WereWolf: A 13 player Seer game

I’m not putting you on my FFA as I want to get a counter wagon going.

#FFA1

Tusk
Kitten
Duffman

tusk

I made a mistake.

Ffa1

Kolido
Strawbs
Duffman

quickbeam

Green&Red wrote: »

Guaranteed QB and Strawbs will have me in their FFA too for something similar.
It’s hard to argue against

100%?

So tusk made a mistake putting baggly in and changed it to duffman.

I’m voting you tusk.

quickbeam

That is indeed interesting. I too went back to compare FFAs. It’s noted. Not voting that way as yet though.

Green&Red

quickbeam wrote: »

Green&Red wrote: »

Guaranteed QB and Strawbs will have me in their FFA too for something similar.
It’s hard to argue against

100%?

No, I’ve no control over that.
It’s only 100% there’s a wolf in QB, Strawbs, Trit

sullivlo

tusk wrote: »

Ffa 1

Kolido
Strawbs
Baggly

tusk wrote: »

I made a mistake.

Ffa1

Kolido
Strawbs
Duffman

Why the change and no rationale?

Ectoplasm

Jesus, you go to the cinema and everything kicks off!

Thanks for getting the info re autopriest Sully. For that you can be my N0 clear

Agree with the getting organised thing, so my initial FFA is:

#FFA1
duffman
tusk
clarabel

tritium

My ffa is already in from earlier. I may change it later but will stick to it for the moment my fellow seers

#SpartacusIsAllAroundUs

duffman13

I love getting ffa'd for nothing other than reaction to Trit. Anyway, I ain't voting Trit tonight cause it's self resolving, if he's the seer/not the seer the wolves can decide!

tusk

sullivlo wrote: »

Why the change and no rationale?

I meant to put duffers in but when I went back to check all the names, I saw baggly's and it confused me.

So duffers should have been there in the first place.

A lynch on me is a wasted vote fyi.

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

That is indeed interesting. I too went back to compare FFAs. It’s noted. Not voting that way as yet though.

I said it very honestly and clearly called it out on the thread.

duffman13

tusk wrote: »

I meant to put duffers in but when I went back to check all the names, I saw baggly's and it confused me.

So duffers should have been there in the first place.

A lynch on me is a wasted vote fyi.

Reasoning? No issues with one or two peoples FFAs but put me on and give me a reason! A lynch vote on me is wasted too but sure that means nothing in this game!

tritium

tusk wrote: »

I said it very honestly and clearly called it out on the thread.

Fair point tbh, a wolf would probably just stick with it. Not saying you are or aren’t but I don’t think it’s a damning slip.


#MyFellowSeers
#AreHastagsAnnoying

Baggly

I think qb is the wolf. She is doing her sitting back stroking her metaphorical beard thing a lot. Oh and 10k post fluff.

tusk

duffman13 wrote: »

Reasoning? No issues with one or two peoples FFAs but put me on and give me a reason! A lynch vote on me is wasted too but sure that means nothing in this game!

Just think you're a wolf...

quickbeam

tusk wrote: »

I said it very honestly and clearly called it out on the thread.

You did. I only said it was noteworthy. I’m not voting for you.

tusk

quickbeam wrote: »

You did. I only said it was noteworthy. I’m not voting for you.

That's a good plan. We don't need to lynch villagers if we only vote for wolves...

quickbeam

Green&Red wrote: »

No, I’ve no control over that.
It’s only 100% there’s a wolf in QB, Strawbs, Trit

You don’t have any control over who is a wolf either though.

quickbeam

Baggly wrote: »

I think qb is the wolf. She is doing her sitting back stroking her metaphorical beard thing a lot. Oh and 10k post fluff.

You are wrong.

Green&Red

quickbeam wrote: »

You don’t have any control over who is a wolf either though.

I didn't say I did, don't be twisting my words to fit your wolfie narrative

I said there is 100% a wolf in the group of Trit, Strawbs and QB, I stand by that because its a fact

Ectoplasm

kitten_k wrote: »

Can't believe the seer outed themselves so early! I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you either made a mistake or are trying to protect the real seer. Would be a suicide play by a wolf IMO. This will be self resolving as the wolves will kill you to make sure, if anyone votes you tonight they really need to be looked at closely.

I tend to agree with you on the suicidal wolf here, although not ruling out an incredibly ballsy wolf play. Based on numbers it seems unlikely though

That actually happened on night we were playing WW at the FG Beers - Necro gave us all village cards!

This is not surprising

I can't see a wolf doing it but I also don't see how it is pro village? It ha given the wolves two clear villagers to munch! If he had held on a few days we could have had a nice core and it would have given us a better chance of identifying the wolves.

The wolves don't need to be given clear villagers, they know who the villagers are. The only info they don't have is who the seer is. If we all play I am spartacus then it doesn't help them figure out who is who. At least that's my assumption on Trit's strategy coz I don't see the real seer outing themselves with their first post and I don't think a wolf does this.

I don't think Trit is a wolf. If he is the real seer then Whip is clear but with a target on her back. If Trit is trying to protect the real seer then nobody knows what Whip is.

The first bit is true about Trit being seer except the wolves would already have the information that Whip is clear (if she is).


If Trit is lying I don't think the real seer would be foolish enough to counter claim this early.

And replying to this has me now re-thinking my position. Conclusion...Trit is either seer/wolf/villager :rolleyes:

quickbeam

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Trit is either seer/wolf/villager :rolleyes:

This is 100% :P

duffman13

Tusk you post a LOT! But you post nothing

tusk wrote: »

Very reasoned and legitimate plan. For a WOLF

Jokey accusation

tusk wrote: »

People like ME! Oh no you di'int!

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Should we just off qb from the getgo to expell the question :pac: ?

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Wait have I completely misread the game...? Is it just one seer for the game or does the seer ability move from night to night. #wtfisgoingon

Mechanics

tusk wrote: »

You're ALL wolves!
Fluff
God help me

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

I'm on it!

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

That's almost exactly like a normal game :pac:

Funny Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Wow. Too soon.

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

I just want something interesting to go instead of losing my marbles trying to find wolves. Even a **** power would be nice

Fluff - Wants a role, is probably a wolf :rolleyes:

tusk wrote: »

Ok. I'm the seer lads

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

best post of the game :pac:

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

great question. When I was holly, the post count was the same on mobile and desktop. which made life so much easier.
Fluff
I need to do that for my normal account.

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

did you vote for yourself? WOLF

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Gonna try out a new tactic this game. Let's see how it goes.

Extra Fluff

tusk wrote: »

My n0 was myself. Just to be sure. I'm safe btw.

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

I vote for no lynch.

And no munch.

Giffy Fluff

tusk wrote: »

*#ArmyOfSpartacii

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Kolido is a wolf

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

for posterity, can you list the cleared villagers for me.

Looking for reasons why people might be considered clear! You made an assertation above as to why Kolido is a wolf with no reasoning. List a few reasons

tusk wrote: »

well that's just silly. We all know there are multiple spartacii, so an army for spartacus wouldn't make any sense.

Extra fluffy fluff

tusk wrote: »

Boom. 1000 posts. I am a god!

Congrats on the fluff milestone

tusk wrote: »

well lah dee dah!

I'm gonna pretend I've thousands more and they just don't count because of anon games.

#heartbroken

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

I'm down for lynching Kolido.

Kolido again, interesting

Kolido wrote: »

Please explain

tusk wrote: »

I think you could be a wolf

Oh no, it was just throwing an arrow

tusk wrote: »

How are we getting on friends?

Any more accusations to shout?

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Does anybody want to just admit they're a wolf?

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Ffa 1

Kolido
Strawbs
Baggly

An FFA with no reasoning, you write so much fluff you could probably give a reason or two

tusk wrote: »

Don't forget I'm also the seer

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

I made a mistake.

Ffa1

Kolido
Strawbs
Duffman

Woohoo I am in, when/if I die lynch him next

tusk wrote: »

I meant to put duffers in but when I went back to check all the names, I saw baggly's and it confused me.

So duffers should have been there in the first place.

A lynch on me is a wasted vote fyi.

Defensive when he gets put under the scope. About 40 posts in and this is his first serious reply IMO

tusk wrote: »

I said it very honestly and clearly called it out on the thread.

Fluff

tusk wrote: »

Just think you're a wolf...

Fluff, no reasoning

tusk wrote: »

That's a good plan. We don't need to lynch villagers if we only vote for wolves...

Fluff

So I now decided that Tusk is Fr Fluffy Bottom!

quickbeam

Green&Red wrote: »

I didn't say I did, don't be twisting my words to fit your wolfie narrative

I said there is 100% a wolf in the group of Trit, Strawbs and QB, I stand by that because its a fact

I am not twisting anything. I am merely pointing out your logical inconsistencies:


QB & Strawbs will include you on their FFAs, but not 100% because it is out of your control.


QB, Strawbs or Trit are 100% a wolf, even though it is out of your control.

tritium

Ectoplasm wrote: »

And replying to this has me now re-thinking my position. Conclusion...Trit is either seer/wolf/villager :rolleyes:

I’m the three eyed raven :pac:

#ISeeEverything

quickbeam

duffman13 wrote: »

Tusk you post a LOT! But you post nothing

I like this post. I'm not voting for you any more. I haven't changed yet though as I don't have an other candidate yet.

tusk

duffman13 wrote: »

Defensive when he gets put under the scope. About 40 posts in and this is his first serious reply IMO

You're right. I went against my own rules there. Sorry me.

quickbeam

tusk wrote: »

You're right. I went against my own rules there. Sorry me.

Is that your new tactic?


You might want to change tactic if so.

tritium

duffman13 wrote: »

Tusk you post a LOT! But you post nothing
!

I like this mindset though I’m not sure it’s a valid complaint yet when we’ve had no munches to deal with. Hopefully you’ll keep it up when bodies start to fall

#SpartacusTheRaven