US take out Suleimani - mod warning in OP

Gatling

Gatling wrote: »

No where does it say they didn't ...


Yes

What does "miss badly" mean to you?

Cheerful Spring2

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

Where would we get a live satellite image from?
Not as if Google maps has a bunch of satellites watching us all the time.

Could be a drone image, I really not sure? Not claiming its real, wait for something official. US has said nothing so far about the damage assessements.

MeMen2_MoRi_

I think a few posters need some kip, it's been a long eventful night. Ye can relax now things have all calmed down now or hours ago. The ones you're arguing with will be here when you wake up.

alastair

charlie14 wrote: »

Jesus wept.

It like dealing with a 5 year old!!

Cast your memory back to all of yesterday:

The Iranian threat is very much over stated they don't possess peer 2 peer weapons and capabilities ,
Do you think American airforce bases aren't heavily definitely with multiple layers of protection and still have the ability to hit back any where in the world from America Never mind Carrier groups and landbases in multiple countries ,

Lets look at the Saudi Aramco attack multiple drones and missles were used most got intercepted by a less than stellar patriot system , causing a fire at an oil production facility isn't exactly difficult a few hand grenades could do the same amount of damage ,
But attacking a heavily defended military base isn't so easy sorry but it's not ,

No point posting a video showing some supposed secret bunker in a mountain means absolutely nothing look at them big rockets I bet they can hit anything anywhere ,but them shiny tubes are more than likely just that empty tubes Painted to look all shiny and new

charlie14

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

Why do you believe they do?
Did the Ukranians have that for the MH17 crash?

I don`t know whether Iran do or not.
It was you stated they didn`t and appeared to have some pie in the sky idea that they should just hand them over to Boeing.

Fr_Dougal

Jesus, lads. The amount of fighting between you, I’d swear you’re probably going to invade each other.

alastair

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Trump to speak to nation at 11am eastern time, 4 pm in Europe. We learn the next move here.

Unless he gets sidetracked by toilet flushing or whatnot.

MeMen2_MoRi_

Fr_Dougal wrote: »

Jesus, lads. The amount of fighting between you, I’d swear you’re probably going to invade each other.

To late for that, they all inside each others heads.

charlie14

alastair wrote: »

Cast your memory back to all of yesterday:

Shiny empty cubes.

Apt description if cubes was replaced by dome

X111111111111

Gatling wrote: »

So the base is still there ,

Iran's missiles missed badly .


The the Iran fanboi's who were bating themselves blind at the idea of Americans getting killed and the base turned to rubble ,have now about face claiming Iran missed on purpose to show off ,

How fcuking pathetic can you's really be

The embarrassing thing is some even on here are attempting to paint this as a positive for Iran.

Gatling

[Deleted User] wrote: »

What does "miss badly" mean to you?

If you launch 20 to 30 missiles at a target and 20 miss ,
Two thirds of the missiles don't hit the target then the majority missed .


Pretty obvious is it not

Cheerful Spring2

For Gatling:

https://twitter.com/EliotHiggins/status/1214911766444093440

Professor Genius

Two wrongs don’t make a right !

Gatling

Fr_Dougal wrote: »

Jesus, lads. The amount of fighting between you, I’d swear you’re probably going to invade each other.

Let's organise this.


Could get very interesting but I'd expect most to hand up notes from their mammies saying they are too sick to attend

alastair

Gatling wrote: »

If you launch 20 to 30 missiles at a target and 20 miss ,
Two thirds of the missiles don't hit the target then the majority missed .


Pretty obvious is it not

And if you launch 15, as they did, and 11 hit, as they did, then that’s a majority not missing.

Boggles

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Trump to speak to nation at 11am eastern time, 4 pm in Europe. We learn the next move here.

Or he will rant and rave for 45 minutes, mention Hilary and Obama before sounding off at the news organisations before having a right go at Biden.

Then he will go back writing love letters to Kim Jong Un the leader of a country who stated 1000s of times they will nuke America.

Looney Tunes.

:rolleyes:

Gatling

Gatling wrote: »

If you launch 20 to 30 missiles at a target and 20 miss ,
Two thirds of the missiles don't hit the target then the majority missed .


Pretty obvious is it not

Missing means to not hit. Missing badly means to not even get close. It doesn't mean that some hit and some didn't.

You are to war what cryptocurrency is to Brexit; a golden shltshow.

alastair

Boggles wrote: »

Or he will rant and rave for 45 minutes, mention Hilary and Obama before sounding off at the news organisations before having a right go at Biden.

Then he will go back writing love letters to Kim Jong Un the leader of a country who stated 1000s of times they will nuke America.

Looney Tunes.

:rolleyes:

Let’s hope they’ve upped their letter-writing game then.

Gatling

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

For Gatling:

And to think

facehugger99

ArchXStanton wrote: »

Were? I see Bibi came out of his shelter this morning to unleash a few threats and that's about it

They've had their second in command taken out.

Their response has been to organise a funeral that killed 50 more, shoot some rockets into the desert and blow up a passenger plane.

Cheerful Spring2

Deleted User wrote: »

Missing means to not hit. Missing badly means to not even get close. It doesn't mean that some hit and some didn't.

You are to war what cryptocurrency is to Brexit; a golden shltshow.

Pentagon officials now claim 16- 12 reached the target- 4 failed unknown why? So 900 miles flight and the majority ended up where they supposed to go. No official images of the base after the strikes last night.

X111111111111

Fr_Dougal wrote: »

Jesus, lads. The amount of fighting between you, I’d swear you’re probably going to invade each other.

:eek:

alastair

facehugger99 wrote: »

They've had their second in command taken out.

Their response has been to organise a funeral that killed 50 more, shoot some rockets into the desert and blow up a passenger plane.

Nobody blew up a passenger plane, they’ve managed to get the US military their marching orders from Iraq, and they look way more reasoned and tempered than the Trump administration, who are now illegally targeting sovereign government officials for assassination.

Gatling

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Missing means to not hit. Missing badly means

So two thirds of the missiles did not hit the base -yes
So the majority of the missiles did not hit the base -yes


Most of the missiles did not hit the base and people are trying to suggest they didn't badly miss because one third of the missiles did hit ,

Basic math

notobtuse

Not exactly World War III, is it... much to the consternation of those suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Gatling

alastair wrote: »

Nobody blew up a passenger plane, .

They did .

X111111111111

alastair wrote: »

Nobody blew up a passenger plane, they’ve managed to get the US military their marching orders from Iraq, and they look way more reasoned and tempered than the Trump administration, who are now illegally targeting sovereign government officials for assassination.

You where badly debunked on the "America has been booted out if Iraq" BS last night.

Don't keep digging when you only have a spoon and the other guy has a JCB

alastair

Gatling wrote: »

So two thirds of the missiles did not hit the base -yes
So the majority of the missiles did not hit the base -yes


Most of the missiles did not hit the base and people are trying to suggest they didn't badly miss because one third of the missiles did hit ,

Basic math

Basic maths tells me that a majority of the missiles, based on DoD figures, hit their target. Best of luck with your alternative facts.

Cheerful Spring2

Gatling wrote: »

So two thirds of the missiles did not hit the base -yes
So the majority of the missiles did not hit the base -yes


Most of the missiles did not hit the base and people are trying to suggest they didn't badly miss because one third of the missiles did hit ,

Basic math

alastair

X111111111111 wrote: »

You where badly debunked on the "America has been booted out if Iraq" BS last night.

Don't keep digging when you only have a spoon and the other guy has a JCB

Nobody has debunked the reality that they have been.