Supposedly extremely attractive people who you don't find attractive?

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Raconteuse wrote: »

Not fancying her is different. That's involuntary.

But she is objectively extremely good looking. A couple of folk here pretending that she isn't.

Yeah it's like instead of just saying "this isn't my cup of tea" they're going for "this IS NOT tea"

You could show Margot Robbie to people from cultures from all around the world, from millennia ago and from today and I guarantee you the vast majority would see a beautiful woman.

She's good auld craic as well going by interviews.

Deebles McBeebles

Raconteuse wrote: »

Not fancying her is different. That's involuntary.

But she is objectively extremely good looking. A couple of folk here pretending that she isn't.

Something involuntary definitely happens whenever I see her.

Relikk

Raconteuse wrote: »

But she is objectively extremely good looking.

Don't be ridiculous. It's all subjective.

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

You could show Margot Robbie to people from cultures from all around the world, from millennia ago and from today and I guarantee you the vast majority would see a beautiful woman.

More than likely, yes. But again, some won't.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Relikk wrote: »

Don't be ridiculous. It's all subjective.



More than likely, yes. But again, some won't.

Honestly the only reason I qualified that statement at all was to preemptively defend against

Actually electro, I was recently reading a paper about the 6th century marriage practices of the Swahili and how they compared to other outliers such as the pre-Socratic Inuit Americans and even present day pygmies

*ten paragraphs of bro science and forensic assessment of Robbie's body*

:pac:

Raconteuse

Relikk wrote: »

Don't be ridiculous. It's all subjective.



More than likely, yes. But again, some won't.

What's ridiculous is saying it's "all" subjective. Yeah most people are in between looking. Beauty is subjective in those cases. But for exceptional looking people like Robbie or Michelle Pfeiffer, it's absolutely objective. Actually wanting to do the deed with them though is where subjectivity always comes in. Or your sexual orientation. As a hetero woman I have no sexual interest in Margot.

storker

my3cents wrote: »

I would never say she wasn't extremely attractive but whenever I look at her I see a neon sign light up on her forehead that says run away. There is definitively something about those eyes.

For me, she goes into the category of "striking"...those women you spot and even though you don't fancy them, you still find them strangely compelling.

Deebles McBeebles

Raconteuse wrote: »

As a hetero woman I have no sexual interest in Margot.

"The lady's not for turning".


As an aside, what do people think of Aisling Bea and Sharon Horgan? I just watched This Way Up and have been having some wild, Irish accent-filled dreams since.

Raconteuse

Deebles McBeebles wrote: »

"The lady's not for turning".


As an aside, what do people think of Aisling Bea and Sharon Horgan? I just watched This Way Up and have been having some wild, Irish accent-filled dreams since.

Wrong thread dude. They're not extraordinarily stunning which means they are deformed looking. Particularly because of being Irish women.

Deebles McBeebles

Raconteuse wrote: »

Wrong thread dude. They're not extraordinarily stunning which means they are deformed looking. Particularly because of being Irish women.

I couldn't find the Female Irish Mutants thread and I daren't start one.

Assetbacked

Raconteuse wrote: »

After seeing Once Upon A Time in Hollywood, lol at the folk on this thread pretending Margot Robbie is unattractive.

There's always a tonne of make up and without it she's a bit manly-looking.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

I'll take Bea so, if she's going.

Relikk

Assetbacked wrote: »

There's always a tonne of make up and without it she's a bit manly-looking.

Careful now. You're not allowed to think of her as anything but good looking around here.

Deebles McBeebles

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

I'll take Bea so, if she's going.

You and me both. A seriously attractive woman.

Potential-Monke

Assetbacked wrote: »

There's always a tonne of make up and without it she's a bit manly-looking.

Same can be said for most celebrities tbh. I remember back when the Spice Girls were first around, 1994, I was 11 and out of the 5, good ole Posh took me fancy. Every picture and video showed this stunning young one (imo). My brother was going out with an English bird at the time, and while visiting home she saw Posh without makeup, and said her skin was scandalous. One would not have thought so.

There are very few celebrities, or indeed in the vein of this thread, the extremely attractive, who look just as good without makeup. Most likely, if they're in the public eye and doing something, they're wearing makeup. The hard part is distinguishing who has very little/basics on, and who used a trowel to apply.

Raconteuse

Assetbacked wrote: »

There's always a tonne of make up and without it she's a bit manly-looking.

"A bit manly looking" - ****ing lol.

Relikk wrote: »

Careful now. You're not allowed to think of her as anything but good looking around here.

You're "allowed" think stupid sh1t all you want, but if you're going to say someone who's extremely good looking is bad looking, then you'll be responded to.

Potential-Monke wrote: »

Same can be said for most celebrities tbh.

Not that they look a bit manly.

And saying someone's skin is "scandalous" - lol again.

Potential-Monke

Raconteuse wrote: »

Not that they look a bit manly.

And saying someone's skin is "scandalous" - lol again.

Sorry, I didn't mean that, I meant most celebrities don't look as stunning without makeup. I don't know why you're lolling though, for using a descriptive word or it wasn't descriptive enough?

Lotus Flower

Potential-Monke wrote: »

Sorry, I didn't mean that, I meant most celebrities don't look as stunning without makeup. I don't know why you're lolling though, for using a descriptive word or it wasn't descriptive enough?

Everyone looks better with make-up, the whole point of make-up is to enhance. Seems like you're damned if you do, damned if you don't- wear make-up and you're criticised for not being naturally perfect but don't wear make-up and your "scandalous" skin is commented on

Raconteuse

Potential-Monke wrote: »

Sorry, I didn't mean that, I meant most celebrities don't look as stunning without makeup. I don't know why you're lolling though, for using a descriptive word or it wasn't descriptive enough?

It's skin. I was lolling at how extreme the term was. Don't know if you used it or the woman who saw Victoria.

Lotus Flower wrote: »

Everyone looks better with make-up, the whole point of make-up is to enhance. Seems like you're damned if you do, damned if you don't

Absolutely. Not you Potential Monke, but It's often "All the make-up is a mask" or "she looks like [insert silly extreme comparison that she doesn't look in the slightest like] without it" and "manly" this, "fivehead" that (you know it's a real struggle to find something wrong when they go on about her forehead).

Anus Von Skidmark

I never found Nicole Kidman in the least bit attractive.

Charlize Theron, I can see the appeal there, but she doesn't really do it for me.

Snickers Man

dubstarr wrote: »

Thats it.You are dead to me:mad:

She's all yours, Stevie Wonder.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Raconteuse wrote: »

Absolutely. Not you Potential Monke, but It's often "All the make-up is a mask" or "she looks like [insert silly extreme comparison that she doesn't look in the slightest like] without it" and "manly" this, "fivehead" that (you know it's a real struggle to find something wrong when they go on about her forehead).

I was googling Margot Robbie without makeup and ended up a reddit thread about

*she's hideous
*in fairness she looks better than most women
*in Eastern Europe she'd be bog standard (:D)
*make up should be illegal, it's comparable to rape
*no it shouldn't be illegal because it does make women sad sometimes and that's good

Relikk

Raconteuse wrote: »

You're "allowed" think stupid sh1t all you want, but if you're going to say someone who's extremely good looking is bad looking, then you'll be responded to.

To some people she's not, no matter what you try to "respond" with to try and justify otherwise. That's two moronic stances you've taken in this thread, already. I suggest not being a numpty in the future.

Lotus Flower

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

I was googling Margot Robbie without makeup and ended up a reddit thread about

*in Eastern Europe she'd be bog standard (:D)

Have seen that sort of thing mentioned on this thread too (such and such wouldn't get a second look in Denmark, there are hotter women in UCD, etc etc). It's so daft

Assetbacked

Relikk wrote: »

To some people she's not, no matter what you try to "respond" with to try and justify otherwise. That's two moronic stances you've taken in this thread, already. I suggest not being a numpty in the future.

That poster is clearly blinded by the movies he's seen her in to see the wood from the trees. She's not ugly, but without being a famous actress I could pick plenty of women on the street who I'd rather throw it into.

Bigbagofcans

Assetbacked wrote: »

That poster is clearly blinded by the movies he's seen her in to see the wood from the trees. She's not ugly, but without being a famous actress I could pick plenty of women on the street who I'd rather throw it into.

Which streets are you walking down? Cos I can tell you, I don't pass by many women close to being as beautiful as Margot. :P

Paddy Cow

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

I was googling Margot Robbie without makeup and ended up a reddit thread about

*she's hideous
*in fairness she looks better than most women
*in Eastern Europe she'd be bog standard (:D)
*make up should be illegal, it's comparable to rape
*no it shouldn't be illegal because it does make women sad sometimes and that's good

What?

smilerf

Never saw anything in Jennifer Aniston

Deebles McBeebles

smilerf wrote: »

Never saw anything in Jennifer Aniston

Wait for the sextape.

my3cents

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

I was googling Margot Robbie without makeup and ended up a reddit thread about

*she's hideous
*in fairness she looks better than most women
*in Eastern Europe she'd be bog standard (:D)
*make up should be illegal, it's comparable to rape
*no it shouldn't be illegal because it does make women sad sometimes and that's good

But you need a good canvas to start with before you put the paint on it.

Margot Robbie is a good example her face is an excellent canvas that can be made to look extremely attractive with make up.

For many others the expression "you can put lipstick on a pig but its still a pig" springs to mind.

Assetbacked

Bigbagofcans wrote: »

Which streets are you walking down? Cos I can tell you, I don't pass by many women close to being as beautiful as Margot. :P

Grand Canal Dock during lunch time.

Raconteuse

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

I was googling Margot Robbie without makeup and ended up a reddit thread about

*she's hideous
*make up should be illegal, it's comparable to rape
*no it shouldn't be illegal because it does make women sad sometimes and that's good

The psychotic bitterness and resentment that they'll never get a woman who looks like her.

Relikk wrote: »

To some people she's not, no matter what you try to "respond" with to try and justify otherwise. That's two moronic stances you've taken in this thread, already. I suggest not being a numpty in the future.

Assetbacked wrote: »

That poster is clearly blinded by the movies he's seen her in to see the wood from the trees. She's not ugly, but without being a famous actress I could pick plenty of women on the street who I'd rather throw it into.

I'm obviously female.

With make-up on (seeing as that aspect has been nitpicked at), Margot Robbie is clearly an objectively good-looking woman (and she isn't absolutely caked in make-up in that photo either). Saying her beauty is subjective is silly. I know you don't like being told this, but no need for the personal insults. Beauty is not always subjective.

Without make-up, she is much less remarkable looking (but obviously miles away from "hideous"... and not remotely mannish ffs) however the photos of her and films with which people are used to, are the ones where she is wearing make-up and looking stunning - these are what people are referring to when they pretend she isn't good-looking. It just looks resentful from men, and jealous from women. Straining to find a way to insult how someone very good-looking appears - resentful or jealous is all it could be.

However, if I told you you were wrong for not fancying her, then I'd be out of order. Some guy lost the plot with me one time here because I said while Ronaldo is good-looking, I don't fancy him. It really angered him - he was being totally unreasonable. Even though I acknowledged that the man is good-looking. You're acting as though I'm saying the same about others - I am not. Not wanting to have sex with Margot Robbie is just how people feel. But saying she isn't good-looking and worse, is just incorrect.

Wibbs

Raconteuse wrote: »

The psychotic bitterness and resentment that they'll never get a woman who looks like her.

And Mr Magoo levels of myopia. Ms Robbie sans the slap...



Yeah, clearly she looks like a man and is a munter. :rolleyes: How deluded are some of these retarded shut-ins? Jesus H Christ. Have they ever seen a woman outside of routers and binoculars?

NoteAgent

I don't think its fair to compare this beaut



To these skanks

DrPhilG wrote: »

This nonsense?

Paddy Cow

Beyonce. Never forget.

DrPhilG

Anus Von Skidmark wrote: »

I never found Nicole Kidman in the least bit attractive.

+1

She has mousey features. And her body isn't my cupan tae either. Everyone got all giddy after watching Eyes Wide Shut, I was entirely unimpressed. Scrawny and boney.

Film was pish too.

DrPhilG

NoteAgent wrote: »

I don't think its fair to compare this beaut



To these skanks

I didn't compare her to anyone. I commented on the current fad of gigantic disproportionate arses that seems to be popular.

I'm no fan of Beyonce either. Certainly more talented, but uses her sexy image to promote herself, every bit as much as the Kardashians do.

Used to play up to the good little Christian girl image to work that market, then started saucing it up big time and when questioned about how she reconciled the new sexy image with her faith, claimed that she was glorifying God's creation by flaunting her body.

Spoofer. Sex sells, everyone knows it and everyone who can, does it. But don't try to pretend that's not what you're doing.

Paddy Cow

DrPhilG wrote: »

+1

She has mousey features. And her body isn't my cupan tae either. Everyone got all giddy after watching Eyes Wide Shut, I was entirely unimpressed. Scrawny and boney.

Film was pish too.

I thought she looked incredible in Moulin Rouge.

AudreyHepburn

Bradley Cooper and Leo DiCaprio - I must be the only woman on the planet who doesn’t turn into a puddle of mush when faced with these two. I just don’t get the fuss.

Bigbagofcans

AudreyHepburn wrote: »

Bradley Cooper and Leo DiCaprio - I must be the only woman on the planet who doesn’t turn into a puddle of mush when faced with these two. I just don’t get the fuss.

Bradley Cooper looks like Barry Manilow.

Raconteuse

DrPhilG wrote: »

Used to play up to the good little Christian girl image to work that market, then started saucing it up big time and when questioned about how she reconciled the new sexy image with her faith, claimed that she was glorifying God's creation by flaunting her body.

Spoofer. Sex sells, everyone knows it and everyone who can, does it. But don't try to pretend that's not what you're doing.

Same with Nicole Scherzinger

bitofabind

Vogue Williams. I don’t get it. Big horsey man head on her, mouth is far too big and for the love of god just get the mole removed.

Don’t get the Ryan Gosling thing either. He’s astonishingly average with an above average body, maybe that’s what it is.

lastusername

Wibbs wrote: »

And Mr Magoo levels of myopia. Ms Robbie sans the slap...



Yeah, clearly she looks like a man and is a munter. :rolleyes: How deluded are some of these retarded shut-ins? Jesus H Christ. Have they ever seen a woman outside of routers and binoculars?

THAT'S Margot Robbie??! I was scrolling up thinking it was just a random pic of an 'ordinary' girl!

I think she is incredible but how ordinary does she look without makeup...still so pretty but it's just amazing how make-up, cameras and lighting can totally transform how people actually look and how that becomes the expectation then...

lastusername

Not sure if she's generally considered 'extremely attractive' but I would say Amy Huberman. I've no doubt she's super-nice though and obviousl not unattractive! So you'd probably fall for her once you got to know her

Yeah, I don't get Bradly Cooper either. I'm sure he's a top chap but he does nothing for me in the looks department.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Bigbagofcans wrote: »

Bradley Cooper looks like Barry Manilow.

:eek:

Never fancied him really, but I could see the crazy-behind-the-eyes, big-dick-energy appeal.

But that's killed it altogether

Bigbagofcans

Kayla Tart Registry wrote: »

:eek:

Never fancied him really, but I could see the crazy-behind-the-eyes, big-dick-energy appeal.

But that's killed it altogether

I thought he was attractive back in 'The Hangover' days but the last couple of years it looks like he has work done or his face has changed.

Wibbs

lastusername wrote: »

THAT'S Margot Robbie??! I was scrolling up thinking it was just a random pic of an 'ordinary' girl!

I think she is incredible but how ordinary does she look without makeup...

She looks anything but ordinary. Though you're dead right on expectations driven by media, but you're also buying into it by thinking she looks ordinary. You expect glammed up photoshopped images, so anything less than that appears ordinary, when it's not. Now we can argue cultural ideals and the like, but according to our current ideal, she'd be in the very top percentage of female beauty minus makeup. And no, you won't find that level too often walking down an average street.

banie01

Bigbagofcans wrote: »

Bradley Cooper looks like Barry Manilow.

Now that I've seen it...
It cannot be unseen!

Still, it gives him a new big musical!
A manilow biopic!

lastusername

Wibbs wrote: »

She looks anything but ordinary. Though you're dead right on expectations driven by media, but you're also buying into it by thinking she looks ordinary. You expect glammed up photoshopped images, so anything less than that appears ordinary, when it's not. Now we can argue cultural ideals and the like, but according to our current ideal, she'd be in the very top percentage of female beauty minus makeup. And no, you won't find that level too often walking down an average street.

I actually meant to say 'ordinary' not ordinary She definitely is anything but and is a 10/10 with or without make up - doesn't matter. Defo one of the most attractive women I've ever seen.

B.A._Baracus

Robbie looks quite different in that pic.
Still beautiful and I guess she's not the first who looks so different without make-up. Wont be the last too.