UEFA Super Cup - Liverpool vs Chelsea, 8pm, VM One/Sport & BT Sport 2

Dave0301

niallo27 wrote: »

Didnt want to show the woman up in her first big game I presume

Or maybe they didn't show the angle that confirmed it as a penalty, I presume.

Edit... definitely wasn't a peno

niallo27

Why arent they calling her out on Bt it was no penalty, she ****ed up. Treat her the same as the men.

AdamD

naughtb4 wrote: »

That's what I mean though. VAR shouldn't be based on an angle not shown. It just muddys the water

The referee said it was a pen, there was no angle disproving it for VAR. It's not difficult to understand. This is gonna be a long season with people obsessing over VAR.

Sam Hain

naughtb4 wrote: »

That's what I mean though. VAR shouldn't be based on an angle not shown. It just muddys the water

Imagine if they reversed the womans decison, we'd never hear the end of it. It Would be like coming home to the wife late from the pub in a stupor every night.

Utopia Parkway

Yeah that's not a pen.

Not sure Adrian should have been out there anyway.

niallo27

Dave0301 wrote: »

Or maybe they didn't show the angle that confirmed it as a penalty, I presume.

Well I saw multiple angles there and looked like no penalty.

davycc

Panthro wrote: »

Hon jorginho.
Justice has been served

Some bollox on him especially after waiting so long,!

sideswipe

It’s been a super cup final so far.

Gbear

No excuse for ****ing that penalty decision up with VAR on hand.

mark_jmc

niallo27 wrote: »

Why arent they calling her out on Bt it was no penalty, she ****ed up. Treat her the same as the men.

If she f***** up Var would have overturned the decision

beertons

Never a peno.

Dave0301

niallo27 wrote: »

Well I saw multiple angles there and looked like no penalty.

Seen some more replays, not sure why VAR didn't overturn the referee's on field decision!

niallo27

mark_jmc wrote: »

If she f***** up Var would have overturned the decision

Why didn't they so. Have we seen a pen overturned yet.

Berserker

Gbear wrote: »

No excuse for ****ing that penalty decision up with VAR on hand.

They didn't f it up. They reviewed it and they confirmed that it was a penalty. Must have been contact there.

Utopia Parkway

beertons wrote: »

Never a peno.

Not even difficult to see on the reverse angle.

I can kinda understand why it looked a pen from the ref's angle but it wasn't.

ThunbergsAreGo

AdamD wrote: »

naughtb4 wrote: »

That's what I mean though. VAR shouldn't be based on an angle not shown. It just muddys the water

The referee said it was a pen, there was no angle disproving it for VAR. It's not difficult to understand. This is gonna be a long season with people obsessing over VAR.

The angle shown on BT pretty much showed it wasn't a pen

Sam Hain

Why don't you ride him when you're at it VVD, you dirty sly get

TitianGerm

AdamD wrote: »

The referee said it was a pen, there was no angle disproving it for VAR. It's not difficult to understand. This is gonna be a long season with people obsessing over VAR.

https://twitter.com/george_payne15/status/1161748497881862144?s=19

Can you see contact here?

Strumms

I thought it was a peno, contact was clear in the angle shown... should it have been a red though for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity? Can VAR adjudicate on that ?

Sanity_Saviour

niallo27 wrote: »

Why didn't they so. Have we seen a pen overturned yet.

That's the modern rules where contact like the above is a penalty. Under current rules clear penalty

ThunbergsAreGo

Strumms wrote: »

I thought it was a peno, contact was clear in the angle shown... should it have been a red though for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity? Can VAR adjudicate on that ?

Now I know you are taking the piss :-)

Fromvert

Strumms wrote: »

I thought it was a peno, contact was clear in the angle shown... should it have been a red though for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity? Can VAR adjudicate on that ?

That rule was removed years ago.

Strumms

TitianGerm wrote: »

https://twitter.com/george_payne15/status/1161748497881862144?s=19

Can you see contact here?

Is that angle definitive enough ? I don’t think.

nullzero

Chelsea getting a fair few chances here.

Sam Hain

Unlucky Mount, Abraham didn't tee it up that well for him, unlucky pedro

ThunbergsAreGo

nullzero wrote: »

Chelsea getting a fair few chances here.

Better team tonight by a fair bit.

Liverpool really poor with nothing going through the midfield

TitianGerm

Strumms wrote: »

Is that angle definitive enough ? I don’t think.

On my 4K TV it was clear there was zero contact. Harder to see it on the scaled down Twitter link.

nullzero

naughtb4 wrote: »

Better team tonight by a fair bit.

Liverpool really poor with nothing going through the midfield

Chelsea created a fair few chances on Sunday. If they can stay tight at the back they may have a decent season,Kante is massively important for them.

Trigger

TitianGerm wrote: »

On my 4K TV it was clear there was zero contact. Harder to see it on the scaled down Twitter link.

On my 8k TV I could make out some contact

ThunbergsAreGo

nullzero wrote: »

naughtb4 wrote: »

Better team tonight by a fair bit.

Liverpool really poor with nothing going through the midfield

Chelsea created a fair few chances on Sunday. If they can stay tight at the back they may have a decent season,Kante is massively important for them.

Best player in the pitch tonight, been brilliant

Mr.Nice Guy

A lot of those angles being mentioned aren't ideal to see it.

If you go to 0:32 below you can see there is slight contact (the angle from the rear):

https://twitter.com/VMSportIE/status/1161747099446157312

This is it

Adrian is proper ropey

nullzero

Long game so early in the season.

Berserker

nullzero wrote: »

Long game so early in the season.

Disastrous evening for both sides really. 120 mins so early in the season, games at the weekend. All for the European equivalent of the community shield.

StringerBell

Chelsea let them off the hook here, surprised. Should have been a handy win for Liverpool you'd think. Poor energy though which would be a worry probably early in the season

Berserker

This is it wrote: »

Adrian is proper ropey

Never lost a penalty shootout, apparently.

davemckenna25

Would be good to see Chelsea win, I do think they deserve it.

Richard Hillman

OK so everybody knows that keepers can't come off their line anymore and that there are Camera's looking to see if the keepers come off of their line.

I bet the keepers don't (despite the ref telling them)

This is it

Jesus Christ shut up Brian

Berserker

StringerBell wrote: »

Poor energy though which would be a worry probably early in the season

Gomez and Robertson were out on their feet by the end of the 90 mins.

c.p.w.g.w

Pool look absolutely knackered

StringerBell

Adrian is better at penalties so I'm going with Liverpool win.

alchemist33

Whatever happened the ABBA system for shootouts?

Richard Hillman

Adrian is off his line for every penalty. If if he saves one, it will be pulled back

StringerBell

Richard Hillman wrote: »

Adrian is off his line for every penalty. If if he saves one, it will be pulled back

Not a chance.

Terrible penalty there from Abraham

Edit: And as you could see, Adrian off his line. Not called back.

LuckyLloyd

Get in! Klopp and the players delighted!!

eigrod

The guy that dived misses

Mr.Nice Guy

Adrian saves from Abraham. Those two involved once again.

DrumSteve

This is being set up for adrian

Berserker

Richard Hillman wrote: »

Adrian is off his line for every penalty. If if he saves one, it will be pulled back

Yep but it looks like they are going to forget about it. Chelsea's last two penalties were very poor.