Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
US take out Suleimani - mod warning in OP
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Eric Cartman wrote: »well Iran has a massive history of threatening the US, trying to develop nuclear weapons, threatening israel (who run to daddy america for help at every turn :rolleyes: ) and a whole load else , see the entire wikipedia article on irans state sponsored terrorism : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism
when Nigeria has any more impact on the outside world than running terrible internet scams then come back to me.
But I thought this was about America trying to bring freedom to the oppressed people
0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Ironicname wrote: »Do you support America or Iran?
I supported the Republic of Ireland until that wanker Delaney came along
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
end of the road wrote: »perhapse if the US stopped funding terorism which effected them and other countries, then maybe they wouldn't be funding it themselves. people cannot complain about 1 country funding terrorism when the country they agree with do the same.
I agree and there has never been more awareness of that than now. I can guarantee you that after Trump's eight years a hell of a lot less money will have found it's way into Terrorist's hands than it did under almost any US administration over the last 50+ years.the obama deal was working
You have got to be joking.Until recently, the Iranian authorities had been playing a blinder, leveraging the West’s willingness to appease its enemies to its advantage, and using the nuclear deal to fill the post-Iraq void in the Middle East. Its actions in Syria, where it supports Bashar Al Assad, are tantamount to aiding and abetting war crimes; its funding of Hezbollah and Hamas, and its decision to locate tens of thousands of missiles in Syria and Lebanon, mean that it is now the world’s number one terror state.
It is therefore absurd that so many “experts” in the West continue to support the nuclear deal. It probably worked on its own narrow terms, but made Iran more dangerous in every other respect. It gave up building nuclear bombs, but could focus on overseas adventures and developing missiles. It is unfashionable to say so, but US President Donald Trump was right to tear up the deal. Appeasing expansionist states rarely works.
From Oct 2017, making the case for tearing up the deal:Iran has been caught at least twice trying to import illicit weapons, and many more times illegally exporting arms to Iraq and Syria, insurgent groups in Afghanistan, Bahrain, Somalia, and Yemen, as well as to terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestine Islamic Jihad.
The U.S. has responded with targeted sanctions on individuals and entities involved in Iran’s ballistic missile program, but the U.N. has failed to punish these violations.
Tehran also has violated the travel ban included in UNSCR 2231 on certain Iranian officials, notably including Major General Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the elite Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, who has publicly travelled to Iraq, Russia, and Syria.
Even if Tehran halted its cheating and rigorously complied with the text of the JCPOA, the flawed structure of the agreement only postpones the potential threat of an Iranian nuclear breakout by allowing Iran to ramp up its uranium-enrichment capabilities to the point where it could quickly make a final sprint to a nuclear weapon capability. For all of these reasons, the State Department should decertify the JCPOA.it's not fact this guy was trying to kill americans, it's a claim by trump which he refuses to provide evidence to prove it.
So we're told, from people who have been lying for three years about Trump in almost every way imaginable.even if he was trying to kill americans, presumably it would be US military and contractors who lets remember, invaded iraq in the first place so are legitimate targets
Which is why Trump wants out. That, however, does not mean that he should just tolerate American's being killed, and he won't. Obama/Hillary he ain't.sad for the families left behind but that's war.
How come this 'but that's war' philosophy of yours doesn't extend to Suleimani?the comparisons were between the numbers who attended the funerals, and the respect for such individuals in their respective countries.
nobody ever said this individual was a good man.
Oh please, they made the comparisons to undermine the current administration and feed the nauseating narrative that Trump took out someone of that calibre. That's the implication they were attempting to make. They certainly didn't fawn over similar footage of crowds mourning OBL that's for damn sure.they don't pretend to be something they aren't unlike other regimes.
Ah here. Iran CONSTANTLY pretend to be something they are not. That's why they control access to the Internet. Why are you speaking about that regime in that way?
0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2TCvzAAHK8Advertisement