Jessica Yaniv refused service at gynaecologist's office

Unknownability

JustAThought wrote: »

He dosn’t have a ‘neo vagina’ - he has a penis. This is why he was refused an appointment in gynacologists.

I think it was the Guardian rewspaper that reported that He has also been refused permission to lodge any more ‘discrimination’ cases until he hs paid out all the money due to the other businesses ge tried to destroy through legally failed, frivolous and malicious fake claims. Of which at least 3 were targeted at poor,imigrant family nail salon businesses - where they rightly refused to do scrotum waxing for him ( they not even offering waxing as a service) and found themselves in court for gender discrimination cases - all of which were thrown out and awarded against him by the judges.

He is certainly giving the transgender lobby a bad name - not unlike like the middle aged ex-railway worker guy from Belfast who took a discrimination case against the childrens ballet teacher wanting to be allowed learn ballet with the little toddler girls - is this the same guy who declared himself a woman and was subsequently caught defrauding a homeless charity he was in charge of / on the board of because he awarded himself a house in the city centre of london and then rented it out - while owning a house under his male name in Ireelnd. One of these ‘transgender’ guys is now hanging around mental disability charities and Autism groups and has been awarded a grand for his ADHD/Autism spectrum poetry... and is wanting to join the orange order as a woman...

I digress. Yaniv is not the only trans person using discrimination as a cash cow and running amuck. He gives any person struggling with their identity or gender a bad name and a harder battle to internally fight.

Who is the person you're speaking about from Belfast?

Limpy

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: »

Cry me a river. :rolleyes:

I think the sports issue is pretty simple actually. Females compete with females, males with males. And if you are a female who is transitioning by taking testosterone, unfortunately that excludes you from the female category because testosterone is a performance-enhancing drug.

Real women should stand up for themselves. When the gun goes off just let the *biological man run alone.

Women's sport shouldn't be watered down with biological men. Or even Intersex athletes.

Solouton? Have a separate division. The problem is nobody will give a toss about it as its a tiny %.

Nermal

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

Transgenderism is not in the DSM manual as a mental illness.

However gender disphoria is. Gender disphoria is the discomfort one feels to be in the body of the wrong gender.

The DSM–5 articulates explicitly that “gender non-conformity is not in itself a mental disorder.”

The DSM doesn't have any scientific basis.

It just reflects what a small coterie of academics consider to be the boundaries of normal behaviour.

Both they and their documents are the product of the 'long march'; the content you describe is hardly surprising.

Panthro

Trans Olympics anyone.

In discussions around trans issues one usually only ever hears of ideology of identity versus two birth genders. Just take a look at this WHO article and one can see there are a variety of birth genders, so the discussion needs to take account of a biology more complex that already familiar to the average person without an interest in biology:

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html

Limpy

Panthro wrote: »

Trans Olympics anyone.

Who would sponsor it.

Gruffalux

Deleted User wrote: »

In discussions around trans issues one usually only ever hears of ideology of identity versus two birth genders. Just take a look at this WHO article and one can see there are a variety of birth genders, so the discussion needs to take account of a biology more complex that already familiar to the average person without an interest in biology:

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html

These exceptions have been noted by participants in this discussion. Importantly they are rooted in biology. Humans are a species that cannot change sex by the power of thought or desire.

One eyed Jack

[Deleted User] wrote: »

In discussions around trans issues one usually only ever hears of ideology of identity versus two birth genders. Just take a look at this WHO article and one can see there are a variety of birth genders, so the discussion needs to take account of a biology more complex that already familiar to the average person without an interest in biology:

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html

I’ve read that report before, and I can’t see where it suggests there are a variety of birth genders? It even makes the point on the first page that sex and gender are often mistakenly used interchangeably -


Sex and gender are both important determinants of health. Biological sex and socially-constructed gender interact to produce differential risks and vulnerability to ill health, and differences in health-seeking behaviour and health outcomes for women and men. (1) ‘Gender’ describes those characteristics of women and men that are largely socially created, while ‘sex’ encompasses those that are biologically determined. However, these terms are often mistakenly used interchangeably in scientific literature, health policy, and legislation.


It doesn’t suggest there are a variety of birth genders, but rather it suggests that biological sex is more complex than asserting an absolute in terms of biological sex and sex determination -


Developmental biology suggests that a strict belief in absolute sexual dimorphism is incorrect. (42) Instead, Blackless et al. suggest two overlapping bell-shaped curves to conceptualize sexual variations across populations. Qualitative variation in chromosome complement, genital morphology and hormonal activity falls under the area of overlap. (43) Such an opinion challenges the need for medical intervention in cases of intersexuality.


Their opinion in no way challenges the concept of sexual dimorphism in human sexual development, let alone whether or not medical intervention is necessary or not in cases where biological sex isn’t immediately apparent. There are conditions where it is necessary, there are conditions where it isn’t medically necessary but advisable, or preferred, particularly when decisions are being made in terms of the overall health encompassing social implications of any decision as to whether or not medical intervention is necessary.

Intersex conditions, sex chromosome abnormalities, developmental sexual disorders, whatever one wishes to call them, are an entirely separate discussion from issues related to transgenderism.