WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

quickbeam

Clarabel wrote: »

I think me and Kitten?

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

I don't think either of us are wolves

Then again it could just be cause it's a lovely summers day?

quickbeam

sullivlo wrote: »

It's exactly what I said there!

Okay, let me be clear, because today has shown that sometimes I am not.

Earlier you wrote: "I voted outside of my FFA because I voted with the results as compiled."

And later you wrote: "I voted for Strawbs, who wasn't on my FFA but who I considered to be more wolfy based on the ISO of her yesterday afternoon."

The first statement makes it sound like none of your FFA list made the race, so you voted outside it. I'm the only one banging on about this, so I could be misunderstanding you here, hence looking for clarification. Is that not what you said? Or, you "voted with the results as compiled" - you went outside your FFA because Strawbs topped the FFAs?

But either way of interpreting that statement, is very different from saying that it was the ISO which convinced you to change.

First statement: FFA list convinced you
Second statement: ISO convinced you

These are hardly "exactly" the same. IMO they're not even close?

quickbeam

Clarabel wrote: »

I don't think either of us are wolves

Then again it could just be cause it's a lovely summers day?

I don't think either of you are either. Kitten a more likely candidate than you though, maybe? Are you voting Kitten for self preservation?

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

I don't think either of you are either. Kitten a more likely candidate than you though, maybe? Are you voting Kitten for self preservation?

I'm not sure, I'm happy to go down to save the seer but the problem is I don't think you learn anything by me flipping green.

So in that case maybe I should

Green&Red

kitten_k wrote: »

Not at the moment, am out and about, will see when I get home

Ha, ha I laughed at this one.


Kitten has about five posts, one her first ISO and the other giving the two fingers to Tusk and the game. "f**k you, I'm out having fun, lynch me, don't lynch me, I don't give a f**k"
We should either all be on Kitten or no one on Kitten cause that is some ballsy play if she is a wolf, I take my hat off to her

sullivlo

quickbeam wrote: »

Okay, let me be clear, because today has shown that sometimes I am not.

Earlier you wrote: "I voted outside of my FFA because I voted with the results as compiled."

And later you wrote: "I voted for Strawbs, who wasn't on my FFA but who I considered to be more wolfy based on the ISO of her yesterday afternoon."

The first statement makes it sound like none of your FFA list made the race, so you voted outside it. I'm the only one banging on about this, so I could be misunderstanding you here, hence looking for clarification. Is that not what you said? Or, you "voted with the results as compiled" - you went outside your FFA because Strawbs topped the FFAs?

But either way of interpreting that statement, is very different from saying that it was the ISO which convinced you to change.

First statement: FFA list convinced you
Second statement: ISO convinced you

These are hardly "exactly" the same. IMO they're not even close?

I also said:
"RIP to strawbs. It was the ISO that convinced me to vote for her.

I voted outside of my FFA because I voted with the results as compiled."

Which is what I said earlier too.

Green&Red

quickbeam wrote: »

Okay, let me be clear, because today has shown that sometimes I am not.

Earlier you wrote: "I voted outside of my FFA because I voted with the results as compiled."

And later you wrote: "I voted for Strawbs, who wasn't on my FFA but who I considered to be more wolfy based on the ISO of her yesterday afternoon."

The first statement makes it sound like none of your FFA list made the race, so you voted outside it. I'm the only one banging on about this, so I could be misunderstanding you here, hence looking for clarification. Is that not what you said? Or, you "voted with the results as compiled" - you went outside your FFA because Strawbs topped the FFAs?

But either way of interpreting that statement, is very different from saying that it was the ISO which convinced you to change.

First statement: FFA list convinced you
Second statement: ISO convinced you

These are hardly "exactly" the same. IMO they're not even close?

Just on this, Sully my reading is that you're saying you voted for Strawbs (outside of your FFA) because she was in the running in the FFA compilation?

Cause she wasn't as far as I recall?

quickbeam

Green&Red wrote: »

Just on this, Sully my reading is that you're saying you voted for Strawbs (outside of your FFA) because she was in the running in the FFA compilation?

Cause she wasn't as far as I recall?

That's actually true. I'd assumed she was, until I looked back.

quickbeam

sullivlo wrote: »

Vote on number of votes votes by
tritium 2 duffman, clara
Green&Red 4 sully, trit, duffman, qb
quickbeam 4 gnr, kolido, baggly, whiplashy
tusk 8 strawbs, ecto, gnr, kolido, clara, kitten, baggly, whiplashy
Clarabel 4 ecto, tusk, kitten, whiplashy
sullivlo 1 duffman
Strawberry Milkshake 2 tusk, gnr
duffman13 2 strawbs, ecto
Baggly 3 tusk, kolido, qb
Ectoplasm 2 clara, kitten
kitten_k 3 sully, strawbs, qb
Kolido 2 sully, tritium
Whiplashy 0

Reordered by number, Strawbs was actually way down:

Vote on number of votes votes by
tusk 8 strawbs, ecto, gnr, kolido, clara, kitten, baggly, whiplashy
Green&Red 4 sully, trit, duffman, qb
quickbeam 4 gnr, kolido, baggly, whiplashy
Clarabel 4 ecto, tusk, kitten, whiplashy
Baggly 3 tusk, kolido, qb
kitten_k 3 sully, strawbs, qb
tritium 2 duffman, clara
Strawberry Milkshake 2 tusk, gnr
duffman13 2 strawbs, ecto
Ectoplasm 2 clara, kitten
Kolido 2 sully, tritium
sullivlo 1 duffman
Whiplashy 0

quickbeam

Even if a few people could *pretend* to join me on Sully, just to see if there'd be ruckus?

Clarabel

Is tusk our wolf? I actually think there was a lot more noise last night when we were on him?

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

Even if a few people could *pretend* to join me on Sully, just to see if there'd be ruckus?

Well my ISO is on Sully, if I don't self preserve I'll be voting there.

I don't even expect you to do my expenses.

Clarabel

Sulli

duffman13

Clarabel wrote: »

Is tusk our wolf? I actually think there was a lot more noise last night when we were on him?

I think I've only pointed that out a few times

Have I missed what he's done today that's made him go from being FFAd 8 times to being ignored really?

Clarabel

duffman13 wrote: »

I think I've only pointed that out a few times

Have I missed what he's done today that's made him go from being FFAd 8 times to being ignored really?

I wasn't around today much either, lots tonight. I'm not sure he has contributed anything either beyond more flip flopping

I'm still sticking with Sulli

Green&Red

Heres my #FFA2

Ecto
Baggly
Tusk

Ecto and Baggly for a similar offence, they are clever players, you have to dissect each post they make cause they are mixing truth with lies and innuendo all the time.

Ecto first, accuses me of evasion, I called her out on it, I admitted I missed a question but that I had returned when pressed with what I thought was a satisfactory answer. She promised to return with further examples of my evasiveness, surprise, surprise they haven't arrived. I called her out on taking what I say to fit her narrative and she never responded. Top of my list

Ectoplasm wrote: »

At the moment Green&Red has my vote. It's not just the whole Trit thing...it's the defensiveness, and the evasion.

Baggly for something similar, accuses me of going after him yesterday, I didnt, not once, in fact as I went as far as to ISO and put him in the neutral pile. But Baggly is a master at just slipping things like this in, it is a superb skill. Whenever I do get to be a wolf I will do my best to do it, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery

Baggly wrote: »

Its as simple as this: I know im village, so the people pushing after me based on....what?......are pushing for a mislynch. Ill be proven right if lynched, and ye 3 (GNR, Tusk, QB) will have questions to answer because im not seeing people lay out why they suss me.

Its also coincidental those same people are ones i have accused of being wolfy first. Very defensive people here in this game.

Tusk is all over the shop, yesterday he ISO'd about 10 times, today he's accusing have the population. At worst its wolfie, at best its a distraction. Concentrate, focus. No matter who is turned up red he will be able to say I told you so, you should listen to me

Green&Red

I'm heading out for a run shortly, should be back just in time for voting

Clarabel

Green&Red wrote: »

I'm heading out for a run shortly, should be back just in time for voting

where's your vote?

quickbeam

GnR, before you go, if you can, can you point me in the direction of your first FFA. I can't find it. Or if somebody else has them handy. I'm trying to put something together that requires a timeline of FFAs.

quickbeam

Too damn quiet!!

Gonna switch to Kolido if he doesn't come back with something meaningful before 10pm.

Ectoplasm

Green&Red wrote: »

Ecto first, accuses me of evasion, I called her out on it, I admitted I missed a question but that I had returned when pressed with what I thought was a satisfactory answer. She promised to return with further examples of my evasiveness, surprise, surprise they haven't arrived. I called her out on taking what I say to fit her narrative and she never responded. Top of my list

Sorry GnR, I haven't been home to it but I stand by it. This is a very flaky as a reason to vote for me...I think you might be a wolf therefore you are accusing me. You've added nothing of substance, it's basically she thinks I'm a wolf.

Ectoplasm

quickbeam wrote: »

Too damn quiet!!

Gonna switch to Kolido if he doesn't come back with something meaningful before 10pm.

Yeah. There is no way a wolf is on the line. Now compare this to last night. We definitely had at least one in danger. This is ACTUALLY quiet.

tusk

I've stepped back to let things flow organically and look what happens. I won't be posting again tonight.

Hope to chat to you in the morning. Good luck

quickbeam

Let's go for Tusk? I don't think he's a wolf, but he's the most likely candidate for the wolves protecting their team last night?

Clarabel

How accurate is the "currently active"?

Clarabel

quickbeam wrote: »

Let's go for Tusk? I don't think he's a wolf, but he's the most likely candidate for the wolves protecting their team last night?

i'll go there

sullivlo

quickbeam wrote: »

Let's go for Tusk? I don't think he's a wolf, but he's the most likely candidate for the wolves protecting their team last night?

CFD. I'm up for that. Happy to switch.

Ectoplasm

quickbeam wrote: »

Let's go for Tusk? I don't think he's a wolf, but he's the most likely candidate for the wolves protecting their team last night?

He's on my FFA but not my strongest candidate. Also don't like that he doesn't seem to be around to fight it but really don't like the silence either.

tusk

I'm around. Watching.