Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Scottish independence

1114115116117118120»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭techman1


    Another thing not often mentioned is the importance of Scotland to the British military and defence, there is a huge naval base up there along with nuclear missile sites. In the light of the Ukraine war the importance of British nuclear deterrence has only increased given that putin is always talking about nuclear strikes.

    Given that Britain and France are the only nuclear armed countries in Europe I doubt the EU would be doing anything to weaken that given the threat from putin. Therefore the last thing they would be encouraging would be a break away of Scotland, they have plenty of other bigger candidates to join like Ukraine, Moldova and balkan countries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,536 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    BJ and his buddies in the ERG were pulling the strings in the party for a long long time before Cameron called the referendum. Nicola Sturgeon was correct to point out "the tories" at the time although I accept that the way she did it probably didn't register very well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,536 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    But the SNP, and most of the Scottish public, are very pro-EU so the EU would have a third nuclear armed country in your scenario (and a second one today)

    On the flip side - if you look at how close the Brexit vote was, the EU were possibly hoping that Scotland remaining in the UK would sway the vote in favour of the UK remaining in the EU. And it nearly did to be fair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,840 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    The nuclear weapons belong to the UK and can be relocated to rUK when Scotland is independent or Scotland can lease the facility to rUK



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,739 ✭✭✭serfboard


    I'd be fairly certain that an independent Scotland would join NATO and so these could be renamed NATO Naval bases rather than British Naval bases for those people who might care about such things. Of course the submarines would be British but they could also be American as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,306 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    FWIW, the position of the Scottish government in 2014 was that an independent Scotland (a) would join NATO, but (b) would not host nuclear weapons, and therefore that rUK would be invited to relocate its nuclear bases away from Scotland (which, in all likelihood, is something rUK would want to do anyway). So no drama.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,739 ✭✭✭serfboard


    The difficulty for the independence supporters in Scotland is that neither they nor anyone else can guarantee that Scotland would be better off, economically, as an independent country.

    Indeed, and had economic arguments only been used, the case for Irish independence would never have stood up either.

    And it seems the population of Scotland want such a guarantee.

    That was one of the winning strategies in the independence referendum - frightening the sh1t out of older people as to what would happen to their pensions after independence. IIRC the big demographic divide in the referendum was age - with younger people voting in favour of independence and older people voting against it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Randycove


    that was prior to the SNP ditching the Greens though, so that position may change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    Boris Johnson wasn't even an MP at the time of the Scottish referendum though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,306 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It could. And, in any event, that was only ever a proposal. Obviously, if Scotland ever does acheive independence, it will be the post-independence Scottish government and parliament that forms and executes defence policy and nuclear policy, and we don't know who will be in government then, any more than we know who will be in government in the UK.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,536 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Neither was Nigel Farrage, he wasn't even a TD at the time of the Brexit referendum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,061 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,007 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Alex Salmond has died suddenly aged 69. RIP.

    I wonder is it the end of the road for Scottish independence in any case. He and Sturgeon were the two driving forces.

    With the demise of the SNP at the last Westminster election it seems to me to be firmly down the list of priorities now for Scottish voters. I wonder is it destined to move back to the political fringes.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,481 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Scottish independence died some time ago. It was always a fortunate (for the SNP) convergence of Labour's unpopularity, the Tories' toxicity, a capable SNP and resentment at austerity.

    RIP Alex Salmond.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,840 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Salmond drove it forward, Sturgeon pushed it back

    The news of his death is a shock and it is a pity he will not be alive to see the truth come out about his stitch up

    RIP



Advertisement