Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Galway traffic

Options
14849515354253

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭ChewyLouie


    cooperguy wrote: »
    because most traffic doesn't go that way, both roads are at capacity.

    There are 4 bridges crossing the Corrib. At the moment none of them have a bus lane. That's 10 lanes for private cars, 0 for buses.

    The proposed "Cross City Link" public transport route looks good. I can't find available traffic data, but I think the Salmon Weir Bridge and College Road route carries a relatively small % of the traffic crossing the city.

    The Quincentenary Bridge does a lot of the heavy lifting on the north and Wolfe Tone Bridge on the South takes a lot of the Salthill traffic.

    I don't think it's unreasonable to push ahead with the Cross City Link, independent of the schedule and approval of the bypass.

    504960.jpg

    504961.jpg

    504962.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    ChewyLouie wrote: »
    There are 4 bridges crossing the Corrib. At the moment none of them have a bus lane. That's 10 lanes for private cars, 0 for buses.

    The proposed "Cross City Link" public transport route looks good. I can't find available traffic data, but I think the Salmon Weir Bridge and College Road route carries a relatively small % of the traffic crossing the city.

    The Quincentenary Bridge does a lot of the heavy lifting on the north and Wolfe Tone Bridge on the South takes a lot of the Salthill traffic.

    I don't think it's unreasonable to push ahead with the Cross City Link, independent of the schedule and approval of the bypass.

    No point in just closing the bridge to private cars, you need to close the roads leading up to it as well. Cant do that without diverting the traffic from the city centre


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,955 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    cooperguy wrote: »
    No point in just closing the bridge to private cars, you need to close the roads leading up to it as well. Cant do that without diverting the traffic from the city centre

    Chicken and Egg; it aint linear. If Public Transport times dramatically improve as a result of this, why would you drive into the City Centre. So that traffic that you talking about - which is always CAR traffic; will dissipate.
    Council would need to reduce car parking in City Centre for non-residents for this to really work though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,904 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    cooperguy wrote: »
    No point in just closing the bridge to private cars, you need to close the roads leading up to it as well. Cant do that without diverting the traffic from the city centre

    Which creates a ****ty quality of life for those of us who actually live in the city centre and practise a minimal car lifestyle.

    We need solutions that fix the problems Galway actually has, not the problems other cities have. A fleet of walking school buses (as are now started in Renmore and Doughiska), and actual school buses for secondary schools, would be a good start.



    And the statement about 10 private car lanes vs zero bus lanes over the bridges is nonsense. There are 10 all-vehicle lanes. That's cars, vans, trucks, public transport buses, private charter buses, two-wheelers of all engine types and none.

    Yes we need more bus lanes and bicycle lanes. But they don't need to go the who length of a,journey to be effective.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭ChewyLouie


    And the statement about 10 private car lanes vs zero bus lanes over the bridges is nonsense. There are 10 all-vehicle lanes. That's cars, vans, trucks, public transport buses, private charter buses, two-wheelers of all engine types and none.

    Yes we need more bus lanes and bicycle lanes. But they don't need to go the who length of a,journey to be effective.

    These lanes are at capacity because they're mostly occupied by single passenger cars.

    The main bottleneck in Galway are the bridges. Public transport needs to get a clear run through at least one of these to be a much more attractive option for those moving around the city.

    If you were sitting in gridlock on the Quin bridge, 45 mins into your 7km commute and you knew there were buses sailing through town and over the Salmon Weir bridge and on through to Westside you'd be very tempted to ditch the car.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ChewyLouie wrote: »
    These lanes are at capacity because they're mostly occupied by single passenger cars.

    The main bottleneck in Galway are the bridges. Public transport needs to get a clear run through at least one of these to be a much more attractive option for those moving around the city.

    If you were sitting in gridlock on the Quin bridge, 45 mins into your 7km commute and you knew there were buses sailing through town and over the Salmon Weir bridge and on through to Westside you'd be very tempted to ditch the car.

    This!


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    ChewyLouie wrote: »
    The main bottleneck in Galway are the bridges. Public transport needs to get a clear run through at least one of these to be a much more attractive option for those moving around the city.

    Relative to some of the traffic on the east side of the city, the bridges aren't the worst.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭ChewyLouie


    Wompa1 wrote: »
    Relative to some of the traffic on the east side of the city, the bridges aren't the worst.

    This isn't going to make issues in the East any worse though is it?

    The bypass isn't going to solve those issues either, there will be new congestion on the East and West city fridges as traffic queues to get on/off the new road.

    If anything, the public transport link through the city centre should help as there would be fewer cars heading towards Parkmore from the west and inner city.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    ChewyLouie wrote: »
    This isn't going to make issues in the East any worse though is it?

    The bypass isn't going to solve those issues either, there will be new congestion on the East and West city fridges as traffic queues to get on/off the new road.

    If anything, the public transport link through the city centre should help as there would be fewer cars heading towards Parkmore from the west and inner city.

    I agree with you but also agree with Bumble earlier in the thread. Traffic in the city centre itself isn't the real problem.

    The ring road could be a plus but only if there's also a massively improved public transportation put in place too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭ChewyLouie


    But traffic in the city centre is what's congesting the public transport network and making it unreliable and a slow alternative.

    An alternative is to dedicate lanes on the Quin to bridge public transport and avoid the city centre but there's a push against that too. I think the cross city link route looks like a good balance. Route all bus routes through that free flowing corridor. You have the advantage of city centre destinations on each route without the disadvantages of the congestion.

    I'm pushing different solutions here - a lot of people are saying no to everything. What we have isn't working. Even if a bypass is built, it'll not be done for many many years. As I said, I think it'll ultimately bring more problems than it'll solve.

    Can those rejecting ideas please suggest alternatives that will at least get us moving over the next 15 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    ChewyLouie wrote: »
    But traffic in the city centre is what's congesting the public transport network and making it unreliable and a slow alternative.

    An alternative is to dedicate lanes on the Quin to bridge public transport and avoid the city centre but there's a push against that too. I think the cross city link route looks like a good balance. Route all bus routes through that free flowing corridor. You have the advantage of city centre destinations on each route without the disadvantages of the congestion.

    I'm pushing different solutions here - a lot of people are saying no to everything. What we have isn't working. Even if a bypass is built, it'll not be done for many many years. As I said, I think it'll ultimately bring more problems than it'll solve.

    Can those rejecting ideas please suggest alternatives that will at least get us moving over the next 15 years.

    The Galway Transport Strategy you post extracts from above, and are advocating for parts of, is something that is planned for within 15 years


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭ChewyLouie


    cooperguy wrote: »
    The Galway Transport Strategy you post extracts from above, and are advocating for parts of, is something that is planned for within 15 years

    Are you were against dedicating roads to public transport until after a bypass is built? It's unlikely the bypass will be built any time soon.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭UsBus


    So Clonboo is now the new Claregalway...
    Regular tailbacks every morning. Stopped as far back as Corrandulla cross again this morning


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭DuckSlice


    UsBus wrote: »
    So Clonboo is now the new Claregalway...
    Regular tailbacks every morning. Stopped as far back as Corrandulla cross again this morning

    Quicker to go Corrandulla - Claregalway if you need to get into parkmore. Don't know about the city. Before Christmas it used to be quicker to go headford road in as far as ballindooley and cross over to tuam road.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭UsBus


    Ya might try that cause getting across from ballindooley to McHugh's is not great all for Parkmore


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,166 Mod ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    UsBus wrote: »
    Ya might try that cause getting across from ballindooley to McHugh's is not great all for Parkmore

    Some of the people using that road should learn how to drive. I live there so have to use it; there are several narrow pinch points where cars have to stop and let oncoming cars through, they are too narrow for two cars to pass, but the amount of people charging on through and forcing other cars into the ditch is ridiculous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭DuckSlice


    Zzippy wrote: »
    Some of the people using that road should learn how to drive. I live there so have to use it; there are several narrow pinch points where cars have to stop and let oncoming cars through, they are too narrow for two cars to pass, but the amount of people charging on through and forcing other cars into the ditch is ridiculous.

    Yea they are mental on that road!

    I was using this road one Friday afternoon, going from McHugh's to Ballindooley. A car coming towards me had ample space to pull in, i didn't have any space to pull in. But he had to keep coming and try to get past me, I was more or less on the edge of the ditch as it was. He got very angry when he seen there wasn't enough room to get past and had to reverse back to where he should have pulled in.

    I took great pleasure in stopping beside him, making he sure he still couldn't pass and calmly asking him why was he getting so angry and if he just pulled in at first he would have been well on his way now, which made him even more angry. :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭WallyGUFC


    Same thing down Cregboy, absolutely lethal at times.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭ChewyLouie


    That's the problem with city drivers on country roads. They also don't abide by the conventions to acknowledge the other driver as they pass. One finger salute (stranger), two finger salute (acquaintance), full hand (friend, relative or neighbour) or the back of the full spread hand against the glass (good friend)... they really need to teach this in the city schools.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭DuckSlice


    ChewyLouie wrote: »
    That's the problem with city drivers on country roads. They also don't abide by the conventions to acknowledge the other driver as they pass. One finger salute (stranger), two finger salute (acquaintance), full hand (friend, relative or neighbour) or the back of the full spread hand against the glass (good friend)... they really need to teach this in the city schools.

    You also need to nearly smash the windscreen for this wave to be done properly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,955 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    https://connachttribune.ie/councillor-calls-for-regional-park-and-rides-to-be-set-up-from-county-gaa-facilities/

    Worth trialing for Inter County Games in Pearse Stadium and other big "events" in the City at least, not sure how practical though as a general P&R proposal


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,955 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Galway is Ireland’s Carmageddon and capital of sprawl, author and journalist tells oral hearing
    https://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/113611/galway-is-irelands-carmageddon-and-capital-of-sprawl-author-and-journalist-tells-oral-hearing


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Solutions to Traffic Congestion & the Downs-Thomson Paradox



    The description of the Downs-Thomson paradox is simplified in this video, but in general, this principal applies. Technically it is possible to meet demand for car traffic, but in practice, this is unaffordable, simply due to the amount of infrastructure required per person carried by car: there is no city that has done this in a sustainable way (as StrongTowns.org is keen to point out). More information can be found at StrongTowns.org, in articles such as this one and this one


  • Posts: 24,715 [Deleted User]


    There won’t be much traffic issues for the next few weeks. Hopefully this normalises working remotely for many more people and it would help traffic a lot. As someone who works remotely a lot of the time it’s just going to be a normal few weeks work wise for me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,656 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    There won’t be much traffic issues for the next few weeks. Hopefully this normalises working remotely for many more people and it would help traffic a lot. As someone who works remotely a lot of the time it’s just going to be a normal few weeks work wise for me.

    Yeah, excellent point.

    I'm currently working for a few companies who've had work from home policies since the 9th, one of them is one of the big four social media firms, another a bio-pharma group and a few smaller firms.
    There's zero difference in (my) dealings with them since they started working from home, in one case my invoicing has rocketed since the change as they're concentrating on previously neglected parts of their operations.

    As you said, this could be the turning point where working from home can be accepted by companies that have antiquated presenteeism obsessions.

    On a side note, my previous employers who have an obsession with presenteeism are suffering big time from staff absenteeism, reluctance to turn up to work, force majeureism, panic holiday taking and sick leave.

    I'm using the bike for all shopping, runarounds, chemist (new baby in the house), and exercise for the older kids. (not much chance of transfer on bikes traveling at 20kph in fresh air and they don't get near enough to each other when they meet their mates compared to on foot)


  • Registered Users Posts: 672 ✭✭✭Ashleigh1986


    They may as well cancel future public oral hearings for galways ring road.
    No chance of it now getting government funding .
    It could be argued it won't now be needed for at lead a decade or more .
    Far more important issues our country will be needing funding for .
    With the amount of job loses the amount of traffic on galways roads will be the least of our troubles .


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,403 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    I think a lot of companies will loosen working from home policies when this all blows over.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    They may as well cancel future public oral hearings for galways ring road.
    No chance of it now getting government funding .
    It could be argued it won't now be needed for at lead a decade or more .
    Far more important issues our country will be needing funding for .
    With the amount of job loses the amount of traffic on galways roads will be the least of our troubles .

    What you are advocating is the exact opposite of what an economist would say to do. In times of recession heavy government investment in infrastructure is one of the things that pulls the country out of the slump (as well as prepares the place for when it is up and running again).


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    John_Rambo wrote: »
    Yeah, excellent point.

    I'm currently working for a few companies who've had work from home policies since the 9th, one of them is one of the big four social media firms, another a bio-pharma group and a few smaller firms.
    There's zero difference in (my) dealings with them since they started working from home, in one case my invoicing has rocketed since the change as they're concentrating on previously neglected parts of their operations.

    As you said, this could be the turning point where working from home can be accepted by companies that have antiquated presenteeism obsessions.

    On a side note, my previous employers who have an obsession with presenteeism are suffering big time from staff absenteeism, reluctance to turn up to work, force majeureism, panic holiday taking and sick leave.

    I'm using the bike for all shopping, runarounds, chemist (new baby in the house), and exercise for the older kids. (not much chance of transfer on bikes traveling at 20kph in fresh air and they don't get near enough to each other when they meet their mates compared to on foot)

    If working remotely becomes the norm, do we even need a ring road? :pac:

    I have worked from home 100% of the time for 3 years. I haven't been out in public since March 7th. I have become IT support for a bunch of people who have been sent to work remotely. There is a slight risk for work from home from this.

    Unfortunately, this is not a good time to measure productivity of those you sent to work from home. Many organizations have rushed a remote access solution to try to support work from home with mixed results. Many have kids at home due to the schools being closed which means at best their attention is divided if not almost entirely consumed with taking care of the kids. Some are not in the best mental state and are worried about loved ones who are in the high risk category.

    One good thing for those of who us who are use to working remote. One of the challenges of working remote for a company who mainly employs people in a head office, it will make them more aware of those who are remote. I work remote and on a massive time difference. I get left out of conversations at times. Now that everyone is remote, the communication should flow better to everyone.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 45,403 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    I'd say the ring road will be in doubt tbh, or at the very least kicked a few years further down the track


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement