Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Jeremy Corbyn- Britain under his leadership

Options
  • 22-11-2019 11:21pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭


    Nicola Sturgeon tonight has claimed he is willing to sacrifice the union in a bid to secure the support of the SNP to prop up his Labour government.

    But the price will be he gets to deliver his radical manifesto.

    Can anyone tell me what is so radical about Corbyn's manifesto. What would Britain look like under his leadership?

    Genuinely curious to know peoples thoughts. Apologies for not giving my own thoughts, I don't know enough, hence i'm looking for opinions of your good selves

    Thanks a million in advance


«134

Comments

  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,592 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Up to 10% of shares to employees, limiting dividends, significant privatisations, all of which will destroy shareholder, and in turn pensioner, value at a time when the country is heading into a pensions timebomb

    City will retreat to other places, unemployment will probably rise, the amount he's proposing to borrow will push up the cost of borrowing for everyone, risking a return to inflation. He thinks he can borrow until his heart's content, but debt has to be repaid, and his plans will likely see borrowing increase further in future years


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,719 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    He plans to renationalise the following industries:

    Broadband
    Energy
    Mail
    Water
    Rail
    Bus

    The majority of this would fall foul of EU State aid rules and competition law. Make no mistake about it, Corbyn is a leaver at heart.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Blanco100


    markodaly wrote: »
    He plans to renationalise the following industries:

    Broadband
    Energy
    Mail
    Water
    Rail
    Bus

    The majority of this would fall foul of EU State aid rules and competition law. Make no mistake about it, Corbyn is a leaver at heart.

    What about Northern Ireland? We all know his history and rep as an paramilitary sympathizer, but what happens to Northern Ireland under Corbyns hand?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    I think he will let NI go.
    The recent performance of the DUP may make that a popular decision outside hardline unionists


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Blanco100


    nuac wrote: »
    I think he will let NI go.
    The recent performance of the DUP may make that a popular decision outside hardline unionists

    How would he dress up "letting NI go" though?

    How would it come about?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,719 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    What about Northern Ireland? We all know his history and rep as an paramilitary sympathizer, but what happens to Northern Ireland under Corbyns hand?

    It is out of his hands. The future of the north lies with the people of the north (and south to a degree). Whoever is in No.10 Downing street wont change that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,548 ✭✭✭Topgear on Dave


    Surely there is only a certain amount any government can successfully take on?

    Realistically all these industries would be a massive job to nationalise all at once?
    Broadband
    Energy
    Mail
    Water
    Rail
    Bus

    Campaign in poetry, govern in prose & all that.

    But oh yes he's a leaver alright.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Everything nationalised
    Wages rise exponentially
    Massive currency inflation
    Importers struggle with poor exchange rates
    Food shortages
    People unhappy
    Nobody willing to export to the UK due to poor credit rating
    More inflation
    Massive protests
    Protestors portrayed as fascist sabateurs
    Violent crackdowns
    More protests
    Nationalised Internet is shut down to stop protests.
    Foreign country (Russia or the US) blamed for all woes
    More protests.
    Police and Armed forces turn on leadership.
    Leadership arrested on corruption

    The usual.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    How would he dress up "letting NI go" though?

    How would it come about?

    It can only come about as a border poll unless he wants to break the Good Friday Agreement


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,762 ✭✭✭✭Charlie19


    Not sure why but I kind of like him.

    That's all I've got.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,182 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Well lets face it he would be better than Boris.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    Better than the elitist, racist Tories. Simple as that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭MeMen2_MoRi_


    I'm a "looney lefty" Corbyn scares the fcuk out of me!


  • Posts: 5,311 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm a "looney lefty" Corbyn scares the fcuk out of me!

    Is that the substance of your argument? I'm not bowled over by the man, but labels like "looney lefty" are a disservice to constructive debate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,018 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    I'd vote for him.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,772 ✭✭✭✭JPA


    Whatever you think of his policies, he shouldn't be a party leader.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    If he was a competent leader that wasn't so polarizing labour would be ahead not behind after the way the tories have acted the last few years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭MeMen2_MoRi_


    Is that the substance of your argument? I'm not bowled over by the man, but labels like "looney lefty" are a disservice to constructive debate.

    Tongue in cheek, in regards the left in any debate are considered lunatics. I lean left with my politics and Corbyns policies I can't buy into them. He's gone to far left.


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,101 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Surely there is only a certain amount any government can successfully take on?

    Realistically all these industries would be a massive job to nationalise all at once?
    Broadband
    Energy
    Mail
    Water
    Rail
    Bus

    Campaign in poetry, govern in prose & all that.

    But oh yes he's a leaver alright.

    rail is part nationalised as it is, the infrastructure manager is a state owned organisation.
    the only real issues would be the rolling stock which would have to be bought out all though a bit of it is scrap value anyway at this stage.
    current operating contracts might have to be bought out all though they could just be left run.
    for bus he seems to want to give councils control of them rather then actual nationalisation, as in he wants to do away with de-regulation, which to be fair hasn't had the greatest of success.
    not sure how he will do the others but presumably it will just be the infrastructure with a state operator for each along with any private operators.
    there will still be private companies providing services as they can't be stopped from using infrastructure and i'm not sure corbyn actually wants to get rid of them, rather stop the state wholey relying on them for providing critical services which in a way may not be a bad thing incase something happens that requires some sort of fallback option.
    i don't think he will win the election anyway, i think it will either be a hung parliament or boris will get in unfortunately.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    He's not messing about with this


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Better Than Christ


    tuxy wrote: »
    If he was a competent leader that wasn't so polarizing labour would be ahead not behind after the way the tories have acted the last few years.

    If he wasn't a competent leader, he wouldn't have survived so many attempts to get rid of him. Given the attacks and smears that have been thrown at him since 2015, it's unbelievable that he's lasted so long. The longest-serving and most electorally-successful Labour leader since Tony Blair.

    With the benefit of hindsight, maybe he should have stepped aside after the 2017 election. He could have left on such a high and would have had enough clout with ordinary members to effectively choose his own successor... someone younger, also left-of-centre, but harder to smear. The last couple of years have been particularly relentless. It doesn't matter that there's not an ounce of truth in the accusations that he's an anti-semite or a terrorist sympathiser - when you throw that much mud at someone, some of it is bound to stick.


  • Registered Users Posts: 90 ✭✭MoashoaM


    Could he be any worse than the mop-top?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,182 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Charlie19 wrote: »
    Not sure why but I kind of like him.

    That's all I've got.



    I dont like him ..but he's still better than boris and the tories.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    Thatcher will be turning in her grave


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,455 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I don't know if anyone has noticed but Coybyn is always very measured when on the box. This is all an act. He's extremely careful about what he says (i.e. not to sound like a raging socialist) which is why he speaks in that slow deliberate faux calm manner, pausing for that slight second before he opens his mouth.

    Tonight's performance by him IMO was contrived to have him come across as 'nice' a guy as possible with his 'nice' policies to help the poor etc....but underneath it all he's intent on 70's style socialist policies which is the last thing Britain needs when they finally Brexit, or anytime for that matter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,018 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    Lololololol.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users Posts: 464 ✭✭Notdeco


    Berserker5 wrote: »
    Thatcher will be turning in her grave

    Good! She was a devil. Tbh, this election is being portrayed in the same way as trump vs Clinton.yet another mess up, no matter who wins.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭Better Than Christ


    AllForIt wrote: »
    I don't know if anyone has noticed but Coybyn is always very measured when on the box. This is all an act. He's extremely careful about what he says (i.e. not to sound like a raging socialist) which is why he speaks in that slow deliberate faux calm manner, pausing for that slight second before he opens his mouth.

    Tonight's performance by him IMO was contrived to have him come across as 'nice' a guy as possible with his 'nice' policies to help the poor etc....but underneath it all he's intent on 70's style socialist policies which is the last thing Britain needs when they finally Brexit, or anytime for that matter.

    That's just how he's always spoken. The man's hobbies include making jam, tending to his allotment, taking photos of manhole covers and train-spotting. There is no act. It's possible to be quietly spoken and also have strong opinions - opinions which he has never hidden.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,018 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    That's just how he's always spoken. The man's hobbies include making jam, tending to his allotment, taking photos of manhole covers and train-spotting. There is no act. It's possible to be quietly spoken and also have strong opinions - opinions which he has never hidden.

    Correct. He's sneakily hiding all his socialist plans by putting out a manifesto, outlining his socialist plans, the cunning socialist.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,182 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Berserker5 wrote: »
    Thatcher will be turning in her grave
    I would say she would be laughing.

    Obama would make Thatcher spin...


Advertisement