The Werewolf Nightmare Before Christmas Game Thread

Necro

khalessi wrote:

Happy to peek whoever put forward for me

Anyone you want to peek yourself khalessi? It's your prize at the end of the day

khalessi

Necro wrote: »

Anyone you want to peek yourself khalessi? It's your prize at the end of the day

Well yeah it is my prize but I want it to benefit the group, so I think we should figure out how to use it for the power of good or love in Frankie goes to Hollywood style since it is Christmas

Green&Red

Drumpot wrote: »

Am I not number 1 on your FFA? I would of thought you would want me peeked if you really were getting a strong wolf lean?

Well its D1 so I dont have any really strong wolf leans. Necro, cause I'd hate if he was a wolf and got away with it. I'd also be happy to just let the two peekers pick who they want, if they wanted to go with my strategy and then pick the second person themselves?

It is up to them I suppose

Drumpot

Spook_ie wrote: »

Players:
Barney
Bounty Hunter Night Time Follow
Drumpot Soap
Duffers
Fixxxer
G&R Peek infringed to Socks
Khalessi One Time Peek
Kitten K
LadySkunk One Time Protect
Mick
MrsFlush
Necro Sack of Coal
Rikand
Spook Brut33
Ted Peek on one player
Uriel Night Time Follow
Valeyard
Yoss




Just for the record, if I've missed one let me know

9 Presents , 4 appear to be useless. Is their 18 players so maybe another 9 tomorrow or later today? I think it’s random and wolves can technically get all peeks or night time follow actions?!

Are any night time actions possibly good? Like can somebody use their night time follow follow and be seeing a goody use a power? Only asking I’m advance of the reveals tomorrow

Necro

Drumpot wrote:

9 Presents , 4 appear to be useless. Is their 18 players so maybe another 9 tomorrow or later today? I think it’s random and wolves can technically get all peeks or night time follow actions?!

Well it does say we can PM the mods to use our apparently useless gifts.

Worth a crack anyways.


Barney I'm dropping a large sack of coal on your head how do you feel about that?

No idea if it does anything or not lol

Bounty Hunter

Looks like I'll have to watch the movie we are WWing in two parts (the joys of watching movies with the other half)...

It might be a waste of a peek but seeing as we can't know if either of them are trustworthy what if they both peeked the same person?

Should either give us a confirmed villager, confirmed wolf or let us know one of them is lying if they say something different to the other. Obviously there is a chance that they are both wolves but I'd say the odds on that are slim.

khalessi

Maybe this for Christmas Necro and we can all enjoy

khalessi

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

Looks like I'll have to watch the movie we are WWing in two parts (the joys of watching movies with the other half)...

It might be a waste of a peek but seeing as we can't know if either of them are trustworthy what if they both peeked the same person?

Should either give us a confirmed villager, confirmed wolf or let us know one of them is lying if they say something different to the other. Obviously there is a chance that they are both wolves but I'd say the odds on that are slim.

Sorry who we talking about lost thread while fire hunting

Bounty Hunter

Drumpot wrote: »

9 Presents , 4 appear to be useless. Is their 18 players so maybe another 9 tomorrow or later today? I think it’s random and wolves can technically get all peeks or night time follow actions?!

Are any night time actions possibly good? Like can somebody use their night time follow follow and be seeing a goody use a power? Only asking I’m advance of the reveals tomorrow

Unless someone is aware of what roles are in the game for sure I don't think anyone can answer this for sure. I'm still banking on this being Vanilla-ish and night time follow being a way to catch a wolf. However you would probably have to be following the wolf who puts in the kill order and not just any wolf. Which would also mean following someone who performs no action would not clear them in any way.

Green&Red

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

Looks like I'll have to watch the movie we are WWing in two parts (the joys of watching movies with the other half)...

It might be a waste of a peek but seeing as we can't know if either of them are trustworthy what if they both peeked the same person?

Should either give us a confirmed villager, confirmed wolf or let us know one of them is lying if they say something different to the other. Obviously there is a chance that they are both wolves but I'd say the odds on that are slim.

I preferred my idea, seems like a waste of a peek


Drumpot - why are you talking about a reveal tomorrow? Why would they not just peek now and tell us immediately? (Provided they got their answers back immediately)

Green&Red

@Drumpot - sorry misread ur previous post

Bounty Hunter

khalessi wrote: »

Sorry who we talking about lost thread while fire hunting

Wasn't suggesting a specific person just wondering if it might be worth both peeking the same person.

Not sure about it myself even though as it'd give us less info for further down the line if one of them or whoever they peeked flipped red.

with regards the who I suppose I will be mostly focusing on who I should follow this night time first though.

Drumpot

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

Unless someone is aware of what roles are in the game for sure I don't think anyone can answer this for sure. I'm still banking on this being Vanilla-ish and night time follow being a way to catch a wolf. However you would probably have to be following the wolf who puts in the kill order and not just any wolf. Which would also mean following someone who performs no action would not clear them in any way.

So should people confirm who they followed and their results ? Are we to presume they won’t accidently be witnessing a goody use an action and then declare on thread which would alert the wolves?

Necro

Deleted User wrote:

Necro
Gnr
Uriel

Oy Mick what's your reasoning for me, for anyone actually?

Bounty Hunter

Drumpot wrote: »

So should people confirm who they followed and their results ? Are we to presume they won’t accidently be witnessing a goody use an action and then declare on thread which would alert the wolves?

Well unless most people get paranoid in this supposedly Vanilla-ish game that it'd be a mistake to say who you followed I intend to say who I followed if they did an action.

If they didn't I'm not sure if I should considering as I noted that does not clear them as it could just mean a different wolf put in the kill order.

Drumpot

Drumpot wrote: »

So should people confirm who they followed and their results ? Are we to presume they won’t accidently be witnessing a goody use an action and then declare on thread which would alert the wolves?

Edit: witnessing a rolled goody

Green&Red

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

Wasn't suggesting a specific person just wondering if it might be worth both peeking the same person.

Not sure about it myself even though as it'd give us less info for further down the line if one of them or whoever they peeked flipped red.

with regards the who I suppose I will be mostly focusing on who I should follow this night time first though.

I don't like the peeking one person tactic, less information to go on

Necro

Necro wrote: »

Oy Mick what's your reasoning for me, for anyone actually?

why do you reckon Rikand was targeted?

Green&Red

Necro wrote: »

Oy Mick what's your reasoning for me, for anyone actually?

I meant to pull him up on that also

Drumpot

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

Well unless most people get paranoid in this supposedly Vanilla-ish game that it'd be a mistake to say who you followed I intend to say who I followed if they did an action.

If they didn't I'm not sure if I should considering as I noted that does not clear them as it could just mean a different wolf put in the kill order.

Is there any benefit to not declaring tomorrow if you followed somebody and they didn’t do a night action? Not sure exactly what we can get from that piece of information but equally can wolves use “x did no night action” as some way of goody role hunting?

Ted_YNWA

Bounty Hunter wrote:

It might be a waste of a peek but seeing as we can't know if either of them are trustworthy what if they both peeked the same person?

That seems like a waste of a peek to me.

It is going to double lock the pick.

Or on the off chance Khal is a wolf & got lucky with prize, we both flip the pick differently. I know I'll flip green, if she wants to change to me.

Necro

Deleted User wrote:

why do you reckon Rikand was targeted?

Cos he's a good player probably, hard to tell on a night 0 crapshoot tbh

Green&Red

Green&Red wrote: »

I meant to pull him up on that also

o ya you didn't ignore it

khalessi

Ted_YNWA wrote: »

That seems like a waste of a peek to me.

It is going to double lock the pick.

Or on the off chance Khal is a wolf & got lucky with prize, we both flip the pick differently. I know I'll flip green, if she wants to change to me.

Green from rolling in grass probably

hate when people start the Im greener then you anyhows like I say see what is suggested and I can peek later before vote

Necro

Necro wrote: »

Cos he's a good player probably, hard to tell on a night 0 crapshoot tbh

really no reads beyond that, not even reads but like you get no ideas from it no?

Like its the only solid info we have on thread surely worth hashing it out a bit see where it takes us?

Drumpot

Ted_YNWA wrote: »

That seems like a waste of a peek to me.

It is going to double lock the pick.

Or on the off chance Khal is a wolf & got lucky with prize, we both flip the pick differently. I know I'll flip green, if she wants to change to me.

We could do a peek FFA?

I’d still be on for peaking lower players to be honest, it’s been easy for people to hide the last two days.

fixXxer

Deleted User wrote: »

why do you reckon Rikand was targeted?

Bit deflection there chief.

fixXxer

fixXxer wrote: »

Bit deflection there chief.

not at all im hashing this out with necro,

Green&Red

Drumpot wrote: »

We could do a peek FFA?

I’d still be on for peaking lower players to be honest, it’s been easy for people to hide the last two days.

If I'm honest I'm bored with the peek talk.

Pick two people, peek them and then we can on with not believing the pair of them and their picks

fixXxer

Drumpot wrote: »

We could do a peek FFA?

I’d still be on for peaking lower players to be honest, it’s been easy for people to hide the last two days.

Speaking of, any sign of Yoss? Not posted yet at all?