Martin Nolan give 1 year to guilty pedo.

pinkyeye · 31-10-2019 9:10pm

jimwallace197 wrote: »

You got some kind of a problem?? Want to pm me?

Is this the boards equivalent of "wanna step outside".

:D

lawred2 · 31-10-2019 9:12pm

Robert McGrath wrote: »

Four posts in and no South Park references yet?

Ah man I'd already said it about 5 times in my head before I got to your post

PowerToWait · 31-10-2019 9:32pm

eviltwin wrote: »

Let's not turn this into one of those arguments please, a child was raped here.

Let’s stick to facts; there was no rape and people are seriously reaching with the “child” thing.

If she’d ‘defiled’ him an hour up the road in Newry there’d be no case to answer.

Justin Credible Darts · 31-10-2019 9:33pm

LillySV wrote: »

Our poor little harmless boys ... oh they don’t know what they want at 16.... they are old enough to drive massive tractors down the road, leave school, drive motorcycles ...etc.... but they didn’t know what they were doing with their Willies and didn’t give consent...absolute bull****e ....she was entirely wrong to mess with a student ... even if he was 17.... but not buying the harmless 16 year old boy ****. Where was his worried mummy and daddy when their son was able to go out to a over 18 disco for the nite? Did tusla investigate?

His mother might be useless with no idea what her kid was up to.
The kid might have enjoyed the sex and went back for more.

But what you seem intent on ignoring is the teacher, who knew it was morally and legally wrong still broke the law....

She is guilty of rape with a minor, that is a FACT, and she is no sexually naive woman like she was painted in the media.....and were that a male having sex with a minor I would suspect the outrage would be more and the sentence tougher

eviltwin · 31-10-2019 9:34pm

PowerToWait wrote: »

Let’s stick to facts; there was no rape and people are seriously reaching with the “child” thing.

If she’d ‘defiled’ him an hour up the road in Newry there’d be no case to answer.

Perhaps she should have done that then. I have no sympathy for her. She isn't a victim here.

smelly sock · 31-10-2019 9:35pm

Harsh on the young woman. No danger to society going forward and the lad was 16. I believe she genuinely though this was the legal age.

Fair play to the youngster too. She is cracking.

ChikiChiki · 31-10-2019 9:37pm

Martin Nolan is a very very strange fish.

smelly sock · 31-10-2019 9:38pm

ChikiChiki wrote: »

Martin Nolan is a very very strange fish.

Ex guard.

ChikiChiki · 31-10-2019 9:40pm

smelly sock wrote: »

Ex guard.

What does that have to do with anything? His judgements are very odd.

Irish Guitarist · 31-10-2019 9:41pm

Where are people getting the idea that a man would have gotten a tougher sentence? This judge is either a fucking moron or a paedophile himself. Male rapists and molesters of children far younger than 15 or 16 regularly walk out of his court free men.

There's a few examples of his ridiculous sentences here. I was going to quote them but Boards won't let me for some reason.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/judge-is-no-stranger-to-controversy-30197046.html

easypazz · 31-10-2019 9:42pm

Surely in teaching college they teach students a module on ethics, not crossing a line with students, legal age being 18 etc.?

I cant believe all this is not taught to students in college.

Justin Credible Darts · 31-10-2019 9:44pm

easypazz wrote: »

Surely in teaching college they teach students a module on ethics, not crossing a line with students, legal age being 18 etc.?

I cant believe all this is not taught to students in college.

you dont NEED to be taught it.

Anyone who is a teacher with a modicum of decency and common sense would know shagging kids in your class is not on

LillySV · 31-10-2019 9:46pm

Justin Credible Darts wrote: »

His mother might be useless with no idea what her kid was up to.
The kid might have enjoyed the sex and went back for more.

But what you seem intent on ignoring is the teacher, who knew it was morally and legally wrong still broke the law....

She is guilty of rape with a minor, that is a FACT, and she is no sexually naive woman like she was painted in the media.....and were that a male having sex with a minor I would suspect the outrage would be more and the sentence tougher

Didn’t ignore it, clearly said she was wrong to have sex with a student, even if 17. Fact is she is a teacher and shouldn’t be ****ing a student ..

Peter Flynt · 31-10-2019 9:48pm

Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte can be grateful they weren't born Paddies.

She'd have long had her life ruined and he would not be President of France.

smelly sock · 31-10-2019 9:48pm

ChikiChiki wrote: »

What does that have to do with anything? His judgements are very odd.

Id have thought his experiences as a guard would have shown him the impact of pedos.

Obviously not.

The J Stands for Jay · 31-10-2019 10:10pm

Robert McGrath wrote: »

Four posts in and no South Park references yet?

Dey tuk ur jebs.

31-10-2019 10:19pm

Is Linda Hayden doing a protest over this??

ChikiChiki · 31-10-2019 10:22pm

Peter Flynt wrote: »

Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte can be grateful they weren't born Paddies.

She'd have long had her life ruined and he would not be President of France.

Tbf, he is not doing a great job of it is he?

RandomName2 · 31-10-2019 10:27pm

Justin Credible Darts wrote: »

you dont NEED to be taught it.

Anyone who is a teacher with a modicum of decency and common sense would know shagging kids in your class is not on

Well she certainly deserved to lose her job. Having her life destroyed seems a bit much. As one poster said, hour up the road in Newry this wouldn't even be considered a crime. Anywhere in mainland Europe this wouldn't be considered a crime, at least in the same sense.

The sticking point is that she was his teacher. That's the real issue here. But that doesn't have as an emotive a kick as going on about him being a 'child' as if he were 6 and not 16. This loses the real point. I've seen abuse of power between people in contexts of sexual relationships, but unless you can slap some bandwagon phase on it like 'feminism' or 'child welfare' nobody seems to give a damn.

That's not saying that what she did was right, but people that are saying that she should be spending best part of a decade in jail really need to evaluate their assessment of justice.

Reviews and Books Galore · 31-10-2019 10:33pm

I wouldn't class her as a pedofile tbh as he reached puberty and pedofilia is a different kettle of fish than statutory rape.

Reviews and Books Galore · 31-10-2019 10:35pm

smelly sock wrote: »

Ex guard.

Now that is interesting.

Rael · 31-10-2019 10:38pm

RandomName2 wrote: »

As one poster said, hour up the road in Newry this wouldn't even be considered a crime.

Just to clarify one thing that's been mentioned a couple of times in this thread, if she had committed the act in Newry, she'd still be liable for the offence under the Sexual Offences (Jurisdiction) Act 1996.

Sexual Offences are one of the few things we claim any sort of extra-territorial jurisdiction-esque powers over (albeit against Irish citizens). The benefit is we can prosecute any citizen who deliberately seeks out children in those countries with the lowest age of consent.

Peter Flynt · 31-10-2019 10:58pm

Reviews and Books Galore wrote: »

Now that is interesting.

Ever seen a member of AGS in a court?

So thick they can't even read their own hand writing

P2C · 31-10-2019 11:07pm

Jailed for making a young fellas dreams come true.

Hal3000 · 31-10-2019 11:08pm

https://www.thejournal.ie/sexual-assault-brendan-clifford-tallaght-4874386-Oct2019/

Nolan again suspended partial sentence. Wonder what the mitigating factor was here ?

Irish Guitarist · 31-10-2019 11:11pm

in 2015 the same judge gave a man six months for abusing his five year old daughter and said he doesn't "represent an ongoing threat to society".

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/man-gets-six-months-for-sexually-abusing-his-daughter-5-31071987.html

That's just one example of ridiculous sentences I found from Googling his name. There's plenty more.

Anyone that says a man would have gotten a harsher sentence for having sex with a teenager is talking shite.

Huntergonzo · 31-10-2019 11:18pm

Heard a couple of women talking about the case in work today, the general consensus was 'he knew what he was doing'. As in the teacher was 'foolish' but 16 year old boy was to really to blame.

Now imagine if the genders were the other way around!!!

Peter Flynt · 31-10-2019 11:19pm

A lot of moronic mysognistic stuff on here demanding death by stoning simply because the teacher is female and not male and "only got" a one year sentence.

Fact is she got 3 years.
She was made an example of by a judge who lets paedophile men with thousands of images of children being abused or raped for off for next to nothing.

In addition the legal age for sex across virtually all EU countries is 16 years (with admittedly exceptions for those in positions around teenagers)

Also .... As Joe Jackson might say...don't you know that it's different for girls.

Women don't have throbbing cocks ready for penetration.
That 16yo guy was no more abused than I was having to read moronic posts on this thread.

Zulu · 31-10-2019 11:22pm

I think the point has been widely missed by a lot of people.
This isn't a gender war thing; this isn't more bullsh1t US identity politics. This is about our broken legal system and a particularly woeful judge.

Zulu · 31-10-2019 11:23pm

Peter Flynt wrote: »

A lot of moronic mysognistic stuff on here demanding death by stoning ....

Really? Really? I missed those posts.

Martin Nolan give 1 year to guilty pedo.

Comments