WereWolf: A 10 player Vigilante game.

Clarabel

Barney92 wrote: »

I'm not sure they show exactly the same thing though. By weights Tusk seems way ahead as the leading suspect, but by count myself and Green and Red seem a lot closer to him.

top 3 are still top 3

Necro

Barney92 wrote:

Ah I see. Yes you should have doubts about your wolf lean. Very strong doubts indeed.

Bah, you've swayed me with your somewhat convincing points on GnR. I remain interested in a rebuttal from him though.

tusk

Table doesn't work on mobile Clara. Are you using tabs or pipes for separators?

Electric Nitwit

I can't see the table either (mobile too) but it looks like three votes from me, I only gave two

I voted Ted and Barney, but they weren't in order for me. In fact they were pretty much from thin air because I thought everyone was voting

I also defended Tusk, but I now worry I'm being gamed by him :P

Clarabel

tusk wrote: »

Table doesn't work on mobile Clara. Are you using tabs or pipes for separators?

excel - so I guess tabs

tusk

Baggly wrote: »

Well im obviously not the vig then.

I don't get this.. Can you explain?

Necro

Clara what's your FFA as a matter of interest?

tusk

Electric Nitwit wrote: »

I also defended Tusk, but I now worry I'm being gamed by him :P

We would call that pocketing.

But don't worry I'm not gaming anyone. I'm not a wolf

Clarabel

Clarabel wrote: »

#ffa1

1. Barney for the breaking my heart stuff
2. ladyskunk for low posting - look i know this is a **** reason but there are you now
3. The newbies - DEFEND YOURSELF. Only jokin (kinda)
3. GnR - you know gut wolfy

Clarabel wrote: »

LadySkunk Ted_YNWA osh Necro Green&Red Barney92 tusk Baggly Clarabel Electric Nitwit
LadySkunk
Ted_YNWA
osh 2 5
Necro 2 5
Green&Red 5 1 2
Barney92 5
tusk
Baggly 2 1 5
Clarabel 2 1 5
Electric Nitwit 5 2 1

Votes 2 1 0 1 3 3 4 2 1 0

Weighted 4 5 0 2 7 9 16 6 2 0


Weighted and counts show the same thing

Necro wrote: »

Clara what's your FFA as a matter of interest?

smart groupings for you

tusk

Ffa1

Baggly
Skunk
Necro
Clara

Necro

tusk wrote:

Baggly
Skunk
Necro
Clara

Why 4, and why those 4 specifically?

Clarabel

tusk wrote: »

Ffa1

Baggly
Skunk
Necro
Clara

Are you putting on 4 to mess with my table? If you are this makes you a cruel human but also I like you ar emy type of people.

Ted_YNWA

FFA1

Green&Red
Necro
Tusk

I haven't voted yet, but just wondering for future reference, can it be changed?

Necro

Ted_YNWA wrote:

I haven't voted yet, but just wondering for future reference, can it be changed?

I presume you can vote as many times as you like but your last vote is the only one that counts.

Why me Ted... Why anyone on the FFA as an FYI:(

tusk

4 because I feel dodgiest vibes from those.

Sorry Clara it wasn't intentional.

Baggly because of his attack on me with nothing to back it up. And low posts with no content
Skunk because she's a wolf
Necro. The only one of the first four posters I didn't clear.
Clara for the craic

Necro

But there's only two wolves????

Clarabel

tusk wrote: »

4 because I feel dodgiest vibes from those.

Sorry Clara it wasn't intentional.


Clara for the craic

So not dodgy! Gwan get out with your craic nonsense, this is how villagers get killed

tusk

Necro wrote: »

But there's only two wolves????

Yeah and two of my reads could be wrong so then where are we if I get killed.

I think any one of them could be a wolf. Not all of them

Necro

Hey Barney you know how you want to lynch GnR for his FFA....

Well we have another contender lol

Ted_YNWA

Necro wrote: »

I presume you can vote as many times as you like but your last vote is the only one that counts.

Why me Ted... Why anyone on the FFA as an FYI:(

G&R - based on #267 comments
Necro - can't find the post now, but there was one that sounded a bit off
Tusk - still can't fully shake off the initial posting about there being an early wolf at start of thread.

tusk

Clarabel wrote: »

So not dodgy! Gwan get out with your craic nonsense, this is how villagers get killed

Clara your cracking me up today :pac:

Necro

tusk wrote:

I think any one of them could be a wolf. Not all of them

So purely based on me being one of the first four posters and nothing to do with my actual posts?

Ok then... carry on there

tusk

Ted_YNWA wrote: »

Tusk - still can't fully shake off the initial posting about there being an early wolf at start of thread.

What's your problem with it?

Necro

Ted_YNWA wrote:

Necro - can't find the post now, but there was one that sounded a bit off

Meh, at least I can work with that, if you get time Ted have a look for it will ya and lemme know

tusk

Necro wrote: »

So purely based on me being one of the first four posters and nothing to do with my actual posts?

Ok then... carry on there

I have my notes. They tell me you are potentially a wolf. That was the easiest to type out.

tusk

Sticking a vote in now from my ffa

Necro

tusk wrote:

I have my notes. They tell me you are potentially a wolf. That was the easiest to type out.

Sure everyone is potentially a wolf but here's the thing, we've 8 villagers so you listing four players just seems like a bit of fudge on your FFA.

tusk

Necro wrote: »

Sure everyone is potentially a wolf but here's the thing, we've 8 villagers so you listing four players just seems like a bit of fudge on your FFA.

Don't know what you mean there.

Those four are my top targets. The rest aren't tingling my tusky senses just yet.

If baggly and skunk flip green, I was wrong and I already have my two next top targets

tusk

I don't see what the problem is here

Ted_YNWA

Necro wrote: »

Meh, at least I can work with that, if you get time Ted have a look for it will ya and lemme know

The word 'potentially' in post 23 was one of them.

Would you guess how I remebered that

:P