an account it was her first account.

    Obviously I wasn't watching as youtube removed her channel, but it was sometime before 6 and the IT article went up shortly after

    She had her main account suspended


    She started streaming on a 2nd (backup account....her words not mine) and that was suspended.

    Google then closed both accounts


    So "almost immediately" could actually be 2 or 3 or even 4 hours after her accounts were closed?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1132
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    super_furry wrote: »
    Gem-Trails is off to make her own YouTube, with hookers, blackjack and Black and Tan Torino.

    'Tan' will of course be listed under the coming hate speech laws. Watch what you say. Everything is screenshotted


  • Options
    #1133
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Absolutely shocking that the so called libs and lefties here fail to see that they will be next.

    Next for what?

    Simple question for you,

    should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?


  • Options
    #1134
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    'Tan' will of course be listed under the coming hate speech laws. Watch what you say. Everything is screenshotted

    Well ISF on facebook is fùcked so.


  • Options
    #1135
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    She had her main account suspended


    She started streaming on a 2nd (backup account....her words not mine) and that was suspended.

    Google then closed both accounts


    So "almost immediately" could actually be 2 or 3 or even 4 hours after her accounts were closed?

    Nope I was re watching her stream from last night about an hour before it was deleted. thats how i knew as I refreshed the page and the channel was gone.


  • Options
    #1136
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Next for what?

    Simple question for you,

    should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?

    Why do you - a supposed leftist, argue for the ability of a hyper capitalist conglomerate to interfere in political discourse

    Just what kind of socialist are you??


  • Options
    #1137
    super_furry
    Registered Users Posts: 27,322 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Nope I was re watching her stream from last night about an hour before it was deleted. thats how i knew as I refreshed the page and the channel was gone.

    Ah well sure look on the brightside, with Gemma off air and getting ready to fling her own ****e at Google HQ, you have the chance to catch up on Love Island tonight.


  • Options
    #1138
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Nope I was re watching her stream from last night about an hour before it was deleted. thats how i knew as I refreshed the page and the channel was gone.

    She literally had a video up 3 days ago boasting about how she had to use he "back up account"


  • Options
    #1139
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,548 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Why do you - a supposed leftist, argue for the ability of a hyper capitalist conglomerate to interfere in political discourse

    Just what kind of socialist are you??

    Im not a leftist lol, that's just a childish label you wisj to use because i disagree with some things you believe.

    If you wish me to answer your question then please answer mine 1st.


  • Options
    #1140
    Annasopra
    Registered Users Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I wonder will she be calling for gardai to arrest her henchman who just tried to assault google staff.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1141
    Seth Brundle
    Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,715 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    She's taking it well


    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151166667776561154
    Jesus H!
    Could you imagine being married to her?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement