Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

12000 images!

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,730 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Well, he didn't "get away with it" as getting that far court-wise would have taken ages for the victim as the protections here are awful. The article says she was unaware of it, but she can't have been unaware forever.

    As goes 12000 images, I'd suspect there could be some level of multiple shot photography there which would usually be 3-4 pictures a second to try emulate a film camera. If you're trying to feel like some 80s paparrazi or whatever that'd probably help! Also, its over 8 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,708 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Was his neighbour a similar looper?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,553 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,145 ✭✭✭LETHAL LADY


    L1011 wrote: »
    Well, he didn't "get away with it" as getting that far court-wise would have taken ages for the victim as the protections here are awful. The article says she was unaware of it, but she can't have been unaware forever.

    As goes 12000 images, I'd suspect there could be some level of multiple shot photography there which would usually be 3-4 pictures a second to try emulate a film camera. If you're trying to feel like some 80s paparrazi or whatever that'd probably help! Also, its over 8 years.

    Oh well that makes it alrighty!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,796 ✭✭✭Sir Osis of Liver.


    The durrty minx dragging her green bin on the path again.
    Jiggle jiggle gyrate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Vic_08


    An Irish court actually deals with a deviant, quick we need some more judges to excuse his behaviour.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,145 ✭✭✭LETHAL LADY


    He's laughing his head off at the judgement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,997 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Moved from After Hours to Current Affairs please follow local guidelines.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    THE HIGH COURT has set aside the nine-month custodial sentence imposed by a lower court on a man who admitted taking 12,000 pictures of a female neighbour without her knowledge or consent.

    The orders were imposed on Mark Mooney of Corish Park, Wexford Town who in 2018 was convicted before the District Court after he admitted harassing a neighbour, contrary to Section 10 of the 1997 Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act.

    The District Court judge hearing the case imposed a nine-month custodial sentence on Mooney but suspended the final seven months on condition he does not reside within a distance of 8km of the injured party.

    The District Court also made a separate permanent order that the man does not reside within 8km of the woman...


Advertisement