Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clue: A 13 player Murder Mystery game.

Options
1…1516182021…68

Comments

  • Options
    #512
    Bounty Hunter
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,730 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    Necro wrote: »
    Kinda wanna veto a lynch of GnR if I'm honest, genuinely don't think he's a wolf.

    Nobody has voted GnR. That said you saying you veto him would not make me not vote him if I wanted to but he is not the person I suspect the most atm


  • Options
    #513
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    Why do duffers and Bounty have 4 people FFAed in a 3 wolf game?

    Oh god. Please not this. Please. Anything but this!


  • Options
    #514
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Bounty Hunter wrote: »
    Nobody has voted GnR. That said you saying you veto him would not make me not vote him if I wanted to but he is not the person I suspect the most atm

    He's pretty high up on FFAs though.

    Who out of the top people FFAed so far would you veto if you had a choice?

    Mine is GnR


  • Options
    #515
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    He's pretty high up on FFAs though.

    Who out of the top people FFAed so far would you veto if you had a choice?

    Mine is GnR

    Why are you even talking about Vetos? We don't have a veto mechanic so it's irrelevant. Find a wolf!


  • Options
    #516
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tusk wrote: »
    Oh god. Please not this. Please. Anything but this!

    FFA is supposed to a Process of Elimination to find who the village (and wolves masquerading as villagers) find the most wolfy.

    Putting 4 people on a list when there are only three possible wolves is stupid.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #517
    Baggly
    Registered Users Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Necro what are you doing. Go find highly strung necro and ask him if veto'ing people is a better idea than finding people to vote for.


  • Options
    #518
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tusk wrote: »
    Why are you even talking about Vetos? We don't have a veto mechanic so it's irrelevant. Find a wolf!

    Because I want to.

    Who would you veto (aside from yourself) who's been FFAed so far?


  • Options
    #519
    Baggly
    Registered Users Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    The last time you tried to pull this kind of ****e was in the Sherlock game Necro.


  • Options
    #520
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Baggly wrote: »
    Necro what are you doing. Go find highly strung necro and ask him if veto'ing people is a better idea than finding people to vote for.

    I want people to discuss everything :)

    If you had a choice from the FFAs would you veto someone, if so, why.


  • Options
    #521
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Baggly wrote: »
    The last time you tried to pull this kind of ****e was in the Sherlock game Necro.

    What, readlists? It's a simple question it doesn't have to take up half the day


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #522
    Bounty Hunter
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,730 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    Necro wrote: »
    He's pretty high up on FFAs though.

    Who out of the top people FFAed so far would you veto if you had a choice?

    Mine is GnR

    using this as the list
    Ectoplasm wrote: »
    Player Post No FFA
    Duffman #418 Clarabel GnR Necro Ecto
    Necro #472 Tusk Clarabel Vale
    BountyHunter #483 GnR Clarabel Vale Sulli
    Ectoplasm #484 Hello2D Vale QB
    Baggly #489 Clarabel GnR Tusk


    Will keep this updated if my laptop doesn't actually brick itself. For clarity Baggly did give his earlier but post #489 was tagged.

    None of them really. I don't trust anyone atm but I guess out of those listed probably suspect you and Ecto the least. That's not me clearing either of you though so I would def not veto others going after either of you nor expect people to stop doing so if I did.


  • Options
    #523
    quickbeam
    Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 16,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭quickbeam


    Necro wrote: »
    Not like you to OMGUS like this QB

    If that was the case I'd be considering you too.


  • Options
    #524
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    FFA is supposed to a Process of Elimination to find who the village (and wolves masquerading as villagers) find the most wolfy.

    Putting 4 people on a list when there are only three possible wolves is stupid.

    I'll disagree down to the ground on this.

    I had ffa 1 as

    Lough
    2D
    BH.

    Lough is dead. I was wrong. now i've to go back to the drawingboard to find a third.

    If I'd had 4 The drawing board would be ready to go.


  • Options
    #525
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    quickbeam wrote: »
    If that was the case I'd be considering you too.

    Why, did I FFA you or call you wolfy? I made a comment regarding your speed at acquiescing to No Lynch last night, that's about it.


  • Options
    #526
    Baggly
    Registered Users Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    Necro wrote: »
    I want people to discuss everything :)

    If you had a choice from the FFAs would you veto someone, if so, why.

    WE DONT EVEN HAVE THE FFA TALLY YET. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT.


  • Options
    #527
    Bounty Hunter
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,730 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    Necro wrote: »
    I want people to discuss everything :)

    If you had a choice from the FFAs would you veto someone, if so, why.

    You want people to discuss everything but want to veto people choosing one particular person. Sounds like a contradiction to me


  • Options
    #528
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tusk wrote: »
    I'll disagree down to the ground on this.

    I had ffa 1 as

    Lough
    2D
    BH.

    Lough is dead. I was wrong. now i've to go back to the drawingboard to find a third.

    If I'd had 4 The drawing board would be ready to go.

    You had an FFA before the munch? Well that's a bit weird. When have ever FFAed before the munch?


  • Options
    #529
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Meh, I'll chill again. Simple question, weird that people don't want to answer it though.


  • Options
    #530
    Bounty Hunter
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,730 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    Necro wrote: »
    Meh, I'll chill again. Simple question, weird that people don't want to answer it though.

    I answered it.

    Weird question though. Why Veto anyone? Everyone should be discussed unless you have some way of proving someone is (and here comes that term everyone loves) lock clear.


  • Options
    #531
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    Because I want to.

    Who would you veto (aside from yourself) who's been FFAed so far?

    I wouldn't veto anyone.

    1. because it's irrelevant conversation in the current setup.
    2. its a game of group-think. if the group thinks someone should be killed then they should be killed. regardless of if one person thinks strongly that they shouldn't

    I'm not wasting more time going down this route. and you doing so is making you seem more and more dodgy.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #532
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tusk wrote: »
    I wouldn't veto anyone.

    1. because it's irrelevant conversation in the current setup.
    2. its a game of group-think. if the group thinks someone should be killed then they should be killed. regardless of if one person thinks strongly that they shouldn't

    I'm not wasting more time going down this route. and you doing so is making you seem more and more dodgy.

    No it's not. It suits you to say that, seeing as I have my vote on you though ;)

    But it's really, really not.


  • Options
    #533
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    You had an FFA before the munch? Well that's a bit weird. When have ever FFAed before the munch?

    I didn't have an official FFA. I posted who I thought was wolfy. and it was those three. simple.

    I'm trying to illustrate a point that there are 13 people in the game. If you have 4 people that feel wolfy, there's nothing wrong with that. and in fact I think it's better than limiting yourself to 3


  • Options
    #534
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    Meh, I'll chill again. Simple question, weird that people don't want to answer it though.

    How does this question in any way help us?


  • Options
    #535
    Green&Red
    Registered Users Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    Baggly wrote: »
    Why in the name of god would you explain how your post makes sense from the perspective of a wolf, GNR..?!?

    I always put myself in wolf shoes to try and solve a game, do other people not?

    So if I was a wolf would I be happy the vig was dead - probably not

    Likewise if I was a wolf why would I munch LoughC - to frame Clara is the best I got on that

    It seems like a reasonable way to solve the problem? To catch a wolf I gotta think like a wolf


  • Options
    #536
    Baggly
    Registered Users Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    You know who else thinks like a wolf, right?


  • Options
    #537
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tusk wrote: »
    I didn't have an official FFA. I posted who I thought was wolfy. and it was those three. simple.

    I'm trying to illustrate a point that there are 13 people in the game. If you have 4 people that feel wolfy, there's nothing wrong with that. and in fact I think it's better than limiting yourself to 3

    You do realise the point of FFA right?

    It's process of elimination by all players.

    Posting more than the allotted number of wolves in the game in an FFA is counter-productive.

    Have suspicions, voice them, sure.

    But adding 4 or 5 or more suspicions is just fudging the numbers and directly impacting on the POE.

    Which is not villagery.


  • Options
    #538
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    No it's not. It suits you to say that, seeing as I have my vote on you though ;)

    But it's really, really not.

    What suits me? to say that vetoing is a useless conversation?

    Unless it helps us, then it's a waste of time.

    You can have your vote on me all you want, it's not going to change the fact that talking about a mechanic that doesn't exist is wasting resources that could be used elsewhere to find a wolf.


  • Options
    #539
    Necro
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tusk wrote: »
    How does this question in any way help us?

    Discussion helps us, ergo - this question is getting people involved.

    I may be different in how I approach each game but one needs to have different methods to push discussion forward.

    So #veto list day 2

    Necro: GnR
    BH: Necro or Ecto
    tusk: No one.


    Anyone else want to add a name?


  • Options
    #540
    Baggly
    Registered Users Posts: 35,024 ✭✭✭✭Baggly


    People who had not interacted with Loughc:

    Duffers
    Ecto
    GNR
    Hello 2D
    QB
    Sully
    Vale


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #541
    tusk
    Registered Users Posts: 5,882 ✭✭✭tusk


    Necro wrote: »
    You do realise the point of FFA right?

    It's process of elimination by all players.

    Posting more than the allotted number of wolves in the game in an FFA is counter-productive.

    Have suspicions, voice them, sure.

    But adding 4 or 5 or more suspicions is just fudging the numbers and directly impacting on the POE.

    Which is not villagery.

    I'm not a mathemetician. I don't know the intricacies of FFA Algebra. What i know is that 99 percent of the time an ffa is not right. so having more than the number of wolves as potential wolves makes sense to me.

    I don't do any calculations to help me solve these games, so ffas are useful to me for seeing who thinks who is bad. That's all. If that doesn't work for your maths, then disregard peoples' excess and let them play the way that works for them.


Advertisement