Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Options
1…3637394142…333

Comments

  • Options
    #1142
    Odhinn
    Registered Users Posts: 8,090 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Seth Brundle wrote: »
    Jesus H!
    Could you imagine being married to her?




    I can imagine the drug and alcohol abuse before remembering divorce is legal allright.


  • Options
    #1143
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Seth Brundle wrote: »
    Jesus H!
    Could you imagine being married to her?

    The videos further down the thread

    Gold


  • Options
    #1144
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Im not a leftist lol, that's just a childish label you wisj to use because i disagree with some things you believe.

    If you wish me to answer your question then please answer mine 1st.

    Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

    So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
    You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

    Fake left indeed...


  • Options
    #1145
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

    So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
    You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

    Fake left indeed...

    Myes and conditions are standard across YouTube google twitter etc


    Second accounts aren’t allowed. This is standard


    They’re not allowed here on boards either by the way


  • Options
    #1146
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,516 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

    Their house their rules.
    So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
    You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

    Fake left indeed...

    No, again thats just you trying to label me based on what you think i believe.

    Gemma's on FB now ranting, she mentions several times that her TWO accounts have been shut down, maybe go listen to her waffle for a while before embarrassing yourself again.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1147
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Their house their rules.



    No, again thats just you trying to label me based on what you think i believe.

    Gemma's on FB now ranting, she mentions several times that her TWO accounts have been shut down, maybe go listen to her waffle for a while before embarrassing yourself again.

    You have argued in favour of tech censorship a hundred times..who's 'right wing' here?
    Clearly its you


  • Options
    #1148
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,516 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    You have argued in favour of tech censorship a hundred times..who's 'right wing' here?
    Clearly its you

    Any chance you might answer this?

    "should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?"


  • Options
    #1149
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,405 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    You have argued in favour of tech censorship a hundred times..who's 'right wing' here?
    Clearly its you

    you keep using that word like you understand what it means


  • Options
    #1150
    Acosta
    Registered Users Posts: 2,337 ✭✭✭Acosta


    I try to avoid her rants and posts as much as possible, but when I do come across it she seems even more unhinged than before. I detest her views on nearly everything, but she really doesn't sound well at all.


  • Options
    #1151
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Any chance you might answer this?

    "should Gemma be allowed to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up?"

    You're a Capitalist shill fronting as a progressive, its as clear as day.
    Others should take note..


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1152
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,516 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    You're a Capitalist shill fronting as a progressive, its as clear as day.
    Others should take note..

    Why the refusal to answer a simple question? You can keep abusing me and adding childish labels if you wish but honestly,

    by refusing to answer that one simple question you're showing everyone that you believe she shouldnt be able to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up.


  • Options
    #1153
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    She was at the door of YouTube’s owners ranting as her channels had been taken down. The day before.
    That’s all.
    You’re reaching here Harvey.


  • Options
    #1154
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Why the refusal to answer a simple question? You can keep abusing me and adding childish labels if you wish but honestly,

    by refusing to answer that one simple question you're showing everyone that you believe she shouldnt be able to post whatever she wants even if its against a sites T&C's that she agreed to when she signed up.

    Contact youtube and ask them what exactly it was she was banned for..then I will answer. Be specific.
    Because you don't know do you?


  • Options
    #1155
    Stop moaning ffs
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Contact youtube and ask them what exactly it was she was banned for..then I will answer. Be specific.
    Because you don't know do you?

    Well all know. It’s a conspiracy against her to silence her

    Wooooooooooooooo!


  • Options
    #1156
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,516 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Contact youtube and ask them what exactly it was she was banned for..then I will answer. Be specific.
    Because you don't know do you?

    She was dropped for

    "violations of its policies aimed at protecting against hate speech"

    So now you will have no problem answering my question? Or will you evade again?


  • Options
    #1157
    For Forks Sake
    Registered Users Posts: 11,571 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    n97 mini wrote: »
    That's one of Leah Doherty's Twitter accounts I think?

    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151203723387047937

    Nope. Here's Gems approaching the Newsworthy person.


  • Options
    #1158
    n97 mini
    Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151203723387047937

    Nope. Here's Gems approaching the Newsworthy person.

    How do you know? That video doesn't identify anyone.


  • Options
    #1159
    Harvey Weinstein
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭Harvey Weinstein


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    She was dropped for

    "violations of its policies aimed at protecting against hate speech"

    So now you will have no problem answering my question? Or will you evade again?

    Hate Speech?
    And yet there are literally thousands of videos spewing hate speech against Whites, Blacks, Catholics, Muslims, LGBT, Trans, Infidels you name it and they are still up and running.

    Like I said youtubes idea of what constitutes hate speech is entirely arbitrary and totally inconsistent.
    This is nothing more than a political move to shut down and silence Gemma likely at the request of the Irish establishment/Media and anyone should be very worried indeed at this development regardless of whether you support Gemma or not.

    Unless of course you are a member of the establishment or on the establishment gravy train which I strongly suspect you are


  • Options
    #1160
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Youtube terms and conditions are entirely arbitrary, they can decide on a whim whether something is categorised as 'hate speech' or anything else and you know this.

    So now we have the truth - you are not a leftist/socialist of any sort.
    You support big business and you support the ability of transnational capitalism to interfere in political discourse.

    Fake left indeed...

    So it's as if it's a company that they own and can define rules for? Shocking...


  • Options
    #1161
    n97 mini
    Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/newsworthy_ie/status/1151203723387047937

    Nope. Here's Gems approaching the Newsworthy person.

    The irony isn't lost on me that a pro Brexit MP was recently lambasted for a comment about any fishing vessel caught in UK waters after Brexit should be given "the Belgrano treatment", and whoever is running that Twitter account has the infamous front page of The Sun about the sinking of the Belgrano as their profile picture.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1162
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,516 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Hate Speech?
    And yet there are literally thousands of videos spewing hate speech against Whites, Blacks, Catholics, Muslims, LGBT, Trans, Infidels you name it and they are still up and running.

    Maybe contact them and tell them that?
    Like I said youtubes idea of what constitutes hate speech is entirely arbitrary and totally inconsistent.
    This is nothing more than a political move to shut down and silence Gemma likely at the request of the Irish establishment/Media and anyone should be very worried indeed at this development regardless of whether you support Gemma or not.

    Ahhhh here we go down the conspiracy rabbit hole
    Unless of course you are a member of the establishment or on the establishment gravy train which I strongly suspect you are

    :D

    I don't even live in Ireland anymore, what
    part of the "establishment gravy train" do you believe i am a member of?

    I also can't help but notice that you have yet again managed to avoid answering my simple question. What has you so flummoxed that you can't give me an honest reply?


  • Options
    #1163
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Don't do the whole social media thing, this place would be the closest thing to it, but from a professional perspective the only people I know who go the dual/multiple accounts route are professional hackers and even then just for work.

    Outside of that can't see the point of having multiple accounts unless you are a complete ****, someone with a dubious mental health status, or just a troll.


  • Options
    #1164
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Don't do the whole social media thing, this place would be the closest thing to it, but from a professional perspective the only people I know who go the dual/multiple accounts route are professional hackers and even then just for work.

    Outside of that can't see the point of having multiple accounts unless you are a complete ****, someone with a dubious mental health status, or just a troll.
    Or if a big old bigot. Although likely falls under ****.


  • Options
    #1165
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    batgoat wrote: »
    Or if a big old bigot. Although likely falls under ****.

    It does.


  • Options
    #1166
    FartyBlartFast
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭FartyBlartFast


    Stop moaning ffs wrote: »
    Harvey Weinstein wrote: »
    Irish times article was up mere minutes after Gemmas channel was deleted...hmmmmm

    Please do elaborate
    Soros.

    Fin.


  • Options
    #1167
    Sir Guy who smiles
    Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭Sir Guy who smiles


    FartyBlartFast wrote: »
    Soros.

    Fin.

    Read an interesting snippet in a Sunday paper, David Crosby thought a lady whose affections came between messr. Stills and Nash was an agent of Richard Nixon sent to break the band up because of its counter culture revolutionary potential.
    His manager replied that Nixon probably didn't know who David Crosby was.


  • Options
    #1168
    Annasopra
    Registered Users Posts: 41,062 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Do Gemmas supporters support the attempted assault on google staff?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Options
    #1169
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Joeytheparrot wrote: »
    Do Gemmas supporters support the attempted assault on google staff?

    Only if milkshakes involved.


  • Options
    #1170
    ILoveYourVibes
    Registered Users Posts: 15,177 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    She was dropped for

    "violations of its policies aimed at protecting against hate speech"

    So now you will have no problem answering my question? Or will you evade again?


    I reported several of her videos. :D


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1171
    musiknonstop
    Registered Users Posts: 289 ✭✭musiknonstop


    ILoveYourVibes wrote: »
    I reported several of her videos. :D

    I reported several of her channels :)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement