Clue: A 13 player Murder Mystery game.

Baggly

Yes thank you duffers. Forgot to go back and look at Loughc interactions.

duffman13

tusk wrote: »

Meh. You made a mistake voting for me, but I wasn't around for it so nothing I can do about it. If you try vote for me today, I will have something to say.

Sounds rather ominous Tusky

tusk

Baggly wrote: »

No; i havent revealed why i think you are bad, Tusky.

So that bit is a secret then? would you care to share with the class, so that they can have all of the information when making a decision, or would you like to just keep this wonderful detail to yourself and not help the village?

Necro

Coming back to you now Clara.

Clarabel wrote: »

WOAH!
Crosshair on my forehead!



I'll give you this 100 times over, I don't read things properly and often make associations where there are none. Doesn't make me a wolf



I never gave a reason for tusk either, why wasn't that picked on? This ISO seems quite selected. on what QB posted yesterday I didn't see her as a wolf, neither did anyone else.....why does that make me a wolf?


So Necro the whole time I;m reading your post I'm thinking to myself, this doesn't read right. I'm defending untruth. I've gone back and looked. I did not thank any of your posts....maybe you can point me to it?

Either way I hadn't read the lynch thread, didn't get the lynch stuff. I was interested to see you moving away from lynch to no lynch so quickly


I was really grumpy yesterday, if I'm honest I wanted to sign my own death rather than get off a flight to discover I am dead again as a village n0


More untruth.....I had asked and you later answered why you had moved from tusk to no lynch.



What cntradictions - nothing above is contradictory
Piggy back on QB - https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=111109359&postcount=172



I know my post comes after these, but i was reading back


her earlier stance long since abandoned of No Lynch- I don't understand this, I practically had the exact same trajectory you did with this

Firstly, where's the untruth - you're making associations between me and Baggly since last night, I'm merely pointing out I could make the same between you and QB.

You did piggyback, because you asked the same question that QB did - maybe phrased it differently but it's the same question - and I've already stated the answer is in the thread already as to why I came to that conclusion.

You stated you were happy to go with no lynch then voted Baggly about 20 mins later - so there's a contradiction.

And that's before your flip-flop on QB today, which isn't even addressed in this post so I'm not properly including it.

But if I was to include it, I could easily say you were now distancing yourself from QB after soft defending her yesterday.

quickbeam

Baggly wrote: »

Who are you going to vote for, QB? And why?

And now I have an answer to this.

Probably voting you Bags. Won't be casting it until I'm home though.

Baggly

quickbeam wrote: »

Ahh now here. You get pissy at me for missing your answer to my question of "what reasons"...



... yet now you admit you haven't actually answered them?



Talk of being sneaky!!!!

How is it being sneaky! I have said mutliple times i havent revealed them yet. Read the thread QB.

tusk

duffman13 wrote: »

Sounds rather ominous Tusky

What does? Me saying that I will fight being voted for? oookaaaay.....

Necro

tusk wrote: »

Meh. You made a mistake voting for me, but I wasn't around for it so nothing I can do about it. If you try vote for me today, I will have something to say.

Ok I suppose you have something to say now

Bounty Hunter

tusk wrote: »

I mentioned yesterday that you were piggybacking on other people's thoughts, without adding your own. Asking questions of people rather than adding additional info to the thread. It's a good way to make it seem like you're involved while not actually incriminating yourself or adding useful info to the thread.

I would think how hard i've been going after Clara & (to a lesser extent) GnR today would incriminate me in the way your suggesting. Which I assume is me sticking my neck out with my own opinions that could come back to bite me if they flip good. Cara has two votes on her atm so she could be someone who we could see being lynched (she is also my most likely vote now) so that could happen.

In that respect I suppose you are doing the same voting me based off the first 3 pages when I thought it was day 0.

Surprised you haven't gone after people who were voting you when you had not even posted yet a bit harder instead however.

Baggly

tusk wrote: »

So that bit is a secret then? would you care to share with the class, so that they can have all of the information when making a decision, or would you like to just keep this wonderful detail to yourself and not help the village?

At the right time, of course i will!

quickbeam wrote: »

And now I have an answer to this.

Probably voting you Bags. Won't be casting it until I'm home though.

Thats a mistake. Im village all the way.

Baggly

Baggly wrote: »

I have hunches on Tusk, Clara, GNR. Dont think its all three. Just have hunches on them each individually.

Hard to read Sully, Loughc and BH so far. They are my next 3 suspicions.

Ive done some analysis this morning but i want to dive deeper into build up to the lynch.

Am i correct in saying munch happens at 9pm? Or is it 10am-ish?

Look lads im not trying to deceive the village here. i have my reasons for keeping my powder dry and ill live or die by those reasons. Bare with me. Im not talking about an 8pm reveal. Just some more time.

tusk

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

I would think how hard i've been going after Clara & (to a lesser extent) GnR today would incriminate me in the way your suggesting. Which I assume is me sticking my neck out with my own opinions that could come back to bite me if they flip good. Cara has two votes on her atm so she could be someone who we could see being lynched (she is also my most likely vote now) so that could happen.

In that respect I suppose you are doing the same voting me based off the first 3 pages when I thought it was day 0.

Surprised you haven't gone after people who were voting you when you had not even posted yet a bit harder instead however.

Like I said, I haven't caught up fully. and my reaction is based off early pages. If you've been engaging more in the thread since, i'll be interested to see if that was before or after I called you out on it.

I'm not bothered with people voting me while I'm not here. It's a stupid mistake for people to do that, and it was lucky I wasn't lynched without being able to defend myself, but I'm around now, and if people vote for me I'll be more than happy to have a conversation as to why.

Necro

Baggly wrote: »

Look lads im not trying to deceive the village here. i have my reasons for keeping my powder dry and ill live or die by those reasons. Bare with me. Im not talking about an 8pm reveal. Just some more time.

Meh, you're either bullspitting which will become evident or you don't.

I can wait.

tusk

Baggly wrote: »

Look lads im not trying to deceive the village here. i have my reasons for keeping my powder dry and ill live or die by those reasons. Bare with me. Im not talking about an 8pm reveal. Just some more time.

This is the maddest craic I've come across to be honest.

Lads, I have reasons... Just can't tell you... but I will tell you... but I can't tell you now... But I will tell you, not at 8, but I will defo tell you.

Whatevs baggers, I'm over this charade. As you were.

Necro

Necro wrote: »

Meh, you're either bullspitting which will become evident or you don't.

I can wait.

*do have evidence.

See, I'm almost TOO mellow today I'm making stupid posts

quickbeam

Baggly wrote: »

Look lads im not trying to deceive the village here. i have my reasons for keeping my powder dry and ill live or die by those reasons. Bare with me. Im not talking about an 8pm reveal. Just some more time.

Okay, but don't say the answers are there to be read if you haven't actually revealed!

I will forbear to vote for you for now.

Bounty Hunter

tusk wrote: »

Like I said, I haven't caught up fully. and my reaction is based off early pages. If you've been engaging more in the thread since, i'll be interested to see if that was before or after I called you out on it.

I'm not bothered with people voting me while I'm not here. It's a stupid mistake for people to do that, and it was lucky I wasn't lynched without being able to defend myself, but I'm around now, and if people vote for me I'll be more than happy to have a conversation as to why.

I was engaging in the thread plenty and it was before you voted for me and I asked for an explanation. Since then I've just been talking to you really. This game isn't exactly super slow but it is more manageable than the previous one so hopefully you can catch up and see for yourself and see that there are better targets (than me a villager).

Necro

quickbeam wrote: »

And now I have an answer to this.

Probably voting you Bags. Won't be casting it until I'm home though.

Not like you to OMGUS like this QB

Green&Red

Baggly are you claiming FBI man?
Cause that’s how it’s coming across

If you’re not then you’re “I have my reasons” are as I’ve said to you already nonsense, we’re all just going on spec so far. To be soft claiming the only good role left is weird for a lot of reasons

I don’t like it at all

Baggly

quickbeam wrote: »

Okay, but don't say the answers are there to be read if you haven't actually revealed!

I will forbear to vote for you for now.

I didnt say the answers were there. Im saying that when you asked what reasons, it was clear as day what reasons people were asking for.

Necro

Green&Red wrote: »

Baggly are you claiming FBI man?
Cause that’s how it’s coming across

If you’re not then you’re “I have my reasons” are as I’ve said to you already nonsense, we’re all just going on spec so far. To be soft claiming the only good role left is weird for a lot of reasons

I don’t like it at all

Like I said, he's either bullspitting or actually has evidence.

I'm willing to put it on the back burner for now, at least.

Now, back under my rock before I get too carried away and post too much.

Baggly

Green&Red wrote: »

Baggly are you claiming FBI man?
Cause that’s how it’s coming across

If you’re not then you’re “I have my reasons” are as I’ve said to you already nonsense, we’re all just going on spec so far. To be soft claiming the only good role left is weird for a lot of reasons

I don’t like it at all

1) im not claiming anything
2) if i were claiming something softly, well done for pointing it out to the wolves, thats great village play GNR
3) We have hundreds of posts worth of behaviour to analyse. If you are still on spec, then get to work.

duffman13

Ok I think I got all of Loughc posts but may have missed some so feel free to double check. i did interactions too

Loughc wrote: »

Greetings everyone!! Also Villager here! What are the odds of everyone here being villagers so far? Even money?

Loughc wrote: »

Nights are being closed??

Necro wrote: »

Yeah we've had games with closed nights (no posting after the lynch) recently.

But setup says open so I don't think this is the case.

Ok I'm gonna stop posting for a while I'm trying something different this game

Loughc wrote: »

Hmmm... that's not like you at all Necro.... :pac:

Intro, little back and forth with Necro

Clarabel wrote: »

I thought it was a funny play on words. I'll get my coat :-D

Loughc wrote: »

It's not a furcoat is it?

Clarabel wrote: »

Dalmatian, picked it up courtesy of our wealthy host

Interaction with Clara

Loughc wrote: »

Is there a lynch for tonight?

Lynch question

sKeith wrote: »

"I've some terribly upsetting news.

When I went into Henry's Office to fetch another bottle of Glenfiddich 30, I.."


".. I found Henry hanging there, from the ceiling fan, going round and round.. and round and round."




Lynch thread is open.
https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=111107513#post111107513


It's is now day 1. First lynch, if you choose to accept it at 9pm tonight.

Loughc wrote: »

Jaysus... not much time... Clarabel would be the only one I'm suss of right now, other wise it's a no vote for me.

Loughc thinks Clara is wolfy at this stage

Green&Red wrote: »

Hey guys

Do we get an option to lynch or not at every lynch?
Why would not lynch? Surely the longer we don’t lynch the more likely the wolves are to munch our good guys? Or am I missing something?

Loughc wrote: »

This game certainly seems to allow a no lynch every round, personally I don't like doing no lynch, I reckon you always learn more from a bad lynch than no lynch at all.

Chat with GnR

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

I was acting as if today was day 0, it seems this game has no day 0 however.

Loughc wrote: »

I also assumed today was Day 0

Loughc agreeing with BH re Day 0

Necro wrote: »

I hate no lynch tbh. But I also have next to no suspicions other than BH being super pockety at the moment, and Clara being a bit odd. And Clara's always that way, so it's more a village tell for me there atm.

Clarabel wrote: »

Why so?

Loughc wrote: »

Necro summed it up nicely but I don't know you well at all so for me it's not a village tell. But it's not much to go on as I assumed it was Day 0...

Lough replying to Clara on why she was wolfy

Necro wrote: »

Pfft I hate wasting a village opportunity to get a wolf though. Means they definitively get to pick first.

Loughc wrote: »

Then don't

Wantes Necro to vote but doesnt vote themselves

Loughc wrote: »

Sorry folks apologies I had prior plans tonight so I completely missed the Lynch. For full disclosure I would have voted Clarabel for acting dodgy and for no other reasons as there was nothing to go on.

Pops back on after lynch, still feels dodge on Clara

Loughc wrote: »

Why did people vote for tusk cause surely if tusk doesn’t meet the minimum post requirements he gets subbed out? And we could be potentially be lynching a villager??

tusk wrote: »

After reading just page one, my first inclinations for wolves are 2d and Lough..

Will continue catching up and give more input when I have some

Loughc wrote: »

I’m listening. Tell me why you think me?

Doesnt like Tusk reading him wolf

tusk wrote: »

Just got a sense from a couple of posts. I'll let everyone know if anything else sets off my Peter tingle

Tusk with no real reasoning as to why he though Lough was a wolf

Necro wrote: »

I'm clueless. But that's a permanent state for me lol

Loughc wrote: »

Hmmm... this is odd, you are many things my good friend, but clueless is not one of them.

Lough finding this post by necro odd

Necro wrote: »

That was 60 per cent a joke, 40 per cent my permanent state of existence

Mainly pertaining to Clara and tusks interaction though.

Necros response

Necro wrote: »

I think Clara's a wolf tbh. She's doing this thing where she's subtly trying to push people onto suspecting others but not throwing any shade herself bar at Baggly who's been not present that much so far.

Soft defending of QB last night was quite pockety too. Yet I'm apparently teamed with Baggly for saying basically the same thing earlier in the thread.

So if I live I'll likely be voting to lynch her today tbh.

Loughc wrote: »

Have to agree with Clara, strongest Wolf vibe from yesterday, not buying this ah sure I'm a mad bastard excuse for it either. She would have been my vote yesterday and will most likely be my lynch vote tonight unless someone outs themselves before then.

Lough really seems set on Clara, would wolves really be as brazen to post what follows

Clarabel wrote: »

So when I flip as village...does that mean I'm actually not weird AF ....

Loughc wrote: »

Correct, but you would need to be village for that to happen.

Clarabel wrote: »

You'll eat your words

Loughc wrote: »

You'll prob will eat me first... :pac:

Clarabel wrote: »

I'm not a wolf but :D:D:D

Really possible here that its a potential set up tbh, I dont know if someone is that brazen. But then again......

Baggly wrote: »

Id be surprised if there isnt a wolf in the no voters.

Loughc wrote: »

In my defence I missed the vote as I had plans, I didn't think we'd be kicking off too soon, and I rather no vote than just pick a random, if I had more time I could have picked Clarabel as I stated last night

Baggly wrote: »

Were you not around all evening to discuss the no vote idea?

Loughc wrote: »

Nope I was gone offline from 6-ishpm until 9.30-ishpm

Baggly wrote: »

Ok so you can be moved from avoid to 'wasnt around'. Still not a great look tbf.

Loughc wrote: »

It may not be, but with no confirmed start date at sign up you couldn't expect everyone to be available for Day 1 especially when most games start with a Day 0.

Interaction with Baggly around the no vote. Would Baggly if a wolf, interact with a munch target literally right before death. Dont think so, good column here for me based on this.

sKeith wrote: »

Night 1.

Everyone went to bed.

Things happened in the night.

Reverend Green was murdered in the night, by strangulation, and the police found a pistol, unfired on his person.

Mr Belvedere makes everybody breakfast while they discuss the happenings of the night.

Day 2 begins.

LoughC is dead.

And there goes our Vig! :mad:

Green&Red

Baggly wrote: »

1) im not claiming anything
2) if i were claiming something softly, well done for pointing it out to the wolves, thats great village play GNR
3) We have hundreds of posts worth of behaviour to analyse. If you are still on spec, then get to work.

Soft was the wrong word in fairness, blatant is a better one

But you are claiming it and I know you’re not cause you’re not that poor of a player to come out with it after half a day under zero pressure
So that’s why I don’t like it

Baggly

Interactions analysis

D1 Interactions N1 Interactions Baggly bounty hunter Clarabel duffman13 Ectoplasm Green&Red Hello 2D Loughc Necro quickbeam sullivlo TheValeyard tusk
Baggly 15 6 0 1 4 0 9 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 0
bounty hunter 15 1 4 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 0 0 1 0
Clarabel 26 14 6 2 1 0 3 1 1 6 11 3 0 0 2
duffman13 6 6 1 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ectoplasm 17 10 10 0 4 7 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
Green&Red 1 6 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Hello 2D 2 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Loughc 7 7 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1
Necro 24 7 3 1 11 1 3 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 0
quickbeam 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0
sullivlo 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
TheValeyard 8 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0
tusk 0 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0

Green&Red

But nice deflection on me for calling you out

Baggly

Lol hadnt spotted Clara interacted with herself at some stage.

Necro

I also do that Baggly :pac:

Baggly

Green&Red wrote: »

But nice deflection on me for calling you out

How is it when you call me on 'setting you up' or whatever it is you accused me of, its you being legit. When i return the favour, im deflecting? Aggressive defense from GNR. Didnt think you would go back to being quiet and reserved.

Baggly

That table is wrong. Some of the numbers are after going off. Ill just upload the excel file.