Werewolf - Winter Is Here - Game of Thrones II Game Thread

tusk

Necro wrote: »

Nope.

The attempt on fixxxer was blocked

grand. i'm happy to clear ecto then

Ectoplasm

Dudes flavour be flavour and can't clear or condemn anyone.

I feel like I'm shouting into the void here.

Anyone have anything to say on my amazing self sacrifice plan?

tusk

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

If flavor clears people then sure she is back to being my queen! though I don't know if flavor can.

sK was saying I have confirmation bias when I thought we saw Drogon twice. What does he have for saying it only happened once ?

I think it can. Based on necro's post there, they are all bang on. the poetic lcense bit just confused the heck out of us.

I agree. SK you're not one for missing stuff like that? What gives?

Necro

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Dudes flavour be flavour and can't clear or condemn anyone.

I feel like I'm shouting into the void here.

Anyone have anything to say on my amazing self sacrifice plan?

I hate it.

Next?

C'mon, you're not even slightly wondering why sKeith, the master of the facts so far has missed that dragon post?

Ectoplasm

Although I do promise I'm good.

Do we want to kill me to attempt to avert a dragon attack? It's a 50/50 whether it will happen if I'm dead.

tusk

Right lads I'm out for a while for real. Dying a death here.

Chat later

Necro

tusk wrote: »

I think it can. Based on necro's post there, they are all bang on. the poetic lcense bit just confused the heck out of us.

I agree. SK you're not one for missing stuff like that? What gives?

Well this is what frustrated me about the poetic license last night, because before that the flavour was indicative of the kills :cool:

sKeith

Baggly wrote: »

CLARABEL was killed by dragon fire. Valar Morghulis.

She was...... Thoros of Myr, of The Brotherhood without banners

Triceratops Ballet wrote: »

quickbeam wrote: »

Green&Red - lynched
Necro - killed by Choccy via prize
Choc Chip - killed by Ecto or H2D via prize
Drumpot - killed by Ecto or H2D via prize

Triceratops Ballet wrote: »

Necro wrote: »

@sKeith

that's not true, the Dragon appeared the second time for Ecto's kill on Drummer too

Thanks for that.



So, the stonlady kills like
Green&Red was viciously attacked, his throat slit. Having survived the lynch, his injuries from this attack were too much to bear, and he died (like dead dead). He was....

Ser Gregor Clegane, The Mountain


danni uses dragon again.

choc chip was killed by team NK.


i dislike basing stuff off flavor.

Ectoplasm

Necro wrote: »

I hate it.

Next?

C'mon, you're not even slightly wondering why sKeith, the master of the facts so far has missed that dragon post?

I'm suspicious af about it but am sus about EVERYTHING now. Am in that panic place where I make crappy decisions.

Necro

sKeith wrote: »

Thanks for that.



So, the stonlady kills like
Green&Red was viciously attacked, his throat slit. Having survived the lynch, his injuries from this attack were too much to bear, and he died (like dead dead). He was....

Ser Gregor Clegane, The Mountain


danni uses dragon again.

choc chip was killed by team NK.


i dislike basing stuff off flavor.

This is why I got so pent up about the flavour not matching the kills last night because it has done so far!!!

tusk

tusk wrote: »

Deleted User wrote: »

This, Tusk.

that doesn't help? you're saying QBs summary is wrong because of GnR. I don't get it?

I killed GnR
Choc killed Necro
Ecto killed Drump
Who killed Choc?

Bounty Hunter

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Although I do promise I'm good.

Do we want to kill me to attempt to avert a dragon attack? It's a 50/50 whether it will happen if I'm dead.

If your good then we don't want to kill you. Only you know for sure if you are. If you know you are good then someone randomly dying or you picking a target (either way a chance of a bad death) is better than you being killed to avoid such a fate.


If you know you are good I don't know why you would want to die for this.

Necro

Deleted User wrote: »

I killed GnR
Choc killed Necro
Ecto killed Drump
Who killed Choc?

Nope, she swung and missed

Necro

Deleted User wrote: »

I killed GnR
Choc killed Necro
Ecto killed Drump
Who killed Choc?

Night King's Ice Dragon ie the baddies

Ectoplasm

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

If your good then we don't want to kill you. Only you know for sure if you are. If you know you are good then someone randomly dying or you picking a target (either way a chance of a bad death) is better than you being killed to avoid such a fate.


If you know you are good I don't know why you would want to die for this.

I don't want to. I'm trying to work the numbers so they work best for village.

sKeith

tusk wrote: »

I think it can. Based on necro's post there, they are all bang on. the poetic lcense bit just confused the heck out of us.

I agree. SK you're not one for missing stuff like that? What gives?

skipping pages in 10's zooming to 10am and 9pms.

Bounty Hunter

Deleted User wrote: »

I killed GnR
Choc killed Necro
Ecto killed Drump
Who killed Choc?

The Ice Dragon so I don't think anyone is claiming it but let's say Mick

Bounty Hunter

Ectoplasm wrote: »

I don't want to. I'm trying to work the numbers so they work best for village.

if you know you are good the odds are in the villages favour if you don't die as the person you kill may at least have a chance of being bad.


Obviously that is only based off what you know as the rest of us can't be sure

Lord TSC

Necro wrote: »

I don't like this post, sKeith it's not like you to distort the facts..

First dodgy vibes I've gotten off you

Necro wrote: »

I hate it.

Next?

C'mon, you're not even slightly wondering why sKeith, the master of the facts so far has missed that dragon post?

Keith spent the morning trying this on me too. Honestly, he'd be my next choice to lynch after you.

He accussed Ecto of killing Eva.
When I quoted the relevant flavour, he gives out that I edited the line or two about conversion out of the post (despite not being relevant).
Tried to suggest there was an "extra day" I wasn't mentioning when I was listing off wolf actions (there wasn't)
All caps asking why I was playing "thick".
Questioned why I'd think Beaker and Mick would work on a plan together.
Then implied I was suggesting Mick got Beaker killed; when I asked where I said that, he never answered.

Also asked why I was posting a gif of the faceless guy (which I did right after we had a change of player).

Keith's entire MO this morning was to ask weird questions of me, and then refuse to answer when I asked clarity, or if he did respond, move quickly on to the next. It felt like he was trying to create "slips" when there was none.

(This on the back of him repeatedly asking Guffy about a backroom and just plain ignoring very obvious sarcasm).

Usually I feel as if Keith deduces things out. This time, I feel as if he's made a decision (TSC = evil) and has tried working backwards.....

Bounty Hunter

btw Necro, careful not to miss your 20k post. Probably going to happen during this game. Mine will probably happen shortly after it

Necro

Yeah look Ecto I'm all down for the heroic sacrifices when it's needed (ie me as an oracle) but we need villagers more than ever to fight to live right now.

Necro

Necro wrote: »

Deleted User wrote: »

I killed GnR
Choc killed Necro
Ecto killed Drump
Who killed Choc?

Night King's Ice Dragon ie the baddies

Exactly, so I don't know why the whole ice dragon thing was brought up by Keith, especially when it was used to back up QB's inaccurate conclusion.

Ectoplasm

Ok. So we need to work out who we lynch and who we target so and we are back to the scenarios I laid out earlier. Do we double kill? Lynch and Dragon same person? Is that best plan?

Necro

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Ok. So we need to work out who we lynch and who we target so and we are back to the scenarios I laid out earlier. Do we double kill? Lynch and Dragon same person? Is that best plan?

I think that might be the best course UNLESS there are two wolf peeks prior to 9pm.

We've had our fun spamming kills on villagers, it's not worked out

Necro

Lord TSC wrote: »

Keith spent the morning trying this on me too. Honestly, he'd be my next choice to lynch after you.

He accussed Ecto of killing Eva.
When I quoted the relevant flavour, he gives out that I edited the line or two about conversion out of the post (despite not being relevant).
Tried to suggest there was an "extra day" I wasn't mentioning when I was listing off wolf actions (there wasn't)
All caps asking why I was playing "thick".
Questioned why I'd think Beaker and Mick would work on a plan together.
Then implied I was suggesting Mick got Beaker killed; when I asked where I said that, he never answered.

Also asked why I was posting a gif of the faceless guy (which I did right after we had a change of player).

Keith's entire MO this morning was to ask weird questions of me, and then refuse to answer when I asked clarity, or if he did respond, move quickly on to the next. It felt like he was trying to create "slips" when there was none.

(This on the back of him repeatedly asking Guffy about a backroom and just plain ignoring very obvious sarcasm).

Usually I feel as if Keith deduces things out. This time, I feel as if he's made a decision (TSC = evil) and has tried working backwards.....

Your reasoning to lynch me makes no sense.

Show me evidence, not just gut feels.

Why would you lynch me when I could potentially clear you?

sKeith

Lord TSC wrote: »

Keith spent the morning trying this on me too. Honestly, he'd be my next choice to lynch after you.

He accussed Ecto of killing Eva.
When I quoted the relevant flavour, he gives out that I edited the line or two about conversion out of the post (despite not being relevant).
Tried to suggest there was an "extra day" I wasn't mentioning when I was listing off wolf actions (there wasn't)
All caps asking why I was playing "thick".
Questioned why I'd think Beaker and Mick would work on a plan together.
Then implied I was suggesting Mick got Beaker killed; when I asked where I said that, he never answered.

Also asked why I was posting a gif of the faceless guy (which I did right after we had a change of player).

Keith's entire MO this morning was to ask weird questions of me, and then refuse to answer when I asked clarity, or if he did respond, move quickly on to the next. It felt like he was trying to create "slips" when there was none.

(This on the back of him repeatedly asking Guffy about a backroom and just plain ignoring very obvious sarcasm).

Usually I feel as if Keith deduces things out. This time, I feel as if he's made a decision (TSC = evil) and has tried working backwards.....

That was you bud, not me.

Lord TSC wrote: »

Ecto admitted to killing Eva, who was described as being killed as follows.....

Ectoplasm

Necro wrote: »

Yeah look Ecto I'm all down for the heroic sacrifices when it's needed (ie me as an oracle) but we need villagers more than ever to fight to live right now.

I am fighting. Have been since I started to get heat on me. I work best when I talk through all scenarios. And as I've had an especially bad game I want input from others so as I said, move on now to who and how we target tonight's lynch and my baby's rampage.

Necro

I don't understand why Lord would want to lynch someone who could potentially clear him.

Explain to me how that's a village thought someone, please.

tusk

I'm in favor of double kill. Now i'm closing the bloody window. Laters

sKeith

Deleted User wrote: »

Exactly, so I don't know why the whole ice dragon thing was brought up by Keith, especially when it was used to back up QB's inaccurate conclusion.

I was just grabbing the names of those involved. and showing my source.
I didn't say who done what, i just said these were the people involved and they all came under the blue eyed dragon picture. I missed the indivudual pictures that came at 9:30.