Lady can't have her hairy balls waxed [mod notes/warnings in post #1]

drunkmonkey

klaaaz wrote: »

Search for what?

What ever you want, I just searched her name...done it again and found this nugget.

Dante7

mike_ie wrote: »

Mod: We're getting a lot of reports about the misgendering, deliberate or otherwise, of Jessica Yaniv.

Whatever people's thoughts on the case at hand, how this person chooses to identify is their choice alone. Jessica Yaniv, whatever you might think of her actions elsewhere, chooses to identify as male-to-female transgender. Discuss the person's actions all you want, but from here on in, use the correct pronouns.

No. Just, no. I will not be compelled to use the preferred pronouns of a paedophilic predator. You can take your social justice blasphemy rules and stick them where the sun don't shine. You won't dictate to me that I have to use words that abrogate scientific facts. What next? Will we have to use language that accommodates the feelings of anti-vaxxers and flat earthers? Fcuk that.

Jonathon Yaniv is a man. If you try to force me to call him a woman, you can shove your website.

klaaaz

drunkmonkey wrote: »

What ever you want, I just searched her name...done it again and found this nugget.

I don't see any of that or your previous post using your instruction. You must be following specific channels.

The Specialist

MrFresh wrote: »

Human rights should not be dependant on being in the majority.

But it’s not human rights at all. If pedophiles launched a similar campaign do you think we would just accept it?

Geuze

'United wishes and good will cannot overcome brute facts,’ Churchill wrote in his War Memoirs. ‘Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is.’

Seek the truth.

For whatever reason, this man may think he is something else.

He may want to be a woman, and I wish him well.

But he is a man.

The Specialist

Geuze wrote: »

'United wishes and good will cannot overcome brute facts,’ Churchill wrote in his War Memoirs. ‘Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it. Ignorance may deride it. Malice may distort it. But there it is.’

Seek the truth.

For whatever reason, this man may think he is something else.

He may want to be a woman, and I wish him well.

But he is a man.

“They” is a man, don’t get yourself banned now talking common sense in here.

Calhoun

Dante7 wrote: »

No. Just, no. I will not be compelled to use the preferred pronouns of a paedophilic predator. You can take your social justice blasphemy rules and stick them where the sun don't shine. You won't dictate to me that I have to use words that abrogate scientific facts. What next? Will we have to use language that accommodates the feelings of anti-vaxxers and flat earthers? Fcuk that.

Jonathon Yaniv is a man. If you try to force me to call him a woman, you can shove your website.

Don't play into the hands of some of the more loonier folk on this website, they more than likely have reported this one for arguing with moderator on thread and are coming out of their safe space to have a go.

There are also one who is stoking the fire and they do it in all threads like this, its best just not to engage.

Mam of 4

drunkmonkey wrote: »

What ever you want, I just searched her name...done it again and found this nugget.

Wtaf ??

Why should parents be prohibited from being there ?
Safe and inclusive in who's eyes ?
Or am I the only one who thinks that's fcuked up ?

Dante7

Overheal wrote: »

Q: What rights are being infringed by transgenderism?

Welcome to the debate. Glad you asked. Here you go.

https://twitter.com/KatKarena/status/1152923828864995328?s=19

The Specialist

Mam of 4 wrote: »

Wtaf ??

Why should parents be prohibited from being there ?
Safe and inclusive in who's eyes ?
Or am I the only one who thinks that's fcuked up ?

Because JY is a disgusting pervert who needs to be strung up by his neck.

Edit: Sorry mods, “they” neck :rolleyes:

Calhoun

Mam of 4 wrote: »

Wtaf ??

Why should parents be prohibited from being there ?
Safe and inclusive in who's eyes ?
Or am I the only one who thinks that's fcuked up ?

This individual is sick, they are not a reflection on the wider trans community but they are exposing a flaw in the current system of laws and protections that are being put in place for the LGBT community.

I don't think anyone likes this individual but the success of their case in Canada will be a warning shot for other places around the world or it will be a turning point where we will stop letting the extreme folks abuse/paint the worst picture of a community.

lawlolawl

MrFresh wrote: »

Human rights should not be dependant on being in the majority.

We should definitely be worried about the rights of pedophile men-in-dresses to see children naked.


This is totally a hill worth dying on in 2019.

drunkmonkey

klaaaz wrote: »

I don't see any of that or your previous post using your instruction. You must be following specific channels.

No just normal Google.ie stick in her name, go over to search tools on the bar and change anytime to past hour on the search tools menu.
Anything that Google has picked up mentioning her name in the last 60 minutes will be in the search results.

The Specialist

lawlolawl wrote: »

We should definitely be worried about the rights of pedophile men-in-dresses to see children naked.


This is totally a hill worth dying on in 2019.

This is the progressive woke left in 2019- **** your children and female loved ones safety because some fella in a dress might who thinks he’s a woman
Might feel offended by being rightly told to get the **** out of there.

Calhoun

MrFresh wrote: »

Human rights should not be dependant on being in the majority.

Human rights should not be dependent on being in the majority but in the case right now it definitely looks like the minority is abusing it for some fairly sinister things.

Even though the minor individuals that do these items its kinda like the loudest person in the room gets the most attention and boy are they getting some.

So while human rights should apply to all, if your in a minority and members of your community are abusing additional rights or laws put in place then you have a target on your back.

You had just better hope we have civilized up enough that we won't devolve into a lynch mob. Look at how one individual has stoked up hate, for some it will because they are bigots but for allot more it will be because they see the injustice and the danger posed to society if this is let fly.

Franz Von Peppercorn II

MrFresh wrote: »

Yeah, I think remember a passage from Anne Frank's diary were she spoke about the torture of not being able to use pronouns. Tragic stuff, that. You guys are the real victims here. There's me thinking ye were all concerned about the kids.

It’s may not fascist but it’s fairly totalitarian to describe men as women (and vice versa) and expect the population to accept this ideology.

I can’t imagine too many historical dictators getting away with it.

Anyway, word to the wise, this is going to blow up against self identification pretty strongly. I’d delete any tweets you may have produced or any public statements. The anger on feminist websites is only increasing and the major effects of self id have yet to be felt.

Dante7

Calhoun wrote: »

Don't play into the hands of some of the more loonier folk on this website, they more than likely have reported this one for arguing with moderator on thread and are coming out of their safe space to have a go.

There are also one who is stoking the fire and they do it in all threads like this, its best just not to engage.

Leave them to it. I have been involved in this battle for a while now and it was never going to be solved on boards. Bans here are irrelevant and just make them look stupid. It's the original second wave feminists and old school transsexuals in the UK who have done the real fighting here and who are effecting change. The student Union beardy woke bloke mods on boards can fcuk right off. History will not be kind to them.

jaxxx

I'm going to repeat something I said last night. If someone who has underwent gender reassignment surgery and treatment, is cloned, what is the clone going to be? Answer that if you dare.

Proper pronouns indeed!

ceadaoin.

Mam of 4 wrote: »

Wtaf ??

Why should parents be prohibited from being there ?
Safe and inclusive in who's eyes ?
Or am I the only one who thinks that's fcuked up ?

Yes it's deeply disturbing that they actively don't want parents there when they are talking about adolescents. Like, what could be an innocent explanation to expressly prohibit them? I can't think of any.

The Specialist

Dante7 wrote: »

The student Union beardy woke bloke mods on boards can fcuk right off. History will not be kind to them.

And this is the crux of the problem - these ****ing student bleeding hearts feel they have a right to dictate to everyone else because they’ve seen the light and are so woke - they can all go hang for all i care. Just wait until hard cold reality kicks their asses.

The Specialist

ceadaoin. wrote: »

Yes it's deeply disturbing that they actively don't want parents there when they are talking about adolescents. Like, what could be an innocent explanation to expressly prohibit them? I can't think of any.

It has an obsession with children and particularly with those having their period, it has also specifically expressed it wants to “help” those children it encounters having periods or with tampons inserted.

Dante7

The Specialist wrote: »

And this is the crux of the problem - these ****ing student bleeding hearts feel they have a right to dictate to everyone else because they’ve seen the light and are so woke - they can all go hang for all i care. Just wait until hard cold reality kicks their asses.

Wait until the lawsuits start by the children who have been permanently sterilised. The Wokeus Dei lads will start saying that they had doubts all along. Cowards.

ILoveYourVibes

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Never heard of him, what's wrong with a party for the numbers to celebrate their sex that got us all here.

It was done deliberately to antagonize gay people.

It had nothing to do with a celebration.

Calhoun

Dante7 wrote: »

Leave them to it. I have been involved in this battle for a while now and it was never going to be solved on boards. Bans here are irrelevant and just make them look stupid. It's the original second wave feminists and old school transsexuals in the UK who have done the real fighting here and who are effecting change. The student Union beardy woke bloke mods on boards can fcuk right off. History will not be kind to them.

The way i look at it is that i rather a place where we can debate and go back and forth and expand my mind than an echo chamber.

If you didn't have an opposition to what you were saying it would be a circle jerk and the same would go if it was the other way around.

It doesn't have to get to this level of upset, i know for sure that the folks in the LGBT community do not want to endanger children and they just want to be equals. I would nearly bet that as far as my principles for treating people as individuals and with respect would be shared exactly the same with them.

So if we take a step back and breath we can see what they are saying and similar will go for them.

ceadaoin.

The Specialist wrote: »

It has an obsession with children and particularly with those having their period, it has also specifically expressed it wants to “help” those children it encounters having periods or with tampons inserted.

Oh yeah, I know about this person's predilictions. As far as I know, this event was going ahead. It's only when it started going around Twitter that they started receiving complaints and it was cancelled. That was before it was widely known who was behind it. I mean, who honestly thought it was a good idea and approved it? It seems like if you can slap an LGBT++ label on it, anything goes these days . No questioning allowed . Same with puppy and leather fetishist groups at pride events encouraging children to interact with them. It's kink shaming to have qualms about that apparently.

The Specialist

ceadaoin. wrote: »

Oh yeah, I know about this person's predilictions. As far as I know, this event was going ahead. It's only when it started going around Twitter that they started receiving complaints and it was cancelled. That was before it was widely known who was behind it. I mean, who honestly thought it was a good idea and approved it? It seems like if you can slap an LGBT++ label on it, anything goes these days . No questioning allowed . Same with puppy and leather fetishist groups at pride events encouraging children to interact with them. It's kink shaming to have qualms about that apparently.

I don’t give a **** about their terminology, but indoctrinating kids in to that warped viewpoint is asking to get your head kicked in

Edit: the more I think about it the more I hope Jy catches a serious dose of reality from someone. They are not immune to societal norms because they think they are a special protected case.

ingalway

Calhoun wrote: »

This individual is sick, they are not a reflection on the wider trans community but they are exposing a flaw in the current system of laws and protections that are being put in place for the LGBT community.

I don't think anyone likes this individual but the success of their case in Canada will be a warning shot for other places around the world or it will be a turning point where we will stop letting the extreme folks abuse/paint the worst picture of a community.

I don't even know why trans is even a part of the LGB 'community'. If a man says he is now a woman, and the TRA's say that trans women are 100% women and they have/want sexual relationships with men, then surely they must be 100% hetrosexual? Same with trans men who have relationships with women - not gay. So, if they believe this, and gay rights activists believe this, why are they even part of the 'rainbow family'?

The Specialist

ingalway wrote: »

I don't even know why trans is even a part of the LGB 'community'. If a man says he is now a woman, and the TRA's say that trans women are 100% women and they have/want sexual relationships with men, then surely they must be 100% hetrosexual? Same with trans men who have relationships with women - not gay. So, if they believe this, and gay rights activists believe this, why are they even part of the 'rainbow family'?

They tagged themselves on to the woke alphabet from what I can tell.

Dante7

Calhoun wrote: »

The way i look at it is that i rather a place where we can debate and go back and forth and expand my mind than an echo chamber.

If you didn't have an opposition to what you were saying it would be a circle jerk and the same would go if it was the other way around.

It doesn't have to get to this level of upset, i know for sure that the folks in the LGBT community do not want to endanger children and they just want to be equals.

The Lesbians definitely agree with this, but I am not so sure about a lot of the Gay men. I have been shocked by the amount of Gay men who have outed themselves as misogynistic on this topic.

The Specialist

Dante7 wrote: »

The Lesbians definitely agree with this, but I am not so sure about a lot of the Gay men. I have been shocked by the amount of Gay men who have outed themselves as misogynistic on this topic.

It’s no longer solely an LgBtqixyz issue when it infringes on our daughters or our wives safety and privacy. Trans and their concerns are irrelevant when it crosses that line.