Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Farming Chitchat 10/10- Now VIRUS-FREE!

Options
1116117119121122333

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    emaherx wrote: »
    https://www.amazon.co.uk/FreeTec-20pcs-Stereo-Removal-Mercedes/dp/B074GZVS3H/ref=asc_df_B074GZVS3H/?tag=googshopuk-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=272040849262&hvpos=1o3&hvnetw=g&hvrand=14272965327957766021&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=20487&hvtargid=aud-858865025026:pla-467988061821&psc=1

    There are several different keys. Your local auto factors will have some. Or a local garage may let you borrow some you only need them for a few seconds just drive truck over.

    2 pieces of flat steel could work either if you had some... Cut out of a tin for example if you have a metal shears.

    Come sort out my cow..... And I'll pop out the radio :D
    I will try the screwdrivers in the morning and if it doesn't work I'll take a saw to the dashboard and cut it out. Our mechanic said that if I give it to him tomorrow afternoon (I have to travel from NCD tomorrow morning to Longford) he will fit it. I was worried if it needed to be 24v but he said that it doesn't matter.
    Hopefully the cow will take to both twins. I'm on the N2 outta Ashbourne to Rathfeigh, then onto Tara, then onto the M3 to Virginia and cross country to my Uncles place. If ye need any help with her/twin calves pm me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭emaherx


    Base price wrote: »
    I will try the screwdrivers in the morning and if it doesn't work I'll take a saw to the dashboard and cut it out. Our mechanic said that if I give it to him tomorrow afternoon (I have to travel from NCD tomorrow morning to Longford) he will fit it. I was worried if it needed to be 24v but he said that it doesn't matter.
    Hopefully the cow will take to both twins. I'm on the N2 outta Ashbourne to Rathfeigh, then onto Tara, then onto the M3 to Virginia and cross country to my Uncles place. If ye need any help with her/twin calves pm me.

    Sure you are passing right by ;)
    But seriously I should be fine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    emaherx wrote: »
    Sure you are passing right by ;)
    But seriously I should be fine.
    Helpful to know you can put the kettle on the next time I get a blow out on the lorry at Rathfeigh at 5am :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭carrollsno1


    Any chance anyone here knows where and how to get an official copy of youre leaving certificate results?

    Better living everyone



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Any chance anyone here knows where and how to get an official copy of youre leaving certificate results?

    Edit.

    State examination website

    https://www.examinations.ie/index.php?l=en&mc=ca&sc=sto


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Any chance anyone here knows where and how to get an official copy of youre leaving certificate results?
    Yep, but ye need to know your exam number and date. As far as I know it takes approx 6 weeks to get. However your old school may still have a copy on file.

    https://www.examinations.ie/?l=en&mc=ex&sc=sp


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭carrollsno1


    Thanks. I was trying the SEC website but that was saying rom 2006-2011 i think

    Better living everyone



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,564 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    _Brian wrote: »
    Does anyone know is there work ongoing by Teagasc or Bord Bia regarding their actual carbon cycle of Irish agriculture specifically ??

    It seems bizarre that groups are being allowed run amok publishing all sorts of mad data against Irish farming and there is no actual scientific evidence that can be pointed to that clears the air.

    You constantly see the IPCC being quoted where All Ag emissions is 24% of total, but it intentionally divides our fossil fuel emissions into various categories to minimise the overall impact, it has the result of making ag seem shocking high when in fact all ag and land use is 24% and fossil fuel related emissions is maybe 65-70% of all emissions.

    I feel very let down by all these highly funded agencies sitting on their hands doing sfa while a propaganda war is raging against animal farming in Ireland and likely a large portion of the next government will be based on the false information of this war.

    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/too-late-to-change-2030-emission-targets-despite-methane-revelation/

    Sweet Jesus.

    Teagasc recognise they have inappropriately calculated the methane cycle in carbon calculations and so have based our 10 year plan from 2020 to 2030 on incorrect information.

    However, seems it’s too much bother to recalculate it but rather they will implement plans based on flawed data.

    Holy Christ farming is being thrown under a bus by an organisation unfit for purpose. So to recap recently they forgot to think about what the extra 800,000 dairy calves would do when calves down, and now we hear that they forgot that grass and soil captures carbon as it grows.

    This is unforgivable behaviour.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,389 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Like everything else, they only realised it when NZ pointed it out in their agricultural calculations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,773 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    So any idea how big the error is?

    'When I was a boy we were serfs, slave minded. Anyone who came along and lifted us out of that belittling, I looked on them as Gods.' - Dan Breen



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,119 ✭✭✭zetecescort


    this is like the closing of the sugar factories all over again


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭alps


    Water John wrote: »
    Like everything else, they only realised it when NZ pointed it out in their agricultural calculations.

    Oooof


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,209 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Looking at the journal this week, had we a picture of one of our regular posters on it feeding a calf?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭MickeyShtyles


    this is like the closing of the sugar factories all over again

    Christ alive, can we not go back to that!


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭alps


    _Brian wrote: »
    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/too-late-to-change-2030-emission-targets-despite-methane-revelation/

    Sweet Jesus.

    Teagasc recognise they have inappropriately calculated the methane cycle in carbon calculations and so have based our 10 year plan from 2020 to 2030 on incorrect information.
    .

    We've been really let down, and again on a topic and point of view that was repeatedly voiced by farmers since the very beginning of this whole emissions saga.

    But I'm not sure teagasc is the culprit. I think this goes back to 2005 when an agreement was made, by unknown personell to me, that only emissions would be included in figures and sequestration figures could not be used.

    This was a monumental mistake by whoever was in our corner...dont know was it our politicians, civil service or scientists...but it has been devastating.

    Compounding that calamity has been the fact that no authority shouted foul.....While we have been given a reprieve from reductions (and this may be partly due to a recognition that in fact sequestration should have been included) the fact that we are being blamed for 34% of the country's emissions has caused and is causing untold and possibly unretreivable bad press with the general public..

    While our suits might have our back in terms of nursing this situation along until it can be redressed in the next round of negotiations running up to 2030, the public perception is detiorating at an alarming extent, and we are largely left to our own devices to get a scientific point of view across to save the sales of our products..

    You've got to ask how much this has already played into beef prices...

    I'm despondent, disgusted and disappointed that whoever was at that meeting in 2005, apparently fell asleep at the wheel..


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,389 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The fault probably lies with the Dept of Environment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    Water John wrote: »
    The fault probably lies with the Dept of Environment.

    Green minister at the time wasnt it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,564 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    alps wrote: »
    We've been really let down, and again on a topic and point of view that was repeatedly voiced by farmers since the very beginning of this whole emissions saga.

    But I'm not sure teagasc is the culprit. I think this goes back to 2005 when an agreement was made, by unknown personell to me, that only emissions would be included in figures and sequestration figures could not be used.

    This was a monumental mistake by whoever was in our corner...dont know was it our politicians, civil service or scientists...but it has been devastating.

    Compounding that calamity has been the fact that no authority shouted foul.....While we have been given a reprieve from reductions (and this may be partly due to a recognition that in fact sequestration should have been included) the fact that we are being blamed for 34% of the country's emissions has caused and is causing untold and possibly unretreivable bad press with the general public..

    While our suits might have our back in terms of nursing this situation along until it can be redressed in the next round of negotiations running up to 2030, the public perception is detiorating at an alarming extent, and we are largely left to our own devices to get a scientific point of view across to save the sales of our products..

    You've got to ask how much this has already played into beef prices...

    I'm despondent, disgusted and disappointed that whoever was at that meeting in 2005, apparently fell asleep at the wheel..

    But if Teagasc really had our back on this they would be digging their heels in and pushing for immediate review.

    How ANY self respecting professional in a governmental position can blindly implement a 10year plan based on known flawed data is beyond me. If we don’t act on current scientific data we’re just blindly bumbling along.

    How can farmers accept punitive measures and implement them knowing its all based on incorrect calculations, it’s a shambles, it is true greenwashing, to be doing something knowing it’s not correct, but doing it to be seen to do something.

    Teagasc employees will plod along drawing wages and getting their wage increases year on year as this plan rolls out over ten years, while farmers on the ground are punished for emissions that were known to be wrong, but it’s not worth correcting.

    Pathetic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    Horse meat scandal in Spain this time.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2020/01/22/Horsemeat-scam-highlights-threat-of-food-fraud

    And loads more similar being found across Europe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Horse meat scandal in Spain this time.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2020/01/22/Horsemeat-scam-highlights-threat-of-food-fraud

    And loads more similar being found across Europe.

    Some interesting articles in that Buford. Looks like the Spanish have been caught with their pants down. Imo here there is large profits to be made - their will always be a small number of unscrupulous individuals willing to do so regardless of the law.

    The article on rice was not surprising tbh - I've been seeing reports for years about rice being adulterated for much the same reasons

    https://i.imgflip.com/3n67mx.jpg

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2019/10/01/Agilent-backs-rice-fingerprinting-method-to-fight-fraud


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    ganmo wrote: »
    Green minister at the time wasnt it?

    No, that was post 2007.
    FF/PD coalition in 2005.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,482 ✭✭✭✭Say my name




  • Registered Users Posts: 29,511 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    11 months to Christmas day ....


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,511 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    So the farmers journal have started the fork, sprong,pike debate. Robbed from here again....


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭kk.man


    whelan2 wrote: »
    So the farmers journal have started the fork, sprong,pike debate. Robbed from here again....

    We are quality journalists you must know!


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,511 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Anyone watch the Dublin kerry game?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,549 ✭✭✭roosterman71




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Anyone watch the Dublin kerry game?
    It was messy although I thought that we would edge it in the last few mins.


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,511 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Base price wrote: »
    It was messy although I thought that we would edge it in the last few mins.

    Oh was the same. Was a fair result in the end


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,444 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    whelan2 wrote: »
    11 months to Christmas day ....

    Nearly there


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement