Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Does anyone actually believe that Gerry Adams wasn't in the IRA?

Options
1131416181921

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,548 ✭✭✭Topgear on Dave


    You'd have to wonder sometimes. He did get them to disarm and like other folks have mentioned they never jailed him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 373 ✭✭careless sherpa


    WB Yokes wrote: »
    Gerry was an IRA man and a British agent. He was responsible for the Eksund seizure.

    Who was it that attempted to kill him a couple of times then?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    WB Yokes wrote: »
    Gerry was an IRA man and a British agent. He was responsible for the Eksund seizure.

    Well I’m sure as other posters who say they don’t care if he was in the IRA or not does it matter if he was a British agent or not as long as he helped achieve peace?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 370 ✭✭WB Yokes


    Who was it that attempted to kill him a couple of times then?

    Go ahead tell me the details of the assassination attempts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,668 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    your 66 posts in this thread would suggest otherwise.

    Most of that is answering the waffle. Great to see you care enough to count my posts though. Life must be boring


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,467 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    maccored wrote: »
    Most of that is answering the waffle. Great to see you care enough to count my posts though. Life must be boring

    no need to count them. you can find that info in a few seconds. no bother at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 373 ✭✭careless sherpa


    WB Yokes wrote: »
    Go ahead tell me the details of the assassination attempts.

    Early don't you do a search


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 370 ✭✭WB Yokes


    Early don't you do a search

    I can use google I just wanted to see if you actually knew.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Well I’m sure as other posters who say they don’t care if he was in the IRA or not does it matter if he was a British agent or not as long as he helped achieve peace?


    Yourself and Blanch, confuse disagreement with all sorts of notions.
    If you said Maggie Thatcher was in the 'RA, and we agreed/disagreed, would we be Conservatives?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,668 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    no need to count them. you can find that info in a few seconds. no bother at all.

    good for you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Well I’m sure as other posters who say they don’t care if he was in the IRA or not does it matter if he was a British agent or not as long as he helped achieve peace?


    Yourself and Blanch, confuse disagreement with all sorts of notions.
    If you said Maggie Thatcher was in the 'RA, and we agreed/disagreed, would we be Conservatives?

    You really are not making any sense. If it doesn’t matter if Gerry Adams was in the IRA or not why should it matter if he was a British agent or not.

    If you would like to know if he was a British agent or not can you understand why others would like to know if he was in the IRA or not?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,668 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You really are not making any sense. If it doesn’t matter if Gerry Adams was in the IRA or not why should it matter if he was a British agent or not.

    If you would like to know if he was a British agent or not can you understand why others would like to know if he was in the IRA or not?

    grand so - damn brits then are completely to blame for everything. If you are correct and if Adams was also in the ira, then the brits are responsible for everything the IRA done. Agreed?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    maccored wrote: »
    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You really are not making any sense. If it doesn’t matter if Gerry Adams was in the IRA or not why should it matter if he was a British agent or not.

    If you would like to know if he was a British agent or not can you understand why others would like to know if he was in the IRA or not?



    grand so - damn brits then are completely to blame for everything. If you are correct and if Adams was also in the ira, then the brits are responsible for everything the IRA done. Agreed?

    I think you miss my point. I don’t know if Adams was a British agent has been suggested in relation to the interception of the Eksund shipment and the Loughgall massacre but I would like to find out.
    Similar I would like to find out if Adams was in the IRA despite being told it doesn’t matter, who cares etc.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 69,184 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Similar I would like to find out if Adams was in the IRA

    What then? What will it change?

    Certainly not your mind, which is already made up.

    You guys just want your 'I told ya, I told ya', day in the sun.

    Whoop de doo. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Similar I would like to find out if Adams was in the IRA

    What then? What will it change?

    Certainly not your mind, which is already made up.

    You guys just want your 'I told ya, I told ya', day in the sun.

    Whoop de doo. :rolleyes:

    Would your perception of Adams changed if it was confirmed he was a British agent?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,467 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    What then? What will it change?

    Certainly not your mind, which is already made up.

    You guys just want your 'I told ya, I told ya', day in the sun.

    Whoop de doo. :rolleyes:

    and it certainly wouldn't change your mind Francie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You really are not making any sense. If it doesn’t matter if Gerry Adams was in the IRA or not why should it matter if he was a British agent or not.

    If you would like to know if he was a British agent or not can you understand why others would like to know if he was in the IRA or not?

    I'll explain. You used this topic to slag off Adams and the IRA. Then you start inferring people supported both. Then you went off on a geography side road to try score points. Now you're attempting to come across like you are actually interested in a discussion.
    To answer your question, genuine debate. If you agree or disagree with a premise you might be inclined to comment on that.
    If he were a British Agent I guess you owe him an apology? Or are you shifting stances depending on which one allows you try score the most points?
    Gerry Adams, 'RA man.
    Gerry Adams, British patriot.
    Good luck playing both sides for personal jollies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 69,184 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Would your perception of Adams changed if it was confirmed he was a British agent?

    My perception of Adams was of a man who was good and bad, who made mistakes and who also made astute political decisions. Much like any other politician.
    If he turned out to be also a British agent that would just be another tick in the mistake column.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You really are not making any sense. If it doesn’t matter if Gerry Adams was in the IRA or not why should it matter if he was a British agent or not.

    If you would like to know if he was a British agent or not can you understand why others would like to know if he was in the IRA or not?

    I'll explain. You used this topic to slag off Adams and the IRA. Then you start inferring people supported both. Then you went off on a geography side road to try score points. Now you're attempting to come across like you are actually interested in a discussion.
    To answer your question, genuine debate. If you agree or disagree with a premise you might be inclined to comment on that.
    If he were a British Agent I guess you owe him an apology? Or are you shifting stances depending on which one allows you try score the most points?
    Gerry Adams, 'RA man.
    Gerry Adams, British patriot.
    Good luck playing both sides for personal jollies.

    I’ve either touched a nerve or you simply can’t support your position that it doesn’t matter if Adams was in the IRA.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 69,184 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    I’ve either touched a nerve or you simply can’t support your position that it doesn’t matter if Adams was in the IRA.

    We are all ears. Tell us why it matters to you?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    I’ve either touched a nerve or you simply can’t support your position that it doesn’t matter if Adams was in the IRA.

    No, you've dodged a comment ;)
    I think he was, however he's never been officially accused. I would much prefer he were an IRA member than a British Agent. The latter would have me losing some respect for him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,668 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    I think you miss my point. I don’t know if Adams was a British agent has been suggested in relation to the interception of the Eksund shipment and the Loughgall massacre but I would like to find out.
    Similar I would like to find out if Adams was in the IRA despite being told it doesn’t matter, who cares etc.

    Make up your mind. Are you saying he was a british agent (therefore the british were in complete control and let things go on) or that he wasn't? Which is it?

    Or alternatively, are you waffling about something you wont take a side on?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    I’ve either touched a nerve or you simply can’t support your position that it doesn’t matter if Adams was in the IRA.

    We are all ears. Tell us why it matters to you?

    You are asking me why I am interested in the role played by one of the major actors in a conflict that has dominated my country for the best part of my life? Seriously?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    maccored wrote: »
    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    I think you miss my point. I don’t know if Adams was a British agent has been suggested in relation to the interception of the Eksund shipment and the Loughgall massacre but I would like to find out.
    Similar I would like to find out if Adams was in the IRA despite being told it doesn’t matter, who cares etc.

    Make up your mind. Are you saying he was a british agent (therefore the british were in complete control and let things go on) or that he wasn't? Which is it?

    Or alternatively, are you waffling about something you wont take a side on?

    I’ll try and spell it out again. I don’t know if he was in the IRA or if he was a British agent but both are things I would be interested in finding out.
    So to say, as you do, that it doesn’t matter, is I believe disingenuous.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 69,184 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You are asking me why I am interested in the role played by one of the major actors in a conflict that has dominated my country for the best part of my life? Seriously?

    Yes.

    Why does it matter, and what difference would knowing, make to you?



    I ran a 'test' on myself:

    1. Gerry was in the IRA. What difference does knowing that make to understanding what happened?

    [2] Gerry wasn't in the IRA: What difference does knowing that make to understanding what happened?

    The answer to both is the same...it makes no difference.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,467 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Yes.

    Why does it matter, and what difference would knowing, make to you?



    I ran a 'test' on myself:

    1. Gerry was in the IRA. What difference does knowing that make to understanding what happened?

    [2] Gerry wasn't in the IRA: What difference does knowing that make to understanding what happened?

    The answer to both is the same...it makes no difference.

    Well if it could be proven he was a member then he has been lying to you for decades. that wouldn't affect your opinion of him?


  • Registered Users Posts: 69,184 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well if it could be proven he was a member then he has been lying to you for decades. that wouldn't affect your opinion of him?

    I don't think any adult should be living in a world where people are hero worshipped.

    I don't hold Adams in any thrall or worship. He is ultimately a politician.

    A politician who navigated his people to a peace deal and equal status in a formerly bigoted and sectarian state. A strategic lie about his membership of the 'RA wouldn't tarnish that achievement in my books anyhow. The IRA existed and operated and would have, even if Adams never existed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    You are asking me why I am interested in the role played by one of the major actors in a conflict that has dominated my country for the best part of my life? Seriously?

    Yes.

    Why does it matter, and what difference would knowing, make to you?



    I ran a 'test' on myself:

    1. Gerry was in the IRA. What difference does knowing that make to understanding what happened?

    [2] Gerry wasn't in the IRA: What difference does knowing that make to understanding what happened?

    The answer to both is the same...it makes no difference.

    Look at the debate on this thread.

    Adams denies he was ever an IRA volunteer.
    Many believe Adams was an IRA volunteer.
    Others believe he was not in the IRA because he was never convicted.
    Others believe he was in the IRA but obviously had to lie about it because if he were to tell the truth he would have to face the consequences.

    If it is accepted by posters that Adams obviously had to lie about being a volunteer for political reasons why is the notion that he would lie about being a British agent for political reasons dismissed out of hand?

    Credibility matters. The truth matters.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,467 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I don't think any adult should be living in a world where people are hero worshipped.

    I don't hold Adams in any thrall or worship. He is ultimately a politician.

    A politician who navigated his people to a peace deal and equal status in a formerly bigoted and sectarian state. A strategic lie about his membership of the 'RA wouldn't tarnish that achievement in my books anyhow. The IRA existed and operated and would have, even if Adams never existed.

    and you have ignored the question. a good politicians answer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 69,184 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Look at the debate on this thread.

    Adams denies he was ever an IRA volunteer.
    Many believe Adams was an IRA volunteer.
    Others believe he was not in the IRA because he was never convicted.
    Others believe he was in the IRA but obviously had to lie about it because if he were to tell the truth he would have to face the consequences.

    If it is accepted by posters that Adams obviously had to lie about being a volunteer for political reasons why is the notion that he would lie about being a British agent for political reasons dismissed out of hand?

    Credibility matters. The truth matters.

    The debate has as much use as one of those 'What if...' radio programmes.

    Navel gazing for the moral high grounders.


Advertisement