Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Buying a car with it's EGR and DPF removed/blanked

  • 24-09-2019 04:10PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,739 ✭✭✭✭


    Are there any legal implications? Implications for an NCT etc?


«13

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,942 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    It won't pass the NCT?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,739 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    It won't pass the NCT?

    Is that a statement or a question?

    The car being sold has only recently passed the NCT so either then tester was lax or the test doesn't actively check for EGR/DPFs specifically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭TheShow


    Question is why would you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,924 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    I would not touch any car, with these things messed with.
    Some lads I know in garages laughing: we got payed to remove these things and soon people will pay to put them back in.
    Ncts will very soon clap down on this removal and these cars will be very expensive to put back
    together properly.

    Op, just get normal one and save yourself a few grey hairs in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,739 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    TheShow wrote: »
    Question is why would you?

    Why would you remove them? That I can't answer. I didn't do it. Owner says it was to avoid costly issues with coked up valves and filters.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    TheShow wrote: »
    Question is why would you?

    Because both items can go wrong, and when they do it costs money.
    Their removal could be to fix a symptom of another problem too.
    I’m not sure many people preventively do it, I’d say more do it as a cheap fix.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭tedpan


    lawred2 wrote:
    Why would you remove them? That I can't answer. I didn't do it. Owner says it was to avoid costly issues with coked up valves and filters.


    Exactly that, they decided that the costs of replacing the dpf (upto 2k) on some cars was not worth it. They probably never nctd the car either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    tedpan wrote: »
    Exactly that, they decided that the costs of replacing the dpf (upto 2k) on some cars was not worth it. They probably never nctd the car either.

    That’s a bit of an assumption!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭tedpan


    colm_mcm wrote:
    That’s a bit of an assumption!


    Basing that assumption on myself and lots of lads I know :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    Had it done a few years ago,had NCT twice since,never been an issue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,739 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    tipptom wrote: »
    Had it done a few years ago,had NCT twice since,never been an issue.

    Why did you get it done?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭selectamatic


    When the time comes the dpf test will be a visual look to see if there is anything remotely like a dpf still connected to the exhaust system.

    Even this is going to be tricky because modern dpf systems aren't exactly located with accessibility in mind. For example on mk7 golfs the setup is wedged right up tight behind the engine.

    Is the car remapped? Dpf deleted and egr blanked off are common mods to do as more power can be got from the remap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    tedpan wrote: »
    Basing that assumption on myself and lots of lads I know :)

    You’re saying the recent NCT is fake?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Truckermal


    When the time comes the dpf test will be a visual look to see if there is anything remotely like a dpf still connected to the exhaust system.

    Even this is going to be tricky because modern dpf systems aren't exactly located with accessibility in mind. For example on mk7 golfs the setup is wedged right up tight behind the engine.

    Is the car remapped? Dpf deleted and egr blanked off are common mods to do as more power can be got from the remap.

    This^^^^^^ is fact and not some of the waffle posted above, the car will have much more power and better MPG. I would buy one with all that work done once it was done correctly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 992 ✭✭✭Bikerman2019


    I know a mondeo 2l TDCI that gave DPF issues. The DPF was replaced. It happened again so was pulled out. The exhaust was removed, and the top part - the part facing the underside of the car, was cut open and DPF removed. Then it was welded up again, and refitted.


    Car passed NCT twice since and you cannot see any weld. It was remapped and no longer gives any trouble. Also puts out a bit more power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭tedpan


    colm_mcm wrote:
    You’re saying the recent NCT is fake?


    No, meant when I was a kid boy racer years ago! Now I drive a leaf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Truckermal


    tedpan wrote: »
    No, meant when I was a kid boy racer years ago! Now I drive a leaf

    I'm not a mathematician but that don't add up as DPF's only became mainstream 11 year's ago so using the assumption they were trouble free for 4 year's that means you are only 24 ish and driving a Leaf...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭TheShow


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Why would you remove them? That I can't answer. I didn't do it. Owner says it was to avoid costly issues with coked up valves and filters.

    No. why would you consider buying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Should be pointed out that a car that’s designed to have a DPF where it’s removed is generally more harmful than one that never had one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    I blanked out the EGR valve in my old 406 because it was very broken and leaking exhaust into the engine bay and cabin. AFAIK the NCT doesn't check for functionality of the EGR valve - blanking is not necessarily visible if the valve is left in place, although close inspection would show the solenoid was disconnected.

    My solution to cars originally fitted with DPFs: Never buy one.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 328 ✭✭HailSatan


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Should be pointed out that a car that’s designed to have a DPF where it’s removed is generally more harmful than one that never had one.

    How so though?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 328 ✭✭HailSatan


    AFAIK the NCT doesn't check for functionality of the EGR valve - blanking is not necessarily visible if the valve is left in place, although close inspection would show the solenoid was disconnected.

    Gas isnt it. With all the world's experts on small diesel engines on hand, the EU never got around to specifying some common standard for selfchecking/reporting/testing diesel emissions equipment.

    How odd. Surely it must have crossed somebodies mind along the way ;););)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,920 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Know of a car where a stuffed dpf was removed, drilled through, refitted, remapped to account for this, and it subsequently passed NCT with very good emissions results.

    Cost €250 and took 6 hours to complete.

    People do it because it’s a very cheap fix to an expensive problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Maybe still doable in Ireland ( at least for another while,,,) but as far as I know..it's an MOT fail in England.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 328 ✭✭HailSatan


    What kind of testing do they do in UK beyond eyeballing it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,618 ✭✭✭grogi


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Are there any legal implications? Implications for an NCT etc?

    It is an illegal car on the public road. Modification like that changes the emission, and the car looses it's type approval.

    Lack of enforcement does not change the above.

    What's more, what does it say about the previous owner?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 328 ✭✭HailSatan


    grogi wrote: »
    What's more, what does it say about the previous owner?

    They wanted to save the planet by making their car more efficient and reduce CO2?

    It's the only emission that mattered apparently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭selectamatic


    Visual test in the uk mot.

    Here for the nct as long as you didn't exceed the db limit or the smoke limit (which is high) you could pass with a full straight pipe on a diesel. Dummy cats and dummy backboxes are used by some and anyone getting their dpf removed would be wise to have a dummy dpf or just have their old one hollowed out.

    The morality side of things is up to the individual.

    I've none of the above done currently and I'm not exactly advocating it but that said people who are so vehemently against this type of thing shouldn't get a free pass to mislead or lie about the technical aspects of this (And I'm not implying anyone on this thread has lied either) but I've seen it before both on here and on fb.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 328 ✭✭HailSatan


    people who are so vehemently against this type of thing shouldn't get a free pass to mislead or lie about the technical aspects of this

    Well said. If they feel so strongly about it they should be making noise about changing the NCT to evolve beyond a token gesture test for "low emissions diesel"


    Are individual countries allowed to go on a solo run on these things? I thought the concept of national car testing was driven by the EU? Would ireland be told to get ****ed if we started asking for real diesel emissions tests to be part of that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭Dave147


    tedpan wrote:
    Exactly that, they decided that the costs of replacing the dpf (upto 2k) on some cars was not worth it. They probably never nctd the car either.


    I removed EGR and DPF delete on my old Audi A4 and it passed the NCT no problem whatsoever, I was advised to remove it rather than spend more money than the car was worth.


Advertisement