Silent Hill Werewolf Game Thread!

Conor WW

Orla WW wrote: »

No lynch keeps our village numbers up most likely as its a higher % chance we will lynch a villager over a wolf day. Village numbers are one of our strongest weapons against the wolfs.

Its also protects our power roles from getting outed and they are often the ones who often gain the info needed to win games.

Agreed, but if I’m not lynched tonight it’ll be back to me vs no lynch again tomorrow night so we should just get it over with.

Patrick WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Agreed, but if I’m not lynched tonight it’ll be back to me vs no lynch again tomorrow night so we should just get it over with.

Then stop acting like a dick and it might not be

Clodagh WW

I've not seen any reasons behind those single wagons.....

Patrick WW

Looks like it might be me now anyway. If it is me do I still get the hour inBetween? Between 9 and 10pm I mean

Rikand

Day 1: Automated Votals from #0 to #33

Patrick WW (4): Conor WW, Gertrude WW, Riona WW, Angus WW
No Lynch (4): Oisin WW, Henry WW, Lucy WW, Orla WW
Angus WW (1): Tegan WW
Henry WW (1): Barbara WW
Conor WW (5): Gabriel WW, Patrick WW, Doris WW, Phil WW, Nigel WW
Phil WW (2): Clodagh WW, Liam WW
Nigel WW (1): Derry WW
Liam WW (1): Brendan WW
Not voting (2): Emily WW, Isla WW

Phase ends in 0h5m.

Angus WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

We can vote no lynch. This may be good for the first lynch to help us figure out who to target first, rather than just guessing.

To be fair we could vote no lynch every time and just live in boardsitania forever

Patrick WW wrote: »

If we no lynch the wolf kill will be the first kill in the morning so advantage wolves.

Right vote changed. Pat I’d made a note if your early no vote post and I’m not sure why you do a gentle floppy floppy. Flimsy but might get us some info

Conor WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Then stop acting like a dick and it might not be

No need for that.

I admit I wasted 1 guess but the other 2 were also wasted and people made other decisions on where to go without asking.

Oisin WW

Conor WW wrote: »

No need for that.

I admit I wasted 1 guess but the other 2 were also wasted and people made other decisions on where to go without asking.

But you wasted the final one when people were starting to make some promising suggestions.

Lucy WW

bit redundant now maybe, buy why is conor getting all the heat for guessing earlier on and phil did the same thing?

Lucy WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

But you wasted the final one when people were starting to make some promising suggestions.

well that answers it i guess

Patrick WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Right vote changed. Pat I’d made a note if your early no vote post and I’m not sure why you do a gentle floppy floppy. Flimsy but might get us some info

Given so many no votes I wonder now, but it was the first time I had seen that option and I wanted to get conversation going because the game was dead and zi thought it would be a conversation topic. Silly me for forgetting independent thought is frowned upon in these games.

If you had made note of my post you’d see I didn’t say I was voting no vote, simply brought it up as a conversation topic.

While I’m at it I am the only one to cut ally calculate how many soldiers in a Roman army. Given my posts were largely being ignored and given I liked Phil’s suggestion I guessed.

Conor WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

But you wasted the final one when people were starting to make some promising suggestions.

Well if it isn’t Hans Solo himself.

Nigel WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

bit redundant now maybe, buy why is conor getting all the heat for guessing earlier on and phil did the same thing?

Yeah a bit redundant but Conors attitude stinks along with his stupid guess without anyone agreeing

Conor WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

well that answers it i guess

I’m toast now Lucy but look back and see what Oisin was up to earlier.

Rikand

Day 1: Final vote count

Patrick WW (4): Conor WW, Gertrude WW, Riona WW, Angus WW
No Lynch (4): Oisin WW, Henry WW, Lucy WW, Orla WW
Angus WW (1): Tegan WW
Henry WW (1): Barbara WW
Conor WW (6): Gabriel WW, Patrick WW, Doris WW, Phil WW, Nigel WW, Emily WW
Phil WW (2): Clodagh WW, Liam WW
Nigel WW (1): Derry WW
Liam WW (1): Brendan WW
Not voting (1): Isla WW

Day has ended.

Conor WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Yeah a bit redundant but Conors attitude stinks along with his stupid guess without anyone agreeing

1 guess outta 3 and that’s without counting the other decisions made without consensus. Did you vote to go to the strip club or churc? I know I didn’t get a choice.

Patrick WW

Guys, can I ask a hypothetical question and I hope I get a few answers.

Usually someone has the ability to help someone, save someone from wolves or serial killers.

If that person exists maybe we could have a discussion to help that person who to protect in the morning without them having to reveal themselves. If that person doesn’t exist then no harm done, if they do we have done them a favour

Rikand

Conor, you are dead. please stop posting.

Gertrude WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Guys, can I ask a hypothetical question and I hope I get a few answers.

Usually someone has the ability to help someone, save someone from wolves or serial killers.

If that person exists maybe we could have a discussion to help that person who to protect in the morning without them having to reveal themselves. If that person doesn’t exist then no harm done, if they do we have done them a favour

Re those roles in this game? I thought they were normally listed on op if used.

Oisin WW

Nighty-night, Conor.

Patrick WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Re those roles in this game? I thought they were normally listed on op if used.

No roles have been listed so I’m just trying to be useful. Worst case scenario there is no role but it helps us focus on who is good or bad

Derry WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Guys, can I ask a hypothetical question and I hope I get a few answers.

Usually someone has the ability to help someone, save someone from wolves or serial killers.

If that person exists maybe we could have a discussion to help that person who to protect in the morning without them having to reveal themselves. If that person doesn’t exist then no harm done, if they do we have done them a favour

That's a nice suggestion.
There's also no harm in discussing, in the event that we have a villager with good eye sight, who might be worth a closer look and pull down the fog of war so to speak

Lucy WW

back to puzzle i guess.

my potential answers are:

1. whatever the plural of this is. so these/those
2. 56
3. the roman population

what was the hozier stuff about?

Derry WW

Rikand wrote: »

Conor, you are dead. please stop posting.

Is he? Where's the death notice? Did I miss it? (serious question)

Oisin WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

what was the hozier stuff about?

Just arseing around seeing as we're in the church (Take Me to Church).

Rikand

The group had had a very trying and testing day today and they didnt really know what to do with themselves. Evil was definitely lurking amongst them. There were no other signs of life and somebody must have killed Billy.... but who ? Some in the group thought it was better that the just sleep on it, but others thought it was better that somebody pay for Billys death and they ultimately won out.

Conor was surrounded by the group and strung up on the alter of the church. Sadly, no evil was discovered within his corpse. He was a villager.

Conor WW was Angela Orosco, a vanilla villager.



It is now in the night phase.

There is to be no voting in the vote thread during this phase. No guessing of the puzzle. Those of you with night actions, they are due by 8am. Cheers

quickbeam

Patrick WW wrote: »

Then stop acting like a dick and it might not be

Mod: Watch it!!

Patrick WW

The strangest one for me right now is isla. She has been active but didn’t vote, was Emily active?

I think we then should look at outlier voting maybe

Patrick WW

How woke

Oisin WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

The strangest one for me right now is isla. She has been active but didn’t vote, was Emily active?

I think we then should look at outlier voting maybe

Emily was active (posted a load of waffle, posting for the sake of being active kinda stuff). She attempted to vote at 19.45 but didn't do it right so seems it didn't register.