South Park WW ROLE MADNESS - Game Thread

Wendy WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Would it be possible they are "lovers"?

Who knows. Let’s lynch one of them and find out!

Desmond WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Jaysus guys don’t be going for the no lynch option. Every lynch is blind. We have to get the ball rolling at some stage and at least if we lynch someone we’ll have some good stats on who’s voted for who.

Stop helping the wolves and start helping villagers.

Grand, so you dont mind me voting for you then. Thats sorted.

Lucy WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Who knows. Let’s lynch one of them and find out!

Grand, vote for Wendy and see what happens!

Henry WW

If my count is right we've only had 17 votes cast from 32 so far.

Eva - Segan
Ewan - Steve
Liam - Isla
Orla - Henry / Lucy
Regan - Eva / Doris
Lucy - Wendy / Winifred / Orla
No lynch - Barbara / Regan / Ewan / Oisin / Conor / Phil / Vernon

Desmond WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Who knows. Let’s lynch one of them and find out!

Lovers sound like a good role, why lynch one?

Wendy WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Grand, so you dont mind me voting for you then. Thats sorted.

Go for it, but promise you’ll focus on LuLa when I come up clean.

Orla WW

I’m not liking the amount of votes for no lynch. I know we’ve got f all to go on but at least there will be votes to analyze tomorrow if we lynch someone. I think it’s a cop out not to lynch. Are we going to keep no lynching until we’re certain we know who the wolves are? We’ve got the numbers, we can afford a good few mislynches, grow a pair and vote for someone!

(Yes I do realize I’d be better off keeping my mouth shut but meh)

Gertrude WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

This happened almost an hour ago now and still nothing further about it, unless I'm blind and missed it.

Did the shot miss its target? Was the target protected? Was there even a target at all and the mods are just psyching us out?!

Very strange.

Could be waiting on the Resurrector to decide if they are saving the person.

Brendan WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

I dont watch it either, its a load of rubbish. I wouldnt worry though, the game setup is pretty vanilla, atm anyway.

I feel like voting for you based off this...... how dare you.

Winifred WW

Henry WW wrote: »

If my count is right we've only had 17 votes cast from 32 so far.

Eva - Segan
Ewan - Steve
Liam - Isla
Orla - Henry / Lucy
Regan - Eva / Doris / Clodagh
Lucy - Wendy / Winifred / Orla
No lynch - Barbara / Regan / Ewan / Oisin / Conor / Phil / Vernon

There is a post from Clodagh from yesterday #7 as well by my count.

Henry WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

I feel like voting for you based off this...... how dare you.

Cheers - I'd forgotten about this comment and meant to come back to it.

Dessie - everyone has a feckin role. What do you consider non-vanilla?

Clodagh WW

Henry WW wrote: »

If my count is right we've only had 17 votes cast from 32 so far.

Eva - Segan
Ewan - Steve
Liam - Isla
Orla - Henry / Lucy
Regan - Eva / Doris
Lucy - Wendy / Winifred / Orla
No lynch - Barbara / Regan / Ewan / Oisin / Conor / Phil / Vernon

As long as my vote still stands from yesterday, the Regan has my vote still

Henry WW

Winifred WW wrote: »

There is a post from Clodagh from yesterday #7 as well by my count.

Thanks!

Steve WW

No Lynch doesn't seem like a good idea for me lads. We get zero information from that and give the wolves first action.

Desmond WW

Orla WW wrote: »

I’m not liking the amount of votes for no lynch. I know we’ve got f all to go on but at least there will be votes to analyze tomorrow if we lynch someone. I think it’s a cop out not to lynch. Are we going to keep no lynching until we’re certain we know who the wolves are? We’ve got the numbers, we can afford a good few mislynches, grow a pair and vote for someone!

(Yes I do realize I’d be better off keeping my mouth shut but meh)

It will be near impossible to lynch a wolf this early with live voting, tho we could lynch the jester.

Data from a blind vote is pretty useless vs losing a villager, which is better?

That said, Ive voted for someone, they're most likely good but there you go.

Wendy WW

Steve WW wrote: »

No Lynch doesn't seem like a good idea for me lads. We get zero information from that and give the wolves first action.

Fingers crossed for a twist and the no vote counts for nothing and we move onto the next highest character. ie Lucy

Henry WW

I've had a think about it, and while I see the argument for no-lynch (cos we've got limited info) I think we'd be better lynching in the long-run. We'll never have perfect information and voting gives us more information than not voting.

We can always vote not to lynch later in the game when we're tighter on numbers (though not knowing how many wolves we have makes figuring out LYLO harder).

I think no-lynch makes it too easy for wolves to hide.

Desmond WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Cheers - I'd forgotten about this comment and meant to come back to it.

Dessie - everyone has a feckin role. What do you consider non-vanilla?

Its vanilla in relation to the theme.

Regan WW

Henry WW wrote: »

If my count is right we've only had 17 votes cast from 32 so far.

Eva - Segan
Ewan - Steve
Liam - Isla
Orla - Henry / Lucy
Regan - Eva / Doris
Lucy - Wendy / Winifred / Orla
No lynch - Barbara / Regan / Ewan / Oisin / Conor / Phil / Vernon

Who is Segan? Is that supposed to be Senan

Clodagh WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

It will be near impossible to lynch a wolf this early with live voting, tho we could lynch the jester.

Data from a blind vote is pretty useless vs losing a villager, which is better?

That said, Ive voted for someone, they're most likely good but there you go.

Assuming only 1 jester and multiple wolves then the odds of lynching the jester are lower than that of lynching a wolf though.

Henry WW

Regan WW wrote: »

Who is Segan? Is that supposed to be Senan

I was just looking over and asked myself that - pretty sure I must have meant Senan alright.

Henry WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Its vanilla in relation to the theme.

I still don't understand what you mean. As in, there's little flavour yet to interpret?

Desmond WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Assuming only 1 jester and multiple wolves then the odds of lynching the jester are lower than that of lynching a wolf though.

If it was secret ballot I'd agree, live voting leaves it more difficult to lynch wolves this early

Desmond WW

Henry WW wrote: »

I still don't understand what you mean. As in, there's little flavour yet to interpret?

We have only been given roles in the op, I mean you dont need to know sp to play the game at this point. Maybe it will change later.

Regan WW

Some flavour to be added over preceding days depending on if you make it that far

Henry WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

We have only been given roles in the op, I mean you dont need to know sp to play the game at this point. Maybe it will change later.

I doubt you'll need to know SP to play at any point.

Henry WW

Regan WW wrote: »

Some flavour to be added over preceding days depending on if you make it that far

Are you playing with a time machine?

Regan WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Are you playing with a time machine?

i just know that getting high helps us all see the future

Phil WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Is it possible oral and Lucy are the same person? The slip by Lucy saying why did you vote for me when fleet was a vote for orla is odd.

Wendy, is this the big reveal you’re talking about?

I’m confused with the last sentence. Is the word fleet meant to be there. Could you rephrase it?

Lucy WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Are you playing with a time machine?

Some South Park individuals have been known to travel into the past and the future. Some just to get there hands on a Nintendo Wii

Wendy WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Wendy, is this the big reveal you’re talking about?

I’m confused with the last sentence. Is the word fleet meant to be there. Could you rephrase it?

YES. Basically Henry said I’m voting Orla then Lucy quotes him saying he should vote for someone else. Even though she said she’s voting for Orla!

Phil WW

K. I’ll go back and read it all.

Desmond WW

But wendy, what if they are the same person, doesnt mean they are bad or does it?

Wendy WW

Regan WW wrote: »

i just know that getting high helps us all see the future

Ladies and gentlemen we have found our Jester. Mr. Regan

Wendy WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

But wendy, what if they are the same person, doesnt mean they are bad or does it?

It means they’re up to something and I wana find out. More likely to be bad than good.

Lucy WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

YES. Basically Henry said I’m voting Orla then Lucy quotes him saying he should vote for someone else. Even though she said she’s voting for Orla!

I should probably answer this. I forgot I was playing Lucy. I thought I was a previous name from a previous game. Actual simple mistake. Ah well.

Senan WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

For all the late arrival please check back on my posts for a big reveal.

I can’t see this? Could you link or spell it out, cheers wends

Phil WW

Liam WW wrote: »

why do people keep bolding stuff, i think ive seen it twice now

People (not including mods) had bolded stuff 10 times by the time you posted this, Liam. Seems like you’re saying something just for the sake of it.

Wendy WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

I should probably answer this. I forgot I was playing Lucy. I thought I was a previous name from a previous game. Actual simple mistake. Ah well.

Vernon WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

It means they’re up to something and I wana find out. More likely to be bad than good.

Who you voting?

Lucy WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Wendy WW

Senan WW wrote: »

I can’t see this? Could you link or spell it out, cheers wends

Basically Henry said I’m voting Orla then Lucy quotes him saying he should vote for someone else. (Even though she said she’s voting for Orla.) She’s obviously forgot to switch accounts before replying. 30 seconds later Orla was in replying after she realized the mistake.

Wendy WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

I can’t see your gifs on my phone! Is it a funny one!

Lucy WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Basically Henry said I’m voting Orla then Lucy quotes him saying he should vote for someone else. (Even though she said she’s voting for Orla.) She’s obviously forgot to switch accounts before replying. 30 seconds later Orla was in replying after she realized the mistake.

You're really clutching at straws here.

Patrick WW

Just in from the pub, 200 odd posts to catch up on, placeholder on Steve from my earlier thoughts. My change pending quick read back

Lucy WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

I can’t see your gifs on my phone! Is it a funny one!

It's a nudie one. And it's awesome. It works fine on my phone???

Brendan WW

Im voting.

Ive no suspects yet.

No lynch is not the way to play this game pussies.

Ive picked a name at random.

Orla WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Just in from the pub, 200 odd posts to catch up on, placeholder on Steve from my earlier thoughts. My change pending quick read back

You need to put vote in front of your vote on the voting thread

Lucy WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Im voting.

Ive no suspects yet.

No lynch is not the way to play this game pussies.

Ive picked a name at random.

Could you imagine if it were your own name.

Brendan WW

Im not voting Steve or Lucy. Probably Jesters in my eyes right now