Lady can't have her hairy balls waxed [mod notes/warnings in post #1]

gmisk

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

We are reaching levels of wokeness that shouldn't be possible..

From "I believe her" to " I believe she should be forced to handle a mans shrivelled d1ck and balls"

Ironic username alert

suicide_circus

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

We are reaching levels of wokeness that shouldn't be possible..

From "I believe her" to " I believe she should be forced to handle a mans shrivelled d1ck and balls"

you mean a womans shrivelled d1ck and balls

Glass fused light

Sittingpretty wrote: »

That is INSANE.

Google Miranda Yardley transgender hate crime
First attempt

Sittingpretty

Glass fused light wrote: »

Google Miranda Yardley transgender hate crime
First attempt

Thankfully the case was dropped for the nonsense it was.

vladmydad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4w4hwQeknE

vladmydad

vladmydad wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4w4hwQeknE

Nope.

An Englishman who can't pronounce aesthetician does not deserve my time.

I suppose it's somewhat amusing that he calls himself a comedian, when he isn't one, not really.

vladmydad

All of this is connected. This Yaniv persons interest in children, MAP movement, drag children, drag story time. It’s all a push to sexualize children and normalize relationships with children.

Glass fused light

Sittingpretty wrote: »

Thankfully the case was dropped for the nonsense it was.

In a country where rape victims must now hand over access to their social media history for forensic examination to "qualify" for further investigation.

Now think on that.

Your whole real life connections are on your phone.
Your phone list : family friends, work numbers etc
Do you keep addresses : e-mail, postal, relationship links etc
Photos of you and other people

And this is now evidence.
If it goes to court guess who gets a copy of all the electronic data?

http://criticallegalthinking.com/2019/05/07/the-cost-of-justice-sexual-offence-complainants-and-access-to-personal-data/

hatrickpatrick

This seems relevant. I shouldn't have to point this out given who's in the thumbnail, but NSFW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIbaZh-zzbA

Glass fused light

JayZeus wrote: »

vladmydad wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4w4hwQeknE

Nope.

An Englishman who can't pronounce aesthetician does not deserve my time.

I suppose it's somewhat amusing that he calls himself a comedian, when he isn't one, not really.

Ok, so the guy is from Leeds in the Humberside police area?

Nothing to google there at all, people, nothing at all.

vladmydad

Glass fused light wrote: »

Ok, so the guy is from Leeds in the Humberside police area?

Nothing to google there at all, people, nothing at all.

What does this mean ? Report him for “hate speech” or something ? I think I’m losing my faith in humanity.

Glass fused light

vladmydad wrote: »

Glass fused light wrote: »

Ok, so the guy is from Leeds in the Humberside police area?

Nothing to google there at all, people, nothing at all.

What does this mean ? Report him for “hate speech” or something ? I think I’m losing my faith in humanity.

Clearly I am now not writing enough

No [watch the video] google the popo and what they getup to WRT hatespeech

Glass fused light

This is interesting to watch, as it shows an emotional intelligence of the litigant.
By trying to spinning the story, using information learned in court against the woman herself, she trying to building an alternative narative of what the case is about

This one first about the bais in the word stab

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR09JEQvIlQ

Fyi she is being played in this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47MT26u_L4M

Glass fused light

Double post

drunkmonkey

Glass fused light wrote: »

In a country where rape victims must now hand over access to their social media history for forensic examination to "qualify" for further investigation.

Now think on that.

Your whole real life connections are on your phone.
Your phone list : family friends, work numbers etc
Do you keep addresses : e-mail, postal, relationship links etc
Photos of you and other people

And this is now evidence.
If it goes to court guess who gets a copy of all the electronic data?

http://criticallegalthinking.com/2019/05/07/the-cost-of-justice-sexual-offence-complainants-and-access-to-personal-data/

That's only right when it comes to a he said she said claim. It's very easy claim any kind of assault and be prosecuted with no evidence. If there's anything that can shed more light on a case it should be investigated. If you told the truth you shouldn't be concerned with a law like that.
As long as we have a compensation culture and just down right nasty people here I'd take any claim with a very big pinch of salt. I've seem women lie plenty of times, mainly when there could be a financial reward or children involved.
I'd be all for a law like that to protect people.

Glass fused light

drunkmonkey wrote: »

That's only right when it comes to a he said she said claim.
...
If you told the truth you shouldn't be concerned with a law like that.
...
I've seem women lie plenty of times, .. financial reward or children involved.
I'd be all for a law like that to protect people.

Can you please supply all the data currently on your phone and full access to any social media accounts, just so that we can judge if you should be posting here?

And before you ask you will need a court order to ask for mine, and the judge will limit this to specific data.

And just to point out your sex based bias, this would apply to men too.
Hetro or homosexual men who suffer a different type of social stigma of being sexually assaulted by a male.
Sex assaults on men by women "don't" happen, that's just the lad not taking advantage of the "oppertunity".

drunkmonkey

Yea I've no problem provide it to show I'm a stand up guy, few questionable pictures from what's app groups but that's about it. I don't do Facebook, Instagram or any of those narcissistic websites.
If I'm defending a false claim by a woman i'd want absolutely everything that was available investigated to help my defence.
I'd say the same thing if I was a woman only the other way around.

Calina

drunkmonkey wrote: »

That's only right when it comes to a he said she said claim. It's very easy claim any kind of assault and be prosecuted with no evidence. If there's anything that can shed more light on a case it should be investigated. If you told the truth you shouldn't be concerned with a law like that.
As long as we have a compensation culture and just down right nasty people here I'd take any claim with a very big pinch of salt. I've seem women lie plenty of times, mainly when there could be a financial reward or children involved.
I'd be all for a law like that to protect people.

Men lie about not assaulting too.

drunkmonkey

Calina wrote: »

Men lie about not assaulting too.

Absolutely and so do some Guards and some legal professional. That's why evidence is critical and now there's even more as we're so connected to the online word.
For example someone on a rape charge, don't you think it's relevant that the plaintiff logged into tinder when they got home and had a few normal chats and never text or called any of their friends about their ordeal.

dudara

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Absolutely and so do some Guards and some legal professional. That's why evidence is critical and now there's even more as we're so connected to the online word.
For example someone on a rape charge, don't you think it's relevant that the plaintiff logged into tinder when they got home and had a few normal chats and never text or called any of their friends about their ordeal.

There isn’t a standard operating procedure for how to act after being raped. It isn’t uncommon for many victims to continue to act normally, a form of denial/coping.

drunkmonkey

dudara wrote: »

There isn’t a standard operating procedure for how to act after being raped. It isn’t uncommon for many victims to continue to act normally, a form of denial/coping.

Fair enough it was only an example. I'd argue it's still relevant to the defence though. It's an extreme example and highly unlikely in a genuine case.
We've seen how from this case how texts, social media etc can call out people like JY. We can see clearly now there a deviant.

Calina

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Absolutely and so do some Guards and some legal professional. That's why evidence is critical and now there's even more as we're so connected to the online word.
For example someone on a rape charge, don't you think it's relevant that the plaintiff logged into tinder when they got home and had a few normal chats and never text or called any of their friends about their ordeal.

No. It really isn't. You are making assumptions about how people handle being sexually assaulted. I wanted to pretend it hadn't happened. That includes behaving as if nothing happened. If your view is women have to behave a certain way before you will believe they are sexually assaulted, then being kind you are deluded.

How often have you been raped or sexually assaulted?

Far more men get away with rape and sexual assault than women lie about it happening. And that is because most women, justifiably, believe that they will be torn apart via the legal process. The general personal cost to rape victims of a case can be huge because people like you need to be convinced she was hysterical enough.

And as far male rape victims, they get almost nowhere because whatever minimal credibility female rape victims have male victims have less. More relevant info is any previous convictions the defendent has.

Glass fused light

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Fair enough it was only an example. I'd argue it's still relevant to the defence though. It's an extreme example and highly unlikely in a genuine case.
We've seen how from this case how texts, social media etc can call out people like JY. We can see clearly now there a deviant.

You are also missing the point that pre or post conviction a violent (or non-violent) rapist can still get access to your contact book, photos etc and potentially contact everyone you ever knew to harass you and them.

B i a n c a D e v i n s family and friends dealing with murder pictures?

If the ladies in this case had to hand over their phones what do you think the impact would be on the lad who did the plumbing 3 years prior.

drunkmonkey

Glass fused light wrote: »

You are also missing the point that pre or post conviction a violent (or non-violent) rapist can still get access to your contact book, photos etc and potentially contact everyone you ever knew to harass you and them.

B i a n c a D e v i n s family and friends dealing with murder pictures?

If the ladies in this case had to hand over their phones what do you think the impact would be on the lad who did the plumbing 3 years prior.

Your missing the point that people should be allowed to defend themselves with any possible relevant evidence.

Calina

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Your missing the point that people should be allowed to defend themselves with any possible relevant evidence.

God you are clueless. A woman having consensual sex with any other man is not relevant evidence in a rape case. Nor is her address nook, recent calls list or facebook password.

Glass fused light

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Your missing the point that people should be allowed to defend themselves with any possible relevant evidence.

This is the State not the defendant.

This in when you turn up at a police station.
They represent the State.
The State take you to a centre where you have a medical exam external and internal.
The State take your clothing.
The State sticks a document down in front of you and requested you sign it.
The State takes your phone and accesses your data and copies it.

The State has not even finished the investigation and may not proceed if you refuse to sign the document.

The person who may end up as the defendent has nothing to do with this (yet)

drunkmonkey

Glass fused light wrote: »

This is the State not the defendant.

This in when you turn up at a police station.
They represent the State.
The State take you to a centre where you have a medical exam external and internal.
The State take your clothing.
The State sticks a document down in front of you and requested you sign it.
The State takes your phone and accesses your data and copies it.

The State has not even finished the investigation and may not proceed if you refuse to sign the document.

The person who may end up as the defendent has nothing to do with this (yet)

I'm not sure what your trying to say, we just take people's word for it or a random doctors?
I agree it's tramatic but so is a false allegation.

Calina

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'm not sure what your trying to say, we just take people's word for it or a random doctors?
I agree it's tramatic but so is a false allegation.

Or a man who has just raped a woman. He is superlikely to lie.

drunkmonkey

Calina wrote: »

Or a man who has just raped a woman. He is superlikely to lie.

Again what are you trying to say, we just believe a woman because she's a woman. Men are rapey. I'm not liking the way women have turned here on the legal right to defend yourself from false alligations.

This was last week, not only did she accuse just one man she accused 12 of rape.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/30/uk-teenager-detained-in-cyprus

Glass fused light

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'm not sure what your trying to say, we just take people's word for it or a random doctors?
I agree it's tramatic but so is a false allegation.

And this is why sex segrated spaces are so so important.