Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Judgement day for Maria Bailey.

Options
1…6162646667…72

Comments

  • Options
    #1892
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    BattleCorp wrote: »
    If INM had medical data on me, I'd be looking for information on where they accessed it.

    I would too.

    Whether you'd get that information is another thing.


  • Options
    #1893
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,459 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    This isnt about a breach of privacy. It appears she is looking for information on where INM collected her medical data.

    what medical data is she alleging they collected?


  • Options
    #1894
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    what medical data is she alleging they collected?

    God knows. I imagine it was some data published by them.
    By initiating a statutory inquiry the DPC puts itself in a position to issue an information notice compelling a third party to hand over specified information

    Thats from the INM article, so its not specifically medical data perhaps. She is looking for data they hold relating her her and how they obtained it.


  • Options
    #1895
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    I wonder if it’s to do with having drinks in her hands whilst on the swing?

    I’ll fess up, I was there and saw said drinks. I wasn’t but we could all do an I’m Spartacus on it :D


  • Options
    #1896
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    Strawberry Milkshake wrote: »
    I wonder if it’s to do with having drinks in her hands whilst on the swing?

    I’ll fess up, I was there and saw said drinks. I wasn’t but we could all do an I’m Spartacus on it :D

    I imagine she believes information was leaked to INM. I think she is seeking information to see who was responsible.

    Shes looking to pinpoint who it was.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1897
    expectationlost
    Registered Users Posts: 11,930 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    This isnt about a breach of privacy. It appears she is looking for information on where INM collected her medical data.
    they didn't collect it somebody gave it to them


  • Options
    #1898
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    expectationlost wrote: »
    they didn't collect it somebody gave it to them

    But when someone gives it to them they are collecting it/obtaining it.


  • Options
    #1899
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,459 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    But when someone gives it to them they are collecting it/obtaining it.

    If a court decides somebody giving their eyewitness account of an event to a journalist counts as personal data about the person involved in an event then say goodbye to investigative journalism.


  • Options
    #1900
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    If a court decides somebody giving their eyewitness account of an event to a journalist counts as personal data about the person involved in an event then say goodbye to investigative journalism.

    Well there is a rule within GDPR that allows Journos to act outside of GDPR. Like the reporting on Court Cases etc.

    We arent privy to the exact details of this enquiry beyond the brief information INM reported last week. But it may have a huge knock on affect regarding individuals providing info to journalists in confidentiality.


  • Options
    #1901
    BattleCorp
    Registered Users Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    If a court decides somebody giving their eyewitness account of an event to a journalist counts as personal data about the person involved in an event then say goodbye to investigative journalism.

    If Bailey can be identified from a written eyewitness account that was leaked either from the Dean's records or from the solicitors, then that's probably a breach of GDPR.

    If the eyewitness told a rake of people what they saw, then that's not a breach of GDPR. That's my take anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1902
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    BattleCorp wrote: »
    If Bailey can be identified from a written eyewitness account that was leaked either from the Dean's records or from the solicitors, then that's probably a breach of GDPR.

    If the eyewitness told a rake of people what they saw, then that's not a breach of GDPR. That's my take anyway.

    I think thats correct. Im no expert but thats my reading of the law. What people do in a personal capacity is not GDPR accountable. Organizations have to comply with GDPR, so Dean, Solicitors, Fine Gael, the would all be governed by GDPR.

    My reading would that the media outlets can work outside of GDPR due to a journalistic exemption. How far that exemption reaches is another matter.

    Personally cant see it going far as compelling INM to reveal a source would be a big precedent. Im interested to see how it plays out.


  • Options
    #1903
    Kivaro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    I wonder if we (The People) can sue Maria Bailey?
    For being really annoying.
    I think we could swing it.


  • Options
    #1904
    happyoutscan
    Registered Users Posts: 6,048 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Kivaro wrote: »
    I wonder if we (The People) can sue Maria Bailey?
    For being really annoying.
    I think we could swing it.

    She did give us that phenomenal interview though.... Ssssssseeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn...


  • Options
    #1905
    the purple tin
    Registered Users Posts: 10,943 ✭✭✭✭the purple tin


    Some judges are starting to cop on when it comes to these stupid lawsuits, thankfully.
    https://www.sundayworld.com/news/irish-news/judge-dismisses-60k-claim-against-sunway-travel-over-child-5-injured-by-ceiling-fan-40348039.html

    The father must have a brass neck on him :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #1906
    Pintman Paddy Losty
    Registered Users Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭Pintman Paddy Losty


    the purple tin wrote: »
    Some judges are starting to cop on when it comes to these stupid lawsuits, thankfully.
    https://www.sundayworld.com/news/irish-news/judge-dismisses-60k-claim-against-sunway-travel-over-child-5-injured-by-ceiling-fan-40348039.html

    The father must have a brass neck on him :rolleyes:


    What has this to do with this thread? Nothing.


  • Options
    #1907
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,459 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: »
    What has this to do with this thread? Nothing.

    people making claims for incidents caused by their own stupidity. I think that links them quite well.


  • Options
    #1908
    1874
    Registered Users Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭1874


    the purple tin wrote: »
    Some judges are starting to cop on when it comes to these stupid lawsuits, thankfully.
    https://www.sundayworld.com/news/irish-news/judge-dismisses-60k-claim-against-sunway-travel-over-child-5-injured-by-ceiling-fan-40348039.html

    The father must have a brass neck on him :rolleyes:


    I hope the father ran some costs up, based on hoisting his kids head into a ceiling fan, Id call that negligence. If only you could sue them for being thick.


  • Options
    #1909
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    1874 wrote: »
    I hope the father ran some costs up, based on hoisting his kids head into a ceiling fan, Id call that negligence. If only you could sue them for being thick.

    Im annoyed the Judge didnt make an order for costs against the father. More cases like this will come before the courts, nothing to deter these claims.


  • Options
    #1910
    Avery Tender Buckle
    Posts: 0 ✭ Avery Tender Buckle


    Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: »
    What has this to do with this thread? Nothing.

    The damage limitation team have a quick response time these days. I'm impressed!


  • Options
    #1911
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,459 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Garrett Tangy Hedgehog wrote: »
    The damage limitation team have a quick response time these days. I'm impressed!

    I think any updates to this thread set off a red flashing beacon in FG HQ.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1912
    Cluedo Monopoly
    Registered Users Posts: 9,416 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    I think any updates to this thread set off a red flashing beacon in FG HQ.

    I believe they have a special Ave Maria unit for this saga.

    There is a vacant seat up the road now...I wonder...

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Options
    #1913
    beakerjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 20,753 ✭✭✭✭beakerjoe


    Garrett Tangy Hedgehog wrote: »
    The damage limitation team have a quick response time these days. I'm impressed!

    Is she not at loggerheads with FG these days?


  • Options
    #1914
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,459 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    Is she not at loggerheads with FG these days?

    maybe but she is still a member so it still reflects on FG


  • Options
    #1915
    McMurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    Is she not at loggerheads with FG these days?

    Prob only with the DL branch, as it was they that ultimately forced her to get **deleted** from the ticket, in case anyone forgets Leo was cool with brushing it under the carpet, it was Bailey's local branch forced his hand.


  • Options
    #1916
    givyjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    beakerjoe wrote: »
    Is she not at loggerheads with FG these days?

    Bee in her bonnet specifically with Leo, noticed likes on a good few tweets giving leo stick.


  • Options
    #1917
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 69,167 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    McMurphy wrote: »
    Prob only with the DL branch, as it was they that ultimately forced her to get **deleted** from the ticket, in case anyone forgets Leo was cool with brushing it under the carpet, it was Bailey's local branch forced his hand.

    This is true.
    He's probably the only reason she's still in the party. Maybe she's been promised rehabilitation and another go? The swings and roundabouts of Irish political life.


  • Options
    #1918
    Shebean
    Registered Users Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Shebean


    She's not gone away you know.


  • Options
    #1919
    Dav010
    Registered Users Posts: 14,585 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Shebean wrote: »
    She's not gone away you know.

    DL could be a swing constituency at next election, she’ll be monitoring it closely, beer bottle in hand.


  • Options
    #1920
    the purple tin
    Registered Users Posts: 10,943 ✭✭✭✭the purple tin


    Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: »
    What has this to do with this thread? Nothing.
    Seemed as good a place as any for it E.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1921
    Pintman Paddy Losty
    Registered Users Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭Pintman Paddy Losty


    This thread should be closed. It has become a dumping ground for anything related to insurance.


Advertisement