WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

Ectoplasm

Green&Red wrote: »

Interested from an information POV, not interested from a have a party POV

I’m interested in the holocaust doesn’t mean I’m f**king happy about it

quickbeam wrote: »

This made me LOL.

Me too but does this mean we've officially Godwinned?

quickbeam

Actually, Tusk was the first to quote Kitten, so not just thanked the post, but even replied to it, making even more of a mockery of his reply to Sully:

tusk wrote: »

I feel like yesterday was a complete farce,for me anywya.

So I'll be taking most things as fresh from here on out.

I was second, and the only other mention was when Duffers ISO'd Kitten.

quickbeam wrote: »

My first post post-munch said that Whippy was cleared as wolves would have known Trit wasn't the seer if Whippy was among them, and left him to be lynched instead.

But I think you actually make a good point. A clever wolf might munch Trit in the hope of putting Whippy in the lock-clear village group?

I still have village lean on her, but, I guess it's something to think about.

Green&Red

Godwinned?

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

Okay, this is weird. This is Kitten's original post about Whippy. I think she was the first one to bring out that Whippy might be a wolf, and the Trit munch was a way of getting her confirmed villager:



But Tusk thanked this???

Yet when Sully posted the same thing, he says:



Tusky, and explanation?

This is clearly not the same thing that sully said.

Yeah they point in similar directions, but sully's was blatant and clear and generally aimed at wolves, this is more round about and specific to whippy.

I don't go through every individual post to see which align and which don't and then choose my replies and likes based on that. If i read something i like, i'll like it, if i feel there's a response to give, I'll give it.

I'm not following what your problem here is?

Ectoplasm

Green&Red wrote: »

Godwinned?

I was joking about Godwin's Law - As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

Actually, Tusk was the first to quote Kitten, so not just thanked the post, but even replied to it, making even more of a mockery of his reply to Sully:



I was second, and the only other mention was when Duffers ISO'd Kitten.

What exactly am I mocking here? You're off your nut hahahaah

quickbeam

Green&Red wrote: »

Godwinned?

The principle that any online chat, if it's allowed to go on long enough, will eventually resort to talk about Hitler/Nazis.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

quickbeam

tusk wrote: »

This is clearly not the same thing that sully said.

Yeah they point in similar directions, but sully's was blatant and clear and generally aimed at wolves, this is more round about and specific to whippy.

I don't go through every individual post to see which align and which don't and then choose my replies and likes based on that. If i read something i like, i'll like it, if i feel there's a response to give, I'll give it.

I'm not following what your problem here is?

tusk wrote: »

What exactly am I mocking here? You're off your nut hahahaah

It just seemed odd, disingenuous even, that you'd react to Sully's post as if you'd never heard it before and it was novel, when you not only thanked, but replied to Kitten's saying the same. It could be nothing. But I just thought it worth noting.

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

It just seemed odd, disingenuous even, that you'd react to Sully's post as if you'd never heard it before and it was novel, when you not only thanked, but replied to Kitten's saying the same. It could be nothing. But I just thought it worth noting.

It is nothing. I agreed with both posts... They are different posts.

I could see you kick up if i had agreed with them and they were contradictory, but this is just foolish.

sullivlo

quickbeam wrote: »

It just seemed odd, disingenuous even, that you'd react to Sully's post as if you'd never heard it before and it was novel, when you not only thanked, but replied to Kitten's saying the same. It could be nothing. But I just thought it worth noting.

Baggly

We doing FFAs today?

quickbeam

Now interesting you defend Tusk, when it was him I was questioning. I had no problem with your original post. You'd shown no sign of having already seen Kitten's.

But yeah, probably am.

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

Now interesting you defend Tusk, when it was him I was questioning. I had no problem with your original post. You'd shown no sign of having already seen Kitten's.

But yeah, probably am.

Qb I'm worrying about you. Either your getting too into this to your detriment or you're a confused wolf trying to find things to point at people with. Noted.

Baggly

I want everyone to note that im noting their notes and the notes of other notees; paying special attention to who is making notes on other people making notes.

Ectoplasm

So, everyone's pretty much like this then?

Baggly

Nah i have a single post it with 'It's QB' on it.

Green&Red

Baggly wrote: »

I want everyone to note that im noting their notes and the notes of other notees; paying special attention to who is making notes on other people making notes.

I’m prepared to note the people who take note of you


The village can thank me later

Baggly

Noted GNR.

tusk

Baggly wrote: »

I want everyone to note that im noting their notes and the notes of other notees; paying special attention to who is making notes on other people making notes.

Noted.

tusk

Lads. this thread is hilarious. Loving this game so far. Yous are all mental.

kitten_k

quickbeam wrote: »

Wut?? And Ecto thanking Sully's post too. This isn't novel. Kitten already mentioned it some hours ago and I commented on it then too.

quickbeam wrote: »

Okay, this is weird. This is Kitten's original post about Whippy. I think she was the first one to bring out that Whippy might be a wolf, and the Trit munch was a way of getting her confirmed villager:



But Tusk thanked this???

Yet when Sully posted the same thing, he says:



Tusky, and explanation?

tusk wrote: »

Maybe she didn't make it as clear as sully. I don't recall seeing that from her anyway. Sorry kitten if it was your idea originally.

Good idea though.

quickbeam wrote: »

My first post post-munch said that Whippy was cleared as wolves would have known Trit wasn't the seer if Whippy was among them, and left him to be lynched instead.


But I think you actually make a good point. A clever wolf might munch Trit in the hope of putting Whippy in the lock-clear village group?



I still have village lean on her, but, I guess it's something to think about.

I may not have made it clear about how that could make Whip a wolf but QB spells it out here - so not a new idea at all.

sullivlo

quickbeam wrote: »

Now interesting you defend Tusk, when it was him I was questioning. I had no problem with your original post. You'd shown no sign of having already seen Kitten's.

But yeah, probably am.

kitten_k wrote: »

I may not have made it clear about how that could make Whip a wolf but QB spells it out here - so not a new idea at all.

I was skimming rather than reading so I missed your post Kitten - apologies.

I'm not defending Tusk btw - I just love an auld gif.

tusk

sullivlo wrote: »

I was skimming rather than reading so I missed your post Kitten - apologies.

I'm not defending Tusk btw - I just love an auld gif.

Same! I'm also not defending myself, as there's nothing to defend. Kitten had an idea, QB fleshed it out more clearly. Sully had the same idea. I agreed with them all. lol

Green&Red

I think it needs to be pointed out to whoever used Tusk thanking a post in their argument, Tusk has thanks 86.9% of all posts

Green&Red

Anyone know somewhere nice to get food in Fermoy?

tusk

Green&Red wrote: »

I think it needs to be pointed out to whoever used Tusk thanking a post in their argument, Tusk has thanks 86.9% of all posts

Wow. is it really that low? I'm really holding back hahaha

quickbeam

Baggly wrote: »

Nah i have a single post it with 'It's QB' on it.

You're wrong.

quickbeam

tusk wrote: »

Qb I'm worrying about you. Either your getting too into this to your detriment or you're a confused wolf trying to find things to point at people with. Noted.

Lookit, lynch me if you like, if my flip (green) helps you at all, then do it. Just do it today or tomorrow. Don't make my lynch the LYLO.

Baggly

quickbeam wrote: »

You're wrong.

It's not me QB - its the note.

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

Lookit, lynch me if you like, if my flip (green) helps you at all, then do it. Just do it today or tomorrow. Don't make my lynch the LYLO.

you're not near top of my list right now.

also, i just checked and apparently I've only thanked 300 posts....